Why Movement [MOVE] crypto is up – L1 shift, buybacks & more!

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-12-15Last updated on 2025-12-15

Abstract

Movement (MOVE) cryptocurrency surged over 12% in 24 hours, extending its rally amid a transition from an Ethereum L2 to a standalone L1 blockchain. Key drivers include partnerships with over 10 DeFi applications, which generate revenue used for MOVE buybacks to reduce circulating supply. Network activity also increased, with monthly active addresses rising 17% to 21.4K and transaction counts growing significantly. Despite the breakout from a two-month descending trendline, sellers remain active, as indicated by negative CVD and MACD signals. For a sustained uptrend, MOVE must hold above $0.0418 and breach $0.0600. The rally shows potential reversal signs after a year of decline, but broader market confirmation is needed.

Movement [MOVE] crypto could have found its bottom after a year of decline. Movement transitioned from an Ethereum Layer 2 (L2) blockchain to a full standalone L1.

In the past 24 hours, MOVE spiked by more than 12%, as per CoinMarketCap data, extending its rally for the second consecutive day. The daily trading volume doubled, exceeding the $84 million mark.

Why is MOVE crypto up today?

Beyond its technical breakout, fundamentals and network activity also drove the rally for MOVE.

On fundamentals, Movement has partnered with more than 10 DeFi applications, which now funnel funds into the ecosystem through fees. This revenue is used in MOVE’s buyback program, which reduces the amount of circulating supply in the market.

For context, the main alliance in the ecosystem was the LayerBank partnership. Its ULAB token launch on the MOVE network added about $2.30 million, fueling more DeFi integration.

On the activity part, the number of Active Monthly Addresses rose by 17%, reaching 21.4K as of press time. This reflected that the network had become busy since the start of December, though prices stayed low.

The total Number of Accounts created almost hit 570,000, while deployed contracts were 28,837 from 4,710 deployers, as per Movement Explorer data.

Additionally, the Transaction Count grew from 50.9K to 84.9K in two days. This brought the monthly sum to 2.8 million transactions, affirming the shift in activity.

All these on-chain metrics supported the growth in price over the past two days. Is the technical setup good enough to say MOVE will sustain the trend?

Will the altcoin maintain momentum?

On the hourly charts, MOVE broke above the descending trendline resistance that had held price for over two months since the October 10th crash.

Still, the altcoin had been in a downtrend since its post-launch rally, which ended on December 25th, 2024, when the MOVE crypto price slightly surpassed the $1.50 mark.

After this breakout, the MOVE price rallied more than 51% but was instantly rejected. The price fell and seemed to be stabilizing around $0.0418. Holding above this level and breaching $0.0600 for a new higher high would mean a continued uptrend. Otherwise, sellers stay in control.

However, in this timeframe, sellers showed momentum, as seen in the MACD bars. Furthermore, the Cumulative Volume Delta (CVD) was negative, at $8.35 million, meaning selling was the dominant activity after the short rally.

While the altcoin was bullish on the day, sellers were not ready to relinquish dominance. MOVE was trading in a bear market, but bulls had thrown the first hints of potential reversal after a year of decline.

The reversal stays alive, though a market shift on bigger timeframes was needed for confirmation.


Final Thoughts

  • MOVE rallies 12%, outperforming the entire market amid a rise in partnerships, buyback programs, and network activity.
  • Movement crypto price was stabilizing above the breakout zone, though sellers did not appear to be giving up control.

Related Reads

2025 Year-End Final Exam: Crypto Asset Allocation Guide After the FOMC Decision

Crypto markets face a critical juncture in late 2025. Bitcoin hovers near $90,000, with the Fear & Greed Index at 25 (Extreme Fear) and short-term holder capitulation at historic highs. The December FOMC meeting delivered an expected 25bps rate cut but adopted a hawkish tone, projecting only one more cut in 2026, causing a brief BTC sell-off. However, the Fed also initiated a $40B/month Reserve Management Purchases (RMP) plan, a form of "stealth QE" injecting liquidity. Key themes emerge: - **Macro Impact**: Hawkish guidance creates short-term pressure, but ending QT and launching RMP set the stage for a 2026 liquidity surge, historically bullish for crypto. - **Institutional Shift**: 2025 marked a pivot to institutional dominance. While BTC remains core, portfolios are diversifying into ETH, Solana, stablecoins, and tokenized real-world assets (RWA). Pension and sovereign wealth funds are increasing exposure. - **Historical Pattern & On-Chain Data**: A potential "Santa Low-Chinese New Year Rally" pattern is anticipated due to seasonal liquidity shifts. On-chain metrics signal a likely bottom: massive STH capitulation, declining exchange reserves, and valuation indicators (MVRV Z-Score, Puell Multiple) in historic buy zones. The confluence of extreme fear, strong underlying accumulation signals, and impending macro liquidity shifts presents a strategic entry point for long-term investors, framing the current pullback as a mid-cycle correction within a broader upward trend.

marsbitHace 17 min(s)

2025 Year-End Final Exam: Crypto Asset Allocation Guide After the FOMC Decision

marsbitHace 17 min(s)

Why Does Hyperliquid Earn Less Than Coinbase?

Hyperliquid, a decentralized exchange, processes near-Nasdaq-level perpetual trading volumes but captures significantly lower fees compared to centralized platforms like Coinbase and Robinhood. While Hyperliquid cleared $205.6 billion in notional volume over 30 days, it generated only $80.3 million in fees—an effective take rate of ~3.9 bps. In contrast, Coinbase and Robinhood achieve take rates of ~35.5 bps and ~33.5 bps, respectively, by operating as retail brokers that monetize multiple layers: distribution, balances, subscriptions, and order flow. This gap stems from a structural difference: Hyperliquid positions itself as a low-fee *market layer* (like Nasdaq), providing high-throughput execution and清算 infrastructure, while brokers like Coinbase control user relationships and extract value through higher-margin activities. Hyperliquid’s model includes permissionless distributor frontends (Builder Codes) and product deployment (HIP-3), which drive ecosystem growth but also create long-term fee compression risks by outsourcing high-value distribution. To defend its economics, Hyperliquid is taking steps to retain distribution control, integrate HIP-3 markets natively, and introduce balance-driven revenue streams like USDH (a native stablecoin with 50% reserve收益 sharing) and portfolio margin (10% interest fee on borrows). These moves aim to shift its model from pure exchange-level execution toward a hybrid approach that captures broker-like profit pools—without sacrificing its core infrastructure advantages. The key challenge remains balancing open ecosystem growth with tighter economic integration to avoid being commoditized as a wholesale execution venue.

marsbitHace 27 min(s)

Why Does Hyperliquid Earn Less Than Coinbase?

marsbitHace 27 min(s)

Trading

Spot
Futures

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of MOVE (MOVE) are presented below.

活动图片