What to Expect from the Crypto Market: How the Conflict Between Trump and the Fed Will Affect Prices

RBK-cryptoPublicado a 2026-01-12Actualizado a 2026-01-12

Resumen

RBC Crypto presents an analysis by Anatoly Radchenko on the state of the cryptocurrency market as of January 12th. The key focus is the conflict between former US President Donald Trump and Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell. Trump is pressuring the Fed to cut interest rates to provide cheaper credit, but Powell is resisting, leading to a reported criminal investigation. This political tension is causing the US dollar to weaken and is boosting gold and silver prices. Such pressure on the Fed and broader geopolitical risks (involving China-Taiwan, Iran-Israel, Venezuela, Cuba) are generally unfavorable for cryptocurrencies, as Middle East escalations have historically not benefited the asset class. Regarding market performance, Bitcoin (BTC) is trading around $90.5k, down 2.5% for the week. It is underperforming compared to Ethereum and Solana. Large holders continue to sell, and there is uncertainty around purchases by entities like Michael Saylor's Strategy company. Privacy coins like Monero (XMR) are seeing interest, but their performance is tied to the overall market strength of BTC and ETH. While positive narratives exist, such as Wells Fargo's $300 million Bitcoin purchase and rumors of crypto trading on Elon Musk's X platform, the analyst assesses the overall picture as negative. He states there is no strong catalyst for a rapid price increase, despite some investors accumulating BTC. The market lacks a convincing reason for a significant rally in the near term.

"RBC-Crypto" does not provide investment advice; the material is published for informational purposes only. Cryptocurrency is a volatile asset that may lead to financial losses.

The current state of the crypto market and the factors that will influence cryptocurrency prices in the coming days—all of this was discussed by Anatoly Radchenko, author of the Telegram channel "Financial Circle," in a new video on January 12, recorded specifically for participants of the RBC Crypto Forum.

"Not in Favor of Cryptocurrency"

Radchenko called the most important news of recent days the statements by US Federal Reserve (Fed) Chairman Jerome Powell that a criminal investigation has been launched against him because the Fed is not lowering the key interest rate as US President Donald Trump wants, while Trump claims he has no involvement in this investigation. The expert noted that against this backdrop, the US dollar is falling, while gold and silver prices are rising.

"Trump has long said that Powell is too slow to lower the rate at a time when America, to become great, needs cheap credit, needs to build factories... But according to market estimates, the Fed does not plan to lower the rate in January," the analyst said.

The market "does not like" it when pressure is put on the Fed chairman, Radchenko noted. He pointed out that the American market is slightly down, but this is more of a rotation of funds, with investors moving capital from one sector to others. Big tech is being sold off slightly, while oil and the real sector are growing a bit, the analyst said. He added that some market participants are buying what hasn't yet risen in price, while others are trying to hedge against potential risks.

And there are many risks, according to Radchenko—China and Taiwan, Iran and Israel, Venezuela, Cuba, and in all these situations—the US is involved. Radchenko recalled that "as we have already seen several years ago, any escalation of conflict in the Middle East or with China, as a rule, is not in favor of cryptocurrency."

What's Happening in the Crypto Market

Radchenko noted several new cryptocurrencies he is tracking and also drew attention to the rise of Monero (XMR) and the pullback of Zcash (ZEC). In the analyst's opinion, there is interest in privacy coins—"everyone wants private money." Nevertheless, if Bitcoin and Ethereum do not rise, then anonymous cryptocurrencies will also perform very weakly, the expert believes.

According to him, among the major coins, Solana is performing better, "Ether" looks good, and Bitcoin is the weakest. Uncertainty remains regarding Bitcoin purchases by Michael Saylor's company Strategy; large holders continue to sell, and speculators are trying to find a new narrative for growth, Radchenko believes.

As of 14:30 Moscow time on January 12, the price of BTC is fluctuating around $90.5K, the same as 24 hours ago. Over the week, Bitcoin has fallen by 2.5%.

"Many Narratives, But No Strong One"

The purchase of $300 million worth of Bitcoin by the major US bank Wells Fargo, rumors about the possible introduction of crypto trading on Elon Musk's social network X—there are quite a few positive narratives, says Radchenko. Nevertheless, in his assessment, the overall picture is negative, and there is no strong catalyst for growth.

Bitcoin started the year very well, and some investors assume that, against the backdrop of money depreciation, rising stocks, and prices for metals and commodities, the leading cryptocurrency will continue to rise, the analyst says. But he also noted that active selling of BTC is still occurring during the American trading session.

Some market participants are possibly "buying Bitcoin little by little," the expert believes. However, he thinks there is no convincing reason for a rapid rise in the cryptocurrency's price.

In Buryatia, a "mining truck" stole electricity worth 3 million rubles.

From $130K to $53.4 million for Bitcoin. VanEck's forecasts until 2050.

What will happen to cryptocurrency market regulation in Russia in 2026.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main reason for the current negative sentiment in the cryptocurrency market according to Anatoly Radchenko?

AThe main reason is the political conflict between former US President Donald Trump and Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell, which has created market uncertainty and is generally unfavorable for cryptocurrency.

QHow did the expert, Radchenko, describe the performance of major cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum?

AHe stated that among the major coins, Solana is performing better, Ethereum looks good, and Bitcoin is the weakest.

QWhat geopolitical risks did the analyst mention that could negatively impact the cryptocurrency market?

AHe mentioned the conflicts and tensions involving China and Taiwan, Iran and Israel, Venezuela, and Cuba, noting that any escalation in these areas, which involve the US, is typically not favorable for cryptocurrency.

QWhat was the price of Bitcoin at the time of the report on January 12th, and what was its weekly change?

AThe price of Bitcoin was fluctuating around $90.5 thousand, and it had fallen by 2.5% over the previous week.

QDespite several positive narratives, why does the analyst believe there is no strong catalyst for a rapid price increase in cryptocurrencies?

AHe believes there is no convincing reason for a rapid rise because, overall, the market picture is negative, with active selling of BTC during the US trading session and a lack of a powerful growth stimulus.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Apple Also Has to Pay Rent Now

Apple Pays Rent Too: The Two-Way Flow of "Traffic Tax" and "AI Capability Rent" Between Tech Giants For over two decades, Google has paid Apple an estimated $20 billion annually to remain the default search engine on Safari, a "traffic tax" for a critical user entry point. However, in 2026, the direction of this cash flow partially reversed. Apple agreed to pay Google roughly $1 billion per year to license its Gemini AI models, as Apple's own models reportedly struggled with complex tasks. This creates a unique dynamic: Apple acts as the "landlord" in the established search ecosystem, collecting rent from Google for access. Simultaneously, in the emerging AI arena, Apple becomes the "tenant," paying Google for access to cutting-edge AI capabilities it cannot currently match internally. While Apple claims its new models are "distilled" from Gemini outputs and contain "not a drop" of Google's original code, core dependencies remain. Its knowledge base is refined using Gemini's outputs, and its most powerful cloud model runs on Google's infrastructure. Apple has structured the deal as non-exclusive, allowing it to theoretically switch AI suppliers—a hedge against over-reliance. The future hinges on whether advanced AI models become a commodity (cheap and abundant) or remain a concentrated, scarce resource (expensive and controlled by few). Apple is betting on the former, leveraging its massive device ecosystem to be a powerful, choosy customer. If the latter proves true, its bargaining power could erode. This power dynamic is extending to developers. Apple, Google, and WeChat are all pushing for apps to expose their core functions as standardized "actions" or "intents" that their respective AI assistants (Siri, Gemini, WeChat AI) can directly call. The new scarce resource is no longer just app store visibility, but "being selected by the AI." The currency of "rent" has changed from a 30% revenue share to ceding control over how users interact with an app's functions.

marsbitHace 42 min(s)

Apple Also Has to Pay Rent Now

marsbitHace 42 min(s)

Missed the SpaceX IPO? WEEX's "First Trade Protection" Lets You Experience US Stock Trading Risk-Free.

With the excitement around SpaceX's recent public listing reigniting interest in the US stock market, Chinese investors face significant challenges accessing compliant and convenient trading channels following regulatory actions against major online brokers. This article explores the available options, highlighting their risks and limitations. Traditional paths for US stock investments remain problematic. Qualified Domestic Institutional Investor (QDII) and Listed Open-Ended Fund (LOF) products, while compliant, suffer from high fees, significant purchase premiums, and a very limited selection of assets. Small, unregulated offshore brokers pose substantial risks, including potential insolvency. While secure, VIP accounts at banks in Hong Kong or Singapore require high minimum deposits (often 1-2 million RMB) and in-person visits, placing them out of reach for most retail investors. The article positions cryptocurrency exchanges, specifically their TradFi (traditional finance on-chain) offerings, as a compelling alternative. Platforms like WEEX are noted for providing access to a wide range of US stocks and ETFs, including SpaceX (SPCXON), through tokenized assets. This method offers advantages such as a single account for both crypto and traditional assets, USDT-based settlement avoiding fiat complexities, flexible leverage, and robust risk management. To attract users, WEEX is promoting a "First Trade Guarantee" campaign. Running from June 15 to July 8 (UTC+8), it features a $30,000 prize pool. Users who trade $500 worth of US stock contracts can qualify for a guarantee on their first eligible trade: 100% loss coverage up to $30 or a 20% bonus on profits up to $30. The campaign is presented as a low-risk opportunity for both crypto natives and traditional investors to experience US stock trading.

marsbitHace 43 min(s)

Missed the SpaceX IPO? WEEX's "First Trade Protection" Lets You Experience US Stock Trading Risk-Free.

marsbitHace 43 min(s)

How Difficult is Chip Making? A Division Error Costs 475 Million Dollars

How Hard Is It to Make a Chip? A Division Error Cost $475 Million Chip expert Shi Kan, a researcher at the Chinese Academy of Sciences and a popular tech creator, explains the immense challenges of chip development. Chips are foundational to modern technology, but their creation is extraordinarily difficult. The journey from sand to a functional chip involves complex design and manufacturing, but a critical bottleneck is verification—ensuring the design works flawlessly before costly production. A single, undetected bug can have catastrophic consequences, as illustrated by the infamous 1994 Intel Pentium FDIV bug. A flaw in the floating-point division unit forced a recall costing $475 million. Unlike software, chips cannot be easily patched after manufacture, making "first-time success" paramount. However, industry surveys show only 24% of chip projects achieve this; over three-quarters require at least one costly re-spin due to design flaws. Verification has thus become the dominant phase, consuming up to 70% of the design cycle. The core challenge is a "verification impossible triangle" between high performance, good debuggability, and low cost. Exhaustively verifying a modern CPU core could take 15,000 years with software simulation, or 30 years with advanced hardware emulation—timeframes utterly impractical for development. Despite being essential, verification is often seen as unglamorous "dirty work," receiving less academic attention than fields like AI. Shi and his team are tackling this by developing an agile verification research framework called ENCORE, based on FPGA technology, to improve verification efficiency and debug capability. Beyond research, Shi engages in public science communication through long-form video content, aiming to demystify chip technology, AI, and computer science. He argues for the value of pursuing "hard and long-term" endeavors, whether in the meticulous world of chip verification or in creating substantive educational content, believing such sustained effort is likely the right path forward.

marsbitHace 53 min(s)

How Difficult is Chip Making? A Division Error Costs 475 Million Dollars

marsbitHace 53 min(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片