What? Lighter Won't Airdrop Today

Odaily星球日报Publicado a 2025-12-29Actualizado a 2025-12-29

Resumen

Rumors and market sentiment around a potential LIT token airdrop from the decentralized exchange Lighter have shifted dramatically, with prediction platform Polymarket showing the probability of an airdrop on December 29 plummeting from 87% to 25% in just four days. Despite earlier expectations, Lighter team has not released a detailed tokenomics model, and no official TGE or airdrop announcement has been made. Market uncertainty is compounded by Lighter’s aggressive anti-Sybil campaign, which has removed a significant number of suspected bot and wash-trading accounts—reportedly up to 70-90% of studio addresses—sparking community backlash. The lack of transparency in the screening process and unclear appeal mechanisms have further eroded trust. Additionally, concerns are rising over Lighter’s valuation. Pre-launch FDV estimates around $3.3 billion have been met with skepticism due to potential sell pressure from the airdrop (reportedly 25% of total supply, unlocked) and limited initial exchange listings. Despite this, some large traders remain bullish, with open interest on Hyperliquid showing balanced whale activity.

Original | Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author | Golem (@web3_golem)

Data from the prediction platform Polymarket shows that the expected probability of "Lighter will airdrop on December 29" has plummeted from 87% four days ago to 25%, nearly halving.

Although the drop in probability does not directly equate to the cancellation of the airdrop, market sentiment has clearly cooled. As of the time of writing, Lighter has still not announced a detailed token economic model, which doesn't feel at all like the atmosphere leading up to a TGE and airdrop. Interestingly, LIT spot trading is already be seen on the Lighter Staging page today, but no one knows how long this testing phase will last.(Odaily Note: Staging is a pre-release environment in the product development process, situated between the Testing environment and the Production (live) environment, generally seen as the final rehearsal before a product's official launch.)

It is important to note that the Polymarket prediction regarding the Lighter airdrop uses Eastern Time (ET) for settlement. Therefore, for investors in the UTC+8 time zone, for the "Lighter will airdrop on December 29" market to settle as "no," Lighter must not airdrop before 13:00 on December 30. Investors in other time zones should convert the time accordingly.

Although Lighter's Head of Market, Pilla.eth, had previously clearly stated in an AMA that both the TGE and airdrop would occur in 2025, under the influence of panic sentiment, the probability on Polymarket for "Lighter will airdrop before December 31, 2025" has dropped from 94% to 64%. The highly-upvoted analyses from players betting "No" below lack reasonable analysis or insider information, mostly consisting of emotional bets or focusing on semantics:

"It's confirmed that the airdrop will be in 2026"
"I still can't understand why these fools didn't mention TGE at all, and the probability actually reached 94%. This was the worst AMA of my life, wasted 45 minutes listening to a bunch of nonsense, not a single useful piece of information."
"TGE is not the same as an airdrop; they are two different things. There are many examples of this. Read the rules clearly first."
"According to the settlement rules, locked tokens or non-tradable tokens do not qualify as conditions for a 'Yes' outcome. Even if the project releases an airdrop checker and shows your allocation, as long as the tokens cannot be freely traded on the market, the result is 'No'."

Of course, besides the unclear airdrop date, Lighter also faces concerns such as anti-sybil questioning and a valuation trap, with several dark clouds looming. Coinciding with the overall market cooling down at the end of the year, any movement from any project will attract extra attention from the community—Lighter's current动向 is可谓 "born at the right time".

The Strictest Anti-Sybil Measures of 2025

Lighter has caught the tailwind of two of the hottest narratives of 2025 (Pre-DEX and RWA), so investors quite看好 it. In early December, market whispers suggested that Lighter would conduct its TGE and airdrop within 2025, further boosting investor enthusiasm. Some users with high积分 even began "popping the champagne halfway through the game" on social media.

Lighter points leader提前发布获奖感言 (pre-releasing a victory speech)

But as the old saying goes, success comes from secrecy, failure from leakage. Many blamed the subsequent stringent sybil screening launched by Lighter on these boastful users (although this might not be the事实).

On December 23, Lighter announced in its official Discord the commencement of a massive sybil screening, removing积分 obtained by sybil addresses, wash trading, and volume manipulation. However, these deducted积分 (including portions already removed) would be redistributed to the community.

The community instantly in an uproar. After Lighter began its sybil screening, large numbers of studio accounts had their积分 deducted. Some bloggers claimed that Lighter's anti-sybil measures were extremely strict, with an estimated 70-90% of studio accounts being caught. Ordinary airdrop farmers were not spared either, with social media filled with "wails of grief".

Some even compared Lighter to the LayerZero of 2025. In 2024, LayerZero identified over 800,000 wallet addresses before its airdrop. Although the number of sybil addresses for Lighter might not be as high as LayerZero's, the severity might be comparable.

Such stringent anti-sybil actions undoubtedly put Lighter at odds with the community.

According to some users flagged as sybils, the reason given by Lighter was simply "abnormal trading," with no further explanation. The sybil rules were not transparent, meaning users didn't even know how they "died."

However, facing community质疑, Lighter's founder and CEO, Vladimir Novakovski, remained confident in this rather arbitrary sybil screening and stated that the anti-sybil algorithm would not be made public. His explanation was "to avoid targeted optimization," and he also mentioned an appeals mechanism was in place, but so far, the number of appeals was much lower than expected.

But some community members didn't believe Vladimir's excuses, suspecting that Lighter's harsh anti-sybil measures were to protect their own insider (rat)仓, and that even the off-market积分 price might have been secretly pumped by the Lighter team.

After all, since ancient times in the crypto world, the principle has been that the biggest airdrops are simple. The more complex the interaction requirements and the stricter the anti-sybil measures, the more likely something fishy is going on. Even peers in the same赛道 as Lighter, like Hyperliquid and Aster, were not this tedious and "stingy" during their airdrops.

The Lighter community currently resembles students checking their exam results after the gaokao (college entrance exam). Every day Lighter continues its sybil screening is another day of煎熬 (agony) for them.

Is the FDV Overvalued?

Amid the already depressed market environment and fueled by negative community sentiment, the market也开始思考 (began to ponder), is Lighter already overvalued?

On Polymarket, the probability for "Lighter's FDV will be greater than $1 billion on the first day of trading" has dropped from 90% to 72%, and the probability for "Lighter's FDV will be greater than $2 billion on the first day of trading" has also fallen from 87% to 68%. This indicates declining market confidence in Lighter's valuation.

Referring to the first-day market capitalizations of the other two major Pre-DEXs (Hyperliquid and Aster), Hyperliquid's FDV was approximately $3.6 billion at its opening on November 29, 2024, while Aster's opening FDV was around $10.8 billion on September 17, 2024. According to Binance Pre-Market data, Lighter's current pre-market FDV is approximately $3.3 billion, having previously peaked at $4.3 billion.

From this perspective, the valuation for Lighter on Polymarket seems reasonable, so why is market confidence still falling?

One reason is that the selling pressure from the airdrop cannot be ignored, especially after Lighter's widespread sybil screening has damaged community goodwill. Most users will likely sell immediately upon receiving the airdrop. According to the Lighter team, the airdrop ratio might be 25% of the total token supply, with no lock-up restrictions. Therefore, the selling pressure from the airdrop will undoubtedly pose significant resistance to any increase in Lighter's market cap.

The second reason is that for a period after the token launch, LIT will only be traded on its own platform and will not主动上线 (actively list on) other exchanges. The Lighter team has also stated that they have not paid listing fees to any trading platform. This means that for some time after launch, Lighter will not have access to the full liquidity of CEXs, thereby limiting the upside potential for the LIT token post-launch.

Nevertheless, some whales remain confident in Lighter. On Hyperliquid, the long-short forces for Lighter are still relatively balanced. Since the pre-market contracts went live, 10 whales with positions exceeding $1 million have entered the market, equally split between longs and shorts.

Andy, founder of The Rollup, also stated that although Lighter's open interest (OI) would likely drop by more than 20% and trading volume could decline by over 30% after the initial token volatility subsides, he would still choose to buy if LIT's fully diluted valuation (FDV) is around $2 billion.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the current probability on Polymarket for Lighter conducting an airdrop on December 29th, and how has it changed?

AThe probability for 'Lighter conducting an airdrop on December 29th' on Polymarket has dropped sharply from 87% four days ago to 25%.

QWhat major action has the Lighter team taken that has caused significant community backlash?

AThe Lighter team has initiated a very strict Sybil screening process, removing points from addresses identified as Sybils, self-trading, and volume farming, which has caused widespread complaints and backlash from the community.

QAccording to the article, what are the two main reasons for the declining market confidence in Lighter's valuation?

AThe two main reasons are: 1) The significant selling pressure expected from the airdrop, especially after the Sybil screening damaged community sentiment. 2) The token will initially only be traded on its own platform, lacking liquidity from centralized exchanges (CEXs), which limits its upside potential.

QWhat is the Fully Diluted Valuation (FDV) of Lighter in the pre-market on Binance, according to the article?

AAccording to Binance's pre-market data, Lighter's current pre-market FDV is approximately $3.3 billion, having previously reached a high of $4.3 billion.

QHow did the Lighter team's CEO, Vladimir Novakovski, justify the decision not to make the anti-Sybil algorithm public?

ACEO Vladimir Novakovski justified the decision by stating that they did not want the algorithm to be 'targetedly optimized' by others, and he expressed confidence in the process, noting that the number of appeals has been lower than expected.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbitHace 6 min(s)

marsbitHace 6 min(s)

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

In 2026, a historic shift occurred in AI as major cloud providers' inference spending surpassed training spending for the first time, signaling a move from "building large models" to "using large models." This shifts the core challenge from computing power to the "memory wall"—the bottleneck of data movement (model weights, activations, KV Cache) between external DRAM and processors, where energy and latency from data transfer far exceed computation itself. Companies like Nvidia face GPU idle time due to bandwidth limits. In contrast, Cerebras Systems adopts a radical "wafer-scale" approach with its Wafer-Scale Engine (WSE). Instead of cutting a silicon wafer into many chips, Cerebras uses almost the entire wafer as one massive chip (WSE-3). This design provides 44GB of on-chip SRAM, delivering memory bandwidth thousands of times higher than traditional HBM (e.g., 21 PB/s vs. Nvidia B200). For LLM inference, weights are streamed layer-by-layer from external MemoryX storage to the chip, avoiding HBM bottlenecks. This results in token generation speeds 1.5–5 times faster than Nvidia's B200 in some models and significant advantages in first-token latency and long-context tasks. Additionally, Cerebras's architecture offers much lower interconnect power consumption (0.15 pJ/bit vs. GPU's ~10 pJ/bit). However, Cerebras faces challenges: SRAM scaling has slowed with advanced nodes, limiting future capacity gains; the chip requires specialized liquid cooling and custom software stacks; and its external I/O bandwidth (150 GB/s) is low compared to NVLink, hindering multi-system scaling for very large models. Competition is intensifying. Major players are pursuing three paths: 1) Developing proprietary inference ASICs (e.g., Google TPU, Microsoft Maia), 2) Leveraging advanced packaging (e.g., TSMC's SoW) to democratize wafer-scale-like integration, potentially eroding Cerebras's process advantage within a few years, and 3) Exploring optical interconnects for ultimate bandwidth. Commercially, Cerebras is transitioning from a hardware vendor to a service provider, facing the immense challenge of building high-power, specialized data centers to meet large contracts (e.g., 250MW/year from 2026–2028). In conclusion, the AI inference era presents a fundamental architectural trade-off. Cerebras opts for extreme physical optimization for low-latency, single-task performance, while Nvidia prioritizes versatility and massive cluster throughput. The path forward remains uncertain, with technology and business models still evolving in the race toward advanced AI.

marsbitHace 11 min(s)

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

marsbitHace 11 min(s)

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

**Title: Has Bitcoin's Rebound Ended, Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?** **Summary:** Bitcoin's price has declined by 13% this week, signaling a potential return to late-stage bear market conditions. The price fell to around $67k, positioned between the Realized Price and Realized Cap Weighted Average. For the first time since early 2022, the Short-Term Holder cost basis has dropped below this key average, confirming a hallmark of late-cycle bear markets. Profitability metrics have collapsed sharply. The 7-day average of the Realized Profit/Loss ratio plummeted from a local high of 3.16 to 0.29, mirroring the February panic sell-off. Critically, the 90-day average never breached the threshold of 2, indicating the recent rally to $82k was a bear market bounce, not a structural shift. Realized losses surged to $1.35 billion daily, with $770 million coming from Long-Term Holders selling at a loss. This accelerating redistribution of supply from weak to strong hands is a necessary but ongoing process for a market bottom. The rally stalled almost precisely at the aggregate cost basis (~$83k) of US spot Bitcoin ETF investors, turning that level into strong resistance and leaving the average ETF holder underwater again. Spot market flows have turned decisively negative, showing sellers are dominating order books despite the price drop. While a significant futures long liquidation event cleared over $400 million in leverage, providing a potential reset, sustained spot demand is yet to materialize. Options markets continue to price in higher future volatility (Implied Volatility) than recent price action (Realized Volatility) has shown, with a persistent skew towards put options, indicating ongoing demand for downside protection. In conclusion, multiple metrics point to a fragile market structure. Resistance at the ETF cost basis, accelerating realized losses, dominant spot selling, and cautious options pricing all suggest the bear market trend persists. A sustainable recovery likely requires a resurgence of spot demand, ETF holders returning to profit, and a clear reduction in selling pressure.

marsbitHace 12 min(s)

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

marsbitHace 12 min(s)

TechFlow Intelligence Agency: Anthropic Calls for Global Pause in AI Development While Preparing for Trillion-Dollar IPO; SpaceX IPO Roadshow Heats Up, But S&P 500 Rejects Fast-Track Inclusion

In today's TechFlow Intelligence Briefing, several major tech stories highlight a growing theme of trust and credibility gaps across AI, crypto, and finance. AI company Anthropic has publicly called for a global pause in AI development, citing risks from Claude's "recursive self-improvement." Ironically, this coincides with reports the company is preparing for a massive IPO targeting a near $1 trillion valuation. This perceived hypocrisy, coupled with widespread user complaints about Claude's declining performance, is sparking debate over whether the safety warning is genuine or a competitive tactic. Meanwhile, in a substantive security move, Anthropic open-sourced a framework for AI-powered vulnerability discovery. In the crypto market, Bitcoin's price drop below $61,000 triggered over $1.16 billion in liquidations, flipping the market into a state where more BTC is held at a loss than at a profit, a historical bearish signal. On the corporate front, SpaceX's highly anticipated IPO is generating immense Wall Street excitement, with Goldman Sachs projecting 100x revenue growth by 2030. However, the S&P 500 has refused to fast-track the company's inclusion post-IPO, potentially limiting immediate institutional demand. Separately, ByteDance's AI app Doubao lost over 6 million monthly active users after introducing a subscription model, highlighting the challenges of AI monetization. Other notable developments include Nvidia certifying HBM4 memory from Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron; Cloudflare's acquisition of front-end tooling company VoidZero; and its CEO warning that bot traffic now exceeds human traffic online. The underlying narrative connects these events: a trust crisis. From AI firms' contradictory actions and crypto volatility to the clash between SpaceX's hyped narrative and institutional rules, a pattern is emerging where stated intentions and actual practices are increasingly misaligned.

marsbitHace 27 min(s)

TechFlow Intelligence Agency: Anthropic Calls for Global Pause in AI Development While Preparing for Trillion-Dollar IPO; SpaceX IPO Roadshow Heats Up, But S&P 500 Rejects Fast-Track Inclusion

marsbitHace 27 min(s)

Dalio Warns: AI Boom Shows Signs of a Bubble, Day of Reckoning Will Be the Time of Burst

Ray Dalio, founder of Bridgewater Associates, warns that the current artificial intelligence investment boom shows classic signs of a bubble, which he expects will eventually burst. In a Bloomberg Television interview, he noted that great technological revolutions often lead to capital inflows that create bubbles, making it difficult for investors and companies to calibrate their spending accurately—either overspending to capture market share or underspending and losing their competitive position. This caution comes amid significant rallies in AI-related assets, particularly chipmakers, driven by soaring demand for data centers and high-bandwidth chips, raising debates about overheating valuations. In contrast, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang recently asserted that investors embracing the AI wave would see "crazy" returns and dismissed concerns over return on investment for data center spending as outdated. Dalio, however, focuses on the risks in the profit realization phase. He argues that bubbles tend to show signs of破裂 when markets transition from investment to the need for tangible returns, describing the burst as a process of converting paper wealth into cash. While acknowledging AI's intrinsic value, he expressed concern over the future profitability of some AI companies, suggesting the market is repeating a familiar pattern. The 76-year-old billionaire, who fully exited Bridgewater in 2025, has a net worth estimated at $21.5 billion according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Dalio Warns: AI Boom Shows Signs of a Bubble, Day of Reckoning Will Be the Time of Burst

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar T

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar Threshold Network Token (T) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar Threshold Network Token (T) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu Threshold Network Token (T)Después de comprar tu Threshold Network Token (T), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear Threshold Network Token (T)Tradear fácilmente con Threshold Network Token (T) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

599 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2024.12.10Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de T (T).