When AI Solves Security, Will DeFi Return to Its Golden Age?

marsbitPublicado a 2026-04-03Actualizado a 2026-04-03

Resumen

The article discusses how AI is revolutionizing DeFi security, potentially ushering in a new era of innovation reminiscent of the 2020 DeFi Summer. Previously, high security costs and lengthy audit processes stifled experimentation, as developers avoided unproven ideas due to financial and time constraints. However, AI tools like Nemesis are now drastically reducing these barriers by efficiently detecting complex vulnerabilities, such as reentrancy and economic attacks, with deep contextual understanding and low false positives. These tools, combined with platforms like Battlechain, enable a streamlined workflow: code is written, AI-audited within minutes, deployed on a test chain for real-world attack simulations, and quickly refined. This process compresses development cycles from months to hours at minimal cost. Future advancements may include wallet-integrated AI audits, allowing users to scan contracts in real-time before signing transactions. AI is set to transform DeFi security across development, chain, and user layers, reopening the door to rapid experimentation and innovation. This shift could empower individual developers to create groundbreaking protocols quickly and safely, much like the early pioneers of DeFi.

Written by: nour

Compiled by: Chopper, Foresight News

During the DeFi Summer of 2020, Andre Cronje was launching new protocols almost every week, with Yearn, Solidly, and a host of other experimental projects emerging. Unfortunately, many of these projects fell victim to contract vulnerabilities and economic attacks, resulting in losses. But the ones that survived have become some of the most important protocols today.

The problem is, that era left a psychological scar on the entire industry. The industry's focus shifted dramatically, pouring vast resources into security. Multiple audits, audit competitions, months of review for each version, all just to validate a new idea with no market fit. I think most people don't realize how much this stifled the spirit of experimentation. No one will spend $500,000 and wait 6 months for an audit for an unproven idea. So everyone just clones verified designs and calls it innovation. DeFi innovation hasn't died; it's just that the incentives are killing it.

And this is changing because AI is driving down security costs at an astonishing rate.

AI audits used to be laughably shallow, basically only flagging surface-level issues like reentrancy and precision loss that any competent auditor could spot. But the new generation of tools is completely different. Tools like Nemesis can already detect complex execution flow vulnerabilities and economic attacks, demonstrating a stunning depth of contextual understanding of the protocol and its operating environment. One particularly standout feature of Nemesis is how it handles false positives: it uses multiple agents to detect issues with different methods, then has another independent agent judge the results, filtering out false positives based on contextual understanding of the protocol's logic and goals. It truly understands nuances, like in which scenarios reentrancy is acceptable and when it's truly dangerous—something even experienced human auditors often get wrong.

Nemesis is also incredibly simple, requiring just three Markdown files added as a skill to Claude Code. Other tools go even further, some integrating symbolic execution and static analysis, others even automatically writing formal verification specifications and verifying the code. Formal verification is becoming accessible to everyone.

But these are just first-generation tools. The models themselves are continuously evolving. Anthropic's upcoming Mythos is expected to far surpass the capabilities of Opus 4.6. You don't need to make any changes; just run Nemesis on Mythos and immediately get stronger results.

Combined with Cyfrin's Battlechain, the entire security workflow is completely restructured: write code → audit with AI tools → deploy to Battlechain → live attack and defense testing → redeploy to mainnet.

The beauty of Battlechain is that it eliminates the implied 'safety expectation' of the Ethereum mainnet. All users bridging in are fully aware of the risks they are taking. It also provides a natural focal point for AI auditors, no longer needing to search for a needle in the mainnet haystack. Its safe harbor framework stipulates that 10% of stolen funds can be a legitimate bounty, creating an economic incentive that drives the development of more powerful attack tools. Essentially, this is competition similar to MEV, but happening in the security realm. AI agents will probe every new deployment at top speed, racing to find vulnerabilities.

The future process for DeFi protocol development will be:

  1. Write the protocol
  2. Complete an AI audit in minutes
  3. Deploy to Battlechain with a small amount of capital
  4. Get automatically targeted by competing AI agents
  5. Get attacked within minutes
  6. Recover 90% of funds
  7. Fix the vulnerability
  8. Redeploy

The entire cycle, from writing code to being battle-tested and deployed on the mainnet, is compressed from months to potentially just hours, with costs almost negligible compared to traditional audits.

The ultimate line of defense will be wallet-level AI auditing. User wallets can integrate the same AI audit tools at the transaction signing stage. Before signing each transaction, the AI will audit the target contract code, read state variables to link all relevant contracts, map out the protocol topology, understand the context, audit both the contract and the user's transaction input, and provide recommendations in the confirmation pop-up. Every user will ultimately run their own professional-grade audit agent, protecting themselves from rugs, team negligence, or malicious frontends.

Agents will protect DeFi protocols from all angles: development, public chain, and user layers. This reopens the entire experimental design space. Ideas that were once economically unviable due to high security costs can finally be tested. One person in their bedroom can iterate quickly and create billion-dollar protocols, just as Andre and others did in 2020. The era of live testing is back.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the main factor that stifled innovation in DeFi after the 2020 DeFi Summer, according to the article?

AThe article states that the industry's shift towards pouring massive resources into security, such as requiring multiple audits, audit competitions, and months of review for each new version, significantly stifled the experimental spirit. The high cost (e.g., $500,000) and long wait times (e.g., 6 months) for auditing unproven ideas killed innovation, leading to mostly forking of verified designs.

QHow is AI currently changing the security cost and process for DeFi protocol development?

AAI is drastically reducing security costs and speeding up the process. New-generation tools like Nemesis can find complex execution flow vulnerabilities and economic attacks with deep contextual understanding. The future development process involves writing code, getting an AI audit in minutes, deploying to a test environment like Battlechain for real-world attacks, and then deploying to mainnet, compressing a months-long cycle into potentially just hours.

QWhat is the specific role of a tool like 'Battlechain' in the new security workflow described?

ABattlechain, specifically mentioned as Cyfrin's Battlechain, is a test environment that restructures the security workflow. It eliminates the implicit 'safety expectation' of the Ethereum mainnet, provides a natural focal point for AI auditors, and has a 'safe harbor' framework where 10% of stolen funds are a legal bounty. This creates economic incentives for powerful attack tools to emerge, allowing protocols to be tested and attacked by competing AI agents quickly before mainnet deployment.

QWhat is the envisioned final line of defense for user security in DeFi ecosystem according to the article?

AThe final line of defense is wallet-level AI auditing. User wallets would integrate the same AI audit tools to audit the target contract's code, read state variables, understand the protocol's topology and context, and audit both the contract and the user's transaction input *before* the user signs the transaction. A recommendation would then be shown in the confirmation pop-up, allowing each user to run their own professional-grade audit agent for protection.

QHow does the article suggest tools like 'Nemesis' handle false positives in smart contract auditing?

ANemesis handles false positives by having multiple AI agents check for issues using different methods. Then, a separate, independent AI agent acts as a judge to filter out the false positives based on its contextual understanding of the protocol's logic and goals. This allows it to understand nuances, such as when reentrancy might be acceptable versus when it is truly dangerous, a task that even experienced human auditors often get wrong.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Strategy's Loss in the Second Quarter Reaches $8.22 Billion Amid Bitcoin Decline

Strategy, the largest corporate holder of Bitcoin, reported a net loss of $8.22 billion for the second quarter. This loss was primarily driven by an $8.32 billion unrealized loss on its Bitcoin holdings due to a decline in the asset's price during the period. Despite these paper losses, the company increased its Bitcoin holdings to 843,775 BTC, a 25% growth since the start of the year. As part of a new monetization strategy, Strategy sold approximately $218.4 million worth of Bitcoin, mainly to fund dividends for preferred shareholders, with $216 million of that sold after Q2 ended. The company also built a $3.75 billion cash reserve, which it claims is sufficient to cover over two years of dividend and interest payments, aiming to insulate itself from Bitcoin's volatility while meeting obligations. Following the earnings release, Strategy's stock (MSTR) rose 4.7% in regular trading but corrected slightly after-hours. This pattern reflects how the company's accounting results are heavily tied to Bitcoin's price swings, even as its long-term strategy remains unchanged. The report indicates that Strategy is maintaining its core strategy of accumulating Bitcoin while building a financial buffer. This quarterly loss follows a recognizable pattern, with the company posting significant unrealized losses in previous quarters (e.g., $12.4 billion in Q4 2025 and ~$12.5 billion in Q1 2026) due to fair-value accounting. A key technical shift is its new monetization program, which introduces periodic selling pressure on the market, transitioning Strategy from a pure accumulator to a participant that occasionally adds supply. A critical question remains: how long can the cash reserve cover dividend obligations if a Bitcoin price downturn persists beyond two years?

cryptonews.ruHace 6 min(s)

Strategy's Loss in the Second Quarter Reaches $8.22 Billion Amid Bitcoin Decline

cryptonews.ruHace 6 min(s)

Will Terrorist Durov Ban Russian Officials?

Telegram founder Pavel Durov publicly reacted to being labeled a "terrorist" by Russian authorities, stating the designation came after he refused demands for mass surveillance and censorship on the platform. In a Telegram post, he highlighted that this status formally bans him from "publishing information online." Durov concluded with a statement widely circulated: Russian officials "clearly don't understand who can ban whom on the internet." This remark suggests Durov could potentially restrict official Russian government and officials' channels on Telegram, which continue to operate on the platform despite its formal blocking in Russia. The situation parallels previous, slow-moving state directives, like switching officials to domestic cars, contrasted with the current push to migrate all government communication to the Russian-made messenger MAX by 2030. However, reports indicate many officials still use Telegram via workarounds, fearing surveillance on MAX, while alternatives like BiP and KakaoTalk recently became inaccessible in Russia without a VPN. Durov has not specified any immediate actions against state channels. His statement is an initial response, with further developments depending on the authorities' reaction. The dynamic differs from 2020 when Russian regulators lifted a block on Telegram; now, Durov implies control from within the platform itself over the official accounts that persisted through that earlier blockade.

cryptonews.ruHace 6 min(s)

Will Terrorist Durov Ban Russian Officials?

cryptonews.ruHace 6 min(s)

DeepSeek V4 Official Version Arrives, New Capabilities Emerge, Value-for-Money King Enters the Fray

On July 31st, DeepSeek officially launched the public API beta for its DeepSeek-V4-Flash model. A key highlight is its performance on multiple Agent benchmark tests, reportedly nearing or even surpassing the level of the V4-Pro preview version from three months ago. Notably, the Flash model achieves this with significantly smaller scale (130B active parameters vs. Pro's 490B), suggesting that post-training optimization and data quality may be as crucial as raw model size. DeepSeek emphasized that the V4-Flash-0731 uses the same model architecture and size as its preview version, with improvements attributed solely to "re-trained post-training." The update also marks the official debut of DeepSeek's self-developed Agent framework, "Harness." The move signals DeepSeek's strategic push to position its cost-effective Flash model as a competitive base for Agent applications—scenarios requiring autonomous planning, tool usage, and complex task execution—where inference speed and cost are critical. By natively supporting OpenAI's Responses API format and adapting for code-generation scenarios, DeepSeek aims not just to be a cheaper alternative but to establish its own ecosystem in the Agent era. This release follows DeepSeek's record-breaking ~$50 billion fundraising round roughly two months prior, underscoring market confidence in its technology and commercialization prospects. The company is reportedly preparing for another funding round at a valuation of approximately $71 billion. The Flash model's advancement represents a step in fulfilling the high expectations that come with this valuation, setting the stage for the impending release of the V4-Pro official version and intensifying competition in the global Agent landscape.

marsbitHace 11 min(s)

DeepSeek V4 Official Version Arrives, New Capabilities Emerge, Value-for-Money King Enters the Fray

marsbitHace 11 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片