XRP Vs. Traditional Banks: Ripple CEO Sends Strong Message To Established Leaders

bitcoinistPublicado a 2026-03-03Actualizado a 2026-03-03

Resumen

Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse has urged traditional banks to act in good faith amid ongoing stablecoin regulation negotiations. The call follows a contentious White House meeting where banking groups, including the ABA and ICBA, disputed a source's claim that talks would fail without Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong's involvement. White House adviser David Sacks stated the crypto industry has made significant concessions on allowing stablecoin yields and called for banks to reciprocate. Garlinghouse emphasized that a path to a deal remains open, advocating for collaborative legislation. He also predicted the stalled CLARITY Act, aimed at digital asset market structure, would pass by April.

Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse recently commented on ongoing tensions between the crypto industry and traditional banking groups following public comments surrounding stablecoin yield negotiations at the White House.

His response came after a series of posts on X involving journalist Eleanor Terrett and White House adviser David Sacks, ultimately resulting in Garlinghouse sending a message to banks, urging them to act in good faith.

Stablecoin Yield Talks Spark Online Debate

The latest chapter in the crypto-vs-banks saga unfolded on social media platform X, where journalist Eleanor Terrett reported on the fallout from a contentious White House meeting over stablecoin yield regulations. Interestingly, Patrick Witt, the White House digital asset advisor, was aiming to pass the legislation by March 1, but that timeline has not been met.

According to Terrett, an unnamed source who claimed direct involvement in the talks painted a bleak picture of the negotiations, a characterization that led to pushback from the banking side.

Terrett reported that bank trade representatives from the American Bankers Association (ABA), the Independent Community Bankers of America (ICBA), and the Bank Policy Institute, all of whom attended the White House meeting, were “perplexed” by the unnamed source’s framing and did not share those views. These views are related to claims by the source that there’s a very real likelihood that negotiations will fall apart unless Ripple CEO Brian Armstrong comes to the table.

David Sacks, Chair of the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology and the White House’s crypto czar, responded to Terrett. Praising crypto policy broker Patrick Witt, Sacks wrote that the crypto industry had already made major concessions on stablecoin yield and called on banks to reciprocate. The issue is around stablecoin yield: whether digital dollar issuers should be permitted to offer interest-like returns to holders.

Ripple CEO Says Banks Should Act In Good Faith

There is still an issue with brokering a compromise between the banks and the crypto industry. Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong had raised concerns about the crypto bill, saying that banking interests in the bill draft were attempting to suppress competition. However, Armstrong later commented that there’s now a path forward for a “win‐win” outcome for the crypto industry, the banking sector, and American consumers.

According to comments from Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse, the ball is now in the court of the banks, who need to act in good faith. “The door to a deal is wide open. The banks just need to act in good faith and walk through it,” Garlinghouse said.

This posture is consistent with Garlinghouse’s support for collaborative and pro-crypto legislation. The Ripple CEO recently predicted that the long-stalled CLARITY Act will pass by the end of April. The bill is designed to define digital asset market structure and reduce uncertainty over jurisdiction between regulators.

XRP trading at $1.34 on the 1D chart | Source: XRPUSDT on Tradingview.com

Criptos en tendencia

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the main trigger for the online debate involving Ripple's CEO and traditional banks?

AThe online debate was triggered by reports about a contentious White House meeting over stablecoin yield regulations, where an unnamed source claimed negotiations might fall apart without Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong's involvement, leading to pushback from banking representatives.

QWhich banking groups were mentioned as being perplexed by the characterization of the stablecoin yield negotiations?

AThe American Bankers Association (ABA), the Independent Community Bankers of America (ICBA), and the Bank Policy Institute were the banking groups that attended the White House meeting and expressed perplexity over the unnamed source's framing of the negotiations.

QWhat specific issue is at the heart of the stablecoin yield discussions between crypto and traditional banks?

AThe core issue is whether digital dollar issuers should be permitted to offer interest-like returns (yield) to stablecoin holders, a point of contention between the crypto industry and traditional banking groups.

QWhat message did Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse send to traditional banks regarding the negotiations?

ABrad Garlinghouse urged traditional banks to act in good faith, stating that 'The door to a deal is wide open. The banks just need to act in good faith and walk through it.'

QWhat legislation did Brad Garlinghouse predict would pass by the end of April, and what is its purpose?

ABrad Garlinghouse predicted the long-stalled CLARITY Act would pass by the end of April. This bill is designed to define the digital asset market structure and reduce uncertainty over jurisdiction between regulators.

Lecturas Relacionadas

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that blockchain's fundamental limitation is not the scalability trilemma (decentralization, scalability, security), which has been largely solved, but the lack of **privacy** and, until recently, clear **legitimacy**. Blockchain is described as a slow, expensive, globally shared computer whose core value is censorship resistance and verifiability. While ideal for native digital assets like money (e.g., stablecoins), its default transparency acts as a **tax**, exposing all transactions and enabling MEV extraction, which deters serious institutional capital. Simultaneously, its permissionless nature created regulatory ambiguity. The piece contends that **privacy** is the missing critical feature. It rejects the false choice between total transparency and complete anonymity. Modern cryptography (like zero-knowledge proofs) enables **compliant privacy**: users can prove facts (solvency, KYC status, compliance) without revealing the underlying sensitive data (specific holdings, identities). This preserves auditability for regulators and eliminates the leak of financial information. With recent regulatory progress (e.g., the GENIUS Act) addressing legitimacy, adding default, provably compliant privacy becomes a pure upgrade. It transforms blockchain from a costly, public ledger into a confidential settlement layer, finally bridging the gap to mainstream institutional and individual adoption of on-chain finance.

链捕手Hace 28 min(s)

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

链捕手Hace 28 min(s)

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

The global optical chip industry is experiencing a massive wave of expansion driven by surging AI data center demand. Major players across the US, Japan, Europe, and China are aggressively investing to ramp up production capacity. In the US, Coherent is expanding its 6-inch Indium Phosphide (InP) semiconductor fab in Texas, supported by CHIPS Act funding and a $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA. Lumentum is building a new factory for InP optical devices, and Nokia is scaling its advanced photonic chip packaging and testing capabilities. NVIDIA's investments aim to secure future supply of critical lasers and optical interconnect products for AI infrastructure. Japan's JX Advanced Metals, a leading InP substrate supplier, plans a multi-billion yen investment to increase its capacity 7-10 times, strengthening its grip on the crucial upstream materials market. In Europe, IQE and Tower Semiconductor settled a patent dispute and signed a multi-year InP epitaxial wafer supply agreement, highlighting that next-generation silicon photonics platforms will integrate high-performance InP components. STMicroelectronics and Sivers Semiconductors are also expanding silicon photonics production and partnerships. China is rapidly building out its domestic supply chain. Dongshan Precision's subsidiary, Source Photonics, announced a $12 billion project to expand optical chip and module production. Companies like Sanan Optoelectronics and Yunnan Germanium are scaling up InP chip manufacturing and substrate production, moving towards vertical integration from materials to modules. While debate continues around the exact future architecture—whether CPO (Co-Packaged Optics), NPO, or pluggables will dominate—analysts like Morgan Stanley argue the underlying driver is unchangeable: the explosive growth in bandwidth demand. This will inevitably increase the volume of optical engines, lasers, and related content per GPU, regardless of the final technical path. The competition for "more light" in the AI era has intensified into a global, full-chain capacity race.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

Stablecoin Real Yield Found: A Deep Dive into On-Chain Reinsurance with Re's Karan Saroya As stablecoin supply exceeds $170 billion, the search for sustainable, non-speculative yield intensifies. Re, an on-chain reinsurance platform, provides an answer: connecting stablecoin capital to the trillion-dollar traditional reinsurance market. Re operates as a regulated reinsurer, accepting stablecoin deposits as collateral to back US insurance companies. These insurers pay premiums, generating yield that flows back to on-chain depositors. Currently supporting 35 insurers and underwriting $500 million, Re projects scaling to over $1 billion soon. Key insights from a Bankless podcast with founder Karan Saroya and investor Avichal of Electric Capital: 1. **Uncorrelated, Real-World Yield:** Re offers stablecoin holders access to reinsurance returns (targeting 12-14%+), an asset class entirely separate from crypto or equity markets. 2. **Operational Efficiency via Smart Contracts:** Re replaces traditional, labor-intensive capital fundraising with smart contracts, allowing a ~12-person team to compete with industry giants. 3. **Regulatory Leverage:** For every $1 of collateral, regulations allow backing $5-7 in written premiums. This leverage amplifies returns from the underlying risk-free rate. 4. **DeFi Integration:** Depositors receive receipt tokens, which can be used in protocols like Morpho for "looping," potentially pushing yields to 18-20%+. 5. **The "DeFi Mullet" Model:** A compliant front-end (regulated reinsurer) paired with a decentralized back-end (smart contracts, DeFi capital markets). 6. **RE Governance Token:** Modeled on Lloyd's of London, the token governs the central capital pool's allocation, counterparty acceptance, and parameters. 7. **Real Economic Impact:** Capital funds real-world productivity (factories, clinics, businesses) via insurance, moving beyond crypto's internal loops. The discussion highlights a pivotal moment: DeFi's supply-side infrastructure is now met by real demand for productive yield, potentially kickstarting a flywheel where vast on-chain stablecoin capital seeks these real-world returns.

链捕手Hace 4 hora(s)

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

链捕手Hace 4 hora(s)

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

"1996 or 1999? Wall's First Big Test Is 'How to View AI'" Federal Reserve Chairman Wall's initial challenge is not whether to raise or cut rates, but a more fundamental judgment: what kind of boom is the current AI boom? This will determine the Fed's policy path and define his legacy. Economics is split between two opposing views, according to reporter Nick Timiraos. One sees imminent productivity gains that will increase supply and cool inflation, allowing the Fed to hold steady. The other argues that while productivity benefits are distant, demand shocks are here now, and waiting for data confirmation risks missing the intervention window, forcing sharper rate hikes later. Wall has signaled a leaning toward the first view, echoing 1996-era Alan Greenspan, who embraced strong, productivity-driven growth without fear of inflation. However, Wall faces a different macro environment than Greenspan did, with tariff pressures, expanding fiscal deficits, and diminishing globalization benefits, which could force more significant inflation pressures even if AI benefits materialize. Wall's logic, expressed before taking office, is that AI-driven productivity gains won't show in official data for years. If the Fed waits for confirmation, it might mistakenly tighten policy and choke off the very growth that could suppress inflation. This argues for using forward-looking narratives over lagging data. Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee presents a key counter-argument. He distinguishes between expected and unexpected productivity booms. A widely anticipated boom, like the current AI wave, can cause people to spend future wealth gains in advance, overheating the economy before productivity actually rises, thus requiring preemptive rate hikes. He cites rising costs for AI data centers as evidence of such overheating. Fed Governor Christopher Waller offers a rebuttal to Goolsbee, noting the "expected spending" mechanism only works if people can borrow against future income, which many households cannot do due to borrowing constraints. Wall also faces a paradox related to his desire to reduce the Fed's use of "forward guidance" (pre-announcing policy moves). This practice was established in 1999 when Greenspan began signaling hikes to avoid market shocks. If the economy follows a less optimistic path, Wall may be forced to choose between using the guidance he wants to abolish or risking market volatility by staying silent. The ultimate question defining Wall's first major test remains: Is this 1996 or 1999?

marsbitHace 5 hora(s)

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

marsbitHace 5 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros

Artículos destacados

Qué es XRP 2.0

XRP 2.0: Una Nueva Frontera en el Panorama de las Criptomonedas Introducción a XRP 2.0 En el siempre cambiante ámbito de las criptomonedas, nuevos proyectos surgen continuamente, compitiendo por atención y adopción. Una de estas iniciativas prometedoras es XRP 2.0, un nuevo proyecto de criptomoneda diseñado para aprovechar la tecnología blockchain avanzada y metodologías de encriptación robustas. Aunque el nombre establece paralelismos con el XRP de Ripple, es crucial señalar que XRP 2.0 opera de manera independiente, enfocándose en mejorar la seguridad de las transacciones, la privacidad y la escalabilidad. A medida que el panorama financiero digital abraza cada vez más soluciones descentralizadas, XRP 2.0 busca contribuir de manera significativa a web3 y a la expansión general de los proyectos de criptomonedas. ¿Qué es XRP 2.0? En esencia, XRP 2.0 es un proyecto de criptomoneda que busca crear un ecosistema de moneda digital seguro y descentralizado. Su tecnología fundamental integra principios avanzados de blockchain con técnicas de encriptación de vanguardia. El objetivo principal de XRP 2.0 es establecerse como una plataforma confiable y eficiente que permita la ejecución rápida de transacciones mientras prioriza la protección de la privacidad de sus usuarios. El proyecto se promociona como una solución a muchas limitaciones enfrentadas por las criptomonedas existentes, proponiendo un sistema que puede manejar un mayor volumen de transacciones con mejor velocidad y privacidad. Esta versatilidad posiciona a XRP 2.0 como un competidor significativo en un mercado plagado de diversas monedas digitales. ¿Quién es el Creador de XRP 2.0? La identidad del creador detrás de XRP 2.0 ha sido señalada como 'Wilbur.' Sin embargo, los detalles completos sobre Wilbur o su entidad asociada siguen siendo elusivos. La anonimidad de muchos creadores de criptomonedas no es un fenómeno poco común en la industria, a menudo diseñado para mantener un grado de privacidad y seguridad. ¿Quiénes son los Inversores de XRP 2.0? Hasta ahora, la información específica relacionada con las fundaciones o organizaciones de inversión que apoyan a XRP 2.0 no está disponible públicamente. En el sector de las criptomonedas, el respaldo de inversores respetables puede influir significativamente en la credibilidad y el éxito de un proyecto, sin embargo, la transparencia sobre los patrocinadores financieros de XRP 2.0 no se ha establecido. ¿Cómo Funciona XRP 2.0? XRP 2.0 se destaca al emplear una combinación de tecnología blockchain y algoritmos de encriptación avanzados que aseguran transacciones seguras y descentralizadas. Su estructura innovadora incluye características únicas diseñadas para fomentar el compromiso del usuario y ampliar las funcionalidades más allá de las transacciones convencionales de criptomonedas. Entre estas características, XRP 2.0 incorpora capacidades impulsadas por IA, como funcionalidades de texto a imagen y de texto a voz. Estas adiciones están diseñadas para mejorar la experiencia interactiva de los usuarios, promoviendo una mayor aplicabilidad en diversos sectores. Al unir avances tecnológicos con un diseño centrado en el usuario, XRP 2.0 busca captar la atención de una amplia gama de individuos y empresas que buscan integrar soluciones de criptomonedas en sus marcos operativos. Cronología de XRP 2.0 Entender XRP 2.0 requiere examinar los hitos que han definido su viaje hasta ahora: 23 de julio de 2023: Se presenta XRP 2.0 como un nuevo proyecto de criptomonedas, con el objetivo de revolucionar las capacidades de transacciones seguras y descentralizadas en el ámbito de blockchain. 8 de septiembre de 2023: Se lanza otro proyecto, XRP20, marcando la aparición de un token ERC-20 en la blockchain de Ethereum que no guarda relación con XRP 2.0. 13 de noviembre de 2023: El Libro Mayor de XRP experimenta una actualización significativa con el lanzamiento de la versión 2.0.0 del software del servidor rippled. Es esencial señalar que este desarrollo está desconectado del proyecto de criptomonedas XRP 2.0. Puntos Clave sobre XRP 2.0 Para destilar la esencia de XRP 2.0, surgen varios factores críticos: Características Únicas: La inclusión de características como texto a imagen y texto a voz impulsadas por IA diversifica aún más las aplicaciones potenciales de XRP 2.0. Tecnología Blockchain: El marco utiliza mecanismos avanzados de blockchain y protocolos de encriptación, asegurando un entorno seguro y descentralizado para las transacciones. Escalabilidad y Privacidad: XRP 2.0 prioriza la protección mejorada de la privacidad en los procesos de transacción y la escalabilidad necesaria para acomodar una base de usuarios creciente. No Afiliación con Ripple: Es importante destacar que, a pesar de su nombre, XRP 2.0 no tiene ninguna lealtad ni colaboración con el XRP de Ripple, diferenciando su marco operativo y objetivos dentro del ecosistema de criptomonedas. Conclusión XRP 2.0 representa una ambiciosa aventura en la esfera de las criptomonedas, buscando ofrecer una combinación de seguridad, privacidad y eficiencia en las transacciones digitales. Al integrar tecnologías sofisticadas y características amigables para el usuario, el proyecto se propone ampliar los horizontes de lo que la criptomoneda puede lograr en la economía digital de hoy. Si bien la anonimidad de su creador y la falta de inversores revelados pueden generar cuestionamientos para algunos, el enfoque de XRP 2.0 en funcionalidades avanzadas y descentralización realza su atractivo en un mercado de criptomonedas cada vez más abarrotado. A medida que el paisaje de las criptomonedas sigue evolucionando, XRP 2.0 podría emerger como un jugador crucial en la expansión de soluciones blockchain seguras y escalables.

182 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2024.04.05Actualizado en 2024.12.03

Qué es XRP 2.0

Cómo comprar XRP

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar XRP (XRP) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar XRP (XRP) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu XRP (XRP)Después de comprar tu XRP (XRP), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear XRP (XRP)Tradear fácilmente con XRP (XRP) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

1.4k Vistas totalesPublicado en 2024.12.10Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Cómo comprar XRP

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de XRP (XRP).

活动图片