Xianyu, the OpenClaw More Suited for Chinese Users

marsbitPublicado a 2026-04-07Actualizado a 2026-04-07

Resumen

The article "Xianyu: The OpenClaw More Suited for Chinese Users" argues that while OpenClaw (a hypothetical AI agent) has generated significant buzz for enabling AI to perform digital tasks, the Chinese second-hand marketplace Xianyu serves as a more practical and "localized" alternative for many. The author contrasts OpenClaw's high computational costs (token consumption) and complex setup with Xianyu's extremely low-cost, human-powered services. On Xianyu, users can find people to perform a vast array of tasks—from booking hotels and buying tickets to AI subscriptions, hiring help, and even matchmaking—often at a fraction of the cost of using an AI. The platform is portrayed as a massive, flexible ecosystem where unconventional supply meets niche demand, creating a parallel economy with over 200 million monthly active users. The piece draws parallels between the two platforms: OpenClaw acts as a leverage tool using AI and tokens, while Xianyu leverages cheap and abundant human labor. Both systems facilitate a form of arbitrage—OpenClaw with digital tokens, and Xianyu through bilateral transactions between buyers and sellers. Ultimately, the article suggests that for China, with its specific socio-economic context and different attitude towards privacy, Xianyu's human-network-based model is a more effective and accessible "agent" platform than an AI-driven solution like OpenClaw.

Original | Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author | Wenser (@wenser2010)

The "Lobster Craze" sparked by OpenClaw has slightly subsided on major social media platforms. A couple of days ago, Anthropic, the developer of Claude, directly issued a statement prohibiting "OpenClaw subscription-based free riding," leading some to exclaim, "Has OpenClaw already cooled down?"

In my opinion, against the backdrop where over 90% of the global population of 8 billion has yet to use AI applications, OpenClaw is already a phenomenal AI product. Its popularity lasting a full three months is enough to demonstrate its sensational impact. On the other hand, for the majority of people in China, perhaps compared to OpenClaw, which consumes massive amounts of Tokens, has complex configuration processes, excessively high update frequencies, and unclear security risks, Xianyu might be the "more localized OpenClaw."

Some readers might be confused seeing this: Xianyu? That second-hand trading platform? What does that have to do with OpenClaw, the current hottest topic in AI?

Let me explain in detail.

Before OpenClaw Gave AI Hands and Feet, Xianyu Had Already Become the Transaction Engine for the Physical World

"If previous Chatbots gave AI a brain; then the value of OpenClaw lies in giving AI hands and feet for the first time."

This statement emphasizes that OpenClaw enables AI Agents to possess various operational and execution capabilities, performing various tasks in the digital world on behalf of humans, and even to some extent, acting upon the physical world in reverse.

However, the more realistic problem facing everyone is that compared to Chatbots whose Token consumption per conversation remained in the tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands, OpenClaw has skyrocketed the scale of API calls and Token usage for AI Agents to millions, tens of millions, or even hundreds of millions. Many have bluntly stated that after the emergence of OpenClaw, to ensure effectiveness, the Token cost of using high-quality models like Claude, GPT, and Gemini can reach hundreds of dollars a day.

Yet the same task, placed as an order on Xianyu, might cost less than one percent. Yes, you read that correctly. Entering the "summer of the 21st century," the cost of human labor on the Xianyu platform has been compressed to the extreme. The time of the "poor" has also gained its own unit of measurement and pricing system—an economic system operating on RMB and Xianyu Coins.

All Trades and Professions Produce Their Topmost Masters: Travel, AI, Sales, Recruitment, Matchmaking

Xianyu frequently sparks waves of discussion. People jokingly call the omnipotent Xianyu platform the "Chinese Dark Web"—on Xianyu, there's nothing you can't think of that it can't do.

Some sell moldy oranges on Xianyu, which are spotted by biology and medical students who say they want to extract the mold for scientific research, buying them back at high prices ranging from hundreds to thousands of yuan;

Some "low-price" sell rare famous dogs on Xianyu—Belgian Wood Dogs, described as "spayed female dogs";

Battle-damaged second-hand Apple phones are considered a relatively normal "small case" on Xianyu.

As for using Xianyu to book hotels, buy tickets, purchase low-cost AI subscription memberships, find helpers, recruit people, and even for matchmaking, these are also part of the platform's "daily business."

With the unconventional creativity of Xianyu sellers, the "sources of goods" are also quite unconventional:

There are those who help others collect拖欠工资 (withheld wages), deploying an 80-year-old grandmother in a wheelchair to the front lines—

Finding someone to help book hotel breakfast, costing as low as 5 yuan, only to later find out it was obtained by threatening to jump off a building—

Wanting to go to a music festival but didn't get a ticket, you think the scalper has connections to get you in, but instead he leads you through a dog hole—

The once famous "Xianyu Air Ticket Refund Service" also sparked much discussion on social media platforms, with the behind-the-scenes trick being "applying for a user death certificate"—

Want to buy low-price scenic spot tickets? The Xianyu seller's external trick is a phone call telling the scenic spot staff "this person is almost gone"—

On this second-hand trading platform with over 200 million monthly active users, various marginal market demands hidden in the capillaries of the domestic internet market and a diverse array of flexible supplies coexist. Thus, a consumer market parallel to mainstream e-commerce platforms and even offline shopping channels has, in less than 13 years, gradually膨胀 (expanded) into today's多元 (diverse) transaction universe, recording 217 million MAU in March, even surpassing Xiaohongshu (Little Red Book).

As early as the beginning of 2024, its daily GMV (Gross Merchandise Volume) had already exceeded 1 billion yuan. Now, thanks to the "AI Camera Function" launched in early March, new products on Xianyu surged by over 50 million items, with more than 12 million users participating in the experience. Furthermore, industry predictions indicate that the scale of the domestic second-hand交易 (transaction) market is expected to exceed 3.1 trillion yuan by 2026, with Xianyu playing a significant role.

The Premium Economics and Free Power Theory Behind Xianyu: Leverage, Arbitrage, Collaboration, and Productivity

The unique survival rules, distinct from other e-commerce platforms, have allowed Xianyu to rise meteorically and find its comfort zone while the domestic internet user market is陷入 (mired in)存量 (stock) competition.

Behind this现状 (status quo), there is a remarkable similarity to the rapidly developing AI in recent years and OpenClaw, which topped the GitHub star chart this year. It contains its own set of premium economics and free power theory.

Last month, Justin Sun, founder of TRON, discussed this phenomenon:

Although some wording is quite extreme, the "premium theory" and "power theory" therein indeed reveal the unique value and market pricing system of Xianyu as a second-hand trading platform. Behind these words, we can glimpse more reasons why Xianyu can be called the "Chinese Localized OpenClaw":

1. AI Limbs vs. Human and Material Leverage

If OpenClaw gave AI independent operational execution capabilities for the first time, then the value of Xianyu lies in enabling the flow, circulation, and value production of human and material resources with an extremely low threshold.

As the joke about学历贬值 (devaluation of academic qualifications) goes: "For 3000 yuan, you can't even buy a 5090 graphics card; but you can hire a college student to work for you."

Whether it's second-hand goods or cheap labor, the Xianyu platform has subjected them to full market pricing and value quantification. In a双边市场 (two-sided market) where supply far exceeds demand, the human and material resources on Xianyu are even more abundant than the AI models and Token resources required by OpenClaw.

2. Token Arbitrage vs. Bilateral Arbitrage

For countless human users, OpenClaw, which responds 24/7 and allows随意添加 (arbitrary addition of) Skill configuration files to expand capability boundaries, is undoubtedly a "Token arbitrage tool"—input the cheapest possible Token raw materials into the machine, and then produce specific content production materials according to one's指令 (instructions). Although this has led to large-scale, exponential Token usage consumption problems, it still allows countless people to experience the thrill of "mastering AI production materials" and becoming "AI capitalists" for the first time.

The commodity resources and market demand on the Xianyu platform, however, represent a form of bilateral arbitrage based on buyers and sellers—leveraging low entry costs, low handling fees (Odaily Planet Daily Note: In June 2024, the Xianyu platform announced that starting September 1 of that year, it would charge all sellers a 0.6% basic software service fee, with a maximum of 60 yuan per transaction, including individual merchants) and the platform's aggregated large-scale idle human resources to do platform business.

Moreover, similar to OpenClaw catering to both Token providers and consumer users, Xianyu also satisfies the bilateral needs of product/service providers and market demanders, and corresponds with Maslow's hierarchy of needs.

3. Lobster Collaboration vs. Human Collaboration

In terms of team collaboration, compared to OpenClaw's "Lobster Corps" or "AI Agent teams," Xianyu also has its merits, which is筛选 (screening for) professional "mercenaries" that meet different requirements, possess different abilities, and play various roles.

Like the intelligent driving in the new energy vehicle sector, the intent engine highly praised in the cryptocurrency market, and the self-driving, self-evolving, self-developing large language models in the AI field, Xianyu can also be seen as a "screening platform" for finding collaborative members.

In essence, the puzzles formed by the technologies and personnel involved above are all the same thing. The ultimate goal of the users is所思即所求 (what you think is what you want),所言即所用 (what you say is what you use),所见即所得 (what you see is what you get).

4. Information Productivity vs. Information Gap Productivity

Strictly speaking, AI does not originally create information. Large language models and various AI Agents merely follow reasoning rules, combine, match, and call upon various information raw materials (including text, images, videos, and other multimodal content), and finally output information products in different forms.

In contrast, humans can not only absorb information and learn from it but also produce various types of information, and can create information gaps through various types of information to create value accordingly. The various service providers on Xianyu have their own subjective judgment abilities, self-screening abilities, and self-driving abilities.

For overseas countries where labor costs remain high and population aging is accelerating, AI Agent applications represented by OpenClaw and embodied intelligent robots may open a new "window of productivity development" for them;而对于 (for) the domestic internet population enjoying past demographic dividends, resource dividends, and even manufacturing dividends, perhaps an internet labor and commodity service provision platform like Xianyu is a better solution. Just as Robin Li, founder of Baidu, once revealed the赤裸裸的真相 (naked truth)—in exchanging privacy for convenience, Chinese people have always been utterly uninhibited. In front of Xianyu, which efficiently convinces users to主动交出 (actively hand over) personal information for convenience, OpenClaw with its potential security risks can only be considered a small巫 (witch)见大巫 (seeing a great witch - meaning pale in comparison).

Facing the declining热度 (heat) of AI Agents and OpenClaw, looking from another perspective, the biggest reason might be—

Xianyu, the OpenClaw more suited for Chinese users.

References:

Has OpenClaw Cooled Down?

Haven't Been on Xianyu for 3 Days, How Did It Become the Chinese Dark Web?!

The Chinese Version of the Dark Web Really Knows What Young People Want

Xianyu Doesn't Want to Compare with Xiaohongshu Either, But It Really Has No Choice

600 Million People Are Looking for Services on It, The Worse the Economy, The Hotter the "Chinese Dark Web"?

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main argument of the article regarding Xianyu and OpenClaw?

AThe article argues that for most Chinese users, the second-hand trading platform Xianyu is a more practical and 'localized' alternative to OpenClaw. It highlights that Xianyu provides a vast, low-cost human labor and service marketplace, which is often cheaper and more accessible than using an AI agent that consumes expensive computational resources (Tokens).

QAccording to the article, why is Xianyu sometimes jokingly called the 'Chinese dark web'?

AXianyu is called the 'Chinese dark web' because it hosts an incredibly diverse and unconventional range of services and goods for sale. Users can find everything from rare moldy oranges for scientific study to unconventional services like help retrieving unpaid wages or obtaining event tickets through unusual means, creating a parallel, often bizarre, online marketplace.

QHow does the cost of completing a task on Xianyu compare to using OpenClaw, as stated in the article?

AThe article states that completing the same task on Xianyu can cost less than one percent of the cost of using OpenClaw. This is because the human labor and services available on Xianyu are priced extremely low within its RMB and Xianyu Coin-based economic system, whereas OpenClaw requires massive and expensive Token consumption.

QWhat are the four key reasons the article gives for comparing Xianyu to OpenClaw?

AThe four key reasons are: 1. Leverage of Human and Material Resources: Xianyu allows for the low-threshold flow and utilization of cheap labor and goods. 2. Bilateral Arbitrage: Like OpenClaw's token arbitrage, Xianyu facilitates arbitrage between service providers and buyers. 3. Human Collaboration: Xianyu acts as a screening platform to find specialized 'mercenaries' for various roles, similar to OpenClaw's AI agent teams. 4. Information Gap Productivity: Humans on Xianyu can use information asymmetry to create value, whereas AI primarily recombines existing information.

QWhat does the article suggest is a major reason for the declining hype around AI Agents like OpenClaw in China?

AThe article suggests that a major reason for the declining hype around AI Agents like OpenClaw is the existence of Xianyu, which is presented as a more suitable and effective solution for Chinese users. It offers a massive, readily available, and extremely cheap human-based service ecosystem that already fulfills many tasks one might use an AI for, making the complex and costly AI alternative less appealing.

Lecturas Relacionadas

When Doing Cryptocurrency Payment, the First Thing is Licenses, What is the Second?

When launching a crypto payment business, obtaining the necessary licenses is the crucial first step. However, the second, and arguably more critical, step is designing a comprehensive operational framework that forms a coherent business loop. This loop must be clearly understood and executable by all stakeholders: banks, payment partners, exchanges, on-chain analytics providers, regulators, and your internal team. Many projects mistakenly believe a single license permits all operations. Licenses merely grant entry; they don't define how the specific business functions. The real challenge lies in detailing every aspect of the workflow. This involves clarifying the customer base, the flow of fiat and crypto assets, the settlement process, and establishing clear lines of responsibility for risks like AML compliance, sanctions screening, chargebacks, and regulatory inquiries. A robust framework must answer seven core questions: Who are the clients and merchants? Who collects fiat and crypto? Who handles conversion and custody? And who is ultimately accountable for compliance and risk management? Projects often fail not from a lack of licensing, but during due diligence when they cannot convincingly explain these operational details. Therefore, beyond securing licenses, the priority must be constructing a closed-loop system. This system ensures the business model is transparent, risks are managed, responsibilities are delineated, contracts are aligned, and the entire process is comprehensible to partners and regulators. The true competitive edge in crypto payments lies not in acquiring a license quickly, but in integrating licensing, banking, compliance, and operations into a sustainable and executable whole.

marsbitHace 47 min(s)

When Doing Cryptocurrency Payment, the First Thing is Licenses, What is the Second?

marsbitHace 47 min(s)

Arthur Hayes Analysis: AI Bubble Nears Burst, Crypto Market Faces Short-Term Pressure

Arthur Hayes argues that the current AI market is a bubble poised to burst, which will exert downward pressure on the crypto market in the near term. The core trigger is rising oil prices due to the US-Iran conflict and a blockade of the Strait of Hormuz. Higher energy costs directly increase the operational expenses of AI data centers, squeezing profit margins for companies like Google, Anthropic, and OpenAI. Hayes predicts that persistent inflation from high oil prices will force Trump, in a bid to win the November election, to turn public sentiment against the AI industry. He may propose regulations and taxes on data centers and AI companies to appeal to voters concerned about costs and job displacement. Such political rhetoric could shatter market confidence. Furthermore, the market is unlikely to healthily absorb the massive concurrent IPOs of SpaceX, Anthropic, and OpenAI, which together seek valuations in the trillions. The combination of soaring energy costs, overwhelming equity supply, and negative political pressure will puncture the AI bubble. Hayes notes that nearly all new USD liquidity since 2022 has flowed into AI, leaving crypto like Bitcoin behind. When the AI bubble bursts, liquidity will contract sharply, pulling down all risk assets, including cryptocurrencies. In response, Hayes's fund, Maelstrom, has sold all AI-related stocks and non-core cryptocurrencies. It maintains core positions in Bitcoin and Ethereum while increasing exposure to energy sector equities, betting on rising oil and gas prices. He expects Bitcoin to bottom after the AI-led market decline, before rallying again with future monetary easing.

Foresight NewsHace 1 hora(s)

Arthur Hayes Analysis: AI Bubble Nears Burst, Crypto Market Faces Short-Term Pressure

Foresight NewsHace 1 hora(s)

To C, To B, and the Next Big Thing Called To A

After To C and To B, the Next Wave is To A: Serving AI Agents In a recent quarterly earnings call, Meituan's Wang Xing introduced a new concept: To A (To Agent), signifying that future business services will increasingly target AI Agents as primary clients, not just consumers or merchants. This shift implies that internet giants must now consider how to make their services more appealing for AI Agents to recommend, fundamentally altering traditional distribution logic. This "To A era" is prompting an unusual trend of alliances among major tech companies. Unlike previous competitive battles, firms like Meituan, Tencent, JD.com, Huawei, OPPO, and OpenAI are rapidly forming partnerships. The reason is strategic: as AI Agents become the primary user interface, handling tasks from a single command (e.g., "Book a Japanese restaurant for tomorrow"), the risk for platforms is being bypassed entirely. Companies are positioning themselves within this new value chain. Three primary strategies are emerging: 1. **Super-Entry Points + Service Providers:** Platforms like Tencent's Yuanbao, WeChat, and ChatGPT aim to be the first-stop Agent, integrating various services (food delivery, shopping, travel) from partners like Meituan and JD.com. 2. **Apps as Callable Services:** Companies like Meituan, JD.com, and Uber are ensuring their core services remain accessible and callable by external Agents, shifting from front-end apps to back-end capabilities. 3. **System-Level Agent Entry Points:** Smartphone makers (Huawei, Honor, OPPO) are leveraging their OS-level AI assistants to control the initial user command, redistributing it to relevant service apps. While alliances offer mutual benefit—entry points gain service capabilities, and service providers gain traffic—inherent conflicts of interest exist. A dominant Agent platform could eventually attempt to connect directly with suppliers (restaurants, hotels), bypassing current aggregators like Meituan or Ctrip. Other unresolved challenges include the potential for Agent recommendations to become a new form of paid ranking and unclear accountability for faulty recommendations. The current rush to form alliances is a defensive move by service providers to secure their position before the landscape solidifies. In this To A-driven restructuring, the greatest risk is not losing the race but failing to hear the starting gun.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

To C, To B, and the Next Big Thing Called To A

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片