‘Wrong approach’ – Crypto lobby rejects Wall Street’s tighter DeFi rules for tokenized securities

ambcryptoPublicado a 2026-04-08Actualizado a 2026-04-08

Resumen

The Blockchain Association (BA) has strongly opposed a proposal from Citadel Securities and traditional finance (SIFMA) calling for stricter regulation of DeFi protocols that handle tokenized securities. In a letter to the SEC, the BA argued that applying existing securities laws, which are designed for intermediaries, to neutral decentralized infrastructure is the "wrong approach." While affirming that tokenized securities are still securities, the BA emphasized that the SEC should consider how modern blockchain technology works before regulating, rather than automatically classifying DeFi infrastructure as exchanges or brokers. This pushback aligns with earlier criticism from the DeFi Education Fund (DEF). Citadel and SIFMA, however, maintain that all platforms handling tokenized securities must be under regulatory oversight to ensure a level playing field and investor protection, regardless of whether they are custodial or decentralized. The outcome hinges on the SEC's decision, which could potentially be challenged in court if it is not codified by the CLARITY Act.

The DeFi sector is doubling down on its pushback against the Citadel-led call for barring decentralized protocols from blanket regulatory exemption.

In a letter to the U.S SEC on Monday, the Blockchain Association (BA) termed Citadel’s proposed regulation of DeFi protocols handling tokenized assets as a “wrong approach.”

The BA is an advocacy and an umbrella group with key industry members, including Coinbase. In the letter, the BA rebutted,

Securities laws regulate intermediaries. They do not automatically turn neutral infrastructure into an exchange, broker, or dealer simply because that infrastructure is part of a tokenized market.

The lobby group added that the DeFi sector is not after a “free pass.” However, it asked the SEC to consider how the underlying tech works before regulating any DeFi protocol.

The digital asset industry is not asking for a free pass. Tokenized securities are still securities. The question is whether the SEC will apply the law in a way that reflects how modern infrastructure actually works.

Tokenized securities are an on-chain version of traditional securities, but traded via blockchain rails.

Citadel wants everyone to play by the rules

Intriguingly, the BA’s request for the SEC to consider how “modern blockchain infrastructure design” works is what Citadel and SIFMA (broader TradFi group) are against. For the TradFi players, the SEC must ensure a level playing field through a “neutral technology” framework.

For them, the issue is not whether a DeFi venue is custodial (controlled by the developer) or not. What’s crucial, they added, is that every platform handling tokenized securities must be under oversight just like traditional intermediaries.

According to critics of the proposed innovation exemption, investor protections in the DeFi world, which is full of scams and rug pulls, can only be ensured by regulations.

Last week, another crypto lobby, the DeFi Education Fund (DEF), castigated SIFMA and Citadel’s call for regulation of AMMs (automated market makers), which are deemed decentralized platforms by experts.

It remains to be seen which route the SEC will take and whether the disgruntled side will sue the agency for its decision on the innovation exemption.

Even so, if the agency’s rulemaking or guidelines related to DeFi exemptions aren’t codified via the CLARITY Act, then they could still be disputed in court. For instance, Roman Storm, the developer behind Tornado Cash with no control over the crypto mixer, is still facing a retrial.

Final Summary

Blockchain Association has joined DeFi Education Fund to fend off Citadel and Wall Street’s push for regulations of decentralized protocols.
The DeFi lobby groups pleaded with the SEC to consider the neutral nature of decentralized protocols before attempting to regulate them.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main argument of the Blockchain Association (BA) against Citadel's proposed DeFi regulations?

AThe Blockchain Association argues that Citadel's proposed regulation is a 'wrong approach,' stating that securities laws regulate intermediaries and should not automatically turn neutral infrastructure into an exchange, broker, or dealer simply because it is part of a tokenized market.

QAccording to the article, what do Citadel and SIFMA believe is crucial for platforms handling tokenized securities?

ACitadel and SIFMA believe that every platform handling tokenized securities must be under regulatory oversight, just like traditional intermediaries, to ensure a level playing field through a 'neutral technology' framework.

QWhat specific request did the Blockchain Association make to the SEC regarding DeFi regulation?

AThe Blockchain Association asked the SEC to consider how the underlying technology of 'modern blockchain infrastructure design' works before regulating any DeFi protocol, rather than granting a blanket exemption or applying rules without understanding the tech.

QWhich other crypto lobby group has also opposed Citadel and SIFMA's call for DeFi regulation?

AThe DeFi Education Fund (DEF) has also opposed Citadel and SIFMA's call for regulation, specifically criticizing their push to regulate automated market makers (AMMs).

QWhat potential legal outcome is mentioned if the SEC's rulemaking on DeFi exemptions isn't codified via the CLARITY Act?

AIf the SEC's rulemaking or guidelines related to DeFi exemptions aren't codified via the CLARITY Act, they could still be disputed in court, as seen in the case of Roman Storm, the developer behind Tornado Cash, who is facing a retrial.

Lecturas Relacionadas

From 'Old Dogs' to 'New Darlings': How AI is Revaluing Old Infrastructure, from Dell to Nokia

"Old Dogs" Become AI's New Darlings: Revaluing Legacy Infrastructure The AI investment narrative is shifting. Beyond the spotlight on core chipmakers like Nvidia, a new wave of interest is rising for legacy tech companies—Dell, HPE, Nokia, Cisco, Corning, Western Digital—once labeled as slow-growth, outdated stories. This resurgence stems from AI's evolution from model development to real-world deployment, creating massive demand for physical infrastructure. As AI moves into data center construction and enterprise adoption, the focus turns to who can actually build and deliver complex systems. These established players hold decades of experience in supply chains, integration, networking, and enterprise delivery—assets now critical for scaling AI. The revaluation can be grouped into three key infrastructure areas: 1. **Servers & Integration (e.g., Dell, HPE):** They are becoming essential system integrators, transforming GPUs into full-scale AI servers with networking, power, and cooling, then delivering them to clients. Strong recent earnings and AI-specific revenue/order growth for Dell and HPE underscore this shift. 2. **Networking & Connectivity (e.g., Corning, Nokia, Cisco):** As AI clusters grow, high-speed data transfer becomes paramount. Corning benefits from fiber demand for data center links, Nokia is exploring AI-integrated wireless networks (AI-RAN), and Cisco sees surging orders for data center switches—all critical for efficient AI operations. 3. **Storage (e.g., Western Digital, Seagate):** The AI data explosion requires vast capacity. Beyond high-speed memory (HBM), there's growing need for high-capacity HDDs to store training data, logs, video, and cold/archival data cost-effectively. This revaluation, however, is not a blanket endorsement. True reassessment requires concrete proof: AI-driven orders and revenue growth, upward revisions to company guidance, and sustainable improvements in profit quality, not just top-line sales. In essence, AI is not turning all old tech firms into high-growth stocks; it is selectively re-pricing the "old assets" of companies that are mission-critical for building the new AI infrastructure, transforming their legacy capabilities into renewed growth engines.

marsbitHace 6 min(s)

From 'Old Dogs' to 'New Darlings': How AI is Revaluing Old Infrastructure, from Dell to Nokia

marsbitHace 6 min(s)

The Bitcoin Roadmap To $500,000: Analyst Shows How Price Will Get There

An analyst projects Bitcoin could reach $500,000 based on technical chart analysis, mapping out a multi-phase roadmap within a long-term ascending channel. The analyst, Crypto Tice, states Bitcoin has completed the first phase ("First touch") of the pattern and is entering a second phase that could trigger its strongest rally yet, potentially driving a more than 693% increase from current levels above $63,000. This would be followed by a final pullback. This outlook comes as Bitcoin faces significant selling pressure, having fallen 17% over three days to around $61,300, erasing roughly $250 billion in market cap. The downturn has also impacted other major cryptocurrencies like Ethereum. Despite the crypto market decline, U.S. equities remain near highs, creating a notable divergence that some suggest could indicate market manipulation or crypto front-running a potential stock market correction.

bitcoinistHace 18 min(s)

The Bitcoin Roadmap To $500,000: Analyst Shows How Price Will Get There

bitcoinistHace 18 min(s)

Expected $1 Billion Crypto Windfall Shrinks To Fraction In Israel Disclosure Program

Israel's voluntary crypto disclosure program has seen a much weaker response than expected, with only 58 individuals coming forward. Tax authorities had projected up to $1 billion in revenue from the initiative, but early reports indicate declared crypto capital totals only about $50 million. The program offered immunity from criminal charges for correcting past reporting errors, but its lack of an anonymous option reportedly deterred many holders who feared putting their names on record. With an estimated $1 billion in digital assets held by Israeli residents, the disclosures so far represent only a small fraction of the market. The filing window, which has specific conditions and runs until August 2026, remains open.

bitcoinistHace 30 min(s)

Expected $1 Billion Crypto Windfall Shrinks To Fraction In Israel Disclosure Program

bitcoinistHace 30 min(s)

Breaking News! Anthropic Calls for a Universal Pause in AI Research

Anthropic warns of AI self-evolution, reporting that over 80% of its internal code is now written by its AI, Claude. Productivity has surged, with engineers merging 8x more code than in 2024. Claude's performance on complex, open-ended tasks jumped from 26% to 76% success in six months, nearing human parity. The company introduces a new metric: "AI task duration." In 2024, AI handled 4-minute tasks; by 2026, it manages 16-hour tasks, with capability doubling every 4 months. Claude also reviews code, catching bugs that previously caused outages, and significantly outperforms humans in research tasks like optimizing code (52x speedup) and conducting AI safety experiments. Anthropic outlines three potential futures: 1) Progress plateaus, 2) AI accelerates but humans remain in control, or 3) AI achieves full recursive self-improvement (RSI), designing its own successors. This final path could revolutionize fields like medicine but also risks catastrophic alignment failure if control is lost. The call echoes similar concerns from OpenAI. Anthropic proposes a coordinated pause on AI development—if a verifiable mechanism to ensure all labs comply can be established.

marsbitHace 35 min(s)

Breaking News! Anthropic Calls for a Universal Pause in AI Research

marsbitHace 35 min(s)

Probability in the Price: How World Cup Odds Are Calculated

**The Probability in the Price: How World Cup Odds Are Calculated** Two major systems released their "championship probabilities" before the 2026 World Cup, and they disagreed on the favorite. Prediction market aggregators listed France at around **17%**, while the Opta supercomputer gave European champion Spain **16.1%**. These numbers look similar, but their production methods are fundamentally different. The market's **17%** is the **price** that clears after hundreds of millions of dollars in trading across platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi, where contracts trade between 0 and 100 cents, directly representing implied probability. This liquidity is provided by crypto-native market makers like Wintermute, though the market still has "the liquidity profile of an early-stage" asset class. In contrast, Opta's **16.1%** is a **simulated frequency**. Its model uses team data (including betting market odds as an input) to estimate match probabilities, then runs **10,000 full tournament simulations**, counting how often each team wins. Which is more accurate? There is **no rigorous, cross-tournament academic study** directly comparing their track records. However, a persistent **longshot bias**—where low-probability outcomes are systematically overvalued—observed in traditional betting for nearly a century, has also been found in modern crypto prediction markets. Research shows low-price contracts on Kalshi/Polymer less likely to pay out than their implied odds suggest. Unlike traditional bookmakers, prediction markets operate on **public blockchain ledgers**, making every transaction auditable and enabling such research. However, price formation is also influenced by **regulatory uncertainty**, as seen in recent US state-level bans and legal battles over jurisdiction. In summary, the "probability" you see is either a **market-clearing price** subject to behavioral biases and liquidity constraints, or a **model-simulated frequency** that partially incorporates market data. The question of which method is more reliable remains open, highlighting the importance of asking: **How was this number produced?**

marsbitHace 35 min(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros