Why SEI must reclaim KEY support to avoid drop below $0.07

ambcryptoPublicado a 2025-12-20Actualizado a 2025-12-20

Resumen

Amidst a weak crypto market, Sei (SEI) faces significant selling pressure after losing the key support level at $0.1206, exposing it to a potential drop toward $0.0689. Despite spot market weakness, derivatives activity surged with $32 million in volume and rising Open Interest, indicating leveraged speculative interest rather than capitulation. Whale activity remains high, suggesting large players are actively trading during the downturn. Momentum indicators show slowing sell pressure but lack bullish strength. For a recovery, SEI must decisively reclaim $0.1261 to prevent further downside; failure to do so could lead to a test of lower supports.

During periods of extreme fear and broader crypto weakness, even strong projects feel the strain. Over the past week, Sei [SEI] has come under pressure as sellers maintained control and market sentiment stayed fragile.

After losing the key $0.1206 support, the price slipped into a vulnerable zone. Spot market activity revealed whales taking the sell side, confirming that the downward pressure was not simply the result of retail panic.

Liquidity conditions deteriorated quickly once support failed. The loss of $0.1206 exposed SEI to a deeper downside pocket near $0.0689, where historical demand previously emerged.

Without a fast reclaim, confidence weakened, and follow-through selling became a real risk. Market participants shifted focus from upside continuation to damage control and liquidity preservation.

Why are traders increasing exposure as price falls?

Despite spot weakness, derivatives activity surged aggressively. SEI derivatives volume reached $32 million within 24 hours, as of writing, highlighting rising speculative interest.

Open Interest (OI) climbed alongside volume, showing that traders were adding exposure rather than exiting positions. This behavior suggested active positioning, not capitulation.

Rising volume paired with increasing OI during price weakness often signals leveraged conviction. Traders appeared willing to take directional bets, expecting volatility expansion.

However, this also increased liquidation risk, especially with price trading below the former support. Any sharp move could trigger forced unwinds, amplifying volatility in either direction.

Whale orders stay active!

Spot Average Order Size showed sustained whale participation as SEI trended lower, signaling active positioning rather than retail-driven selling.

Large orders continued to appear during price weakness. This suggests distribution and absorption occurred simultaneously, with bigger players shaping market direction even as sentiment deteriorated.

Can SEI reclaim control before liquidity takes over?

Momentum indicators reflected sustained weakness, though early stabilization signals began to emerge. At press time, RSI stayed suppressed, signaling limited bullish strength but slowing sell pressure.

MACD remained negative, yet histogram compression pointed to fading downside momentum, with the blue line curling upward toward a bullish flip.

Such conditions often precede short-term reactions, though they do not guarantee a reversal.

For the structure to improve, SEI must reclaim the $0.1261 range decisively. A clean move above that zone would prevent former support from flipping into resistance.

Failure to reclaim leaves fear dominant and keeps $0.0689 in focus. Conversely, a break back above $0.20 would shift the structure meaningfully and relieve downside pressure.


Final Thoughts

  • SEI’s breakdown alongside rising derivatives volume and OI reflects a market driven by leverage, not conviction.
  • Smart investors often accumulate strong projects during fear, watching $0.1261 as the line between recovery and deeper downside.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat key support level did SEI lose that exposed it to a potential drop to $0.0689?

ASEI lost the key $0.1206 support level, which exposed it to a deeper downside pocket near $0.0689.

QDespite the price weakness, what two derivatives indicators showed increased speculative interest in SEI?

ASEI derivatives volume reached $32 million and Open Interest (OI) climbed, showing rising speculative interest and that traders were adding exposure.

QAccording to the article, what does rising volume paired with increasing Open Interest during a price drop often signal?

AIt often signals leveraged conviction, meaning traders are taking directional bets and expecting volatility expansion.

QWhat price level must SEI reclaim decisively to prevent the former support from flipping into resistance and improve its structure?

ASEI must decisively reclaim the $0.1261 range to prevent former support from flipping into resistance.

QWhat did the Spot Average Order Size data reveal about the type of selling pressure SEI was experiencing?

AIt revealed sustained whale participation, signaling that the selling was due to active positioning by larger players rather than being retail-driven.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbitHace 37 min(s)

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbitHace 37 min(s)

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbitHace 42 min(s)

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbitHace 42 min(s)

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

In 2026, a historic shift occurred in AI as major cloud providers' inference spending surpassed training spending for the first time, signaling a move from "building large models" to "using large models." This shifts the core challenge from computing power to the "memory wall"—the bottleneck of data movement (model weights, activations, KV Cache) between external DRAM and processors, where energy and latency from data transfer far exceed computation itself. Companies like Nvidia face GPU idle time due to bandwidth limits. In contrast, Cerebras Systems adopts a radical "wafer-scale" approach with its Wafer-Scale Engine (WSE). Instead of cutting a silicon wafer into many chips, Cerebras uses almost the entire wafer as one massive chip (WSE-3). This design provides 44GB of on-chip SRAM, delivering memory bandwidth thousands of times higher than traditional HBM (e.g., 21 PB/s vs. Nvidia B200). For LLM inference, weights are streamed layer-by-layer from external MemoryX storage to the chip, avoiding HBM bottlenecks. This results in token generation speeds 1.5–5 times faster than Nvidia's B200 in some models and significant advantages in first-token latency and long-context tasks. Additionally, Cerebras's architecture offers much lower interconnect power consumption (0.15 pJ/bit vs. GPU's ~10 pJ/bit). However, Cerebras faces challenges: SRAM scaling has slowed with advanced nodes, limiting future capacity gains; the chip requires specialized liquid cooling and custom software stacks; and its external I/O bandwidth (150 GB/s) is low compared to NVLink, hindering multi-system scaling for very large models. Competition is intensifying. Major players are pursuing three paths: 1) Developing proprietary inference ASICs (e.g., Google TPU, Microsoft Maia), 2) Leveraging advanced packaging (e.g., TSMC's SoW) to democratize wafer-scale-like integration, potentially eroding Cerebras's process advantage within a few years, and 3) Exploring optical interconnects for ultimate bandwidth. Commercially, Cerebras is transitioning from a hardware vendor to a service provider, facing the immense challenge of building high-power, specialized data centers to meet large contracts (e.g., 250MW/year from 2026–2028). In conclusion, the AI inference era presents a fundamental architectural trade-off. Cerebras opts for extreme physical optimization for low-latency, single-task performance, while Nvidia prioritizes versatility and massive cluster throughput. The path forward remains uncertain, with technology and business models still evolving in the race toward advanced AI.

marsbitHace 48 min(s)

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

marsbitHace 48 min(s)

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

**Title: Has Bitcoin's Rebound Ended, Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?** **Summary:** Bitcoin's price has declined by 13% this week, signaling a potential return to late-stage bear market conditions. The price fell to around $67k, positioned between the Realized Price and Realized Cap Weighted Average. For the first time since early 2022, the Short-Term Holder cost basis has dropped below this key average, confirming a hallmark of late-cycle bear markets. Profitability metrics have collapsed sharply. The 7-day average of the Realized Profit/Loss ratio plummeted from a local high of 3.16 to 0.29, mirroring the February panic sell-off. Critically, the 90-day average never breached the threshold of 2, indicating the recent rally to $82k was a bear market bounce, not a structural shift. Realized losses surged to $1.35 billion daily, with $770 million coming from Long-Term Holders selling at a loss. This accelerating redistribution of supply from weak to strong hands is a necessary but ongoing process for a market bottom. The rally stalled almost precisely at the aggregate cost basis (~$83k) of US spot Bitcoin ETF investors, turning that level into strong resistance and leaving the average ETF holder underwater again. Spot market flows have turned decisively negative, showing sellers are dominating order books despite the price drop. While a significant futures long liquidation event cleared over $400 million in leverage, providing a potential reset, sustained spot demand is yet to materialize. Options markets continue to price in higher future volatility (Implied Volatility) than recent price action (Realized Volatility) has shown, with a persistent skew towards put options, indicating ongoing demand for downside protection. In conclusion, multiple metrics point to a fragile market structure. Resistance at the ETF cost basis, accelerating realized losses, dominant spot selling, and cautious options pricing all suggest the bear market trend persists. A sustainable recovery likely requires a resurgence of spot demand, ETF holders returning to profit, and a clear reduction in selling pressure.

marsbitHace 48 min(s)

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

marsbitHace 48 min(s)

TechFlow Intelligence Agency: Anthropic Calls for Global Pause in AI Development While Preparing for Trillion-Dollar IPO; SpaceX IPO Roadshow Heats Up, But S&P 500 Rejects Fast-Track Inclusion

In today's TechFlow Intelligence Briefing, several major tech stories highlight a growing theme of trust and credibility gaps across AI, crypto, and finance. AI company Anthropic has publicly called for a global pause in AI development, citing risks from Claude's "recursive self-improvement." Ironically, this coincides with reports the company is preparing for a massive IPO targeting a near $1 trillion valuation. This perceived hypocrisy, coupled with widespread user complaints about Claude's declining performance, is sparking debate over whether the safety warning is genuine or a competitive tactic. Meanwhile, in a substantive security move, Anthropic open-sourced a framework for AI-powered vulnerability discovery. In the crypto market, Bitcoin's price drop below $61,000 triggered over $1.16 billion in liquidations, flipping the market into a state where more BTC is held at a loss than at a profit, a historical bearish signal. On the corporate front, SpaceX's highly anticipated IPO is generating immense Wall Street excitement, with Goldman Sachs projecting 100x revenue growth by 2030. However, the S&P 500 has refused to fast-track the company's inclusion post-IPO, potentially limiting immediate institutional demand. Separately, ByteDance's AI app Doubao lost over 6 million monthly active users after introducing a subscription model, highlighting the challenges of AI monetization. Other notable developments include Nvidia certifying HBM4 memory from Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron; Cloudflare's acquisition of front-end tooling company VoidZero; and its CEO warning that bot traffic now exceeds human traffic online. The underlying narrative connects these events: a trust crisis. From AI firms' contradictory actions and crypto volatility to the clash between SpaceX's hyped narrative and institutional rules, a pattern is emerging where stated intentions and actual practices are increasingly misaligned.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

TechFlow Intelligence Agency: Anthropic Calls for Global Pause in AI Development While Preparing for Trillion-Dollar IPO; SpaceX IPO Roadshow Heats Up, But S&P 500 Rejects Fast-Track Inclusion

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar SEI

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar Sei Network (SEI) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar Sei Network (SEI) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu Sei Network (SEI)Después de comprar tu Sei Network (SEI), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear Sei Network (SEI)Tradear fácilmente con Sei Network (SEI) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

105 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2024.12.11Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Cómo comprar SEI

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de SEI (SEI).

活动图片