VIRTUAL falls 10% – Can bulls defend the $0.70 level?

ambcryptoPublicado a 2025-12-17Actualizado a 2025-12-17

Resumen

VIRTUAL price fell over 10% in 24 hours, continuing a bearish trend since early November. Technical indicators, including downward SMAs, negative MACD, and an oversold RSI, signal strong selling pressure. Network activity has declined, with holder numbers and trading volume dropping significantly. However, the $0.70 level shows concentrated liquidity, potentially acting as a support zone for a bounce. If bulls defend this level, a reversal toward $0.80 is possible, but failure could lead to further declines.

AI crypto coins continue to crash as traders anticipate a reversal to the upside.

Virtuals Protocol [VIRTUAL] price crashed by more than 10% in the past 24 hours, at press time, aligning with the weakness in the technical outlook and network activity.

The altcoin was fifth in terms of market drop across the top 100 coins, with a weekly drawdown reaching 16%.

VIRTUAL price analysis: Selling pressure ahead?

Price action charts show that VIRTUAL has been in steady decline since the 1st of November. This ongoing correction followed a brief rally that occurred ten days after the crash on the 10th of October.

According to DyorNetCrypto, the altcoin’s trend score remains strongly bearish, supported by multiple indicators.

At press time, the 10‐day and 25‐day SMAs were both pointing downward, with prices trading below them. The MACD bars were red, reinforcing the bearish structure, while the OBV reflected weakness at negative $1.55 million.

Additionally, Virtual Protocol was trading below the SuperTrend, and its price sat under the Ichimoku cloud, both signaling continued bearish pressure.

Pattern-wise, VIRTUAL’s compression was tightening, suggesting a potential reversal was coming. However, the price does not need to fall below the $0.70 zone. The RSI was oversold, adding confluence to the potential bounce.

Conversely, losing this zone would escalate sell pressure. This comes as network activity also follows the technical outlook.

Network activity is falling too!

Network activity, including volume, liquidity, fees, and the number of holders, has been declining.

As per CoinMarketCap data, the number of holders has been declining over the past week, reaching 1.03 million as of writing.

Since the start of November, VIRTUAL’s token volume has dropped from around $1 billion to $80 million. This represents a 10X decline, while liquidity has only lost half of its initial value, reaching $13 million.

Moreover, the ecosystem’s fee revenue has declined over the past five quarters. Shortly after launch, quarterly revenue peaked at $20 million, but it has since fallen steadily to $8.51 million.

Will VIRTUAL bounce from $0.70?

While all metrics and technicals point to a continued price weakness, the liquidity heatmap suggested otherwise.

The structural outlook seemed to be stabilizing around $0.70. Liquidity was stacked at this zone, and the reaction after touching it each time showed it could ignite a bounce.

On the other hand, VIRTUAL was forming more clusters above $0.72. As VIRTUAL now starts to rise, the clusters act as a price magnet for the altcoin.

The uppermost liquidity concentration for the day’s data was around $0.80, which could be a target.

Worth noting, VIRTUAL was sandwiched between two liquidity clusters, and the price seemed to be headed north. However, there was more liquidity building around $0.70, which could hinder price appreciation.


Final Thoughts

  • VIRTUAL drops 10% due to a technical breakdown and weak network activity.
  • The liquidity above the current price could trigger a reversal if bulls take control.

Lecturas Relacionadas

TechFlow Intelligence Bureau: Chip Stocks Lose Trillions in a Single Day, Bitcoin Falls Below $60,000, US-Iran Conflict Escalates

**Daily Tech & Markets Roundup: AI Advances, Market Turmoil, and Geopolitical Tensions** **AI / LLMs**: Anthropic's internal report on AI self-improvement sparked serious discussions about Recursive Self-Improvement (RSI). Meanwhile, debate continues on AI coding tools after Claude was accused of introducing bugs into the rsync codebase. In positive news, DeepSeek V4 Flash impressed in local deployment tests, and GitHub Copilot now supports custom endpoints for local models. A surprising research turn suggests removing chain-of-thought prompting can sometimes improve LLM performance. **Crypto / Web3**: Bitcoin plunged below $60,000, with its RSI hitting levels last seen during the COVID-19 crash, driven by strong U.S. jobs data reviving interest rate hike fears. Discussions highlight Ethereum DeFi's continued lack of a smooth consumer payment layer. **Chips / Hardware**: Chip stocks suffered a massive sell-off, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index posting its worst single-day drop in six years, erasing over a trillion dollars in value. Marvell, Micron, AMD, and Intel were among the biggest losers. **Tech Companies**: A leaked Microsoft document revealing goals to make Copilot "addictive" drew criticism. LinkedIn founder Reid Hoffman left Microsoft's board to focus full-time on his AI agent startup, Manus. Google was revealed to be paying SpaceX $920 million monthly for AI training compute. **Markets & Macro**: A blowout U.S. jobs report (172k vs. 80k expected) crushed hopes for near-term rate cuts, sending Treasury yields soaring and triggering a broad market sell-off. CEOs from Kraft, McDonald's, and Whirlpool simultaneously warned U.S. consumers are exhausting their savings. **Geopolitics**: U.S.-Iran tensions escalated with missile/drone interceptions and U.S. strikes on Iranian radar sites, keeping the critical Strait of Hormuz largely closed since late February and posing ongoing oil supply risks. **The Bottom Line**: The strong jobs data acted as a single trigger for correlated sell-offs across equities, crypto, and chips. Underlying the volatility is a stark contradiction between robust employment data and warnings of consumer weakness, alongside geopolitical risks that could reignite inflation, leaving markets to price in a fraught macro outlook with no clear "soft landing" path.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

TechFlow Intelligence Bureau: Chip Stocks Lose Trillions in a Single Day, Bitcoin Falls Below $60,000, US-Iran Conflict Escalates

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

It Took Me a Year to See the Bitter Truth About Agent Payments

After a year building infrastructure for the Agent economy, engaging with major players like Stripe, Visa, and Coinbase, the author shares a sobering analysis of the current state of Agent payments. The core finding is a stark lack of genuine, immediate demand across most envisioned use cases. The article breaks down four key market segments: 1. **Agent-to-Merchant (Consumer Shopping):** For most product categories (e.g., clothing, electronics), conversational AI shopping is a step backwards from visual e-commerce interfaces. While agents excel at understanding needs, they can't replace side-by-side product comparison. Real merchant interest is defensive "Agent Engine Optimization," not driven by current customer demand. Potential exists for high-frequency, low-decision purchases (like food delivery) or navigating complex store UIs, but these require massive B2C distribution channels dominated by giants like Amazon. 2. **Agent-to-API (Developer Services):** Developers already have subscriptions and billing relationships for APIs (compute, data). Prepaid balances solve micro-payment issues for low transaction volumes. A deeper structural problem is that major SaaS vendors' business models rely on enterprise contracts, resisting granular pay-per-call pricing. While protocols like MPP and x402 serve the long tail of niche services, this market is small and developers are historically low-willingness-to-pay. 3. **Agent-to-Agent:** This remains largely theoretical with minimal transaction volume. While it represents a long-term bet on a fundamentally new transaction infrastructure (sub-second, micro-penny to million-dollar, multi-party settlements), it does not constitute a present market. 4. **Agent-to-Finance:** This is the only category with existing, paying demand. Integrating AI into financial workflows (trading, portfolio management) is a natural evolution and enables new capabilities like autonomous rebalancing. However, competition favors established, regulated institutions. The "real problem" is not moving money between agents, but the broader challenge of **coordination**—orchestrating work between agents and humans, verifying outcomes, and settling results. Payment is just one component of settlement, which is itself part of coordination. Companies that solve the coordination layer will subsume payment, not the other way around. While well-funded incumbents build defensively for a long-term future, startups must find where the market is today—which, for the author's team, lies outside these four categories in an area of real, growing, and underserved activity.

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

It Took Me a Year to See the Bitter Truth About Agent Payments

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments

**Title: It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments** Over the past year, I've worked on infrastructure for the Agent economy, engaging with major players like Stripe, Visa, Coinbase, and numerous startups. The findings reveal a stark reality: genuine, widespread demand for Agent-based payments does not yet exist. **Key Observations:** * **Agent-to-Merchant (Shopping):** The user experience for AI shopping often falls short, especially for visual product discovery. While AI excels at understanding needs, conversational interfaces can't yet replace browsing and comparing multiple products visually. Current merchant interest is largely defensive ("Agent Engine Optimization") for a future that hasn't arrived. High-frequency, low-friction purchases (like food delivery) are potential fits, but lack open APIs and face high AI inference costs. Simpler, more affordable, or cross-language interactions for complex UIs are a niche opportunity but require massive consumer distribution to scale. * **Agent-to-API (Developer Tools):** Developer payment needs for APIs (computing, data, models) are already met through subscriptions and prepaid credits. The core challenge is not payment friction but supplier economics: most large SaaS providers prefer enterprise contracts over micropayments for API calls. Protocols like MPP and x402 suit the long-tail of smaller services but cater to a developer market historically reluctant to pay for these tools. Major infrastructure needs at the top of the stack are already being addressed. * **Agent-to-Agent (Machine Commerce):** This is a long-term vision with almost no current transaction volume. While a future with high-speed, high-frequency, multi-party machine-to-machine transactions would require novel infrastructure, it remains theoretical. The market is not here yet. * **Agent-to-Finance:** This is the only category with clear, present demand. Financial professionals and DeFi users already pay for tools, and AI augmentation is a natural evolution. Autonomous AI agents can enable entirely new financial strategies. However, competition is fierce from established, regulated incumbents who can more easily layer AI onto their existing products. **The Core Insight:** Companies, especially giants with long time horizons, are building defensively for a potential future of mass machine commerce. For them, early investment is a low-cost hedge. For startups, the current market reality is different. The primary challenge isn't just moving money between agents (payments). The larger, unsolved problem is **orchestration** – coordinating work between agents and humans, verifying outcomes, and then settling. Payment is just a part of settlement, which is just a part of orchestration. Companies that solve the orchestration problem will subsume payments, not the other way around. After a year of building, we see the real, growing, and underserved market opportunity lies in this broader domain of orchestration.

链捕手Hace 3 hora(s)

It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments

链捕手Hace 3 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar VIRTUAL

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar Virtuals Protocol (VIRTUAL) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar Virtuals Protocol (VIRTUAL) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu Virtuals Protocol (VIRTUAL)Después de comprar tu Virtuals Protocol (VIRTUAL), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear Virtuals Protocol (VIRTUAL)Tradear fácilmente con Virtuals Protocol (VIRTUAL) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

342 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2024.12.23Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Cómo comprar VIRTUAL

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de VIRTUAL (VIRTUAL).

活动图片