Why Only Dollar-Cost Averaging Can Capture Bitcoin's Long-Term Dividends?

marsbitPublicado a 2026-03-06Actualizado a 2026-03-06

Resumen

The article argues that dollar-cost averaging (DCA) is the optimal strategy for capturing Bitcoin's long-term gains, supported by backtested data and forward-looking models. Historical analysis shows that a weekly DCA investment of $250 in Bitcoin starting in January 2021 would have yielded a 76% return by mid-2026, with significant upside potential at higher price levels. Even shorter-term DCA strategies, while susceptible to short-term drawdowns, show strong performance over time. Comparisons with the S&P 500 indicate that Bitcoin DCA outperforms traditional equity DCA despite higher risk. Long-term projections based on Bitcoin’s power-law growth model suggest substantial returns by 2030, with mid-range estimates around $430,000 per BTC. The key conclusion is that while entry timing affects short-term returns, long-term consistency is the primary driver of wealth accumulation in Bitcoin.

Written by: Cointelegraph

Compiled by: AididiaoJP, Foresight News

Both backtest data and forward-looking models indicate that using a dollar-cost averaging (DCA) strategy to buy Bitcoin is the best way to invest in BTC. Will this method still work in the next bull market?

Bitcoin has experienced a 50% crash over the past 5 months, and savvy investors adjust their strategies during such bear markets and correction periods. This strategy is called dollar-cost averaging (DCA), which involves investing a fixed amount regularly, regardless of market conditions.

By examining historical market cycle data and forward-looking BTC price simulations, we can more clearly see how this steady investment approach performs across different entry times and investment horizons.

Five Years of DCA in Bitcoin Yields Substantial Net Gains

Starting from January 2021, investing $250 weekly in Bitcoin via DCA, the total investment over five years would be $67,500. According to DCA simulation data, this strategy would have accumulated 1.65097905 BTC, with an average purchase price of $40,884.

At Bitcoin's current price of nearly $71,000, this 1.65097905 BTC is worth approximately $120,500, resulting in a profit of $53,000 (a 76% increase). If Bitcoin rises to $100,000, the holdings would be worth about $165,000; and at the cycle peak of around $126,000 in October 2025, the holdings would reach a value of $208,000.

2021-2026 Bitcoin DCA Cycle Source: Newhedge

Now, consider a shorter investment period to see the impact of entry timing on early returns. Starting from January 2024, investing $250 weekly, the total investment would be $28,500, accumulating 0.36863166 BTC with an average purchase price of $77,312.

At the current price of $71,000, these bitcoins are worth approximately $26,909, representing a 6% paper loss. If the price reaches $100,000, the holdings would be worth $36,863; and at the cycle peak of $126,000, the holdings would be valued at $46,448.

In February of this year, Swan Bitcoin analyst Adam Livingston compared on platform X the returns of DCA into BTC versus the S&P 500 over the past five years. Investing $100 weekly, BTC yielded $42,508, while the S&P 500 yielded $37,470, with returns of 62.9% and 43.6% respectively.

Livingston noted that although Bitcoin is highly volatile, historical data shows that persisting with DCA during downturns leads to higher long-term gains.

Weekly $100 DCA: BTC vs. S&P 500 Source: Adam Livingston/X

Long-Term Model: Time is the Key Factor

Forward-looking simulation studies have also tested the effectiveness of DCA starting in 2026. From January 2026, investing $250 weekly until March 2030, the total investment would be approximately $54,250.

The price prediction is based on Bitcoin's long-term power law growth curve (which tracks the relationship between Bitcoin's historical price and time on a logarithmic scale). This model generates a rising support band and a median trendline, which aligns well with previous market cycles.

Bitcoin Power Law Growth Curve Source: Bitbo.io

Based on this model, analysts estimate that the long-term trend support level could break through $100,000 by 2028, which also serves as the foundational assumption for future DCA modeling. Bitcoin Well's simulation shows that by March 2030, the median price projection is approximately $430,000.

Considering potential price deviations, the model also accounts for the upper and lower bounds of the power law channel, providing a lower estimate (around $274,000) and a higher estimate (around $900,000).

Based on these assumptions, four years of DCA would accumulate roughly 0.30 BTC:

  • If BTC price is $274,000, the holdings are worth approximately $82,200.
  • If BTC price is $430,000 (median projection), the holdings are worth approximately $129,000.
  • If BTC price is $900,000, the holdings are worth approximately $270,000.

DCA Investment Results as of March 2030 Source: Bitcoin Well

In November 2025, Bitcoin researcher Sminston With conducted a study using a similar predictive model to test the impact of entry time on long-term returns. The results found that even buying at a price 20% higher than the then price of $94,000 and selling at a price 20% lower than the projected 2035 median price, the remaining holdings after ten years would still yield a profit of nearly 300%.

In this simulation, the final total assets were 7.7 times the initial investment.

The study concluded: Entry timing affects the level of returns, but long-term holding is the key determinant of the magnitude of gains.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main investment strategy discussed in the article for capturing Bitcoin's long-term gains?

AThe main strategy discussed is Dollar-Cost Averaging (DCA), which involves investing a fixed amount of money at regular intervals, regardless of market conditions.

QAccording to the article, how much profit was generated from a 5-year DCA strategy starting in January 2021 with a weekly investment of $250?

AThe 5-year DCA strategy generated a profit of $53,000, representing a 76% return on the initial investment of $67,500.

QWhat model is used to predict Bitcoin's long-term price growth in the article?

AThe article uses Bitcoin's long-term power law growth curve model, which tracks the historical relationship between Bitcoin's price and time on a logarithmic scale to predict future prices.

QHow does the performance of DCA in Bitcoin compare to the S&P 500 over a 5-year period, as mentioned in the article?

AOver a 5-year period, a weekly DCA of $100 in Bitcoin yielded $42,508 (62.9% return), while the same strategy in the S&P 500 yielded $37,470 (43.6% return).

QWhat is the key factor that determines the magnitude of returns in Bitcoin investment, according to the research cited in the article?

AThe key factor is the length of time the investment is held. While entry timing affects the level of returns, long-term holding is crucial for determining the overall magnitude of gains.

Lecturas Relacionadas

How to Do Research Well: Deliberately Practice the Real Skills That Matter

No one truly teaches you how to do research. You're often given a desk, a pre-selected problem, and vague instructions to "create something new." Consequently, many people reverse-engineer the job based on visible outputs—papers, posts, announcements—learning only how to *appear* like a researcher rather than how to *become* one. True research capability is built from stacking small, trainable skills, nearly all of which can be developed through deliberate practice. **Pick Your Own Problem:** Most researchers absorb problems from advisors or trends, lacking the underlying reasoning. Choosing a problem you genuinely care about, as John Schulman advises, leads to original work. Develop "taste" like a muscle: predict experiment outcomes, guess paper results from methods, and track which findings remain important over time. **Upgrade Your Inputs:** Relying on shared reading lists (arXiv hot lists, filtered group chats) leads to unoriginal conclusions. Undervalued old literature often holds crucial insights (e.g., MoE, LSTM, backpropagation). Richard Sutton's "The Bitter Lesson" or Claude Shannon's 1952 talk on creative thinking are more predictive than lengthy modern surveys. Breadth matters as much as depth: draw from neuroscience, mechanism design, hardware knowledge, and honest statistics. Read papers directly, especially appendices and limitations sections. **Write Everything Down:** As Paul Graham noted, writing exposes flaws in seemingly mature ideas. Writing is the cheapest defense against self-deception. Following Feynman's principle, Darwin programmatically wrote down facts contradicting his theory to combat memory bias. Maintain a detailed log of hypotheses, setups, predictions, results, and updated understandings. Reviewing past logs fosters essential humility.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

How to Do Research Well: Deliberately Practice the Real Skills That Matter

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Following US Ban on Fable 5, Zhipu AI's Stock Soars 47%

On June 15th, shares of Zhipu AI surged dramatically on the Hong Kong stock market, peaking at a 47.6% gain before closing 32.82% higher. This sharp increase was directly triggered by two recent industry events. On June 12th, Anthropic announced it was suspending global access to its latest flagship models, Claude Fable 5 and Claude Mythos 5, to comply with a U.S. government export control order. The next day, Zhipu AI announced it would open access to its latest open-source flagship model, GLM-5.2, under the permissive MIT license. The Anthropic incident highlighted a critical issue beyond raw model capability: the risk of sudden, unpredictable loss of access to advanced AI models, especially for developers and enterprises deeply integrated with them. This has shifted industry and market focus toward factors like stability, sustainable access, and controllability. Zhipu's move, promoting "frontier intelligence for all," positions its openly available model as a reliable and accessible alternative. The GLM-5.2 model emphasizes "Long Horizon Task" capabilities with a 1M context window, targeting complex, multi-step coding and engineering workflows where maintaining context is crucial. Analysts note this event exposes the risk of dependency on closed-source models subject to single jurisdictional controls, potentially accelerating a shift toward domestic base models and localized deployments. The market's reaction signals a new valuation dimension in AI: providers who can offer stable, long-term, and sustainably accessible AI capabilities are gaining strategic importance.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Following US Ban on Fable 5, Zhipu AI's Stock Soars 47%

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Fully Entering the AI Era: Alipay Bets on Conversation, WeChat Holds Fast to Social

In May 2026, Alipay announced over 300 million AI payment transactions. Shortly after, WeChat opened its mini-programs for AI integration, sparking controversy by requiring developer source code access. This highlights their diverging approaches to AI integration. Alipay is testing "Project Treasure," an optional AI-native interface replacing traditional app grids with a conversational window. Users can command complex tasks (e.g., "book a ride and order coffee") handled end-to-end by AI. This shift follows an abandoned standalone AI app, focusing instead on enhancing its existing user base. For unmodified mini-programs, Alipay's AI uses "screen-reading" to simulate user interactions, bypassing the need for developer overhaul. It also introduced "Token Pay" for micro-transactions and "AI Wallets" for autonomous agent spending. WeChat, prioritizing its core social function, is taking an embedded approach. Its AI agent will operate within existing contexts like group chats and official accounts, assisting without a separate interface. To enable this, WeChat offers developers two paths: granting source code access for direct AI control ("Automatic Mode") or manually encapsulating services into standardized "Skills." Both place significant burden on developers. Key differences emerge in handling legacy services: WeChat demands developer cooperation (code or labor), while Alipay's screen-reading offers immediate, if potentially less stable, compatibility. Alipay's 3 billion AI transactions demonstrate user acceptance of AI-driven commercial actions. The divergent strategies may reshape mini-program ecosystems—Alipay passively "AI-fying" services, WeChat potentially favoring resource-rich developers—and set competing technical standards. Ultimately, the competition centers on where users entrust the command to "help me get things done."

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Fully Entering the AI Era: Alipay Bets on Conversation, WeChat Holds Fast to Social

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片