ZachXBT Links US Seized Crypto Theft to Contractor CEO’s Son

TheNewsCryptoPublicado a 2026-01-26Actualizado a 2026-01-26

Resumen

Blockchain investigator ZachXBT has alleged that the individual responsible for stealing millions of dollars in cryptocurrency from U.S. government-controlled wallets is John Daghita, the son of Dean Daghita, CEO of Command Services and Support (CMDSS). The company was contracted by the U.S. Marshals Service to manage seized digital assets. ZachXBT linked online persona “Lick” to the theft, tracing transactions back to a government wallet tied to the 2016 Bitfinex hack. Approximately $23 million was consolidated into a single wallet during the incident. CMDSS has not commented, and no criminal charges have been filed.

ZachXBT, a blockchain investigator, has claimed that the person accountable for a multimillion-dollar robbery of cryptocurrency from US government-curbed wallets is the son of the CEO of a company contracted to protect captured digital assets.

ZachXBT posted his detailed findings, claiming that a body known online as “Lick”, recognised as John Daghita, drained tens of millions of dollars in crypto from wallets associated with the US government.

He further claimed that Daghita is the son of Dean Daghita, president and CEO of Command Services and Support (CMDSS), a firm contracted by the US Marshals Service to manage some captured cryptocurrencies.

Public records reveal that CMDSS, based in Haymarket, Virginia, was awarded a contract in October 2024 to help the Marshals Service with the custody and disposal of so-called “Class 2-4” digital assets.

These comprise tokens that aren’t backed by prominent centralised exchanges and mostly need bespoke handling. The claim hasn’t been tested in court, and no criminal charges have been publicised.

At the time of writing, CMDSS had not officially commented on the matter. The claims of ZachXBT were highlighted with the publication of January 23, which associated the same online persona with over $90 million in suspected illegal crypto activity.

The Investigation

The investigation followed the trail back to a U.S. government wallet linked with assets captured from the 2016 Bitfinex hack. The inquiry gained traction after a listed dispute in a Telegram group chat between “Lick” and another individual.

At the time of exchange, “Lick” screen-shared an Exodus wallet showing a Tron address holding around $2.3 million after a live transfer of around $6.7 million in Ether. With the conclusion of the session, around $23 million had been united into a single wallet.

After the transactions were traced backward, ZachXBT associated that wallet with an address that got $24.9 million from a US government-controlled wallet in March 2024.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Metaplanet Lifts 2026 Outlook Despite $680M BTC Write-Down

Preguntas relacionadas

QWho is ZachXBT and what did he claim in his investigation?

AZachXBT is a blockchain investigator who claimed that the person responsible for a multimillion-dollar cryptocurrency theft from US government-curbed wallets is the son of the CEO of Command Services and Support (CMDSS), a company contracted to protect captured digital assets.

QWhat is the online alias and real name of the individual accused of the crypto theft?

AThe individual accused is known online as 'Lick' and is identified as John Daghita.

QWhat is the connection between the accused individual and the company CMDSS?

AJohn Daghita is alleged to be the son of Dean Daghita, who is the president and CEO of Command Services and Support (CMDSS).

QWhat was the value of the suspected illegal crypto activity associated with the online persona 'Lick'?

AThe online persona 'Lick' was associated with over $90 million in suspected illegal crypto activity.

QFrom which infamous hack were the assets in the US government wallet linked to?

AThe assets in the US government wallet were linked to the 2016 Bitfinex hack.

Lecturas Relacionadas

The U.S. Payment System Collectively Shut Down Over Weekends, This Settlement Network Keeps the Dollar Running 24/7

The U.S. dollar's traditional settlement systems, like Fedwire, T2, and CHAPS, shut down for 44 to 60 hours every weekend, creating a void in round-the-clock markets. This vacuum is being filled by crypto-based dollar stablecoins. A key example is the Tempo settlement network, which saw $447 million of the newly launched Open USD stablecoin flow onto its platform just one day after its debut. Open USD is a consortium-backed stablecoin initiated by companies like Coinbase, Stripe, and Visa. Tempo addresses three major friction points in traditional finance: weekend closures, cross-border delays, and siloed bank ledgers. It enables near-instant, low-cost settlements 24/7, contrasting with the slow evolution of legacy systems (e.g., Fedwire plans to add Sunday hours only by 2028/2029). For cross-border payments, which often fail to meet speed targets, Tempo eliminates the need for pre-funded nostro accounts, freeing up working capital. The network differentiates itself through "liquidity mobility"—allowing the same cash pool to settle various transactions (e.g., repo trades,跨境 payments, margin calls) without re-issuance. It separates private execution in "Zones" from shared settlement. Tempo's business model involves minimal transaction fees, with revenue from API access and consulting, and notably, it has no native token. While current stablecoin payment volume is a tiny fraction of global financial flows, the rapid adoption by major financial players and infrastructure like Tempo signals an early collision between traditional finance and crypto-based settlement rails.

marsbitHace 12 min(s)

The U.S. Payment System Collectively Shut Down Over Weekends, This Settlement Network Keeps the Dollar Running 24/7

marsbitHace 12 min(s)

Pearl: Can You Simultaneously Conduct AI Inference and Mine Cryptocurrency? | Project Introduction

Pearl: Can AI Inference and Mining Really Be Done Simultaneously? A Project Introduction Pearl is a new proof-of-work (PoW) blockchain that aims to merge cryptocurrency mining with useful AI computation. Its core idea is to replace the traditional, arbitrary cryptographic hashing in PoW (like Bitcoin's) with matrix multiplications—the fundamental operation in neural network inference. In theory, a GPU performing these multiplications for an AI task (like generating text) could simultaneously be participating in block validation and earning the native PRL token. This proposes a "2-for-1" scenario where one unit of energy produces both AI output and cryptocurrency. The concept tackles the perceived "waste" in traditional PoW by making the computation useful. However, the critical challenge lies in ensuring this useful work is performed in a trustless, permissionless manner like Bitcoin. Pearl's protocol uses cryptographic techniques (adding verifiable "noise" to matrices and requiring proofs for small slices of the calculation) to prevent miners from cheating by using easily computable random numbers instead of genuine AI model weights and data. Despite the technical design, current network data suggests a significant gap between theory and practice. Analysis indicates the vast majority of the network's substantial computing power (tens of Exahashes) is still spent on multiplying randomly generated matrices, not on processing real AI inference requests. The "useful" output of the network is currently near zero. This happens because the protocol verifies the computational work (the multiplication) but cannot inherently verify the semantic usefulness or origin of the input data. Miners economically optimize for the block reward, not for producing usable AI results. Pearl's development includes releasing certified variants of open-source AI models (like Llama, Qwen) optimized for its system and partnerships (e.g., with Together AI) to offer discounted inference services subsidized by the future value of PRL tokens. The project bets that a future surge in scalable, low-latency AI inference demand will make it more profitable for miners to run real models than random data, aligning the network's security with productive output. Until then, it operates primarily as a GPU mining chain with a different, AI-compatible algorithm.

marsbitHace 53 min(s)

Pearl: Can You Simultaneously Conduct AI Inference and Mine Cryptocurrency? | Project Introduction

marsbitHace 53 min(s)

September US Bond Sell-off: Not Inflation Expectations, But Soaring Real Interest Rates

In September, the U.S. Treasury market experienced a significant sell-off. The yield on the 10-year Treasury surged from 4.75% to 5.29%, a 54 basis point increase. However, analysis reveals that over 90% of this rise, about 49 bps, came from a jump in real yields (as measured by TIPS), while market-implied inflation compensation rose only slightly by about 5 bps. This indicates the sell-off was driven primarily by a spike in real interest rates, not renewed inflation fears. This raises a key question: why is the market demanding higher real returns? Explanations could include stronger growth expectations, monetary policy adjustments, or higher risk premiums for holding long-term bonds. Notably, this bond market stress coincided with strong performance in AI-related tech stocks, particularly semiconductors, while other rate-sensitive sectors declined. This divergence suggests investors are pricing in vastly different futures for different assets. QuantStreet Capital's Harry Mamaysky proposes one explanation: the market may be repricing for both stronger future economic growth and the massive capital demands from Big Tech's AI infrastructure expansion. In this view, higher real rates and strong AI stocks aren't contradictory if investors believe future AI-driven profit growth can offset higher financing and discount rates. Yet, this remains a theory. Rising real yields could also reflect an increase in the term premium—the extra compensation investors require for holding long-term bonds—due to fiscal concerns or market volatility, rather than pure growth optimism. This distinction is crucial: if driven by growth, higher rates can coexist with rising equity valuations; if driven by a higher term premium, it could pressure corporate profits and asset prices more broadly. The critical unresolved issue is whether the market's demand for higher real returns stems from confidence in future economic profits (especially from AI diffusion) or from a reassessment of the risks of holding long-term assets. The answer will define the path for bonds, stocks, and the ongoing AI investment cycle.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

September US Bond Sell-off: Not Inflation Expectations, But Soaring Real Interest Rates

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Goldman Sachs Research Report Interpretation: Dell Delivers 4 to 6 Weeks Faster Than Peers, Memory Is the 2027 Bottleneck

Goldman Sachs Research Report Summary: Dell's Competitive Edge and Future Outlook (Based on October 8, 2026 Report) Dell maintains a competitive advantage in AI server delivery, with a lead time approximately 4-6 weeks faster than its competitors. This speed-to-market allows customers to generate revenue from their infrastructure sooner, supporting Dell's premium pricing relative to other OEMs and ODMs. Goldman Sachs reiterates a Buy rating with a $570 price target. Key points from the report, based on a management meeting at Dell's headquarters, include: * **Extended Competitive Moat:** Dell's leadership extends beyond component procurement to differentiated capabilities in system design, supply chain, manufacturing, and deployment. The company's scale and pre-integration testing enable faster deployment of large clusters. * **2027 Memory Bottleneck:** Supply remains a primary constraint for AI infrastructure growth. Dell expects memory supply tightness to persist into 2027, with demand growth outpacing supply improvements. Its scale and direct sales model provide early visibility into demand shifts, aiding in prioritizing allocations for AI/server opportunities over weaker segments like PCs. * **Profitability Drivers:** Future margin expansion is expected to be driven primarily by storage solutions (leveraging Dell's own IP like PowerScale) and operational leverage. AI server margins are maintained in the mid-single-digit range, seen as a balance between profitability and competitive positioning. Component cost fluctuations, especially for memory, are passed through to customers. * **Enterprise AI Adoption:** Enterprise AI adoption is still in early stages. Dell believes successful deployment requires data preparation and business process redesign, not just compute infrastructure. A hybrid architecture model is anticipated, combining cloud-based cutting-edge models with on-premise open-source models for cost control and security. The report concludes that the sustainability of Dell's premium pricing hinges on maintaining its delivery speed, order quality, and storage attach rates, with 2027 memory supply being a critical near-term factor to watch. *Disclaimer: This summary is based on a third-party Goldman Sachs research report dated October 8, 2026, and is for informational purposes only.*

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Goldman Sachs Research Report Interpretation: Dell Delivers 4 to 6 Weeks Faster Than Peers, Memory Is the 2027 Bottleneck

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

U.S. Treasury Yields Soar, Why Can AI Stocks Continue to Rise?

In September, U.S. financial markets experienced a notable divergence: while long-term Treasury yields surged dramatically—the 10-year yield rising over 50 basis points—and fixed-income assets declined, AI-related and semiconductor stocks continued to rally, with the Nasdaq holding relatively firm. In contrast, small and mid-cap stocks, the equal-weight S&P 500, and rate-sensitive sectors lagged. This dynamic raises a key question: if higher interest rates typically pressure equity valuations by raising discount rates, why have tech stocks remained strong? The article, referencing analysis from QuantStreet Capital, suggests one interpretation: markets may be pricing in sufficiently high future earnings growth from AI, potentially enough to offset the valuation drag from elevated rates. However, a deeper puzzle emerges. The market optimism appears concentrated in AI infrastructure suppliers like semiconductor firms, which directly benefit from soaring capital expenditure (Capex) on data centers and chips. There is little evidence yet of this enthusiasm spreading to the broader corporate sector (the "Rest of the Corporate Sector"), whose future profits are supposed to ultimately justify these massive AI investments. This highlights the critical uncertainty in the AI investment thesis: who ultimately captures the economic value? While chipmakers see near-term revenue, the long-term sustainability depends on whether AI adoption boosts productivity and profitability for the wider economy, enabling end-user companies to bear the high costs. Preliminary productivity data shows some improvement, but direct evidence of AI-driven profit gains outside the tech sector remains sparse. Moving forward, key signals to watch include: the sustainability of AI infrastructure spending, evidence of AI translating into improved profitability for non-tech companies, and whether the rise in long-term yields reflects strong growth expectations or other risks like fiscal concerns. The current market behavior suggests confidence in the AI builders, but the broader payoff from AI—essential for justifying current valuations—is still pending confirmation.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

U.S. Treasury Yields Soar, Why Can AI Stocks Continue to Rise?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot