What The New On-Chain Lending Amendment Means For XRP

bitcoinistPublicado a 2026-01-29Actualizado a 2026-01-29

Resumen

The XRP Ledger has advanced its financial capabilities with the release of version 3.1.0, introducing a native on-chain lending feature now in the validator voting phase. This update includes the critical "fixBatchInnerSigs" amendment, which addresses a signature validation flaw to ensure secure batch processing for lending operations. The new protocol will enable fixed-rate, fixed-term lending and borrowing for XRP, RLUSD, and other on-chain assets, using Single Asset Vaults to isolate risk and mirror traditional finance lending. However, activation requires over 80% validator approval sustained for two weeks, a threshold not yet met. This amendment is part of XRPL's ongoing upgrades to enhance utility and institutional adoption.

The XRP Ledger has taken another step toward expanding its financial functionality with the rollout of XRPL version 3.1.0. Shortly after the update went live, the network formally pushed its native on-chain lending feature into the validator voting phase, a feature that could boost the ledger’s capabilities and attract more institutional use.

A Technical Fix With Multiple Implications

The XRP Ledger has had major improvements with the latest release of RippleD (xrplD) v3.1.0. According to notes of the release, the latest release contains the fix of fixBatchInnerSigs and new amendments of SingleAssetVault and LendingProtocol, both of which must be enabled for the Lending Protocol to be fully usable.

Among the elements included in the v3.1.0 release, one stands out for its potential impact on lending protocols. The “fixBatchInnerSigs” amendment corrects a signature validation flaw in the batch transaction mechanism of the Ledger. Since lending operations often involve multiple steps, such as checking collateral, moving funds, and updating balances, there is a need to make sure that these actions run securely.

The fixBatchInnerSigs amendment seeks to make these batch processes safe and dependable, clearing a technical hurdle that might have deterred larger lending applications until now. The new protocol will include fixed-rate, fixed-term credit at the ledger level, using Single Asset Vaults to isolate risk and replicate TradFi lending protocols.

As noted by the Ledger validator Vet on the social media platform X, the lending protocol will allow for native on-chain lending and borrowing for XRP, RLUSD, and any other issued asset on-chain. This approach would allow users and institutions to access credit using XRP or RLUSD, while reducing the complexity and additional risk layers that often come with third-party contract systems.

That said, the amendment has not yet been activated. It is currently open for validator voting, a process that requires more than 80% of trusted validators to vote in favor and maintain that level of support for two consecutive weeks before activation can occur. As of the time of writing, the approval threshold has not yet been reached, meaning there isn’t a defined timeline for the amendment to go live.

XRPL’s Continued Path Of Network Upgrades

Developers are always rolling in updates and amendments as part of efforts to bolster the XRP ecosystem and its real-world utility. Notably, these recent amendments come on the heels of five other amendments that were announced in December 2025. Node operators running versions earlier than 3.0 have been advised to upgrade to version 3.1.0, as remaining on older software will eventually prevent them from maintaining communication with the network.

Validators are still in the process of voting on the permissionless domains proposal. Current voting trends show validators are already voting for approval. If momentum holds, the amendment is expected to pass on February 4, 2026.

XRP trading at $1.87 on the 1D chart | Source: XRPUSDT on Tradingview.com

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main purpose of the new XRPL version 3.1.0 update?

AThe main purpose of XRPL version 3.1.0 is to expand the ledger's financial functionality by introducing a native on-chain lending feature and fixing technical issues like the signature validation flaw in the batch transaction mechanism.

QWhat specific technical flaw does the 'fixBatchInnerSigs' amendment address?

AThe 'fixBatchInnerSigs' amendment corrects a signature validation flaw in the batch transaction mechanism of the XRP Ledger, ensuring that multi-step lending operations are secure and reliable.

QWhich assets will be supported by the new on-chain lending protocol?

AThe lending protocol will support native on-chain lending and borrowing for XRP, RLUSD, and any other issued assets on the XRP Ledger.

QWhat is the current status of the lending protocol amendment and how is it get activated?

AThe amendment is currently in the validator voting phase. It requires more than 80% of trusted validators to vote in favor and maintain that support for two consecutive weeks before activation can occur.

QWhat was the previous major update to the XRP Ledger mentioned in the article?

AThe previous major update mentioned was the announcement of five other amendments in December 2025, which preceded these recent updates in version 3.1.0.

Lecturas Relacionadas

GitHub, Transfixed by AI

On the night of February 9th, GitHub suffered a major outage caused by a simple configuration change—reducing a cache refresh interval from 12 to 2 hours—that triggered a cascade of failures. This was not an isolated event, but part of a broader pattern. In early 2026, GitHub experienced at least 8 major incidents, failing to meet its promised 99.9% availability. These outages stemmed from structural issues: explosive growth in load, tight service coupling, and insufficient protection against abnormal traffic. This unprecedented load is driven by AI Agents. In 2025, GitHub handled ~1 billion commits. By 2026, weekly commits reached 275 million, projecting to ~14 billion for the year—a 14x increase. AI tools like Claude Code now contribute 4.5% of all public repository commits, with weekly submissions surging 25x in just three months. AI-generated pull requests jumped from 4 million to 17 million per month in half a year. Unlike human developers, AI Agents work continuously, generating commits at a scale that overwhelms infrastructure designed for human rhythms. The surge also shattered GitHub's business model. Copilot's flat-rate pricing, based on assisting human developers, became unsustainable as Agentic AI sessions consumed resources worth hundreds of dollars for a few dollars in fees. In response, GitHub imposed usage limits and, by June 1st, shifted to a pay-per-use "AI Credits" system. Facing this new reality, GitHub realized a 10x scaling plan was insufficient. It announced a need to *redesign* its architecture for 30x current scale—decoupling services, adding fault isolation, and improving change management to prevent cascading failures. Other platforms like Stripe and AWS are facing similar challenges with AI Agents. Fundamentally, GitHub is transitioning from a human collaboration platform to an "exhaust pipe" for automated AI workflows. Its detailed post-mortem reports aim to maintain trust during this turbulent rebuild. The February outage was not just a technical glitch, but a signal of the software industry's entry into a new, AI-driven era.

marsbitHace 4 min(s)

GitHub, Transfixed by AI

marsbitHace 4 min(s)

Both Suffer Massive Losses Exceeding $90 Billion, Which Is in Greater Peril: Strategy or Bitmine?

Facing massive paper losses exceeding $90 billion each amidst a sharp market downturn, "Digital Asset Treasury" (DAT) giants Strategy and Bitmine find themselves in a precarious position, but with different underlying risks. Strategy, heavily invested in Bitcoin (BTC), faces significant financial strain. Its strategy relies heavily on debt, including convertible notes and preferred stock (STRC) requiring substantial dividend payments. With its cash reserves dwindling and BTC offering no staking yield for cash flow, Strategy's high leverage makes it vulnerable. A continued price decline could force asset sales to meet obligations, potentially creating a negative feedback loop. Its market value has already fallen sharply. In contrast, Bitmine, an Ethereum (ETH) holder, appears on firmer financial ground. It primarily funds its purchases through equity offerings (like ATM programs), avoiding debt pressure. It also generates income by staking a large portion of its ETH holdings. While not immune to market drops and shareholder dilution concerns, Bitmine maintains more flexibility, recently announcing a new preferred share offering to raise further capital. The core divergence lies in their financing: Bitmine uses equity (investor money), while Strategy uses debt (borrowed money). Consequently, Bitmine currently faces less immediate liquidity pressure than Strategy, which must navigate the dual challenge of servicing debt/dividends and a declining core asset (BTC) price.

marsbitHace 11 min(s)

Both Suffer Massive Losses Exceeding $90 Billion, Which Is in Greater Peril: Strategy or Bitmine?

marsbitHace 11 min(s)

Where the AI Bubble Really Is: Which Layer of Players Are Naked

AI Bubble: Where It Really Is and Who's Swimming Naked This analysis dissects the AI industry not as a single entity but as a five-layer pyramid, arguing that bubbles are concentrated in specific tiers, not uniformly distributed. **Key Distinction from the 2000 Dot-com Bubble:** Unlike 2000, where companies had stock prices before revenue, today's leading AI players have massive, contract-backed revenue driving their valuations. Core infrastructure demand is real, with every GPU running at full capacity for paying customers. **The Five-Layer Pyramid & Bubble Assessment:** * **L0 (Fab/Manufacturing) & Top L4 (Leading AI Apps): NO BUBBLE.** Companies like TSMC, NVIDIA, major cloud providers (Microsoft, Google, Meta, Amazon), and top AI labs have real revenues and orders. Supply is tightly constrained by TSMC's disciplined capacity control and physical limits like power/land for data centers, preventing a supply glut. * **L1 (Memory): BATTLEGROUND.** Sky-high HBM margins could signal a new structural cycle or a classic "boom before bust." The oligopoly of three major players may enforce supply discipline, making this a high-stakes bet. * **L2 (Interconnect/Optical Modules): BUBBLE TERRITORY.** Companies like Lumentum and AAOI have seen stock surges (4-10x) far outpacing revenue growth. This hardware segment has lower physical barriers to expansion than fabs, allowing speculation. It mirrors the 2000 bubble's epicenter—optics. * **L3 (Infrastructure/"GPU Landlords"): VULNERABLE.** GPU leasing companies profit from the current compute shortage but own no long-term moat. Their business model relies on a temporary bottleneck that will ease as big tech expands and new tech (e.g., potential space-based data centers) emerges. * **L4 Long Tail (VC-backed Startups): STRONG BUBBLE SIGNALS.** VC funding concentration in AI is twice that of the 1999 peak. Many startups with little revenue use the valuation logic of successful giants to justify their own, creating high risk of a "valuation crunch" when funding dries up. **Critical Risks to Monitor:** 1. **GPU Depreciation & Accounting:** Companies extending the assumed useful life of GPUs artificially boost profits. The true economic life depends on future generational leaps from NVIDIA. 2. **"GPU Credit" & Off-Balance-Sheet Leverage:** Emerging structures where shell companies borrow to buy GPUs and lease them out (with chipmakers sometimes investing) move debt off major balance sheets. This echoes the "vendor financing" of 2000 and the securitization risks of 2008, though currently small-scale. 3. **TSMC Abandoning Caution:** If the primary supply bottleneck (TSMC's conservative capacity planning) breaks, runaway supply could trigger a bust. 4. **Algorithmic Efficiency Breakthrough:** A major leap in software efficiency could drastically reduce the need for raw compute hardware, undermining the investment thesis. **Conclusion:** The AI boom is expensive and has frothy areas, but its core is underpinned by real demand and physical supply constraints. The bubble risk is layered: most present in optical components, GPU leasing, and the long-tail startup ecosystem, while the foundational chip manufacturing and leading application layers remain relatively solid—for now.

marsbitHace 24 min(s)

Where the AI Bubble Really Is: Which Layer of Players Are Naked

marsbitHace 24 min(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros

Artículos destacados

Qué es XRP 2.0

XRP 2.0: Una Nueva Frontera en el Panorama de las Criptomonedas Introducción a XRP 2.0 En el siempre cambiante ámbito de las criptomonedas, nuevos proyectos surgen continuamente, compitiendo por atención y adopción. Una de estas iniciativas prometedoras es XRP 2.0, un nuevo proyecto de criptomoneda diseñado para aprovechar la tecnología blockchain avanzada y metodologías de encriptación robustas. Aunque el nombre establece paralelismos con el XRP de Ripple, es crucial señalar que XRP 2.0 opera de manera independiente, enfocándose en mejorar la seguridad de las transacciones, la privacidad y la escalabilidad. A medida que el panorama financiero digital abraza cada vez más soluciones descentralizadas, XRP 2.0 busca contribuir de manera significativa a web3 y a la expansión general de los proyectos de criptomonedas. ¿Qué es XRP 2.0? En esencia, XRP 2.0 es un proyecto de criptomoneda que busca crear un ecosistema de moneda digital seguro y descentralizado. Su tecnología fundamental integra principios avanzados de blockchain con técnicas de encriptación de vanguardia. El objetivo principal de XRP 2.0 es establecerse como una plataforma confiable y eficiente que permita la ejecución rápida de transacciones mientras prioriza la protección de la privacidad de sus usuarios. El proyecto se promociona como una solución a muchas limitaciones enfrentadas por las criptomonedas existentes, proponiendo un sistema que puede manejar un mayor volumen de transacciones con mejor velocidad y privacidad. Esta versatilidad posiciona a XRP 2.0 como un competidor significativo en un mercado plagado de diversas monedas digitales. ¿Quién es el Creador de XRP 2.0? La identidad del creador detrás de XRP 2.0 ha sido señalada como 'Wilbur.' Sin embargo, los detalles completos sobre Wilbur o su entidad asociada siguen siendo elusivos. La anonimidad de muchos creadores de criptomonedas no es un fenómeno poco común en la industria, a menudo diseñado para mantener un grado de privacidad y seguridad. ¿Quiénes son los Inversores de XRP 2.0? Hasta ahora, la información específica relacionada con las fundaciones o organizaciones de inversión que apoyan a XRP 2.0 no está disponible públicamente. En el sector de las criptomonedas, el respaldo de inversores respetables puede influir significativamente en la credibilidad y el éxito de un proyecto, sin embargo, la transparencia sobre los patrocinadores financieros de XRP 2.0 no se ha establecido. ¿Cómo Funciona XRP 2.0? XRP 2.0 se destaca al emplear una combinación de tecnología blockchain y algoritmos de encriptación avanzados que aseguran transacciones seguras y descentralizadas. Su estructura innovadora incluye características únicas diseñadas para fomentar el compromiso del usuario y ampliar las funcionalidades más allá de las transacciones convencionales de criptomonedas. Entre estas características, XRP 2.0 incorpora capacidades impulsadas por IA, como funcionalidades de texto a imagen y de texto a voz. Estas adiciones están diseñadas para mejorar la experiencia interactiva de los usuarios, promoviendo una mayor aplicabilidad en diversos sectores. Al unir avances tecnológicos con un diseño centrado en el usuario, XRP 2.0 busca captar la atención de una amplia gama de individuos y empresas que buscan integrar soluciones de criptomonedas en sus marcos operativos. Cronología de XRP 2.0 Entender XRP 2.0 requiere examinar los hitos que han definido su viaje hasta ahora: 23 de julio de 2023: Se presenta XRP 2.0 como un nuevo proyecto de criptomonedas, con el objetivo de revolucionar las capacidades de transacciones seguras y descentralizadas en el ámbito de blockchain. 8 de septiembre de 2023: Se lanza otro proyecto, XRP20, marcando la aparición de un token ERC-20 en la blockchain de Ethereum que no guarda relación con XRP 2.0. 13 de noviembre de 2023: El Libro Mayor de XRP experimenta una actualización significativa con el lanzamiento de la versión 2.0.0 del software del servidor rippled. Es esencial señalar que este desarrollo está desconectado del proyecto de criptomonedas XRP 2.0. Puntos Clave sobre XRP 2.0 Para destilar la esencia de XRP 2.0, surgen varios factores críticos: Características Únicas: La inclusión de características como texto a imagen y texto a voz impulsadas por IA diversifica aún más las aplicaciones potenciales de XRP 2.0. Tecnología Blockchain: El marco utiliza mecanismos avanzados de blockchain y protocolos de encriptación, asegurando un entorno seguro y descentralizado para las transacciones. Escalabilidad y Privacidad: XRP 2.0 prioriza la protección mejorada de la privacidad en los procesos de transacción y la escalabilidad necesaria para acomodar una base de usuarios creciente. No Afiliación con Ripple: Es importante destacar que, a pesar de su nombre, XRP 2.0 no tiene ninguna lealtad ni colaboración con el XRP de Ripple, diferenciando su marco operativo y objetivos dentro del ecosistema de criptomonedas. Conclusión XRP 2.0 representa una ambiciosa aventura en la esfera de las criptomonedas, buscando ofrecer una combinación de seguridad, privacidad y eficiencia en las transacciones digitales. Al integrar tecnologías sofisticadas y características amigables para el usuario, el proyecto se propone ampliar los horizontes de lo que la criptomoneda puede lograr en la economía digital de hoy. Si bien la anonimidad de su creador y la falta de inversores revelados pueden generar cuestionamientos para algunos, el enfoque de XRP 2.0 en funcionalidades avanzadas y descentralización realza su atractivo en un mercado de criptomonedas cada vez más abarrotado. A medida que el paisaje de las criptomonedas sigue evolucionando, XRP 2.0 podría emerger como un jugador crucial en la expansión de soluciones blockchain seguras y escalables.

174 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2024.04.05Actualizado en 2024.12.03

Qué es XRP 2.0

Cómo comprar XRP

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar XRP (XRP) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar XRP (XRP) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu XRP (XRP)Después de comprar tu XRP (XRP), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear XRP (XRP)Tradear fácilmente con XRP (XRP) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

1.4k Vistas totalesPublicado en 2024.12.10Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Cómo comprar XRP

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de XRP (XRP).

活动图片