War Won or Lost? Trump: Profited

Odaily星球日报Publicado a 2026-03-24Actualizado a 2026-03-24

Resumen

Former President Trump claimed on Truth Social that productive U.S.-Iran talks had led to a 5-day delay in military strikes, causing immediate market reactions: gold rebounded over $200, oil dropped 14%, and S&P 500 futures rose nearly 4%. However, Iranian media denied any talks occurred, calling it a "psychological operation." Just before Trump’s post, large trades were detected—a $1.5 billion S&P 500 buy order and a $580 million crude oil sell-off—suggesting possible insider trading or sophisticated market anticipation of Trump’s pattern. This isn’t the first time Trump’s statements have moved markets; similar tactics were used during tariff policy shifts in 2025, where rumors and official posts created multiple market swings. Trump’s market influence may serve dual purposes: creating trading opportunities and using stock market gains as a proxy for economic success to bolster political support. Despite accusations, lack of direct evidence shields him from legal consequences. His actions highlight the intersection of financial markets, media, and political strategy.

Original | Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author | Golem (@web 3_golem)

Whether Trump is a competent president is hard to say, but he is definitely an excellent financial market manipulator.

On March 23, Trump started his antics again regarding the US-Iran conflict. At 19:05 Beijing time, he posted on Truth Social, stating that the US and Iran had productive discussions over the past two days and that all military strikes targeting Iranian power plants and energy infrastructure have been delayed for five days.

As soon as these words were out, gold, which had been dropping for days due to inflation concerns and rising global interest rate hike expectations, instantly rebounded. According to Gate data, after Trump's post, gold that had fallen all day rebounded over $200, and S&P 500 index futures also rose nearly 4% in response. Meanwhile, Brent crude oil fell from a high of $113 per barrel to a low of $97, a drop of over 14%.

But less than an hour later, Iranian media came out to "debunk" this, saying there had been no direct or indirect contact between the US and Iran. Iran's Tasnim News Agency even quoted a senior Iranian security official stating that Trump's related remarks were "psychological warfare."

Faced with this rebuttal, Trump tried to brush it off with a simple "I don't know what Iranian media is talking about." To casual observers, this might just seem like another instance of T.A.C.O. (Trump Always Chickens Out), but for traders, it was a mix of joy and sorrow. Because this series of events caused market fluctuations exceeding trillions of dollars within just a few hours.

According to The Kobeissi Letter, 15 minutes before Trump's post, a large buy order for S&P 500 futures with a notional value of $1.5 billion inexplicably appeared in the market. The order was so large that it directly pushed the S&P index up about 0.3% in one minute. And 15 minutes later, this trader/institution who opened the $1.5 billion position pocketed $60 million.

Besides this one who maximized gains, there were also traders who perfectly timed the market top. According to the Financial Times, also 15 minutes before Trump's post, approximately 6,200 Brent crude and West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil futures contracts were sold, with a notional value of $580 million.

Placing large buy or sell orders just before major market news is announced—this looks less like news trading and more like classic insider trading. But whether the source can be traced back to Trump is hard to say. After all, it's not the first time Trump has done something like this. Iranian scholar Seyed Mohammad Marandi posted on platform X, "Trump makes these kinds of statements every week when the market opens to suppress oil prices. Even the five-day deadline he set coincidentally aligns with the energy market's closing time."

This means those trades that seem like insider trading could also be top-tier traders who have figured out Trump's pattern. It wouldn't be strange at all if Wall Street started studying Trump himself as a separate market trading indicator, because this method of his to influence the market isn't the first time he's played it, and it's been remarkably effective every time.

Last year's tariff turmoil was the most typical example. On April 7, 2025, US stocks were being battered by Trump's reciprocal tariff policy when news suddenly emerged that the White House was preparing to suspend tariffs for 90 days for most countries except China. The news caused the Dow Jones to surge about 800 points, but later the White House came out to debunk it as "fake news," and the Dow eventually closed down 629 points that day.

Not many people suspected that this rumor might have been spread by interests related to Trump, but the answer soon appeared.

On April 9, Trump first promoted his own stock on Truth Social, saying verbatim "THIS IS A GREAT TIME TO BUY!!! DJT". A few hours later, he announced a new tariff policy, which was no different from the "fake news" the market heard 2 days earlier—suspending "reciprocal tariffs" for 90 days for countries that did not take retaliatory measures, but raising tariffs on China to 125%. The market took off again instantly, with the three major US stock indices all rising, marking a large single-day rally not seen for many days.

A mediocre manipulator can only use one piece of good news to create one wave of rises, but Trump can use one piece of good news to create two.

Now, against the backdrop of war, every statement from leaders and official media of the conflicting parties naturally carries a price lever. A tough statement can send gold soaring on the spot; a conciliatory statement can also cause risk assets to rebound immediately,上演 "words becoming reality" in the financial markets.

Meeting a master like Trump, even prediction markets that claim to get ahead of the truth of events can be spun in circles. According to monitoring by Odaily Seer先知频道, after Trump posted that US-Iran discussions had made good progress, the probability of the event "US and Iran will cease fire before March 31" on Polymarket quickly rose to 54%. After it was discovered to be a farce, the probability of this event quickly fell back to 16%, and has now dropped to 12%.

Does Trump intentionally manipulate the market? The answer is certainly yes. But is it just for making money? If you think so, you are ignoring another, more cost-effective business—the political dividends behind a rising stock market. Trump, coming from a business background, calculates this economic account clearer than anyone else.

During the 2024 presidential campaign, Trump promised that if he won the election, he would usher in a brand new era of Trump economic prosperity. But economic construction also takes time, and economic prosperity is itself a subjective concept for ordinary people—having money to spend is prosperity, not having money is not. Therefore, Trump urgently needed an immediate indicator to prove to voters that he was delivering results, so stock market prosperity became the best "substitute" for economic prosperity.

During his first term, Trump repeatedly touted new highs in the Dow Jones and S&P, almost treating the stock market as his personal governance scorecard. But every time Trump talks up the market, he aims to please not just stockholders, but also the capital and business owners behind them, because they are often either already or will eventually become Trump's political donors.

This script has already been played out in the crypto field. Trump was previously called the first "Crypto President" of the United States because during the 2024 US election year and early 2025 after Trump was elected president, he frequently extended olive branches to the crypto industry, such as participating in crypto industry conferences, making various crypto promises, and enacting crypto-friendly decrees. Each time, it brought upward momentum to the crypto market. In return, the crypto industry gave Trump support from tens of millions of US voters and hundreds of millions of dollars in political donations from crypto companies.

Manipulating the market without the purpose of making money also allows Trump to find loopholes in the law. Previously, countless US lawmakers and regulatory officials have accused Trump of manipulating the crypto market for profit, but these accusations ultimately came to nothing because there is no direct evidence that Trump obtained economic benefits from the market.

After the March 23 farce, some also accused Trump of涉嫌 insider trading. White House spokesperson Kush Desai stated that the White House does not tolerate any officials using insider information for illegal profit, provided there is evidence. But the "profit" referred to here mostly means economic benefit. And Trump? He has long withdrawn from his family business and moved behind the scenes,施展 intricate political and commercial手段 within the gaps of the law.

This is where Trump's true "brilliance" lies. He knows that in this world, power trumps money; but he also understands how money, in turn, influences the power structure.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the immediate market reaction to Trump's post on Truth Social about productive talks with Iran?

AGold rebounded by over $200, and S&P 500 futures rose nearly 4%, while Brent crude oil fell by over 14% to as low as $97 per barrel.

QHow did some traders allegedly profit from Trump's statement before it was publicly known?

AA large buy order of $1.5 billion in S&P 500 futures was placed 15 minutes before Trump's post, netting a profit of $60 million, and approximately $580 million worth of oil futures were sold around the same time.

QWhat does the article suggest is Trump's broader motive for influencing markets, beyond financial gain?

ATrump uses market manipulation to create a perception of economic prosperity, which serves as a political tool to gain voter support and secure donations from industries and capitalists.

QHow did the prediction market on Polymarket react to Trump's claims about U.S.-Iran talks?

AThe probability of a ceasefire between the U.S. and Iran by March 31 initially surged to 54% but quickly dropped to 12% after Iranian media denied the talks.

QWhy has it been difficult to legally prove Trump's involvement in insider trading or market manipulation?

AThere is no direct evidence linking Trump to financial gains from these actions, as he has distanced himself from family businesses and operates within legal loopholes, focusing on political rather than personal profit.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbitHace 55 min(s)

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbitHace 55 min(s)

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

In 2026, a historic shift occurred in AI as major cloud providers' inference spending surpassed training spending for the first time, signaling a move from "building large models" to "using large models." This shifts the core challenge from computing power to the "memory wall"—the bottleneck of data movement (model weights, activations, KV Cache) between external DRAM and processors, where energy and latency from data transfer far exceed computation itself. Companies like Nvidia face GPU idle time due to bandwidth limits. In contrast, Cerebras Systems adopts a radical "wafer-scale" approach with its Wafer-Scale Engine (WSE). Instead of cutting a silicon wafer into many chips, Cerebras uses almost the entire wafer as one massive chip (WSE-3). This design provides 44GB of on-chip SRAM, delivering memory bandwidth thousands of times higher than traditional HBM (e.g., 21 PB/s vs. Nvidia B200). For LLM inference, weights are streamed layer-by-layer from external MemoryX storage to the chip, avoiding HBM bottlenecks. This results in token generation speeds 1.5–5 times faster than Nvidia's B200 in some models and significant advantages in first-token latency and long-context tasks. Additionally, Cerebras's architecture offers much lower interconnect power consumption (0.15 pJ/bit vs. GPU's ~10 pJ/bit). However, Cerebras faces challenges: SRAM scaling has slowed with advanced nodes, limiting future capacity gains; the chip requires specialized liquid cooling and custom software stacks; and its external I/O bandwidth (150 GB/s) is low compared to NVLink, hindering multi-system scaling for very large models. Competition is intensifying. Major players are pursuing three paths: 1) Developing proprietary inference ASICs (e.g., Google TPU, Microsoft Maia), 2) Leveraging advanced packaging (e.g., TSMC's SoW) to democratize wafer-scale-like integration, potentially eroding Cerebras's process advantage within a few years, and 3) Exploring optical interconnects for ultimate bandwidth. Commercially, Cerebras is transitioning from a hardware vendor to a service provider, facing the immense challenge of building high-power, specialized data centers to meet large contracts (e.g., 250MW/year from 2026–2028). In conclusion, the AI inference era presents a fundamental architectural trade-off. Cerebras opts for extreme physical optimization for low-latency, single-task performance, while Nvidia prioritizes versatility and massive cluster throughput. The path forward remains uncertain, with technology and business models still evolving in the race toward advanced AI.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

**Title: Has Bitcoin's Rebound Ended, Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?** **Summary:** Bitcoin's price has declined by 13% this week, signaling a potential return to late-stage bear market conditions. The price fell to around $67k, positioned between the Realized Price and Realized Cap Weighted Average. For the first time since early 2022, the Short-Term Holder cost basis has dropped below this key average, confirming a hallmark of late-cycle bear markets. Profitability metrics have collapsed sharply. The 7-day average of the Realized Profit/Loss ratio plummeted from a local high of 3.16 to 0.29, mirroring the February panic sell-off. Critically, the 90-day average never breached the threshold of 2, indicating the recent rally to $82k was a bear market bounce, not a structural shift. Realized losses surged to $1.35 billion daily, with $770 million coming from Long-Term Holders selling at a loss. This accelerating redistribution of supply from weak to strong hands is a necessary but ongoing process for a market bottom. The rally stalled almost precisely at the aggregate cost basis (~$83k) of US spot Bitcoin ETF investors, turning that level into strong resistance and leaving the average ETF holder underwater again. Spot market flows have turned decisively negative, showing sellers are dominating order books despite the price drop. While a significant futures long liquidation event cleared over $400 million in leverage, providing a potential reset, sustained spot demand is yet to materialize. Options markets continue to price in higher future volatility (Implied Volatility) than recent price action (Realized Volatility) has shown, with a persistent skew towards put options, indicating ongoing demand for downside protection. In conclusion, multiple metrics point to a fragile market structure. Resistance at the ETF cost basis, accelerating realized losses, dominant spot selling, and cautious options pricing all suggest the bear market trend persists. A sustainable recovery likely requires a resurgence of spot demand, ETF holders returning to profit, and a clear reduction in selling pressure.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

TechFlow Intelligence Agency: Anthropic Calls for Global Pause in AI Development While Preparing for Trillion-Dollar IPO; SpaceX IPO Roadshow Heats Up, But S&P 500 Rejects Fast-Track Inclusion

In today's TechFlow Intelligence Briefing, several major tech stories highlight a growing theme of trust and credibility gaps across AI, crypto, and finance. AI company Anthropic has publicly called for a global pause in AI development, citing risks from Claude's "recursive self-improvement." Ironically, this coincides with reports the company is preparing for a massive IPO targeting a near $1 trillion valuation. This perceived hypocrisy, coupled with widespread user complaints about Claude's declining performance, is sparking debate over whether the safety warning is genuine or a competitive tactic. Meanwhile, in a substantive security move, Anthropic open-sourced a framework for AI-powered vulnerability discovery. In the crypto market, Bitcoin's price drop below $61,000 triggered over $1.16 billion in liquidations, flipping the market into a state where more BTC is held at a loss than at a profit, a historical bearish signal. On the corporate front, SpaceX's highly anticipated IPO is generating immense Wall Street excitement, with Goldman Sachs projecting 100x revenue growth by 2030. However, the S&P 500 has refused to fast-track the company's inclusion post-IPO, potentially limiting immediate institutional demand. Separately, ByteDance's AI app Doubao lost over 6 million monthly active users after introducing a subscription model, highlighting the challenges of AI monetization. Other notable developments include Nvidia certifying HBM4 memory from Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron; Cloudflare's acquisition of front-end tooling company VoidZero; and its CEO warning that bot traffic now exceeds human traffic online. The underlying narrative connects these events: a trust crisis. From AI firms' contradictory actions and crypto volatility to the clash between SpaceX's hyped narrative and institutional rules, a pattern is emerging where stated intentions and actual practices are increasingly misaligned.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

TechFlow Intelligence Agency: Anthropic Calls for Global Pause in AI Development While Preparing for Trillion-Dollar IPO; SpaceX IPO Roadshow Heats Up, But S&P 500 Rejects Fast-Track Inclusion

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar WAR

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar WAR (WAR) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar WAR (WAR) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu WAR (WAR)Después de comprar tu WAR (WAR), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear WAR (WAR)Tradear fácilmente con WAR (WAR) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

161 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2024.12.11Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Cómo comprar WAR

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de WAR (WAR).

活动图片