‘We’ve not identified Dragonfly as a target’ – DoJ reverses course

ambcryptoPublié le 2025-07-28Dernière mise à jour le 2025-07-29

Key Takeaways 

DOJ has backtracked on last week’s reports that it would bring charges against crypto VC Dragonfly for supporting Tornado Cash. 


The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has clarified it is not pursuing charges against crypto venture capital firm Dragonfly over its investment in Tornado Cash.

In a statement, Thane Rehn, Federal Prosecutor and Assistant U.S. Attorney, said recent media reports were “inaccurate and misleading.”

He added, 

“The government wants the record to be clear that it has not identified Dragonfly or any of its directors, officers, employees, or controlling investors as targets of its investigation.”

Tornado CashTornado Cash

Source: X

Dragonfly slams DoJ

The DoJ’s U-turn followed Dragonfly’s pledge to fight and stand by its investment in Tornado Cash should the justice system proceed with the reported threat of charges. 

The controversy arose after DOJ prosecutors hinted in open court that Dragonfly could face charges simply for backing an open-source privacy protocol.

In fact, the comment followed a last-minute conference involving Dragonfly partner Tom Schmidt, who had been approached to testify in Roman Storm’s ongoing trial.

Hasseeb Qureshi, managing partner at the VC firm, welcomed the move but maintained that last week’s ‘threat’ was a ‘clear violation of DoJ policy.’

“The DOJ’s public statements on Friday in open court—that Dragonfly, as investors, could face prosecution merely for backing an open-source privacy technology—was not only unprecedented, it was a clear violation of DOJ policy.”

Tornado CashTornado Cash

Source: X

Qureshi said the DOJ used the veiled threat to discourage them from defending Storm.

“They (DoJ) are never allowed to speculate on prosecuting a third party in open court in front of the media. The prosecutors did this to prevent us from testifying for the defense.”

What’s at stake

The incident sparked broader concerns across the tech and crypto communities. In fact, this case would be unprecedented if the DOJ had gone after the financial backers of crypto protocols. 

Qureshi added,

“Its outcome will have massive implications for open-source software and privacy rights in America. We are hopeful that the American judicial system will get this right.”

The U.S. removed Tornado Cash from its sanctions list in early 2025 after accusing North Korean hackers of using it to launder funds.

But regulators have not cleared its developers, including Storm. Their legal fate could be decided as soon as this week.

Share

Lectures associées

« Ne peut être censuré » - La proposition Bitcoin visant à bloquer les Ordinals recueille moins de 1 % de soutien

La proposition controversée de soft fork Bitcoin, BIP-110, visant à limiter les données non financières comme les inscriptions Ordinals et Runes, n'a pas obtenu le soutien nécessaire des mineurs. À la date limite du 4 juillet, moins de 1% de la puissance de hachage du réseau (seulement 10 blocs sur 2016) avait signalé son soutien, bien loin du seuil de 55% requis pour l'activation. Les partisans du BIP-110, comme le développeur Luke Davis Jr., y voyaient un moyen de préserver la fonction première de Bitcoin en tant qu'argent numérique en empêchant les transactions de spam et les memecoins qui augmentent les coûts. Cependant, les critiques, dont BitMEX Research et Adam Back de Blockstream, ont vivement contesté la proposition. Ils ont averti qu'elle pourrait casser des portefeuilles existants, interdire des transactions légitimes impliquant plus de 1,7 million de BTC et aller à l'encontre du principe fondamental de Bitcoin : un réseau ouvert et non censurable. La faible adoption par les mineurs est considérée par certains, comme David Bailey de Bitcoin Conference, comme un signe positif ("bullish") pour l'avenir de Bitcoin. La dernière fenêtre d'activation par les utilisateurs est prévue en août, mais son succès semble très improbable compte tenu de l'opposition majoritaire exprimée. La communauté Bitcoin reste profondément divisée sur la question de la régulation des types de transactions autorisées sur son réseau.

ambcryptoIl y a 4 h

« Ne peut être censuré » - La proposition Bitcoin visant à bloquer les Ordinals recueille moins de 1 % de soutien

ambcryptoIl y a 4 h

Trading

Spot
活动图片