$1.8B in 60 minutes: How war headlines triggered historic leverage purge

ambcryptoPublié le 2026-03-01Dernière mise à jour le 2026-03-01

Résumé

On February 28th, news of a U.S.-Israeli military strike on Tehran triggered an immediate and severe reaction in the crypto markets. Within one hour, traders sold off a staggering $1.8 billion in assets, causing a historic leverage purge. This rapid liquidation cascade forced out over-leveraged positions, collapsing bullish sentiment as the Bitcoin Derivatives Pressure Index plummeted. Despite the initial panic, the market demonstrated resilience. The total crypto market cap has since rebounded to $2.32 trillion, with Bitcoin climbing back above $67,000. The Crypto Fear and Greed Index, while still signaling "Extreme Fear," improved from its recent lows. The community highlighted Bitcoin's role as a hedge against geopolitical instability, with some analysts pointing to a potential upcoming altcoin season. Historically, war-related dips in Bitcoin have been short-lived. This event was unique because the market entered the crisis already oversold and had been deleveraging for months, meaning most weak hands had already been shaken out. Consequently, the shock did not break the market but may have instead helped establish a bottom. As global tensions persist, the market shows signs that the worst of the selling pressure may be over.

As news of “Operation Epic Fury” broke and reports confirmed a U.S.-Israeli strike over Tehran on the 28th of February, the crypto market reacted instantly.

Within an hour, digital asset traders turned the market into a fear bubble. This wasn’t a gradual decline. Traders rushed to sell, triggering panic at full speed.

According to CryptoQuant, sellers pushed nearly $1.8 billion in volume through the market in just one hour. But the real impact showed up in the derivatives market.

The Bitcoin Derivatives Pressure Index dropped from 30% to 18%, showing that bullish confidence collapsed fast.

Many leveraged traders were forced out, triggering what’s known as a leverage purge, a chain reaction where falling prices cause more liquidations and even more selling.

So yes, prices fell. But risk was also flushed out of the system.

And despite rising geopolitical tensions, the crypto market has shown surprising strength, suggesting the panic may have already done its damage.

Crypto market didn’t blink

At press time, the Crypto Fear and Greed Index was standing at 14, which signaled “Extreme Fear.” But this is actually an improvement from the 23rd of February, when it dropped to a very low level of 5.

That day marked one of the sharpest collapses in market confidence in recent memory.

The difference now is clear. Investors are still cautious, but the blind panic from last week has eased. This change is also visible in the numbers.

The total crypto market cap has climbed to $2.32 trillion, rising 3.39% in just 24 hours. Bitcoin has moved back above $67,114, gaining 4.34%. Ethereum [ETH] has done even better, jumping 6.86% and trading above $2,000 again.

Community is confident about Bitcoin and altcoins

Remarking on Bitcoin’s strength, a user on X put it best when he said,

“Iran just showed the world why Bitcoin is the hardest money.”

He added,

“It doesn’t fix war. But it does remove a key weapon: the ability to trap people inside a broken currency and a controlled banking system.”

Additionally, there have also been talks around the upcoming altcoin season. Remarking on the same, another X user said,

“I don’t think people understand the magnitude of this setup... yet. WW3 just broke out and Alts did NOT go to Zero.”

This shows that the market is rotating, and people are ready to move their money slowly into altcoins. He added,

“Alts just had first 2 month green MACD and bullish crossover in 4 years. It’ll all seem so obvious when it’s too late...”

Echoing similar sentiments, another user added,

“Altcoin dominance is also on the verge of breaking out of a wedge that has been forming for several years. Even if the market does not look like it yet. Good times ahead.”

However, as per data from CoinMarketCap, we still stand in the Bitcoin season zone.

Past reactions to war

In the past, military tensions involving Iran have often caused short-term panic in Bitcoin, but the drops didn’t last long. Looking back, in April 2024, Bitcoin [BTC] fell 8% overnight but recovered within two days.

In October 2024, Bitcoin dropped 3%, but it recovered within a single day. In June 2025, it fell 6% and then surged 62% to new highs. But February 2026 told a different story.

This time, Bitcoin entered the strike already weakened. It had fallen 48% from its all-time high. The Weekly RSI hit its lowest level ever, signaling that the market was deeply oversold.

The Fear & Greed Index stayed in the fear zone for three straight weeks, showing that extreme fear had already taken control.

Meanwhile, traders had reduced Open Interest by 55%, and the market had flushed out leverage over the previous five months. In simple terms, most over-leveraged positions had already been cleared.

So when the new strike hit, the market simply didn’t have many weak hands left to shake out.

What’s more?

While gold and silver stayed slightly positive and the S&P 500 struggled, Bitcoin held up better than expected. This suggests that most of the selling pressure may already be over.

This time, the shock didn’t break the market instead, it might have confirmed where the bottom is.

This coincided with Iran’s digital asset activity reaching around $7.78 billion in 2025, and data showing that people increasingly moved crypto into personal wallets during periods of unrest and currency weakness.

Ergo, as global tensions continue to rise, the market now waits to see what happens next for crypto.


Final Summary

  • Bitcoin entered the conflict deeply oversold, meaning much of the damage was likely priced in beforehand.
  • Historical patterns show war-driven dips often reverse quickly, but this cycle began from a structurally different base.

Questions liées

QWhat was the immediate impact of the 'Operation Epic Fury' news on the crypto market?

AThe crypto market reacted instantly with panic selling, resulting in $1.8 billion in trading volume within one hour and triggering a historic leverage purge in the derivatives market.

QHow did the Bitcoin Derivatives Pressure Index change following the news, and what did this indicate?

AThe Bitcoin Derivatives Pressure Index dropped from 30% to 18%, indicating a rapid collapse in bullish confidence among leveraged traders.

QWhat evidence suggests that the crypto market has shown resilience despite the geopolitical tensions?

AThe total crypto market cap rose 3.39% to $2.32 trillion within 24 hours, with Bitcoin gaining 4.34% and Ethereum jumping 6.86%, while the Fear and Greed Index improved from an extreme low of 5 to 14.

QAccording to historical data mentioned, how have past military tensions involving Iran typically affected Bitcoin's price?

APast tensions caused short-term panic and price drops (e.g., 8% in April 2024, 3% in October 2024, 6% in June 2025), but Bitcoin usually recovered within days and sometimes surged to new highs.

QWhy was the market's reaction to the February 2026 strike different from previous war-related events?

ABitcoin entered the conflict already weakened, down 48% from its all-time high, with oversold conditions, prolonged fear sentiment, and reduced open interest, meaning most weak hands and leverage had already been flushed out.

Lectures associées

qinbaFrank : Récapitulation et perspectives de la vague de puissance de calcul de l'IA – Des trois grands débats de Nvidia à l'interconnexion optique, l'introduction en bourse de SpaceX, comment les capitaux sont-ils en train de se redéployer ?

Source : Cynthia, Hong Kong Ethereum Community Hub. Invité : qinbaFrank, investisseur en actions américaines et en crypto-marchés secondaires. Lors d'un événement VIP le 8 juin 2026, l'investisseur expérimenté qinbaFrank a partagé son analyse sur la vague de puissance de calcul de l'IA. Il a retracé le parcours du marché depuis 2023, marqué par trois grands débats : sur la nécessité des dépenses d'investissement (2023), sur l'accélération soutenue des dépenses des grandes entreprises technologiques (2024-début 2025), et sur la possible surévaluation de la puissance de calcul (début 2025). Un consensus s'est finalement établi en 2025. Le cadre central de son analyse repose sur le **taux de pénétration** comme clé de l'efficacité commerciale. Contrairement à la bulle Internet de 2000, l'IA bénéficie aujourd'hui d'infrastructures matures (cloud, API) permettant une diffusion et une adoption commerciale beaucoup plus rapides. Le point critique se situe à 10% de pénétration, un seuil déjà dépassé dans les entreprises, signant l'entrée dans une phase de croissance accélérée. La logique commerciale de l'IA diffère de celle d'Internet : elle ne se contente pas de connecter, mais remplace directement le **travail cognitif humain**. Une fois ses capacités dépassant la moyenne humaine, sa valeur commerciale croît de manière exponentielle. L'investissement dans la chaîne d'approvisionnement en puissance de calcul évolue d'une focalisation sur les GPU vers une réévaluation systémique, suivant trois logiques : 1. **Pénurie et tarification** : la demande se propage des GPU à la mémoire (HBM, DRAM), aux CPU pour l'ordonnancement, et enfin à l'alimentation électrique. 2. **Mise à niveau** : les interconnexions optiques (CPO), les réseaux d'alimentation (passage au HVDC 800V) et le packaging avancé (3D) deviennent essentiels pour gagner en efficacité. 3. **Perspective à long terme** : l'informatique en périphérie (edge computing) et l'IA physique (robots, véhicules autonomes) formeront la prochaine courbe de croissance. Le point d'ancrage fondamental pour la poursuite de la tendance est la croissance des **revenus annuels récurrents (ARR) des éditeurs de modèles** et des **revenus cloud** des grands acteurs technologiques. Tant que cette croissance reste soutenue, les dépenses d'investissement et la dynamique de la chaîne logistique restent justifiées. Les ajustements de marché sont alors plus susceptibles d'être des corrections de valorisation (niveau L1/L2) que le renversement d'une tendance structurelle (niveau L3). En conclusion, qinbaFrank considère l'IA non comme une révolution technologique isolée, mais comme une **amélioration fondamentale de la capacité cognitive sous-jacente** de la civilisation, ouvrant la voie à une série de vagues d'innovations (agents, robots, etc.). Le marché suivra une progression en vagues, alternant entre les phases de pénurie, de mise à niveau et de validation commerciale. *Disclaimer : Ce contenu présente les opinions de l'invité et ne constitue pas un conseil en investissement.*

marsbitIl y a 3 h

qinbaFrank : Récapitulation et perspectives de la vague de puissance de calcul de l'IA – Des trois grands débats de Nvidia à l'interconnexion optique, l'introduction en bourse de SpaceX, comment les capitaux sont-ils en train de se redéployer ?

marsbitIl y a 3 h

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片