Why Hyperliquid is ‘quietly outgrowing’ Coinbase on THESE fronts

ambcryptoPublicado a 2026-02-11Actualizado a 2026-02-11

Resumen

Hyperliquid, a decentralized exchange (DEX), is significantly outperforming Coinbase in key metrics, with nearly double the notional trading volume ($2.6T vs. $1.4T). Its native token, HYPE, has also delivered superior investor returns, up 32% YTD compared to COIN's 27% decline. Both platforms are competing to become an "everything exchange," but Hyperliquid has rapidly expanded beyond crypto into tokenized assets like gold and silver, which now account for over 30% of its volume. It currently handles 10% of Binance’s perpetual volumes, 32% of Bybit’s, and 24% of OKX’s. Despite regulatory risks being a concern, Hyperliquid’s growth continues, with its token eyeing key support levels amid renewed market interest.

Over the past few months, Hyperliquid has been playing catch-up to major centralized exchanges (CEXs). Now, it has begun flipping them on key metrics.

According to the analytics firm Artemis, the DEX platform is “quietly outgrowing” Coinbase with nearly 2x in notional trading volume.

“Notional trading volume: Coinbase $1.4T, Hyperliquid $2.6T. That’s nearly 2x Coinbase’s volume... from an onchain exchange. And the market is noticing.”

The outperformance has gone beyond ecosystem traction. Hyperliquid’s native token, HYPE, has also surpassed Coinbase’s COIN in investor returns. On a year-to-date (YTD) basis, HYPE holders have netted 32% while COIN holders were down 27% – A nearly 60% lead on investor gains.

The race for ‘everything exchange’

The comparison between the two platforms makes sense because both are pushing towards an “everything exchange” vision. Coinbase covers services spanning asset custody, trading, prediction markets, and more.

Similarly, Hyperliquid aims to house all finance under one roof and has made significant strides despite being operational for over a year.

After conquering the crypto perpetual markets and rivaling incumbents like Binance, Hyperliquid’s debut into tokenized markets via equity perps exploded. Now, over 30% of Hyperliquid’s DEX volume comes from non-crypto assets, dominated by gold and silver.

The results? Slow and steady clawing of market share from Binance and other top centralized players. Since last August, Hyperliquid has handled over 10% of Binance’s perpetual volumes.

Although the October crash led to a cool-off of the ratio to 10%, the perp DEX platform traction has since been climbing again. Compared to Bybit, Hyperliquid now handles 32% of its perpetual volumes and 24% of OKX’s activity.

Overall, at press time, the perp DEX was handling over 6% of total CEX volumes, with a strong renewed traction in 2026.

HYPE eyes key support

Market watchers have cautioned that the only threats to the massive growth can be a hack or regulatory risk, especially from the U.S Department of Justice (DoJ).

“Agree here that hype’s biggest risk is regulatory. They need to get much more embedded with the tradfi elites as regulators will eventually get involved.”

That said, HYPE has been a key beneficiary of the traction, with rising revenue funding token buybacks.

However, HYPE’s cool-off isn’t over yet, and a retest of $26-$28 support zone (white) could offer new buying opportunities if risk sentiment improves after the U.S inflation print scheduled for Friday.


Final Thoughts

  • Hyperliquid saw 2x more derivatives market activity compared to Coinbase.
  • The DEX platform handled over 6% of total CEX perpetual volumes amid renewed traction in 2026.

Preguntas relacionadas

QAccording to the article, how does Hyperliquid's notional trading volume compare to Coinbase's?

AAccording to analytics firm Artemis, Hyperliquid's notional trading volume is nearly 2x that of Coinbase, with $2.6T compared to Coinbase's $1.4T.

QWhat is the year-to-date (YTD) performance difference between the HYPE token and Coinbase's COIN stock?

AOn a YTD basis, HYPE holders have netted a 32% gain, while COIN holders were down 27%, giving HYPE a nearly 60% lead in investor gains.

QWhat significant non-crypto market did Hyperliquid debut in, and what is its impact?

AHyperliquid debuted in tokenized markets via equity perps, and now over 30% of its DEX volume comes from non-crypto assets, which are dominated by gold and silver.

QWhat percentage of Binance's perpetual volumes has Hyperliquid handled since last August?

ASince last August, Hyperliquid has handled over 10% of Binance's perpetual volumes.

QWhat are cited as the primary threats to Hyperliquid's massive growth?

AThe primary threats cited are a potential hack or regulatory risk, especially from the U.S. Department of Justice (DoJ).

Lecturas Relacionadas

Bitcoin Withdrawals Continue: 8 Years of Storage in a Coldcard Cold Wallet Ended in Zero

Coldcard Hardware Wallet Hacked: Losses Mount Due to Vulnerable Seed Generation A critical vulnerability in Coldcard hardware wallets has led to a continued wave of fund thefts. According to Galaxy Research, the total stolen has reached 1,367.05 BTC (approx. $88.6 million) from 4,585 addresses, a significant increase from the initial 594.5 BTC reported on July 30, 2026. Most of the stolen funds remain on the attackers' addresses. The issue is not with the current firmware, which Coinkite has updated, but with seed phrases generated on vulnerable devices between March 2021 and the release of fixed firmware versions. Due to a programmer error, devices switched from using a hardware random number generator to the software-based Yasmarang generator, which was initialized with publicly accessible data like the chip's serial number. This made the seed phrases predictable through offline brute-force attacks, meaning wallets remain at risk until funds are moved to a new wallet generated with the patched firmware. Affected devices include Mk2/Mk3 with firmware 4.0.1–4.1.9 (and up to 5.0.3), Mk4/Mk5 up to version 5.6.0, and Q models up to 1.5.0Q. The only exceptions are seeds created with a high-entropy method like at least 50 independent dice rolls or a strong unique BIP-39 passphrase. All other owners must generate a new seed on the fixed firmware and transfer their assets. A case highlighting the human impact involves a 39-year-old long-term investor who lost 2 BTC (approx. $130,000) in minutes. He had accumulated the Bitcoin over eight years through physical labor, viewing it as a financial lifeline and a retirement plan in a country suffering from hyperinflation. His story underscores that even conservative "buy and hold in cold storage" strategies can be compromised by such underlying technical flaws. From a technical perspective, this incident echoes historical failures where weak random number generators undermined cryptographic security, challenging the assumption that offline storage is automatically foolproof.

cryptonews.ruHace 6 min(s)

Bitcoin Withdrawals Continue: 8 Years of Storage in a Coldcard Cold Wallet Ended in Zero

cryptonews.ruHace 6 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片