XRPL to Activate Permissioned Domains as XLS-80 Goes Live

TheNewsCryptoPublicado a 2026-02-04Actualizado a 2026-02-04

Resumen

On February 4, 2026, the XRP Ledger (XRPL) is set to activate Permissioned Domains following the approval of the XLS-80 amendment by over 91% of validators. This upgrade introduces credential-gated access layers on the public XRPL, allowing controlled participation without creating a private blockchain. It aims to bridge the transparency and security of decentralized technology with the regulatory needs of traditional finance. Built on the XLS-70 framework, permissioned domains enable rule-based access control, where domain owners define accepted credentials. The amendment is foundational, enabling future regulated applications like permissioned decentralized exchanges, though it carries security risks dependent on trust in credential issuers and domain governance.

On February 4, 2026, the XRP Ledger (XRPL) is supposed to start off Permissioned Domains when over 91% of validators supported the XLS-80 amendment. The cornerstone comes amid challenging times for XRP, which has fallen by double digits in the last week following a wider market downturn.

As the network is preparing for a major infrastructure upgrade, everyone is curious to know its impact on the price trajectory of XRP. The XLS-80 proposal gives an introduction to permissioned domains, where access and user activity are operated by rule-based credentials.

Instead of making a private blockchain, these domains work as credential-gated access layers on the public XRPL, permitting controlled participation while still using the shared ledger infrastructure.

The proposal mentions that this approach targets fulfilling the gap between the transparency and security profits of decentralised blockchain technology and the regulatory needs of traditional financial institutions.

Made on the XLS-70 Credentials framework, permissioned domains permit credential-based access control. The owners of the domain characterise rules by stating a list of accepted credentials.

More in the Proposal Documentation

Accounts having accepted credentials become members automatically, having no additional joining steps needed. The proposal gives an introduction to new technical components, adding the Permissioned Domain Ledger object and management transactions like Permissioned Domain Set and Permissioned Domain Delete.

As per the proposal documentation, this amendment is basic in nature. It does not provide end-user functionality on its own but rather permits future amendments and features, like permissioned decentralised exchanges or other regulated apps, to be made on top of it.

Security considerations are deliberately referred to in the proposal. The model depends on trust in credential issuers and domain owners and permits risks like compromised credentials or the potential misuse of permissioned domains for unlawful activity, necessarily mitigated at the application and governance levels.

XLS-80 crossed the required validator supermajority threshold of more than 80% in late January under the XRP Ledger amendment process. The amendment set its foot into the standard two-week activation window, having activation scheduled for February 4.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Ethereum Eyes Frame Transactions as Hegota Headliner

TagsLedgerxrpXRPL

Criptos en tendencia

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main purpose of the XLS-80 amendment on the XRP Ledger?

AThe XLS-80 amendment introduces Permissioned Domains, which provide credential-gated access layers on the public XRPL to allow for controlled participation while maintaining the shared ledger infrastructure, aiming to bridge the gap between decentralized blockchain benefits and the needs of traditional financial institutions.

QWhen is the XLS-80 amendment scheduled to be activated on the XRP Ledger?

AThe XLS-80 amendment is scheduled to be activated on February 4, 2026.

QHow does an account become a member of a Permissioned Domain?

AAccounts that possess the accepted credentials specified by the domain owner automatically become members, with no additional joining steps required.

QWhat is the foundational framework that the Permissioned Domains feature is built upon?

APermissioned Domains are built on the XLS-70 Credentials framework.

QWhat level of validator support did the XLS-80 amendment receive to enter its activation window?

AThe XLS-80 amendment received support from over 91% of validators, crossing the required supermajority threshold of more than 80%.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbitHace 27 min(s)

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbitHace 27 min(s)

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbitHace 46 min(s)

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbitHace 46 min(s)

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbitHace 55 min(s)

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

marsbitHace 55 min(s)

Trading

Spot

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar 4

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar 4 (4) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar 4 (4) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu 4 (4)Después de comprar tu 4 (4), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear 4 (4)Tradear fácilmente con 4 (4) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

797 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2025.10.20Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Cómo comprar 4

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de 4 (4).

活动图片