7*24

Hot topic

Market

Activities

ELIZAOS fluctuated by 53.14% within 24 hours, current price $0.00119

【ELIZAOS fluctuated over 50% in 24 hours!】ELIZAOS fluctuated by 53.14% within 24 hours, current price $0.00119

ELIZAOS fluctuated over 50% in 24 hours!

PANTHER fluctuated by 50.82% within 24 hours, current price $0.00741

【PANTHER fluctuated over 50% in 24 hours!】PANTHER fluctuated by 50.82% within 24 hours, current price $0.00741

PANTHER fluctuated over 50% in 24 hours!

SWTCH fluctuated by 89.36% within 24 hours, current price $0.002301

【SWTCH fluctuated over 50% in 24 hours!】SWTCH fluctuated by 89.36% within 24 hours, current price $0.002301

SWTCH fluctuated over 50% in 24 hours!

Bitcoin Fear and Greed Index is 43. Fear.
Current Price: $80363.57.

[Bitcoin Fear and Greed Index is 43]Bitcoin Fear and Greed Index is 43. Fear.
Current Price: $80363.57.

Bitcoin Fear and Greed Index is 43

SWEAT fluctuated by 68.0% within 24 hours, current price $0.001753

【SWEAT fluctuated over 50% in 24 hours!】SWEAT fluctuated by 68.0% within 24 hours, current price $0.001753

SWEAT fluctuated over 50% in 24 hours!

On May 15, according to monitoring data from Farside Investors, the US spot Ethereum ETF experienced a net outflow of $5.6 million yesterday.

[US Spot Ethereum ETF Sees $5.6 Million Net Outflow]On May 15, according to monitoring data from Farside Investors, the US spot Ethereum ETF experienced a net outflow of $5.6 million yesterday.

US Spot Ethereum ETF Sees $5.6 Million Net Outflow

On May 15, according to Farside monitoring, the US Bitcoin spot ETF saw a net inflow of $131 million yesterday. The breakdown is as follows: BlackRock IBIT: +$144 million, Fidelity FBTC: +$3.5 million, Btwise BITB: +$17.7 million, Invesco BTCO: -$5.7 million, Franklin EZBC: -$14.1 million, ARK ARKB: -$9.5 million, VanEck HODL: +$7.5 million, Morgan Stanley MSBT: +$6.8 million, Grayscale GBTC: -$31.6 million, Grayscale Mini BTC: +$12.6 million. Meanwhile, the US Ethereum spot ETF experienced a net outflow of $5.6 million, with the following details: BlackRock ETHA: -$13.2 million, BlackRock ETHB: -$3.6 million, Fidelity FETH: +$6.9 million, VanEck ETHV: +$3.4 million, Franklin Templeton EZET: +$0.9 million.

[US Bitcoin Spot ETF Sees $131 Million Net Inflow, Ethereum Spot ETF Experiences $5.6 Million Net Outflow]On May 15, according to Farside monitoring, the US Bitcoin spot ETF saw a net inflow of $131 million yesterday. The breakdown is as follows: BlackRock IBIT: +$144 million, Fidelity FBTC: +$3.5 million, Btwise BITB: +$17.7 million, Invesco BTCO: -$5.7 million, Franklin EZBC: -$14.1 million, ARK ARKB: -$9.5 million, VanEck HODL: +$7.5 million, Morgan Stanley MSBT: +$6.8 million, Grayscale GBTC: -$31.6 million, Grayscale Mini BTC: +$12.6 million. Meanwhile, the US Ethereum spot ETF experienced a net outflow of $5.6 million, with the following details: BlackRock ETHA: -$13.2 million, BlackRock ETHB: -$3.6 million, Fidelity FETH: +$6.9 million, VanEck ETHV: +$3.4 million, Franklin Templeton EZET: +$0.9 million.

US Bitcoin Spot ETF Sees $131 Million Net Inflow, Ethereum Spot ETF Experiences $5.6 Million Net Outflow

On May 15, the Cryptocurrency Market Structure Act (the CLARITY Act) was approved by the Senate Banking Committee this morning and has moved on to the full Senate vote. The market is optimistic about the prospects of completing the legislation this year, with the prediction market Polymarket giving a success probability of over 70%. However, the CLARITY Act still faces significant hurdles, the most challenging being the need to secure 60 votes out of 100 to end the debate motion in the full Senate. The legislative process for the CLARITY Act is detailed as follows: The Senate Banking Committee version of the bill is set to be merged with the Senate Agriculture Committee version, which currently appears highly likely to succeed. The Banking Committee version addresses SEC-related aspects, focusing on securities attributes, trading platform registration, and DeFi protections; the Agriculture Committee version was passed on January 29 and deals with CFTC-related matters, emphasizing digital commodity spot markets, derivatives, and intermediaries. The two committee versions complement each other without significant conflicts, and the merger is expected to take 2-3 weeks. After the merger, the CLARITY Act will enter the full Senate vote. The vote must first pass the 'hard threshold' to end the debate motion, requiring 60 votes out of 100; without 60 votes, any senator can indefinitely delay the process, preventing the final vote on the bill. Currently, 2 Democratic senators have crossed party lines in support, and all 51 Republican senators are expected to vote in favor, but at least 7 Democratic senators need to switch their votes for the bill to pass, representing the biggest variable in the legislative path of the CLARITY Act. Following a successful end to the debate motion, the final vote will require a simple majority (51 votes) to pass, leading to the formation of the Senate version of the CLARITY Act. This Senate version will then be reconciled with the House version, which was passed in July 2025, to establish a final unified text through a conference committee, followed by a final vote in both chambers, which only requires a simple majority to pass, as consensus has typically been reached within the committee before the vote, allowing for a swift passage to be signed into law by Trump.

[Final Showdown for the CLARITY Act: 7 Democratic Senators Needed to Switch Votes Before Full Senate Vote]On May 15, the Cryptocurrency Market Structure Act (the CLARITY Act) was approved by the Senate Banking Committee this morning and has moved on to the full Senate vote. The market is optimistic about the prospects of completing the legislation this year, with the prediction market Polymarket giving a success probability of over 70%. However, the CLARITY Act still faces significant hurdles, the most challenging being the need to secure 60 votes out of 100 to end the debate motion in the full Senate. The legislative process for the CLARITY Act is detailed as follows: The Senate Banking Committee version of the bill is set to be merged with the Senate Agriculture Committee version, which currently appears highly likely to succeed. The Banking Committee version addresses SEC-related aspects, focusing on securities attributes, trading platform registration, and DeFi protections; the Agriculture Committee version was passed on January 29 and deals with CFTC-related matters, emphasizing digital commodity spot markets, derivatives, and intermediaries. The two committee versions complement each other without significant conflicts, and the merger is expected to take 2-3 weeks. After the merger, the CLARITY Act will enter the full Senate vote. The vote must first pass the 'hard threshold' to end the debate motion, requiring 60 votes out of 100; without 60 votes, any senator can indefinitely delay the process, preventing the final vote on the bill. Currently, 2 Democratic senators have crossed party lines in support, and all 51 Republican senators are expected to vote in favor, but at least 7 Democratic senators need to switch their votes for the bill to pass, representing the biggest variable in the legislative path of the CLARITY Act. Following a successful end to the debate motion, the final vote will require a simple majority (51 votes) to pass, leading to the formation of the Senate version of the CLARITY Act. This Senate version will then be reconciled with the House version, which was passed in July 2025, to establish a final unified text through a conference committee, followed by a final vote in both chambers, which only requires a simple majority to pass, as consensus has typically been reached within the committee before the vote, allowing for a swift passage to be signed into law by Trump.

Final Showdown for the CLARITY Act: 7 Democratic Senators Needed to Switch Votes Before Full Senate Vote

On May 15, on-chain analyst Ai Yi reported that the new address 0x669…bF437 has added 1,655 ETH, bringing the total accumulation to 3,957 ETH over two days. The average withdrawal price for this $9 million worth of ETH is $2,272.55, and it is currently at the breakeven point.

[New Address Accumulates 1,655 ETH, Totaling 3,957 ETH in Two Days]On May 15, on-chain analyst Ai Yi reported that the new address 0x669…bF437 has added 1,655 ETH, bringing the total accumulation to 3,957 ETH over two days. The average withdrawal price for this $9 million worth of ETH is $2,272.55, and it is currently at the breakeven point.

New Address Accumulates 1,655 ETH, Totaling 3,957 ETH in Two Days

Binance, one of the world's largest cryptocurrency exchanges, developed a plan to avoid the threat of prosecution by U.S. authorities as it started an American entity in 2019, the Wall Street Journal reported on Sunday.
Any lawsuit from U.S. regulators, who had signaled a coming crackdown on unregulated offshore crypto players, would be like "nuclear fall out" for Binance's business and its officers, the WSJ said, citing a Binance executive's warning to colleagues in a 2019 private chat.
It noted that Binance.com operated mainly from hubs in China and Japan, yet a fifth of its customers were based in the United States.  Binance. US is based in San Francisco.
Binance developers in China maintained the software code that supported Binance. US users' digital wallets, potentially giving Binance access to U.S. customer data, the WSJ reported.
In an emailed statement to Reuters, a Binance spokesperson said, "we have already acknowledged that we did not have adequate compliance and controls in place during those early years... we are a very different company today when it comes to compliance."
Binance is under heightened scrutiny as three U.S. senators this week asked the giant cryptocurrency exchange and Binance.  US for information about their regulatory compliance and finances.

Detail

【Binance execs' texts, documents show plan to avoid US scrutiny - WSJ】Binance, one of the world's largest cryptocurrency exchanges, developed a plan to avoid the threat of prosecution by U.S. authorities as it started an American entity in 2019, the Wall Street Journal reported on Sunday.
Any lawsuit from U.S. regulators, who had signaled a coming crackdown on unregulated offshore crypto players, would be like "nuclear fall out" for Binance's business and its officers, the WSJ said, citing a Binance executive's warning to colleagues in a 2019 private chat.
It noted that Binance.com operated mainly from hubs in China and Japan, yet a fifth of its customers were based in the United States.  Binance. US is based in San Francisco.
Binance developers in China maintained the software code that supported Binance. US users' digital wallets, potentially giving Binance access to U.S. customer data, the WSJ reported.
In an emailed statement to Reuters, a Binance spokesperson said, "we have already acknowledged that we did not have adequate compliance and controls in place during those early years... we are a very different company today when it comes to compliance."
Binance is under heightened scrutiny as three U.S. senators this week asked the giant cryptocurrency exchange and Binance.  US for information about their regulatory compliance and finances.

Binance execs' texts, documents show plan to avoid US scrutiny - WSJ

Article

Intel Stock Drops Over 4% in Pre-Market Trading

BTC breaks through 81000 USDT

BTC Surpasses $81,000

UFD's 24-hour fluctuation exceeds 50%!

US Treasury Secretary Yellen: Iran's Oil Storage Depleted, Production to Halt

BTC breaks through 82000 USDT

Binance execs' texts, documents show plan to avoid US scrutiny - WSJ

Disclaimer：The content above does not represent HTX's positions.，HTX does not provide any trading recommendations.。

Related Articles

All Comments0LatestHot

Trending Topics

Related Articles