Why is the STRC Preferred Stock Unlikely to Return to $100?

Foresight NewsPublicado a 2026-06-29Actualizado a 2026-06-29

Resumen

## Summary **Title: Why is STRC Preferred Stock Struggling to Return to $100?** The article analyzes the challenges facing STRC preferred stock in returning to its designed $100 price level. The original mechanisms to support the $100 price included an adjustable dividend yield, Strategy's right to buy back shares at $101, and a $100 per share liquidation claim in case of bankruptcy. However, these mechanisms are currently failing to function effectively. **Key Points:** * **Dividend Adjustments are Ineffective:** Increasing the dividend rate to attract investors is unlikely to work. It would place a greater financial burden on the issuer, Strategy, and high dividends in a difficult environment can be perceived negatively. Dividend payments are not guaranteed and depend on board discretion, creating significant uncertainty for investors. * **The $100 Claim is Largely Theoretical:** The $100 per share claim in bankruptcy is a key theoretical support, but its practical value is questionable. STRC, as preferred stock, has no maturity date, so investors can only recover principal if Strategy initiates a buyback or goes bankrupt. Strategy's current low leverage (11%) makes bankruptcy highly unlikely unless Bitcoin's price collapses to extreme lows (~$6,600). Even in a bankruptcy scenario, preferred stockholders' claims are subordinate to bondholders, making full recovery of the $100 unlikely. * **No Fundamental Reason for a $100 Price:** Given the weak dividend guarantee...


Written by: @100y_eth

Compiled by: AididiaoJP, Foresight News


Under the current circumstances, there is no reason for STRC to return to $100.


The mechanisms originally designed to keep STRC trading near $100 are as follows: If the STRC price falls below $100, the dividend yield rises due to the price drop, and Strategy Corp. may also increase the nominal dividend rate to above 11.5%. Since Strategy has the right to buy MSTR at $101 per share, price increases beyond that level are suppressed. If Strategy goes bankrupt, STRC holders have a claim for $100 per share plus accumulated unpaid dividends. For STRC to return to $100, these mechanisms need to function normally.


Dividend Rate Adjustments Cannot Be a Fundamental Solution


First, increasing the dividend rate is unlikely to be effective for two reasons. A higher dividend rate becomes a financial burden for Strategy Corp., potentially worsening its financial condition. From an investor's perspective, offering a high dividend rate in a challenging environment could also be a negative psychological factor.


Dividend rate adjustments and payments are not an obligation of STRC but depend on board decisions, creating significant uncertainty from an investor's viewpoint.


Since STRC pays dividends on a per-share fixed amount basis, not as a percentage of principal, it was supposed to be a product that allows dividend investors not to worry too much about their principal. Nevertheless, there remains high uncertainty about whether Strategy can continue to pay dividends to STRC investors at the current level.


Of course, Strategy currently has dollar reserves that can cover bond interest and preferred stock dividends for about 9.8 months; if it sells its Bitcoin holdings, it could sustain for about 30 years. However, this does not completely resolve the uncertainty surrounding dividends.


Dollar reserves covering only 9.8 months is far from a long-term solution. To extend this period using dollar reserves, Strategy would need to continue issuing MSTR via ATM. But at the current mNAV level, this would inevitably dilute book value per share, which is absolutely unsustainable for Strategy.


Even if dollar reserves are exhausted, extending the lifespan of Strategy and STRC by selling Bitcoin fundamentally contradicts the purpose and essence of Strategy as a company. It would reduce the appeal of STRC and MSTR as investment products and accelerate a negative feedback loop.


The $100 Per Share Claim is Meaningless Without Redemption


If STRC price is guided solely by dividend rate adjustments, then the $100 figure has no practical significance. The fundamental reason STRC could be guided to trade near $100 is that, in the event of Strategy's bankruptcy, STRC has a claim on the remaining assets for $100 per share plus accumulated unpaid dividends.


Simply put, STRC currently trading at $75 appears to be selling at a massive 25% discount to its conventional $100 face value. But is this really the case?


The key point is that STRC is not a bond, but a preferred stock. Bonds have maturity dates; if STRC were a bond, investors would receive $100 per share at maturity, and such a significant discount likely wouldn't exist.


Unless Strategy separately announces a buyback of STRC, the only way for STRC investors to get their principal back is for Strategy to go under.


There are two problems here. Contrary to the prevailing view in the community, Strategy is not likely to go bankrupt easily. The company's net leverage ratio is only 11%, and its amplification factor (the ratio of bonds and preferred stock to Bitcoin reserves) is merely 44%. For the company to actually go bankrupt, its leveraged position via bonds would have to collapse. Unless Bitcoin falls to about 11% of its current level (around $6,600), this is difficult to achieve. Even considering price declines from selling pressure, it's unlikely to happen unless Bitcoin approaches around $10,000.


Even if bankruptcy does occur, it's still a problem. If Strategy goes bankrupt, it means a leveraged position of just 11% has collapsed. Under such dire circumstances, preferred stock investors, including STRC holders (whose claims are junior to bondholders), would likely struggle to fully obtain the remaining assets.


In other words, for STRC investors to receive $100 per share, two conditions must be met simultaneously: 1) Strategy must go bankrupt; 2) If such a bankruptcy scenario actually occurs, they likely won't be able to get the full $100.


There's No Reason for STRC to Trade Near $100


Strategy set the STRC dividend rate at 11.50% based on a $100 price. But the STRC price is determined by the market. The $100 per share claim on remaining assets seems largely meaningless in the worst-case scenario, and the long-term sustainability of dividend rate adjustments and payments is also questionable.


STRC is currently trading around $75. At this price, the effective annualized dividend yield reaches 15.3%. That is, investors are demanding an additional yield of about 3.8% over the original 11.5% dividend rate due to factors like bankruptcy risk and dividend payment uncertainty.


If investors believe a 20% dividend yield is reasonable given STRC's risks, then STRC might trade at $57.5. Since the fair price depends on market uncertainty and investor psychology, no one can know for sure where it should be.


Under the current circumstances, there is no reason for STRC to trade near $100. Its price will converge to the market price assigned by investors.

Preguntas relacionadas

QAccording to the article, what are the two main reasons why increasing the STRC dividend rate is unlikely to be an effective solution?

AFirst, a higher dividend rate would be a financial burden for Strategy and could worsen its financial health. Second, from an investor perspective, offering a high dividend rate in a challenging environment could act as a negative psychological factor.

QWhy is the $100 per share liquidation claim for STRC holders considered largely meaningless unless a redemption occurs?

ASTRC is a preferred stock, not a bond, so it has no maturity date. The only way for investors to get the $100 principal is if Strategy goes bankrupt. However, Strategy is unlikely to bankrupt unless Bitcoin crashes severely. Even if it does, STRC holders, being junior to bondholders, are unlikely to fully recover the $100 claim amount from the remaining assets.

QWhat is the current effective annualized dividend yield of STRC at its price of around $75, and what does this indicate?

AAt around $75, STRC's effective annualized dividend yield is approximately 15.3%. This indicates that investors are demanding a risk premium of about 3.8% (on top of the stated 11.5% rate) due to perceived risks like bankruptcy and dividend payment uncertainty.

QWhat are the two conditions that must be met for STRC investors to receive the $100 per share claim, and what is problematic about the second condition?

ATwo conditions must be met: 1) Strategy must go bankrupt. 2) If bankruptcy occurs, STRC investors must successfully recover the full $100 from the remaining assets. The problem is that in the scenario where bankruptcy is triggered (e.g., Bitcoin price collapse), STRC holders, as junior claimants, are likely to face significant losses and not receive the full $100.

QWhat mechanism was originally designed to keep STRC trading close to $100, and what is the core argument for why this mechanism is failing?

AThe original mechanism involved: a rising dividend yield if price fell below $100, Strategy's ability to increase the dividend rate above 11.5%, a cap on price above $101 due to Strategy's call option, and a $100 liquidation claim in case of bankruptcy. The core argument is that the mechanism is failing because the dividend adjustment is unsustainable and uncertain, and the $100 bankruptcy claim is practically meaningless unless Strategy is redeemed or liquidated, which is an unlikely and undesirable event.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Must-Watch Events Next Week|CLARITY Act Could Face Senate Vote; SpaceX, Circle to Report Earnings (8.3-8.9)

**Summary: Key Events and Developments to Watch (August 3-9)** The upcoming week is marked by significant financial disclosures, key legislative deadlines, and notable product updates. **Major Financial Events:** Several companies are scheduled to release their Q2 2026 earnings. American Bitcoin (ABTC) will report on August 3, followed by SpaceX and Hut 8 Mining Corp. on August 4, and Circle on August 5. Notably, a significant portion of SpaceX shares (up to 12% of total shares) will be unlocked on August 6 following their earnings release. **Key Legislative Deadline:** The U.S. Senate faces an August 7 deadline to secure 60 votes for the CLARITY Act, a bipartisan bill aiming to establish a federal regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies. The Senate may hold a full vote on the bill during the week. **Economic Data:** The U.S. July Non-Farm Payrolls report will be released on August 7, providing crucial labor market data. **Technology & Product Updates:** * **Shutdowns:** DeFi portfolio tracker Zapper and wallet app Ctrl Wallet will cease operations on August 3. * **Upgrades:** LayerZero will deprecate its v1 relayers on August 3. XRP Ledger's new version 3.3.0, featuring five new functions, is expected next week. * **AI:** Elon Musk announced that the advanced Grok 4.6 AI model is set for release around August 7. * **Bitcoin:** The BIP-110 forced signaling for a potential Bitcoin network change is scheduled to begin around August 8. **Other Notable Events:** Chinese robotics firm Unitree Tech has set its preliminary price inquiry for its IPO for August 5. South Korean exchange Upbit will delist AQT and AERGO tokens on August 3.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Must-Watch Events Next Week|CLARITY Act Could Face Senate Vote; SpaceX, Circle to Report Earnings (8.3-8.9)

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Stocks Are Plummeting More Sharply Than Cryptocurrencies. Where Has the Money Gone?

Stock Markets Plunge Deeper Than Cryptocurrencies: Where Did the Money Go? In late July, Seoul's Kospi index triggered circuit breakers for two consecutive days, plummeting over 40% from its June high. The collapse was led by heavyweight stocks like SK Hynix, whose record profits still disappointed investors, and devastating leveraged ETFs, with one major product losing over 83% of its value. This signaled a global, forced deleveraging targeting the most crowded trades. Interestingly, while stocks exhibited extreme volatility akin to crypto markets, Bitcoin rose nearly 15% in July after a prior steep drop. Analysis shows the money fleeing equities did not flow into Bitcoin. Instead, Bitcoin had already absorbed its sell-off in May-June, when U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs saw historic outflows. The true safe-haven beneficiary was gold, whose price rose over 20% year-on-year, highlighting a decoupling between Bitcoin and gold as "digital gold." The sell-off was a targeted unwinding of leveraged positions in tech and semiconductors, accelerated by broker-dealer risk management and shifts in the AI narrative, including new competition from Chinese memory chipmakers. The retreat path was clear: from high-valuation tech stocks to cash and U.S. Treasuries, then to gold. For Bitcoin to attract sustained institutional inflows, conditions like eased global liquidity pressure, a "soft-landing" Fed rate cut, and U.S. regulatory clarity via legislation like the stalled CLARITY Act are needed. Currently, Bitcoin is not a safe haven but an already-cleared asset. Its low correlation with tech stocks, however, makes it a potential diversification play for institutional portfolios once the storm passes. The money isn't here yet, but the positioning is underway.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Stocks Are Plummeting More Sharply Than Cryptocurrencies. Where Has the Money Gone?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

In Conversation with Ray Dalio: We Are Currently in an AI Bubble, with 1% of My Portfolio in Bitcoin

Ray Dalio, founder of Bridgewater Associates, warns in an interview that the current AI boom shows classic bubble characteristics, which could lead to significant economic downturns as seen in past cycles like 1929 or 2000. He explains that speculative enthusiasm, fueled by debt and overvaluation, often precedes a crash when rising rates or taxation force asset sales, causing widespread losses and recession. Dalio also outlines his "Big Cycle" theory, describing an approximate 80-year pattern where widening wealth gaps, massive government deficits, and shifting geopolitical power (like China's rise) create internal conflict and global instability. He emphasizes that we are in a late-cycle, transitional phase where traditional powers like the US and UK face decline. For personal wealth protection, Dalio advises diversification beyond cash into assets like stocks, bonds, real estate, and particularly gold, which he prefers over Bitcoin. While he holds about 1% of his portfolio in Bitcoin as a non-printable hard asset, he views gold as more secure from technological or governmental threats. Regarding AI's impact, Dalio believes it will disproportionately benefit capital owners, worsening inequality by replacing both physical and cognitive labor. He suggests that human intuition and emotional intelligence, combined with AI, will be key for future workers. On taxation, Dalio argues that wealth taxes are impractical and risk triggering asset sell-offs, reducing productive investment. He points to the UK as a cautionary example of debt, low productivity, and political strife. Geopolitically, Dalio foresees a more regionalized world, with the US showing weakness in prolonged conflicts like with Iran, akin to past imperial declines. The ideal outcome, he suggests, is coexisting powerful blocs (e.g., Americas, China-Asia Pacific) without major war.

marsbitHace 5 hora(s)

In Conversation with Ray Dalio: We Are Currently in an AI Bubble, with 1% of My Portfolio in Bitcoin

marsbitHace 5 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片