What’s next as GENIUS Act misses first major rulemaking deadline?

ambcryptoPublicado a 2026-07-18Actualizado a 2026-07-18

Resumen

The GENIUS Act, the U.S. stablecoin framework passed in July 2027, has missed its first major rulemaking deadline. Regulators, including the Federal Reserve, were required to finalize rules by July 18, 2027, but none of the 10 related proposals have been officially completed. Six are past the comment period, while four remain open. Federal Reserve Chairman Kevin Warsh indicated final rules could be issued imminently. The banking industry has expressed concerns about the legislation creating an uneven playing field. Despite the regulatory delay, the stablecoin market has responded positively, with total supply growing from $250 billion to over $300 billion since the law's passage, and firms like Fidelity launching new offerings. Senator Bill Hagerty, a co-sponsor, hailed the act as a "watershed moment" for U.S. leadership in digital assets.

The U.S. stablecoin framework, the GENIUS Act, has hit the initial deadline of the 18th of July. Passed into law on the 18th of July 2027, the framework set multiple milestones for its progressive enactment.

For the first year after passage, regulators, including the Federal Reserve and the OCC, were mandated to finalize rulemakings for the GENIUS Act by the 18th of July, 2027.

In 18 months, or by January 2027, the framework should begin taking effect after the regulators publish final rules.

Finally, the transition period will end after three years, by mid-2028. After this, there will be no firm allowed to offer or handle stablecoins in the U.S. without GENIUS Act compliance.

Why are the final rules delayed?

Six regulators have issued 10 rulemaking proposals related to the law. But none of the proposals have been officially completed, at least as of writing. Only six of the proposals have closed their comment period, meaning the regulators could issue final rulings for them.

Source: Paradigm

Still, four other proposals, including Bank Secrecy Act and sanction compliance for FDIC-supervised stablecoin issuers, are still open for comment.

In other words, despite hitting the rulemaking deadline, the GENIUS Act was still far from finalizing key rules.

What’s next for the GENIUS Act?

However, it’s worth noting that in a recent Congress hearing, Kevin Warsh, the chairman of the Federal Reserve, said that the final rules could be issued soon.

We’re racing to put that out (GENIUS Act final rules) by this deadline, this Saturday.

For the banking industry, which has opposed the legislation due to the stablecoin yield loophole, it called for a review of the proposed rules to avoid.

Uneven playing field or opportunities for regulatory arbitrage, unintended policy consequences, or unworkable or incongruous requirements.

How has the stablecoin market responded?

The GENIUS Act is the first formal stablecoins framework in the U.S that aims to advance innovation and protect consumers. To achieve this, it has reserve requirements and anti-money laundering provisions.

Commenting on the legislation, Senator Bill Hagerty, who co-sponsored it, said,

The United States has the first comprehensive federal framework for payment stablecoins, positioning America not just to participate in the digital asset economy, but to lead it. It was a watershed moment, and it’s only the beginning.

Source: X

Since the law, the stablecoin market supply surged from $250B to over $300B. Even several firms like Fidelity have begun their stablecoin offerings.

Additionally, some crypto platforms like Phantom recorded a 20% increase in stablecoin balance from $2.33B to $2.82B since the GENIUS Act was passed.

It remains to be seen how the growth will accelerate when regulators publish final rules as the legislation enters its second year.


Final SummaryThe

  • GENIUS Act has entered its second year, but final rules will likely stretch beyond the rulemaking deadline
  • Stablecoin market supply increased by over $50B after legislation became law, with Sen. Hagerty calling ‘watershed moment’

Criptos en tendencia

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the first major rulemaking deadline that the GENIUS Act has missed, and who was responsible for meeting it?

AThe first major rulemaking deadline was July 18, 2027. Regulators, including the Federal Reserve and the OCC, were mandated to finalize rules for the GENIUS Act by this date, but none of the proposals have been officially completed.

QAccording to the article, what are two key reasons why the final rules for the GENIUS Act have been delayed?

ATwo reasons for the delay are: 1) Only six out of ten rulemaking proposals have closed their comment period, meaning regulators could only potentially issue final rules for those. 2) Four proposals, including those on Bank Secrecy Act and sanction compliance for FDIC-supervised issuers, are still open for comment.

QWhat specific market impact has the passage of the GENIUS Act had on the stablecoin sector?

ASince the GENIUS Act became law, the stablecoin market supply has surged from $250 billion to over $300 billion, an increase of over $50 billion. Firms like Fidelity have launched stablecoin offerings, and platforms like Phantom saw a 20% increase in stablecoin balances.

QWhat did Federal Reserve Chairman Kevin Warsh recently indicate about the timing of the final rules for the GENIUS Act?

AIn a recent Congress hearing, Federal Reserve Chairman Kevin Warsh said that the final rules could be issued soon, stating, "We're racing to put that out (GENIUS Act final rules) by this deadline, this Saturday."

QWhat is the banking industry's primary concern regarding the GENIUS Act, as mentioned in the article?

AThe banking industry opposes the legislation due to the stablecoin yield loophole. They have called for a review of the proposed rules to avoid an uneven playing field, opportunities for regulatory arbitrage, unintended policy consequences, or unworkable requirements.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Amidst Capital's Encirclement, Decentralization is the Sole Defense for Public Blockchains

In a landscape dominated by power and profit motives, the author argues that decentralization is not merely one desirable feature among many in blockchain design—it is the singular, non-negotiable defense against corporate and capital capture. The article adopts a Machiavellian, realist perspective on human institutions, positing that businesses will inevitably attempt to co-opt any valuable network to protect their profits and dominance. While external attacks like 51% forks are often discussed, the greater existential risk is internal capture—the gradual erosion of a protocol’s neutrality by vested interests, as seen historically with platforms like Visa and Google. The piece critiques permissioned chains, highly centralized “permissionless” layer-1s, and layer-2s without sufficient decentralization (e.g., single sequencers) as inherently vulnerable. These compromised systems, promoted by established financial players, are framed as delaying tactics to stifle truly open networks that threaten existing high-fee, inefficient business models. Real-world examples, such as closed enterprise consortiums that exclude competitors, illustrate how such systems cement oligopolies rather than foster innovation. The author concludes that while decentralized protocols like Ethereum are imperfect and costly to operate, they represent the only viable long-term equilibrium. In a market where value naturally flows to the most secure and neutral settlement layer, only maximally decentralized public blockchains can resist being subsumed by capital and powerful incumbents.

Foresight NewsHace 11 min(s)

Amidst Capital's Encirclement, Decentralization is the Sole Defense for Public Blockchains

Foresight NewsHace 11 min(s)

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

Bitcoin's governance is once again at the center of a heated debate, this time ignited by BIP-110, the "Reduced Data Temporary Softfork." This proposal aims to curb non-monetary data (like inscriptions and Runes) by introducing seven new consensus-layer restrictions over a year, such as limiting new output scripts to 34 bytes and restoring the OP_RETURN cap to 83 bytes. The controversy stems from BIP-110's fundamental shift: it moves the battle against "spam" from node relay and miner policies to the consensus layer, rendering currently valid transactions invalid. Supporters, arguing that default policy governance has failed (highlighted by Bitcoin Core v30's relaxation of OP_RETURN limits), see this as necessary to protect node resources and Bitcoin's monetary focus. Opponents, led by figures like Michael Saylor and Adam Back, warn it dangerously centralizes governance. Saylor listed 110 reasons against it, criticizing its low 55% miner activation threshold and potential for chain splits. Back emphasized Bitcoin's "permissionless" ethos, arguing no single group should impose value judgments via consensus rules. Further complicating matters, technical critiques suggest BIP-110 may be technically circumventable, and a "BlockSlop" vulnerability in its upgrade path poses a consensus risk. The debate has drawn in diverse stakeholders: miners (with pools like Ocean signaling support and Foundry polling clients), node operators (like Bitcoin Knots), and new players like corporate treasury holder MicroStrategy (Saylor), whose market influence adds a novel dimension. Ultimately, BIP-110 acts as a governance stress test, exposing the unresolved question: who decides Bitcoin's rules? It pits the authority of miners, node operators, developers, and capital holders against each other, with each side claiming to defend Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and security.

marsbitHace 27 min(s)

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

marsbitHace 27 min(s)

Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

Title: Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate A new technical proposal, BIP-110 (Reduced Data Temporary Softfork), has sparked a fundamental governance debate within the Bitcoin community. It aims to impose new consensus rules for one year to limit non-financial data (like inscriptions and Runes) on-chain, moving beyond simple node and miner policy filters to invalidate currently valid transactions. Supporters argue that default policies have failed due to workarounds, necessitating consensus-layer changes to protect Bitcoin's core monetary function from data spam. Critics, including Michael Saylor and Adam Back, contend this dangerously centralizes judgment, undermines permissionlessness, and sets a risky governance precedent. They advocate for market-based solutions like fees or Layer 2s instead. The debate exposes deeper tensions: miners are divided on activation; node operators assert their sovereignty; Bitcoin Core developers influence defaults without direct accountability; and large corporate holders like MicroStrategy now wield narrative influence. Technically, BIP-110 may not fully block data and carries a disclosed consensus bug risk. Ultimately, BIP-110 acts as a stress test, forcing the community to confront the unresolved question: who legitimately decides what Bitcoin is and how it evolves, amidst competing claims from miners, nodes, developers, and capital holders.

链捕手Hace 39 min(s)

Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

链捕手Hace 39 min(s)

Zcash's New Node Zakura Goes Live: Privacy Payments Can Reach 50,000 TPS, Aiming to Rival Visa and Mastercard

Zcash, a privacy-focused cryptocurrency, has launched a new full node software called Zakura version 1.0.0. Developed by Zcash co-founder Sean Bowe and Dev Ojha, with private ZEC donations, its goal is to enable Zcash to process over 50,000 transactions per second (TPS)—matching the scale of Visa and Mastercard—while maintaining full transaction privacy and verifiability. This addresses a key bottleneck, as Zcash currently handles only about 1 private transaction per second. Zakura is a fork of the Zcash Foundation's Zebra node. It features chain pruning and snapshots, reducing disk usage and allowing new nodes to sync in under two minutes. It also offers compatibility with the legacy `zcashd` client interface. The scalability challenge stems from the large data size of privacy proofs. Bowe's Tachyon project aims to use recursive proofs to reduce consensus-layer data needs from ~500 MB/s to ~100 MB/s. For wallet scalability, Valar Group is researching Private Information Retrieval (PIR) tech to allow wallets to fetch their data privately. Zakura supports fast block propagation and the upcoming "Ironwood" network upgrade (NU6.3), scheduled for activation around July 28th. Ironwood was created to contain a critical inflation bug discovered in the Orchard shielded pool in May 2024. The fix uses "turnstiles" to trap any counterfeit ZEC created during the vulnerability period within the shielded pool, preventing it from entering circulation and restoring supply integrity.

marsbitHace 54 min(s)

Zcash's New Node Zakura Goes Live: Privacy Payments Can Reach 50,000 TPS, Aiming to Rival Visa and Mastercard

marsbitHace 54 min(s)

Trading

Spot

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar GENIUS

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar Genius (GENIUS) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar Genius (GENIUS) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu Genius (GENIUS)Después de comprar tu Genius (GENIUS), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear Genius (GENIUS)Tradear fácilmente con Genius (GENIUS) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

353 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2026.04.29Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Cómo comprar GENIUS

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de GENIUS (GENIUS).

活动图片