When Funds Flow into Gold and Silver, Bitcoin Is Temporarily Left Behind

比推Publicado a 2025-12-26Actualizado a 2025-12-26

Resumen

In 2025, precious metals surged dramatically, with silver rising parabolically to a record $72/oz and gold reaching $4524.30/oz, up 143% and 70% annually, respectively. In contrast, Bitcoin fell 8% year-to-date and dropped 30% from its October peak. This divergence challenges the "digital gold" narrative, as traditional safe-haven drivers—such as a weaker dollar, Fed rate cut expectations, and geopolitical risks—failed to boost Bitcoin. Investors preferred tangible assets like gold and silver, which benefit from institutional credibility and, in silver’s case, robust industrial demand from sectors like solar and electronics. Bitcoin, lacking industrial utility and relying on speculative and financial demand, struggled as ETF flows turned negative. While Bitcoin’s potential remains tied to future regulatory clarity or unique features like censorship resistance, it has yet to be integrated into the hard asset ecosystem. The 2025 trend underscores that macroeconomic tailwinds do not automatically extend to cryptocurrencies.

In 2025, the precious metals market experienced a frenzy. Silver broke through the $50 range in late November and then surged parabolically, reaching a historic high of $72 per ounce on December 24, with a yearly gain of 143%. Gold hit $4,524.30 per ounce on the same day, rising 70% for the year.

In stark contrast, Bitcoin was trading at $87,498 at the time of writing, down 8% year-to-date and 30% from its October peak of $126,000.

This has given pause to proponents of Bitcoin's "digital gold" narrative, as the macroeconomic trends driving the rally in precious metals do not seem to be transferring to the crypto market.

The core drivers of the precious metals rally—a weaker U.S. dollar, expectations of Federal Reserve rate cuts in 2026, and rising geopolitical risks—are the very conditions Bitcoin supporters have long anticipated as bullish.

However, when allocating funds for避险, the market favors tangible hedging tools with centuries of credibility, like gold and silver. Central banks globally have been increasing their gold reserves throughout the year, and retail funds shifted towards physical precious metals after Bitcoin's decline early in the year.

Multiple studies in 2025 confirmed that gold demonstrates more stable避险 performance during various macroeconomic shocks, whereas Bitcoin behaves more like a high-beta risk asset, correlating positively with stocks and failing to lead in this cycle.

Structural demand differences further widened the gap. Silver's rise was fueled not only by避险 demand but also by record industrial demand from sectors like photovoltaics and electronics. Scarcity of substitutes in the supply chain exacerbated tightness, creating dual support from both macro and industrial factors.

Bitcoin, lacking industrial utility, has demand concentrated in financial speculation and on-chain settlements, with no physical demand buffer. This asymmetry means that even if rate cuts stall and risk appetite cools, silver still has industrial demand as a floor, while Bitcoin can only rely on ETF inflows to absorb selling pressure. With those flows now turning negative, its support has weakened.

The silver surge is a macroeconomic barometer, not a trading signal. It confirms the market's pricing of low real interest rates and a weak dollar, but it highlights that Bitcoin has not yet been integrated into the hard asset trading system.

For Bitcoin to reverse its downtrend, it needs improved regulatory clarity to drive renewed institutional allocation, a recovery in retail sentiment, or a macroeconomic shock where its attributes like censorship resistance and programmability prove valuable.

It is worth noting that silver positions are becoming relatively crowded; a hawkish pivot by the Fed or similar events could trigger asset volatility, which would also indirectly impact Bitcoin.

The divergence in 2025 proves that "hard assets" cannot yet be equated with Bitcoin. Silver combines industrial demand with institutional credibility, gold has institutional credibility and narrative momentum, while Bitcoin is still vying for institutional acceptance and can never possess industrial attributes.

This does not negate Bitcoin's value, but for it to outperform, additional conditions must be met. Once those conditions are satisfied, its upside potential could still surpass that of precious metals.

Until then, we must recognize that macroeconomic tailwinds have not yet propelled the crypto market, and Bitcoin still has a way to go before it becomes a hard asset.

Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Discussion Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7598415

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat were the key performance differences between precious metals and Bitcoin in 2025 as described in the article?

AIn 2025, silver surged by 143% and reached a record high of $72/oz, while gold rose 70% to $4524.30/oz. In contrast, Bitcoin fell 8% year-to-date and was down 30% from its October peak of $126,000.

QAccording to the article, what were the core drivers behind the rally in precious metals?

AThe core drivers for the precious metals rally were a weaker US dollar, expectations of Federal Reserve interest rate cuts in 2026, and rising geopolitical risks.

QWhy did the market prefer precious metals over Bitcoin for避险 (hedging/risk-off) allocation, as per the analysis?

AThe market preferred precious metals due to their century-long credibility as tangible hedging tools. Central banks increased gold reserves, and retail funds shifted to physical precious metals after Bitcoin's early-year decline, viewing gold's避险 performance as more stable.

QWhat structural demand difference between silver and Bitcoin contributed to their performance gap?

ASilver's demand was driven by both避险 and record industrial demand from sectors like photovoltaics and electronics, with scarce substitutes creating supply紧张. Bitcoin lacks industrial use, with demand focused solely on financial speculation and on-chain settlements, leaving it without a physical demand buffer.

QWhat does the article suggest Bitcoin needs to reverse its underperformance and potentially outperform precious metals?

AThe article suggests Bitcoin needs improved regulatory clarity to drive institutional re-allocation, a recovery in retail sentiment, or a macro shock where its censorship-resistant and programmable properties prove valuable. It states that Bitcoin still has the potential to outperform precious metals if these conditions are met.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Stuck Polymarket: The Real Test After Riding the Traffic Boom Has Arrived

Polymarket, a leading prediction market platform, is facing significant technical challenges as its growth outpaces its current infrastructure on Polygon. Users are experiencing laggy transactions, unresponsive orders, and delayed confirmations, severely impacting the trading experience. In response, DeFi Engineering VP Josh Stevens outlined a comprehensive engineering overhaul. The plan includes reducing on-chain data delays, fixing order cancellation issues, rebuilding the central limit order book (CLOB), improving website performance, and developing a unified SDK and API. A major revelation was the ongoing "chain migration," indicating a potential move away from Polygon. The core issue is that Polymarket has evolved from a simple prediction market into a high-frequency trading platform, making Polygon's limitations—such as block space, gas fees, and block time—a ceiling for further growth. The migration is not just a simple chain switch but a fundamental rebuild of its trading system to support more complex products like perpetual contracts (Perps). This announcement has sparked competition among chains like Solana, Sui, and Algorand, all vying to host Polymarket. For Polygon, losing this key application, which contributes significantly to its gas fee revenue, would be a major setback. The real test for Polymarket is no longer attracting users but proving it can provide a stable, reliable trading environment that retains them.

Odaily星球日报Hace 31 min(s)

Stuck Polymarket: The Real Test After Riding the Traffic Boom Has Arrived

Odaily星球日报Hace 31 min(s)

Key Lawmaker 'Relents', Wash's Biggest Obstacle to Assuming Fed Chair on May 15 Cleared

Key political opposition to Kevin Warsh's nomination as Federal Reserve Chair has been removed after Senator Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) withdrew his objection, clearing the way for a committee vote on April 29. Tillis had previously blocked the nomination due to a criminal investigation into current Chair Jerome Powell, which he viewed as a threat to Fed independence. The Justice Department has since dropped the investigation. Warsh, who has broad Republican support, is expected to be confirmed by the Senate in time for Powell’s term expiration on May 15. If confirmed, Warsh has signaled significant policy changes, including abolishing the "dot plot" of interest rate projections and reevaluating the Fed’s forward guidance framework. These changes could fundamentally alter the market’s pricing mechanisms for stocks, bonds, and currencies. Although the criminal case against Powell is closed, uncertainty remains as he retains his board seat until 2028. President Trump has not fully endorsed Powell, citing an ongoing review of Fed renovation spending. Warsh’s potential reforms target the communication tools developed post-2008, which have become foundational to global asset pricing.

marsbitHace 54 min(s)

Key Lawmaker 'Relents', Wash's Biggest Obstacle to Assuming Fed Chair on May 15 Cleared

marsbitHace 54 min(s)

Lowering Expectations for BTC's Next Bull Market

The author, Alex Xu, explains his decision to significantly reduce his Bitcoin holdings (from full to ~30% of his portfolio) during the current bull cycle, citing a lowered long-term outlook for BTC's price appreciation in the next cycle. He outlines six key reasons for this reduced expectation: 1. **Diminished Growth Drivers:** The narrative of exponential user adoption has largely played out with institutional ETF adoption. The next major growth phase—adoption by sovereign national reserves or central banks—seems unlikely in the near future. 2. **Personal Opportunity Cost:** More attractive investment opportunities have emerged in other assets, such as undervalued companies. 3. **Industry-Wide Contraction:** The broader crypto industry is struggling, with most Web3 business models (SocialFi, GameFi, DePIN) failing. This overall萧条 (depression) reduces the fundamental demand and consensus for Bitcoin. 4. **Strain on Major Buyer:** MicroStrategy, a major corporate buyer of BTC, faces rising financing expenses for its debt, which could slow its purchasing rate and create significant marginal pressure on the market. 5. **Increased Competition from Gold:** The emergence of "tokenized gold" has closed the functional gap (portability, divisibility) between physical gold and Bitcoin, offering a strong competitor in the non-sovereign store-of-value space. 6. **Security Budget Concerns:** The block reward halving continues to exacerbate the long-standing issue of funding Bitcoin's network security, with new fee source explorations like Ordinals and L2s largely failing. The author's decision to hold a significant (though reduced) position reflects a cautious, not bearish, outlook. He remains open to increasing his exposure if the fundamental reasons for his skepticism change or if new positive catalysts emerge.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Lowering Expectations for BTC's Next Bull Market

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Prediction Markets Cannot Exist Without Insider Trading, But Insider Trading Is Killing Them

Prediction markets face a fundamental contradiction: they rely on insider trading to generate accurate prices, yet this same activity erodes public trust and threatens their survival. Recent scandals, such as a U.S. special forces member making $400,000 on Polymarket using classified information about a raid, highlight the severity of the issue. While platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi market themselves as venues where "everyone is an expert" and encourage informed trading, they also enforce policies against illegal insider trading. The core dilemma is that these markets depend on informed insiders for price efficiency but require uninformed retail participants to provide liquidity. If insider trading is too rampant, retail traders leave, perceiving the market as unfair. If restrictions are too strict, valuable information flow dries up, reducing the market’s predictive utility. The challenge is finding a balance that maintains both accuracy and perceived fairness—a task complicated by regulatory pressures and recurring scandals.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Prediction Markets Cannot Exist Without Insider Trading, But Insider Trading Is Killing Them

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Can Iran 'Control' the Strait of Hormuz?

Iran has announced a comprehensive plan to assert control over the strategic Strait of Hormuz, a critical global oil shipping chokepoint. The proposed measures include requiring all vessels to obtain Iranian permission for passage, imposing fees for security, environmental protection, and navigation management—preferably paid in Iranian rials—and absolutely banning Israeli ships. Vessels from countries deemed hostile by Iran’s top security bodies may also be barred. Analysts suggest Iran’s motives are multifaceted: increasing pressure on the U.S. and Israel by leveraging control over oil transit to influence global prices and inflation; creating a new revenue stream, potentially exceeding $7.7 billion annually, to counter Western sanctions and support postwar reconstruction; and using transit permissions as bargaining chips in future negotiations, notably with the U.S. However, the plan faces significant practical and diplomatic challenges. Enforcing comprehensive interception and fee collection in the busy waterway, patrolled by international military forces, would be difficult. The U.S. has already countering with a blockade of Iranian ports and threats to intercept any ship paying fees, potentially strangling Iran’s oil exports and fee revenue. Broad international opposition, led by European and Gulf states, and legal controversies further complicate implementation. The proposal may ultimately serve more as a negotiating tactic than a feasible policy, with its execution remaining highly uncertain.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Can Iran 'Control' the Strait of Hormuz?

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar FLOW

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar Flow (FLOW) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar Flow (FLOW) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu Flow (FLOW)Después de comprar tu Flow (FLOW), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear Flow (FLOW)Tradear fácilmente con Flow (FLOW) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

216 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2024.12.10Actualizado en 2025.03.21

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de FLOW (FLOW).