Video game mods are spreading new ‘Stealka’ crypto infostealer: Kaspersky

cointelegraphPublicado a 2025-12-22Actualizado a 2025-12-22

Resumen

A new malware called "Stealka" is targeting cryptocurrency wallets and browser extensions by disguising itself as video game cheats, mods, and software cracks, according to Kaspersky. The infostealer, discovered in November, is distributed through legitimate platforms like GitHub and Google Sites, and sometimes via fake professional-looking websites. It primarily targets Chromium and Gecko-based browsers—including Chrome, Firefox, and Edge—and steals autofill data, login credentials, and payment details. It also specifically targets 115 browser extensions related to crypto wallets, 2FA services, and password managers, including Binance, MetaMask, Trust Wallet, and Coinbase. Kaspersky advises using reliable antivirus software, avoiding pirated software and unofficial mods, and refraining from storing passwords in browsers.

New malware has been discovered that targets crypto wallets and browser extensions while disguising itself as game cheats and mods, says cybersecurity firm Kaspersky.

Kaspersky reported on Thursday that it had uncovered a new infostealer dubbed “Stealka,” which targets Microsoft Windows user data.

Attackers have used the malware, which was discovered in November, to hijack accounts, steal cryptocurrency, and install crypto miners on their victims’ computers while masquerading as video game cracks, cheats, and mods.

The malicious software has been distributed through legitimate platforms like GitHub, SourceForge, and Google Sites, and disguised as game mods, especially for Roblox, and software cracks for applications such as Microsoft Visio.

Sometimes, attackers go a step further, possibly using artificial intelligence tools, and creating entire fake websites that look “quite professional,” said Kaspersky researcher Artem Ushkov.

A fake website pretending to offer Roblox scripts, Source: Kaspersky

Crypto wallets and extensions targeted

Ushkov noted that Stealka has a fairly “extensive arsenal of capabilities,” but is particularly dangerous because its prime target is data from browsers built on the Chromium and Gecko engines.

This puts over 100 different browsers at risk, including popular ones such as Chrome, Firefox, Opera, Yandex, Edge, Brave, and many others.

Related: Hackers are exploiting a JavaScript library to plant crypto drainers

Its primary targets are autofill data, such as sign-in credentials, addresses, and payment card details, but it also targets the settings and databases of 115 browser extensions for crypto wallets, password managers, and 2FA (two-factor authentication) services.

Some of the 80 crypto wallets targeted include Binance, Coinbase, Crypto.com, SafePal, Trust Wallet, MetaMask, Ton, Phantom, Nexus, and Exodus.

Kaspersky also said the messaging apps, including Discord, Telegram, Unigram, Pidgin, and Tox, were also at risk, as were email clients, password managers, gaming clients, and even VPN applications.

Avoid pirated software and game mods

To stay protected, Kaspersky recommended using reliable antivirus software and password managers to avoid storing passwords in browsers. It also cautioned against using pirated software and unofficial game mods.

Cloudflare reported last week that more than 5% of all emails sent worldwide contain malicious content, and more than half of those contained a phishing link, while a quarter of all HTML attachments were found to be malicious.

Magazine: Big questions: Would Bitcoin survive a 10-year power outage?

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the name of the new infostealer malware discovered by Kaspersky and what does it target?

AThe new infostealer is called 'Stealka'. It primarily targets data from browsers built on Chromium and Gecko engines, including autofill data (sign-in credentials, addresses, payment card details), and the settings and databases of 115 browser extensions for crypto wallets, password managers, and 2FA services.

QHow is the Stealka malware being distributed to potential victims?

AThe malware is distributed by disguising itself as video game cracks, cheats, and mods. It has been spread through legitimate platforms like GitHub, SourceForge, and Google Sites. Attackers sometimes create entire fake, professional-looking websites to host the malicious software.

QWhich specific types of applications and services are at risk from the Stealka infostealer?

AOver 100 different browsers (Chrome, Firefox, Opera, etc.), 80 crypto wallets (Binance, Coinbase, MetaMask, etc.), messaging apps (Discord, Telegram, etc.), email clients, password managers, gaming clients, and VPN applications are all at risk.

QWhat recommendations does Kaspersky provide to protect against this threat?

AKaspersky recommends using reliable antivirus software, using password managers instead of storing passwords in browsers, and avoiding the use of pirated software and unofficial game mods.

QBeyond game mods, what other type of software is commonly used as a disguise for this malware?

AThe malware is also disguised as software cracks for applications such as Microsoft Visio.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

The era of fragmented AI agents is ending. Over the past month, China's tech giants—Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance—have simultaneously shifted strategy: instead of launching new, standalone AI agents, they are consolidating their various agent projects into unified "super workbenches." Tencent integrated its QClaw teams into WorkBuddy, a strategic product hailed as a potential third flagship after QQ and WeChat. Alibaba is merging its QoderWork, Wukong, and MuleRun agents into a new "Qianwen Office" platform under DingTalk's leadership. ByteDance rebranded its TRAE SOLO coding agent to TRAE Work, signaling a broader focus on workflow collaboration. This convergence marks a pivotal industry consensus. The initial exploration phase, where companies rapidly built numerous overlapping agents for different scenarios, proved costly and inefficient. With open-source tools eroding technical barriers, competition has shifted from agent creation to resource consolidation and cost control. Historically, platform wars are won not by creating more products, but by simplifying them—as seen with browsers unifying web access and super-apps consolidating services. Now, the "super workbench" aims to become the unified AI entry point for work. This reflects a deeper market realization: the primary audience for AI is no longer just programmers (a market in the tens of millions) but all knowledge workers (a market of billions). The real opportunity lies in augmenting everyday tasks—managing emails, documents, data, and meetings—across the entire workday. The core battleground is becoming control over the primary AI entry point that employees use daily. Tencent's WorkBuddy leverages WeChat and Tencent Docs; Alibaba's Qianwen Office taps into DingTalk's organizational data; ByteDance's TRAE Work integrates with Feishu's workflows. Whoever owns this "super workbench" gains strategic control over orchestrating enterprise data and APIs. This shift is redefining enterprise software. Traditional SaaS applications, valued for their user interfaces, will recede into the background. Their core functionalities will be exposed as standardized "Skills" or APIs for the super workbench's agents to invoke. Software value will shift from selling user seats to charging based on API calls and outcomes delivered. The evolution of agents is moving through clear stages: first as novel standalone products, then as consolidated primary work entry points, and finally as pervasive, invisible capabilities embedded into the digital fabric. The recent moves by major tech firms signal the transition from the first stage into the second, accelerating toward the third. In the end, the most successful agent technology may become invisible—like electricity or the HTTP protocol—a fundamental, unnamed infrastructure powering work itself.

marsbitHace 18 min(s)

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

marsbitHace 18 min(s)

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

Michael Saylor presents 110 arguments against Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) 110, a soft fork aimed at restricting certain non-monetary data storage uses (like inscriptions) on the Bitcoin blockchain. He acknowledges the proponents' valid concerns—such as node costs, fee pressure, and preserving Bitcoin's monetary focus—but fundamentally disagrees with the proposed solution. Saylor argues that BIP 110 represents a dangerous precedent of using consensus rules to enforce value judgments on transaction validity, moving away from Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and permissionless innovation. His key objections are organized into eleven categories: 1) It violates neutrality and hard consensus by banning currently valid transactions. 2) It fails to meet the high burden of proof required for a consensus change, lacking concrete data on the alleged crisis. 3) Its seven bundled technical restrictions are overly broad, targeting generic script functionalities and blocking future upgrade paths. 4) It sacrifices compatibility and future optionality by closing off designed upgrade hooks. 5) Its temporary rules add significant complexity (grandfathering, expiry states) without sufficient justification. 6) The economic and security impacts, particularly on miner revenue and fee markets, are uncertain and unmodeled. 7) Superior, market-based tools (fee markets, relay/mining policies) already exist to manage blockchain load. 8) It stifles innovation by creating a chilling effect for developers. 9) Its modified activation mechanism (55% threshold, forced signaling) is aggressive and risks network splits. 10) The precedent it sets—using consensus to suppress disliked but legal uses—is more dangerous than the problem it aims to solve. 11) A better path exists: improving measurements, refining resource-based policies, and allowing market forces to work. Saylor concludes that Bitcoin's strength lies in its neutral rules, open markets, and hard consensus. Changing these foundational elements to target specific use cases is an unnecessary and risky "iatrogenic" intervention. He advocates for guarding Bitcoin's neutrality rather than acting as its redeemer.

marsbitHace 34 min(s)

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

marsbitHace 34 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片