Wintermute Reveals: Are Retail Investors No Longer Trading Crypto?

marsbitPublicado a 2026-03-02Actualizado a 2026-03-02

Resumen

Wintermute, a leading crypto market maker, reveals a significant shift in retail investor behavior: instead of simultaneously investing in both cryptocurrencies and stocks as in the past, retail traders are now choosing between them. Since late 2024, activity in crypto and equities has become negatively correlated—when retail buys stocks, crypto activity stagnates, and vice versa. Key factors driving this change include the structural compression of crypto’s volatility premium relative to stocks, reducing its appeal as a high-risk, high-reward asset. Technical developments, such as smoother on/off ramps via fintech integrations, make it easier for capital to flow between asset classes. Additionally, the rise of LLM-powered analysis tools gives retail a perceived edge in stock markets—a feeling absent due to crypto’s lack of clear valuation frameworks. As a result, traditional crypto indicators like M2 money supply are becoming less reliable. Investors should now view crypto through a multi-asset portfolio lens, acknowledging it as one option among many rather than the primary speculative arena.

Author: Jasper De Maere, Wintermute

Compiled and Edited: BitpushNews

Bitpush Note:

As a leading market maker in the crypto industry, Wintermute handles hundreds of billions of dollars in daily trading volume. Compared to ordinary researchers, they can cut through the fog and see the most authentic flow of retail funds. In this latest report, Wintermute puts forward an alarming view for the crypto circle: the "retail faith" that once supported the crypto market is wavering. In the past, cryptocurrencies and stocks usually rose and fell together, but since the end of 2024, this relationship has completely reversed—retail investors have begun to make a "binary choice" between the two.

Main Text:

Retail activity drives the cryptocurrency market. Through speculation, reflexive buying on dips, and agile capital rotation within the token world, retail investors define every major market cycle. However, new data suggests that the relationship between retail investors and cryptocurrencies is changing. For some time, we have observed that the stock market is attracting retail attention at the expense of altcoins. New data from J.P. Morgan's strategy department, combined with our own flow data, now indicates that stocks and cryptocurrencies are increasingly becoming complementary risk assets.

Key Points

  • Reversal Phenomenon: Retail investment activity in cryptocurrencies and stocks used to move in the same direction. But since the end of 2024, the two have shown an inverse relationship: when retail buys stocks, they are quiet in the cryptocurrency market, and vice versa.

  • Compressed Volatility Premium: The volatility premium of cryptocurrencies relative to stocks, which was once their biggest attraction to retail, is now structurally compressing. Volatility is no longer a diversifying product feature in cryptocurrency investment.

  • Technical Drivers: Some underappreciated technical reasons have accelerated this shift. For example, easier access to cryptocurrencies has dismantled the "captive audience" effect; meanwhile, large language model (LLM)-driven analysis is narrowing the cognitive advantage gap in the stock market, a phenomenon that has not yet occurred in the cryptocurrency space.

  • Traditional Indicators Fail: Traditional leading indicators of crypto risk appetite (such as M2 money supply) are failing. Investors should increasingly view cryptocurrencies through a multi-asset portfolio lens, similar to how they treat other mature asset classes.

Reversal Phenomenon

By overlaying Wintermute's proprietary crypto retail flow data with J.P. Morgan's retail stock inflow data, we gain a new perspective on the relationship between retail stock and crypto activity.

Historically, the two have maintained a synchronized trend until the end of 2024. At that time, high risk appetite drove buying in both, as they both acted as outlets for excess capital (see M2) and risk appetite.

However, since the end of 2024, this relationship has broken down: as retail flooded into the stock market at an unprecedented rate, they remained inactive in cryptocurrencies, and the divergence between the two has now reached a historical extreme.

Zooming in, we use altcoin market capitalization as a long-term proxy for retail crypto activity.

It closely aligns with our retail flow data and has an unbiased and longer history. Between 2022 and the end of 2024, cryptocurrencies and stocks fluctuated roughly in sync, both being viewed by the retail sector as a type of high-risk investment portfolio. The decoupling at the end of 2024 is very noticeable, reflecting that retail activity has become more short-term driven, volatile, and to some extent, lacking in sustainability.

The rolling correlation between retail activity and altcoin market capitalization confirms this shift. What was once a volatile but generally positive relationship has turned negative. Retail is now allocating between the two, rather than injecting funds into both simultaneously.

Focusing on 2025 and overlaying key catalysts makes this dynamic clearer. Several points are noteworthy:

  • Memecoins and AI agents had their moments in the spotlight when stock market activity stalled, as retail found speculative outlets elsewhere.

  • Retail continued to buy the dip aggressively in the stock market, both during the tariff policy announcement in April 2025 and in recent market volatility.

  • After October 10th, the market almost completely shifted to stocks, and this trend continues.

Causality

The rolling correlation between retail activity and altcoin market capitalization confirms this shift. The once volatile but overall positive relationship has now turned negative. Retail is now choosing between the two, rather than investing in both.

This new data also confirms this. Retail activity in the stock market has become a new variable that cryptocurrency investors should closely monitor to identify windows of opportunity where retail funds might more sustainably flow into cryptocurrencies.

Volatility = The Product Itself

One reason retail is attracted to and remains active in cryptocurrency is the asset's volatility characteristics. Volatility is the product. It was the initial force that drew retail into the crypto space.

However, although the actual volatility of cryptocurrencies still far exceeds that of stocks, a structural contraction trend has formed, and this trend is difficult to reverse in the short term. The volatility ratio of BTC to the Nasdaq Index (NDX) continues to decline, even compressing to below 2x in the first half of 2025.

Thoughts on key drivers:

  • Market Maturation: With the increasing number of sophisticated investors and new liquidity tools such as ETFs and DATs, the reflexive volatility peaks that defined earlier cycles have been smoothed out.

  • Market Capacity: At a market capitalization of $2.3 trillion (even 40% below the all-time high), the market requires far greater capital flows to move than it did five years ago.

As volatility compresses, the core selling point of cryptocurrencies to retail erodes. The "excess volatility" that defined the 21-22 cycle and attracted a generation of retail investors is gone. For volatility-seeking retail, stocks are becoming increasingly attractive.

Technical Factors

In addition to the structural changes in the crypto market itself, some technical factors are also accelerating this shift, which is rarely mentioned.

  • Facilitation of Crypto Access — The integration of crypto trading by fintech companies and traditional brokerage platforms (or the introduction of stock trading by crypto-native platforms) has indeed lowered the barrier to entry, but its more profound impact is on the exit process. In previous cycles, the cumbersome process of depositing funds meant that once money entered the crypto market, it was easily "locked in" and naturally circulated among various tokens. Now, these smooth entry and exit channels mean that funds can flow freely between the stock market and the crypto market without significant obstacles.

  • Gaining an Information Edge — Retail seems to be increasingly attracted to the stock market, partly because they are gaining an unprecedented "analytical advantage" through artificial intelligence (AI). Large language models (LLMs) have greatly enhanced the analytical capabilities of retail investors, giving them a sense that they can compete on an equal footing with institutions.

This feeling does not exist in the cryptocurrency market. Although data-based analysis of cryptocurrencies is feasible, the crypto market lacks a consensus valuation framework, the value capture mechanisms of tokens are unclear, and the number of investable assets continues to膨胀, making it difficult for retail to gain that sense of "having an edge."

Conclusion

Retail investors, once the most reliable source of self-reinforcing demand for the crypto market, are increasingly satisfying their risk appetite elsewhere.

The stock market not only offers increasingly competitive volatility but also a growing analytical advantage, and the ability to seamlessly switch from crypto to stock trading through applications already on retail investors' phones.

Cryptocurrencies still have a place in retail investment portfolios, but they are now just one of many choices, no longer the main battlefield for speculation.

This shift should also reshape how investors view the market. Some proven traditional indicators have failed. For crypto investors, simply finding leading indicators of risk appetite and combining them with a crypto-native framework is no longer enough to win. Investors need to increasingly view cryptocurrencies through a cross-asset portfolio lens, just as is standard practice in stocks and fixed income.

Preguntas relacionadas

QAccording to Wintermute, what major shift in retail investor behavior has occurred since late 2024 regarding stocks and crypto?

ASince late 2024, the relationship between retail investment in stocks and cryptocurrencies has reversed. Instead of moving in the same direction, they now show an inverse relationship. When retail investors buy stocks, they are inactive in the crypto market, and vice versa.

QWhat core attraction of cryptocurrency for retail investors is structurally compressing, according to the report?

AThe volatility premium of cryptocurrencies relative to stocks, which was a major attraction for retail investors, is structurally compressing. The high volatility that defined earlier market cycles and attracted a generation of retail traders no longer exists in the same way.

QWhat are two technical factors mentioned that are accelerating the shift of retail attention away from crypto?

ATwo technical factors are: 1) The facilitation of crypto on-ramps/off-ramps through fintech and traditional broker platforms, which allows capital to flow freely between stocks and crypto instead of being 'locked' in the crypto ecosystem. 2) The use of Large Language Models (LLMs) by retail investors, which provides them with a perceived 'analytical edge' in the stock market—a feeling of advantage that does not exist in the less structured crypto market.

QHow does the report suggest investors should now view cryptocurrency in light of these changes?

AThe report suggests that cryptocurrency should now be viewed through a multi-asset portfolio lens, similar to how other traditional asset classes like stocks and fixed income are analyzed. Relying solely on crypto-native frameworks and traditional leading indicators is no longer sufficient.

QWhat does the data show about the correlation between retail activity and altcoin market cap since the shift occurred?

AThe rolling correlation between retail activity and altcoin market cap, which was once volatile but generally positive, has turned negative. This indicates that retail investors are now allocating capital between stocks and crypto rather than injecting funds into both simultaneously.

Lecturas Relacionadas

From South Korea to the United States: Blue-Collar Jobs Are Becoming Increasingly Popular, Thanks to AI

AI is reshaping the labor market's value proposition. The traditional four-year college degree is losing its appeal as a guaranteed career path, while skilled blue-collar trades like electricians, welders, and plumbers are experiencing historic demand and wage premiums. This shift is driven by dual pressures: AI's displacement of certain white-collar roles and a booming need for physical infrastructure and data center construction. Data confirms the trend. In the U.S., vocational school revenue surged, and a significant portion of recent layoffs are AI-related. Surveys show a majority of Gen Z adults plan to pursue blue-collar work, citing better job security against AI automation. Vocational education interest has exploded recently. Experts cite a psychological shift as younger generations seek tangible, AI-resistant careers and avoid high student debt. In many cases, salaries for skilled trades now match or exceed those requiring a bachelor's degree. In South Korea, semiconductor vocational high schools boast near-total employment, with graduates securing high-paying roles at companies like Samsung. The shortage is structural, exacerbated by a retiring baby boomer workforce and massive infrastructure projects. Companies like JPMorgan Chase, Meta, and Lowe's are investing heavily in training programs. However, overcoming historical stigma and a "perception gap" around trade careers remains a key challenge to closing the talent gap.

marsbitHace 49 min(s)

From South Korea to the United States: Blue-Collar Jobs Are Becoming Increasingly Popular, Thanks to AI

marsbitHace 49 min(s)

Qualcomm: AI Hype Subsides, When Will Smartphones Emerge from the Gloom?

Qualcomm reported its Q3 FY2026 results (ending June 2026), with revenue of $9.95B, down 4% YoY but above expectations. Gross margin declined to 53.1%, pressured by rising costs across manufacturing and memory. Key business segments showed mixed performance: Handset revenue fell 19.6% YoY to $5.09B, dragged by an 11% decline in non-Apple Android shipments and weaker high-end mix. Conversely, Automotive revenue surged 61% to $1.59B, and IoT grew 9% to $1.83B. Core operating profit dropped 41% YoY due to margin compression and higher expenses. Management's Q4 FY2026 guidance projects revenue of $9.7B-$10.5B, in line with consensus, but Non-GAAP EPS guidance of $2.05-$2.25 fell short of expectations. Amidst persistent weakness in its core handset market, Qualcomm is pursuing growth in AI, focusing on Edge AI (smartphones, PCs, automotive) and Data Center AI. Its data center strategy includes four pillars: AI accelerators (e.g., AI200), commercial CPUs (Dragonfly C1000), custom silicon, and connectivity solutions. While these initiatives initially boosted its stock, concerns over AI capital expenditure sustainability have since erased those gains. The company targets $5B in data center revenue for FY2027 and $15B for FY2029. The report concludes that with the traditional handset business still under pressure, the data center opportunity is currently viewed as a longer-term option, and a more conservative valuation based on core operations may be warranted until AI contributions materialize.

marsbitHace 54 min(s)

Qualcomm: AI Hype Subsides, When Will Smartphones Emerge from the Gloom?

marsbitHace 54 min(s)

From TPU to Self-Evolving Agents: How Jeff Dean Predicts the Next Step in AI

At the 2026 YC Startup School, Jeff Dean outlined his vision for AI's next phase, shifting focus from simply scaling models to building intelligent, autonomous systems. He believes AI's progress is no longer just about creating smarter models, but about integrating them into systems capable of long-term, iterative work, automated experimentation, and continuous learning. This evolution moves the competition from "who has the bigger model" to "who can best organize intelligence." Dean suggests AI capabilities are now comparable to a junior engineer, enabling the automation of complex workflows. However, the true challenge and opportunity lie in managing these AI "workers" at scale. He emphasizes the importance of **context engineering**—structuring tools, memory, and feedback loops—over raw model power. For startups, this means building deep expertise in niche domains where general models currently fail (near 0-1% success rates), leveraging proprietary data, specialized tools, and domain-specific evaluators. A recurring theme is re-examining fundamental constraints. Dean's past work, like moving Google's search index to memory or creating the TPU, stemmed from questioning outdated assumptions about hardware and cost. He sees similar inflection points today, particularly in **specialized inference hardware** to drastically reduce latency and energy consumption for real-time Agent operation. Notably, he points out that in modern AI systems, the dominant cost is often not computation but **data movement**. Reliable, long-running Agents require robust system design, borrowing concepts from distributed computing like checkpointing, state management, and parallel exploration to handle failures and maintain progress over days or weeks. As AI automates execution, the scarcest human skills will shift to **defining clear specifications**, **judging what problems are worth solving** (taste), and designing effective feedback loops. Ultimately, Dean's framework prioritizes understanding the problem deeply, identifying the true bottlenecks, and systematically building closed-loop systems where AI can not only perform tasks but also improve AI itself.

marsbitHace 54 min(s)

From TPU to Self-Evolving Agents: How Jeff Dean Predicts the Next Step in AI

marsbitHace 54 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片