‘We’ll get it done’: White House calls CLARITY Act a regulatory unlock

ambcryptoPublicado a 2026-02-14Actualizado a 2026-02-14

Resumen

The White House, through Trump's digital assets advisor Patrick Witt, expresses strong commitment to passing the CLARITY Act, a crypto market structure bill, before the midterm elections. Witt acknowledges that stablecoin yield remains the key sticking point but believes regulatory clarity is crucial to unlock trillions in institutional capital waiting to enter the crypto space. A third meeting is planned for next week to broker a compromise between crypto and traditional finance industries after some progress was made in recent negotiations. While the U.S. Treasury Secretary notes the bill's positive momentum would boost market sentiment, prediction markets are skeptical, pricing only a 36% chance of passage by June.

The Donald Trump Administration remains committed and hopeful that the crypto market structure bill, the CLARITY Act, could be passed into law before the November midterm elections.

In a recent interview with Yahoo Finance, Patrick Witt, the executive director for the U.S. President’s Council of Advisors for Digital Assets, said,

“Even if we get the CLARITY Act out of the Senate Banking Committee, it needs to be reconciled with the Senate Agriculture Committee’s portion.

He continued,

“Ultimately, there’ll be a cloture vote and a Senate floor passage vote; that’s all it takes time. I believe we’ll get this done.”

However, he acknowledged the stablecoin yield as the key sticking issue derailing the bill’s progress.

But Witt reiterated the importance of getting the bill to the finish line, adding,

“There are trillions of dollars in institutional capital on the sidelines waiting to get into this space. Regulatory clarity is the unlock.”

Will the third stablecoin yield meeting be fruitful?

Worth pointing out that White House, led by Witt, has held two meetings to broker a stablecoin yield compromise between the crypto and traditional finance industries.

Although none led to a deal, last week’s meeting broke some ground, according to Witt. In fact, some crypto leaders, including Ripple’s CLO, viewed it as a positive progress for a potential “compromise.”

There could be another meeting next week to iron out some of the pending issues, Witt noted. During last week’s negotiations, the banking industry enlisted principles for the stablecoin deal, including the safety of bank deposits.

In a rejoinder, The Digital Chamber (TDC), one of the crypto trade unions involved in the negotiations, released its version of ‘principles’ for the stablecoin yield deal.

TDC listed preservation of the U.S. dollar’s dominance and data-dependent frameworks to verify the impact of stablecoins on bank deposits, amongst others, as the principles.

Assessing CLARITY Act passage odds

It’s unclear whether next week’s round of negotiations will help reach a compromise. When asked whether the bill would be passed by March or Q2, Witt said it could be done before the political season for the midterms begins.

There’s no doubt the bill’s progress could boost the market sentiment. Even the U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the bill’s positive momentum would give ‘great comfort to the crypto market.’ He urged stakeholders to push for the bill’s passage by Spring.

Still, Kalshi bettors were only pricing a 36% chance of the bill’s passage by June and a 22% chance by March. Put differently, the market had not priced in the possibility that the bill would become law this year.


Final Summary

  • Trump’s crypto advisor, Patrick Witt, said there will be another meeting next week to reach a deal on the stablecoin yield.
  • The market was pricing only a 36% chance of the bill’s passage by June.

Criptos en tendencia

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main purpose of the CLARITY Act according to the White House?

AThe White House views the CLARITY Act as a 'regulatory unlock' that will provide the regulatory clarity needed to bring trillions of dollars in institutional capital into the crypto space.

QWho is Patrick Witt and what is his role regarding the CLARITY Act?

APatrick Witt is the executive director for the U.S. President’s Council of Advisors for Digital Assets. He is leading the White House's efforts to broker a compromise on the stablecoin yield issue and pass the CLARITY Act.

QWhat is identified as the key sticking issue preventing the progress of the CLARITY Act?

AThe stablecoin yield is identified as the key sticking issue derailing the bill's progress.

QWhat are the market's predictions for the passage of the CLARITY Act by June, according to Kalshi bettors?

AKalshi bettors were pricing only a 36% chance of the bill's passage by June.

QWhat was one of the key principles for a stablecoin deal that The Digital Chamber (TDC) proposed?

AThe Digital Chamber (TDC) listed the preservation of the U.S. dollar's dominance as one of its key principles for a stablecoin deal.

Lecturas Relacionadas

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

In mid-June, three seemingly independent industry events—the compliance-driven throttling of Fable 5, the open-sourcing of GLM-5.2, and the leaked release timeline for GPT-5.6—are pushing the global AI industry toward a watershed moment. These shifts signal a fundamental restructuring of the industry's underlying logic. First, **"usability" has substantially overtaken "advanced capabilities"** as the primary weight, pushing the global large language model (LLM) supply chain into a "dual-track" phase of controlled closed-source and local open-source coexistence. Second, **the competitive moats of closed-source giants are shifting**. Their technical focus is moving from "language intelligence" toward "spatial intelligence (world models)"—a domain heavily reliant on computing power. Third, faced with常态化 transnational compliance risks, **a "model-agnostic" decoupled design has become a survival necessity for application-layer developers to maintain business continuity.** The article details how Anthropic's Fable 5, despite its advanced engineering feats, was restricted for non-U.S. citizens within 72 hours of launch, highlighting how geopolitical compliance can instantly limit even the most advanced models. In response, the open-source camp, exemplified by Zhipu AI's MIT-licensed GLM-5.2, is gaining market share by offering stable performance improvements and significant cost advantages (up to 70% savings for enterprises), while achieving full adaptation with domestic semiconductor platforms. Meanwhile, closed-source leaders like OpenAI are pivoting. The anticipated GPT-5.6 reportedly shifts focus from language to spatial intelligence and world models, aiming to rebuild a generational gap in areas like 3D understanding, simulation, and industrial design that demand immense compute. The core conclusion is that the LLM supply chain's logic has changed. Enterprises must now evaluate infrastructure based on a composite of technical performance and policy compliance. For developers, complete reliance on a single closed-source API poses unacceptable risk. Implementing a truly model-agnostic architecture—enabling swift switches to compliant, locally deployable open-source alternatives—is no longer just good practice but a fundamental baseline for business continuity.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

The article discusses the ongoing "token subsidy war" among AI giants like OpenAI and Anthropic, questioning whether it's nearing its end. It reveals that current AI subscription prices are heavily subsidized, with some plans offering tokens at up to 70 times the actual cost to attract and retain heavy users, especially developers and enterprises. This strategy mirrors past internet-era subsidy battles, but with a key difference: AI tokens lack "lock-in" effects. Unlike ride-hailing or food delivery apps, users can easily switch between AI providers as APIs become standardized, making it difficult for companies to raise prices post-subsidy. The piece highlights a structural asymmetry in the competition. Giants like Google, with massive advertising revenue, can afford to subsidize tokens indefinitely, akin to using "tokens as a weapon." In contrast, venture-backed companies like OpenAI and Anthropic face pressure to become profitable, especially as they approach IPO. The article cites Google Ventures founder Bill Maris, who suggests Google could slash token prices by 80%, putting immense pressure on competitors. Two potential endgames are presented: the "internet service" model (subsidize, monopolize, then raise prices) and the "utility" model (tokens become a standardized, low-margin commodity like electricity). Given the low switching costs, the latter seems more likely. The competition may not have a single winner but could instead accelerate AI's evolution into a foundational, infrastructure-level technology, akin to a public utility. For now, users continue to benefit from heavily subsidized token costs.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

"Beyond the Pitch: The Profit Game Around the World Cup" The FIFA World Cup transcends being a sporting spectacle, evolving into a massive global arena for speculation and profit-seeking. The 2026 tournament has amplified this dynamic, creating a multi-layered ecosystem of financial opportunism alongside the football. **Prediction markets** have surged into the mainstream. Platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi saw trading volumes for World Cup contracts soar, attracting new users with their financial trading model and high-profile, chain-based wealth stories that overshadow traditional sports betting in terms of growth and narrative. However, **traditional sportsbooks** remain the dominant force, leveraging established user habits, legal markets, and comprehensive product offerings to handle the vast majority of speculative wagers, with projections suggesting record-breaking betting volumes. Capital markets also react. **"Concept stocks"** in countries like South Korea and Japan experience volatile price swings based on team performance and anticipated fan spending on items like chicken, beer, and viewing parties, effectively becoming a stock market reflecting fan sentiment. The **ticket resale market** has become a sophisticated arena for arbitrage. Prices fluctuate wildly based on team draws and star power, with sellers sometimes listing tickets they don't yet own in a practice akin to short-selling, while FIFA's own "Right to Buy" tokens add another layer of speculative trading. **Collectibles and merchandise** offer another avenue. Panini sticker albums, with their inherent scarcity and nostalgic value, can become high-value collectibles. Limited-edition or locally themed jerseys command significant premiums on secondary markets, and even counterfeit vendors profit from fans' desire for affordable match-day identity. The **cryptocurrency** space has seen a frenzy of speculative, unauthorized World Cup-themed meme coins on chains like Solana. These tokens, often exploiting team names and player imagery, experience extreme pump-and-dump cycles, creating stories of massive gains for a few early entrants and steep losses for many others. Finally, an entire industry thrives on **providing information and tools** to other speculators. Developers create platforms like SeatSidekick to track ticket inventory and prices, while paid Telegram groups and subscriptions sell betting tips and predictions, monetizing the widespread desire for an informational edge. In essence, the World Cup has become a compressed, global laboratory for speculation. While the games determine champions on the field, a parallel, complex network of financial transactions—spanning prediction contracts, bets, stocks, tickets, collectibles, crypto, and information services—settles its own scores in the global market.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

This article explains the three primary methods for Codex to interact with a computer, each with distinct use cases, permission boundaries, and trust levels. **1. Computer Use:** This offers the broadest access, allowing Codex to visually control and interact with the graphical user interface of authorized macOS/Windows apps, system settings, and even iOS simulators. It's ideal for tasks lacking APIs or structured tools, such as operating legacy software or multi-app workflows. However, it's the slowest method and has the widest permission scope, requiring careful supervision for sensitive actions. **2. Chrome Extension:** This grants Codex access to the user's logged-in Chrome browser state, including cookies, profiles, and open tabs. It's best for tasks requiring user identity across websites like Gmail, LinkedIn, Salesforce, or internal dashboards. Its key advantage is multi-tab control for complex workflows. While more powerful for browser-based tasks than Computer Use, it carries higher sensitivity as actions are performed under the user's identity. **3. In-App Browser:** This is a browser isolated within the Codex thread, separate from the user's personal browsing data. It excels in web development and debugging scenarios—previewing local servers, testing responsive layouts, or annotating designs directly on the page. Its isolation is a strength for development but a limitation for tasks requiring login sessions. The core principle is to choose the narrowest, safest, and most structured interface for the task. Use plugins or MCPs first, resort to visual control (Computer Use) only for GUI-dependent tasks, employ the Chrome extension for identity-reliant browser work, and prefer the In-App Browser for isolated development. **Appshots** are clarified as a fourth, complementary tool for *inputting* context—capturing a screenshot of a window to point Codex to something—rather than a method for Codex to *act*. Together, this layered approach highlights a key to AI agent productization: not granting unlimited permissions, but constraining them within clear boundaries for specific tasks while preserving user oversight.

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar HOUSE

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar Housecoin (HOUSE) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar Housecoin (HOUSE) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu Housecoin (HOUSE)Después de comprar tu Housecoin (HOUSE), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear Housecoin (HOUSE)Tradear fácilmente con Housecoin (HOUSE) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

254 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2025.04.27Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Cómo comprar HOUSE

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de HOUSE (HOUSE).

活动图片