Video | Dialogue with Sei Founder Jay: Belief and Survival Rules Through the Crypto Super Cycle

marsbitPublicado a 2026-03-11Actualizado a 2026-03-11

Resumen

Video | Conversation with Jay Jog, Founder of Sei: Belief and Survival Strategies Through Crypto’s Super Cycle Jay Jog, co-founder of Sei, shares his journey from Robinhood to building the world’s fastest blockchain. The 2021 GameStop short squeeze and Robinhood’s trading halt revealed structural flaws in traditional finance, inspiring the creation of Sei—a high-performance, decentralized alternative to Nasdaq. Sei began development in 2021, launching its Cosmos-based V1 mainnet in August 2023. To attract more developers, the team integrated EVM support, addressing Ethereum’s scalability limitations. With the launch of parallel EVM in July 2024, Sei achieved up to 50x performance improvements, processing over 5 billion transactions and attracting 100 million unique wallets. Major institutions like BlackRock, Brevan Howard, and Ondo have launched products on Sei, drawn by its growing user base and distribution channels rather than underlying tech alone. Jay emphasizes that real adoption comes from killer apps and user growth, not just high TPS. Reflecting on his journey, Jay highlights the challenges of fundraising after Terra’s collapse and the importance of building through bear markets. He remains optimistic about crypto’s future, citing real-world adoption and regulatory progress. Sei’s vision is a “Wall Street on-chain.” Upcoming upgrades like Sei Giga aim for another 50x performance boost, enabling Nasdaq-level order book systems. The team is also focusing on permis...

Podcast: The Round Trip

Compiled & Edited by: Yuliya, PANews

Having personally witnessed the GameStop short squeeze, and seeing his then-employer Robinhood "pull the plug" to forcibly end the retail frenzy, this "crash" moment in traditional finance directly spurred the creation of Sei—the world's fastest public chain aimed at replacing Nasdaq.

In the new Founder’s Talk series of *The Round Trip*, co-produced by PANews and Web3.com Ventures, Sei founder Jay Jog not only provides a hardcore breakdown of how parallel EVM achieves a 50x performance leap but also exclusively reveals the institutional funding secrets behind the hundred-billion TVL and the new track of AI Agent payments, offering a glimpse into the real landscape of a "decentralized Wall Street."

From Robinhood to Crypto: The Fracture of Traditional Finance and the Birth of Sei

PANews: Welcome Jay to *Round Trip*! How has Hong Kong been treating you so far? Perhaps we can start by chatting about your personal journey. How did you get to where you are today? And what projects have you been working on recently?

Jay Jog: Thanks for having me! This is my first time in Hong Kong since 2018, and the city is as amazing as I remember, if not more.

Regarding my background, I majored in Computer Science in college and joined the US brokerage platform Robinhood after graduation. It's most famous for the GameStop short squeeze incident. At that time, a large number of retail investors, driven by genuine belief or a certain "meme-like" price movement, bought stocks like GameStop, AMC, and a dozen others dubbed "meme stocks," causing prices to soar. Wall Street hedge funds, seeing this trend, tried to short these stocks. The mechanism of shorting involves borrowing shares to sell, then buying them back later to return. But as prices rose sharply, short sellers kept losing money and were forced to cover their positions by buying back shares, triggering a massive "short squeeze" that drove prices even higher. During that period in 2021, almost every retail investor made a lot of money.

But suddenly one day, the brokerage I worked for, Robinhood, directly shut down the buy function, meaning no one could continue buying those rising stocks, which basically ended that price movement. People across the US were shocked and extremely angry because it was a moment when the "little guy" finally triumphed over Wall Street, only to have Wall Street essentially turn off the buy side. As an internal employee, I felt terrible. Friends often treated me as the company itself, demanding, "Why can't I trade now?" "Why am I losing money?" And I couldn't do anything; I had no control over the situation.

This incident made me truly realize how "broken" the current financial system is. The root cause behind it is the T+2 settlement mechanism: Robinhood had to provide up to $3 billion in collateral to a third-party clearinghouse to allow users to continue trading, but the company didn't have that capital. This was the initial inspiration: the traditional financial system has structural problems. If you want to build a truly "internet-native" financial system, you need "internet-native" financial infrastructure. That's why I believe blockchain is the ideal carrier for all this, which is basically the initial motivation for us to create Sei.

Breaking the EVM Performance Bottleneck: The Rise of Parallel EVM and Ecosystem Explosion

PANews: With that motivation, how did you start building Sei?

Jay Jog: We started R&D in 2021, initially launching Sei V1 based on the Cosmos architecture, and went live with the first version of the mainnet in August 2023. Cosmos does have a large developer community, but we realized you also must support EVM smart contracts (typically written in Solidity and compiled into EVM bytecode). If you don't support EVM, it's very difficult to build a truly large, vibrant developer ecosystem.

So we started seriously considering supporting EVM while also researching its limitations. One of the most prominent issues is that the throughput supported by the Ethereum mainnet and various Rollups on it is very limited, around 50 transactions per second. For example, if you want to build an order book-based exchange like Nasdaq, you need to support about 20,000 transactions per second (TPS). This creates a complete disconnect: there's a huge gap between what can be done on-chain and the performance of the off-chain real world. We saw an opportunity to support that level of performance while still maintaining decentralization. That was the初衷 (initial intention) behind building parallel EVM.

PANews: After parallel EVM officially launched on the mainnet in July 2024, it sparked a huge wave of excitement. It's fair to say you pioneered this narrative, right?

Jay Jog: Yes, I believe we were indeed the first team to propose this narrative and the first to actually implement it on the mainnet. This also led to many application scenarios initially appearing only on our chain, followed by a significant increase in on-chain activity. To date, over 5 billion transactions have occurred on the mainnet, with about 100 million unique wallet addresses having conducted transactions, and over 1 million daily active users.

This level of activity further drove more TVL within the ecosystem; our TVL peak reached about $18 billion, a very substantial figure across the entire ecosystem.

The Underlying Logic of Institutional Entry: Traffic, Distribution, and Killer Apps

PANews: Such high numbers have indeed attracted institutional capital. When these institutional allocators choose between different blockchains, what do they value most? Is it traffic, brand, or the underlying technology?

Jay Jog: In the past year, we've had five large institutional funds (including BlackRock, Brevan Howard, Hamilton Lane, Apollo, and Laser) launch fund products on our chain. A few weeks ago, Ondo also launched USDY on our chain. We are now starting to see significant institutional adoption materializing.

Frankly, institutions don't care that much about the underlying technology itself. They care more about what kind of user base you have and whether the distribution channels are already well established. This is also why ecosystems like Ethereum and Solana naturally attract institutions more easily, as they already have the largest user scale and mature distribution networks.

From a broader perspective, the value of blockchain performance is mainly reflected in empowering developers. If you can support very high throughput, it opens up new design spaces for developers, allowing them to build entirely new types of applications. If you can create "killer apps" that simply cannot be realized in other ecosystems, it will naturally bring more users, which in turn makes institutions more interested in that ecosystem. In crypto, "excitement" usually comes from two things: either a new source of yield that allows users to make money, or an application scenario that is inherently very interesting and worth participating in. As long as one of these is satisfied, users will start transacting on-chain; this is the key to attracting and initiating the "flywheel effect."

Navigating Bull and Bear Markets: Maintaining Focus and Resilience in Adversity

PANews: I'd like to go back to your personal experience and delve deeper. Leaving a comfortable, high-paying, stable job at Robinhood to start a business in the crypto industry—during the journey of the past few years, were there any moments that made you think, "This isn't what I wanted"? Could you share those difficult moments that made you stronger?

Jay Jog: I feel like we've been sailing against the wind from the start. We started building the project in 2021, but our first fundraising happened almost right after the Terra collapse. At that time, Terra's roughly $50 billion market cap almost evaporated within a week, and just three weeks after that event, we, as a new team, went out to raise funds. You can imagine, most VCs were taking a wait-and-see attitude then.

That was probably our first real encounter with the reality of the crypto industry's fundraising environment. But when you start a project in a bear market, especially after a "doomsday" style crash, you become very frugal, pragmatic, and extremely careful with the resources at hand, keeping the team as lean as possible. This makes you very self-sufficient and clear on direction. If you start in a bull market, you face distractions from 10 different development directions; in a bear market, these distractions basically don't exist, allowing you to focus on one thing and execute it perfectly.

Overall, I'm very grateful to have embarked on this journey; the project has been much more successful than I initially imagined. Of course, there have been many low points. Whenever a bear market hits, morale across the industry drops, and confidence wanes. For example, at the time of recording this podcast, many influential people have left the industry in the past two weeks, and Bitcoin's price recently fell to a阶段性低点 (stage low) of around $59,000.

PANews: In recent weeks, we've seen many old players liquidating and exiting, even doubting whether crypto finance is scalable and whether everything we're building is meaningless. Faced with this sentiment, why are you still 100% optimistic about the future?

Jay Jog: The crypto industry is an extremely resilient industry. The current situation is very interesting: on one hand, the industry is making huge progress—for example, the US government is pushing legislation to provide legal status for stablecoins and establish a clear regulatory framework, institutions are launching stablecoins and fund products on-chain on a large scale; but on the other hand, Bitcoin's price is falling.

But one thing is very clear to me: as long as there is real growth and real adoption, the short-term fluctuations brought by bear markets will dissipate in the long run. As long as you maintain enough belief in your project, bear markets are often the best time to enter. From a builder's perspective, it's a great time to build truly substantial applications and achieve real product-market fit (PMF); from an investor's perspective, it's also a good time to make high-conviction investments and position in quality assets (like Bitcoin at a "discount"). So I remain very optimistic about the future of the entire crypto industry.

Building a "Decentralized Wall Street": Sei Giga, Permissionless Assets, and Internal Incubation

PANews: In your opinion, what else needs to be built to lay the foundation for the next bull market? What role does Sei play in this?

Jay Jog: Our vision is to build a "decentralized Wall Street." From our perspective, the bear market is an excellent opportunity to complete several key constructions. There are three core layers:

  • The first core is the underlying L1 protocol itself. We are developing Sei Giga, which will help us achieve about a 50x performance improvement. This is a very夸张 (exaggerated/impressive) improvement compared to any other blockchain protocol on the market, making it possible to build systems like Nasdaq on-chain (which is very difficult to achieve with existing public chain architectures). There's a lot of very interesting technology behind this, like multi-concurrent block production mechanisms and related incentive design.
  • The second layer is institutional adoption. We are already seeing assets like USDY and fund products going live. The next step is to make these assets as "permissionless" as possible. Currently, many assets are "permissioned"—after issuance, they cannot be freely traded on-chain. Once permissionless is achieved, these assets can truly be used in DeFi scenarios, such as in lending markets and other applications, which will be very exciting.
  • The third point, which I most hope to see, is more killer applications landing in our ecosystem. Over the past few years, we've observed that there are basically two paths to building killer apps. The first is to contact as many entrepreneurs as possible and persuade them to join, but this often has limited effect because truly excellent founders usually choose top ecosystems that already have the largest user base (like Solana, Base, or Ethereum). This is a typical "chicken and egg" problem. The more effective way is the second: actively incubating projects and getting them to truly run within your own ecosystem. The traditional "standard playbook" (like hackathons, builder houses) has become less effective by 2026. We are already taking the internal incubation route, and I believe other ecosystems will gradually follow suit.

PANews: As a retail investor, I'd like to ask, among the projects incubated internally within your ecosystem, what are some unique features specific to Sei? After all, chains like Solana also emphasize high performance. Where's the difference?

Jay Jog: A key point is that once Sei Giga is live, all applications related to Central Limit Order Books (CLOB) will only be possible on our chain. If you want to build a system like Nasdaq, it requires about 20,000 TPS, which is basically impossible on existing public chains. And Nasdaq only accounts for about 10% of global securities trading volume. So, if you want securities trading to truly move on-chain, it's almost impossible on other chains currently, and Sei Giga will unlock this capability. I believe more financial applications, especially trading scenarios, will be the most promising direction.

Advice for Ordinary Investors: Establish Core Beliefs, Reject Blind Following

PANews: I believe you've experienced multiple bull and bear cycles. I personally believe we are in a super cycle, but market sentiment is really terrible. As an investor in this field, how would you advise ordinary investors to weather the bear market?

Jay Jog: This is an interesting question. I first entered the crypto market in 2017, experienced the frenzy of late 2017, and saw the market cool significantly in 2018, especially in 2019. Ironically, I took my Bitcoin to a poker gambling site at that time and lost it all, so I strongly advise everyone not to do such things. Later, I went through the 2020 and the bear market after the FTX collapse in 2023.

The most important advice I can give is: You must maintain a firm belief in your original purpose for participating in crypto. Many people don't have real conviction in crypto; they just come in because friends are doing it or the industry is hot.

You need to establish a core logic to understand why you yourself believe in crypto. Once you have this core understanding, whether you are a builder or an investor, all decisions during the bear market will be made more calmly. But if you just think crypto is "exciting," it often doesn't end well. So I strongly advise those going through the bear market to think deeply about why you truly believe in crypto.

Breaking the Myth of Technological Materialism: The Real Moat of an Ecosystem Lies in Users and Applications

PANews: By 2026, what misconceptions do you think the market has about Sei? How would you correct these views?

Jay Jog: The biggest misconception is that people think we are only focused on the technology itself, just疯狂地提升性能 (crazily improving performance).

We certainly value continuous technological optimization and improving chain performance. But we also understand that the value of technology has its limits. Beyond a certain stage, what really determines the success of an ecosystem is actual user growth, real traction, and killer applications, not TPS numbers or finality time. This is also why we focus on incubating projects, as that is the most efficient and direct way to enhance the overall strength of the ecosystem.

2026 Advice for Asian Developers: Deepen Financial Scenarios and Embrace AI Agent Payments

PANews: One last additional question: what advice would you give to Asian developers in 2026? What should they focus on when building applications?

Jay Jog: I think there are two broader trends currently:

  • The first is that finance is gradually converging as the core application scenario for crypto. Of course, there are many other directions experimenting on-chain, like链游 (chain games/GameFi) and social, but we are starting to see that even in games, social, and various other crypto use cases, the part that is most effectively落地 (landed/implemented) is often the financial-related aspect最适合在链上执行 (most suitable for on-chain execution), while other modules can be built off-chain and then brought on-chain via state commitments or proof mechanisms. So I believe we should further deepen financial use cases and think about how to play a more important role within them.
  • The second direction that will increasingly emerge is AI, especially with the rise of more AI Agents (like products such as Multibot), where users can run their own Agents and instruct them to perform tasks. Agents are a form of activity execution native to the internet, and for this form, using an internet-native currency is most reasonable. "Agent payments" will become a bigger trend. Protocols like x402 launched by Coinbase are being created, and we actually played an important role in helping them launch and become one of their first ecosystem promoters. So I believe "Agent payments" is definitely a new direction worth exploring, especially for entrepreneurs just starting out.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the key event that inspired Jay Jog to create Sei, and how did it expose a fundamental flaw in traditional finance?

AThe GameStop short squeeze in 2021, where Robinhood (Jay's former employer) disabled the 'buy' button for certain stocks, was the key event. This exposed the fundamental flaw of the T+2 settlement mechanism in traditional finance, which required Robinhood to post $3 billion in collateral it didn't have, demonstrating the system's structural failure and the need for internet-native financial infrastructure like blockchain.

QAccording to Jay Jog, what is the primary limitation of the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) that Sei's parallel EVM aims to solve, and what performance level does it target?

AThe primary limitation of the EVM is its low throughput, supporting only about 50 transactions per second (TPS). Sei's parallel EVM aims to solve this by targeting a performance level necessary for a Nasdaq-like, order book-based exchange, which requires approximately 20,000 TPS.

QWhat are the three core layers Jay Jog identifies as crucial for building the foundation for the next bull run and achieving the vision of a 'decentralized Wall Street'?

AThe three core layers are: 1) The underlying L1 protocol itself, specifically the development of Sei Giga for a 50x performance boost. 2) Institutional adoption, focusing on making assets permissionless for use in DeFi. 3) The incubation of killer applications within the ecosystem, as this is more effective than trying to attract external builders.

QWhat does Jay Jog say is the biggest misconception about Sei, and what does he believe is the true determinant of an ecosystem's success beyond a certain point?

AThe biggest misconception is that Sei is solely focused on technology and performance metrics. He believes that beyond a certain point, the true determinant of an ecosystem's success is not TPS or confirmation times, but actual user growth, real traction, and killer applications.

QWhat two macro trends does Jay Jog suggest Asian developers should focus on when building applications in 2026?

AThe two macro trends are: 1) The convergence of finance as the core application for crypto, suggesting developers should deepen their focus on financial use cases. 2) The rise of AI, specifically the trend of 'Agent支付' (Agent payment), where AI Agents use internet-native currency, making it a promising new direction for builders.

Lecturas Relacionadas

TechFlow Intelligence Bureau: Chip Stocks Lose Trillions in a Single Day, Bitcoin Falls Below $60,000, US-Iran Conflict Escalates

**Daily Tech & Markets Roundup: AI Advances, Market Turmoil, and Geopolitical Tensions** **AI / LLMs**: Anthropic's internal report on AI self-improvement sparked serious discussions about Recursive Self-Improvement (RSI). Meanwhile, debate continues on AI coding tools after Claude was accused of introducing bugs into the rsync codebase. In positive news, DeepSeek V4 Flash impressed in local deployment tests, and GitHub Copilot now supports custom endpoints for local models. A surprising research turn suggests removing chain-of-thought prompting can sometimes improve LLM performance. **Crypto / Web3**: Bitcoin plunged below $60,000, with its RSI hitting levels last seen during the COVID-19 crash, driven by strong U.S. jobs data reviving interest rate hike fears. Discussions highlight Ethereum DeFi's continued lack of a smooth consumer payment layer. **Chips / Hardware**: Chip stocks suffered a massive sell-off, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index posting its worst single-day drop in six years, erasing over a trillion dollars in value. Marvell, Micron, AMD, and Intel were among the biggest losers. **Tech Companies**: A leaked Microsoft document revealing goals to make Copilot "addictive" drew criticism. LinkedIn founder Reid Hoffman left Microsoft's board to focus full-time on his AI agent startup, Manus. Google was revealed to be paying SpaceX $920 million monthly for AI training compute. **Markets & Macro**: A blowout U.S. jobs report (172k vs. 80k expected) crushed hopes for near-term rate cuts, sending Treasury yields soaring and triggering a broad market sell-off. CEOs from Kraft, McDonald's, and Whirlpool simultaneously warned U.S. consumers are exhausting their savings. **Geopolitics**: U.S.-Iran tensions escalated with missile/drone interceptions and U.S. strikes on Iranian radar sites, keeping the critical Strait of Hormuz largely closed since late February and posing ongoing oil supply risks. **The Bottom Line**: The strong jobs data acted as a single trigger for correlated sell-offs across equities, crypto, and chips. Underlying the volatility is a stark contradiction between robust employment data and warnings of consumer weakness, alongside geopolitical risks that could reignite inflation, leaving markets to price in a fraught macro outlook with no clear "soft landing" path.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

TechFlow Intelligence Bureau: Chip Stocks Lose Trillions in a Single Day, Bitcoin Falls Below $60,000, US-Iran Conflict Escalates

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

It Took Me a Year to See the Bitter Truth About Agent Payments

After a year building infrastructure for the Agent economy, engaging with major players like Stripe, Visa, and Coinbase, the author shares a sobering analysis of the current state of Agent payments. The core finding is a stark lack of genuine, immediate demand across most envisioned use cases. The article breaks down four key market segments: 1. **Agent-to-Merchant (Consumer Shopping):** For most product categories (e.g., clothing, electronics), conversational AI shopping is a step backwards from visual e-commerce interfaces. While agents excel at understanding needs, they can't replace side-by-side product comparison. Real merchant interest is defensive "Agent Engine Optimization," not driven by current customer demand. Potential exists for high-frequency, low-decision purchases (like food delivery) or navigating complex store UIs, but these require massive B2C distribution channels dominated by giants like Amazon. 2. **Agent-to-API (Developer Services):** Developers already have subscriptions and billing relationships for APIs (compute, data). Prepaid balances solve micro-payment issues for low transaction volumes. A deeper structural problem is that major SaaS vendors' business models rely on enterprise contracts, resisting granular pay-per-call pricing. While protocols like MPP and x402 serve the long tail of niche services, this market is small and developers are historically low-willingness-to-pay. 3. **Agent-to-Agent:** This remains largely theoretical with minimal transaction volume. While it represents a long-term bet on a fundamentally new transaction infrastructure (sub-second, micro-penny to million-dollar, multi-party settlements), it does not constitute a present market. 4. **Agent-to-Finance:** This is the only category with existing, paying demand. Integrating AI into financial workflows (trading, portfolio management) is a natural evolution and enables new capabilities like autonomous rebalancing. However, competition favors established, regulated institutions. The "real problem" is not moving money between agents, but the broader challenge of **coordination**—orchestrating work between agents and humans, verifying outcomes, and settling results. Payment is just one component of settlement, which is itself part of coordination. Companies that solve the coordination layer will subsume payment, not the other way around. While well-funded incumbents build defensively for a long-term future, startups must find where the market is today—which, for the author's team, lies outside these four categories in an area of real, growing, and underserved activity.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

It Took Me a Year to See the Bitter Truth About Agent Payments

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments

**Title: It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments** Over the past year, I've worked on infrastructure for the Agent economy, engaging with major players like Stripe, Visa, Coinbase, and numerous startups. The findings reveal a stark reality: genuine, widespread demand for Agent-based payments does not yet exist. **Key Observations:** * **Agent-to-Merchant (Shopping):** The user experience for AI shopping often falls short, especially for visual product discovery. While AI excels at understanding needs, conversational interfaces can't yet replace browsing and comparing multiple products visually. Current merchant interest is largely defensive ("Agent Engine Optimization") for a future that hasn't arrived. High-frequency, low-friction purchases (like food delivery) are potential fits, but lack open APIs and face high AI inference costs. Simpler, more affordable, or cross-language interactions for complex UIs are a niche opportunity but require massive consumer distribution to scale. * **Agent-to-API (Developer Tools):** Developer payment needs for APIs (computing, data, models) are already met through subscriptions and prepaid credits. The core challenge is not payment friction but supplier economics: most large SaaS providers prefer enterprise contracts over micropayments for API calls. Protocols like MPP and x402 suit the long-tail of smaller services but cater to a developer market historically reluctant to pay for these tools. Major infrastructure needs at the top of the stack are already being addressed. * **Agent-to-Agent (Machine Commerce):** This is a long-term vision with almost no current transaction volume. While a future with high-speed, high-frequency, multi-party machine-to-machine transactions would require novel infrastructure, it remains theoretical. The market is not here yet. * **Agent-to-Finance:** This is the only category with clear, present demand. Financial professionals and DeFi users already pay for tools, and AI augmentation is a natural evolution. Autonomous AI agents can enable entirely new financial strategies. However, competition is fierce from established, regulated incumbents who can more easily layer AI onto their existing products. **The Core Insight:** Companies, especially giants with long time horizons, are building defensively for a potential future of mass machine commerce. For them, early investment is a low-cost hedge. For startups, the current market reality is different. The primary challenge isn't just moving money between agents (payments). The larger, unsolved problem is **orchestration** – coordinating work between agents and humans, verifying outcomes, and then settling. Payment is just a part of settlement, which is just a part of orchestration. Companies that solve the orchestration problem will subsume payments, not the other way around. After a year of building, we see the real, growing, and underserved market opportunity lies in this broader domain of orchestration.

链捕手Hace 2 hora(s)

It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments

链捕手Hace 2 hora(s)

Claude Opus 4.8 Finds a $4.5 Billion Bug: The AI Era is Mass-Producing Hackers

A researcher discovered a critical "infinite mint" vulnerability in the Zcash cryptocurrency's Orchard protocol using Claude Opus 4.8, leading to a swift fix but also a 50% market drop, erasing billions in value. This incident highlights a new era where powerful, accessible AI models are dramatically lowering the barrier to finding software vulnerabilities. Previously, the security community feared specialized models like Claude Mythos Preview, capable of finding decades-old zero-day exploits. The Zcash case, however, involved a publicly available, general-purpose model. This shift makes advanced security auditing—and attack capabilities—accessible to far more people, not just experts. The mass democratization of vulnerability discovery brings a dual challenge: a flood of low-quality, AI-generated false reports that overwhelm maintainers, and the real, rapid uncovering of deep, dangerous bugs. Open-source projects, often understaffed and unfunded, are particularly vulnerable to this "attention DDoS." The article cites examples like curl shutting down its bug bounty program due to the unsustainable workload. Our perceived digital safety has often been luck, relying on the high cost and effort required to find deeply hidden flaws in complex systems, as seen with historical vulnerabilities like Heartbleed or Baron Samedit. AI changes this cost structure, effectively "mass-producing flashlights" to illuminate every corner of our codebase. While large companies operate extensive security chains involving external white-hat hackers and massive defensive operations, the global cybersecurity workforce faces a severe shortage, especially of experienced personnel capable of analyzing complex threats and coordinating fixes. The core dilemma emerges: AI makes *finding* bugs cheap and scalable, but *fixing* them remains a slow, expensive, and human-intensive process. The article concludes that AI won't destroy the internet but acts as a bright light, revealing that our digital existence is not inherently secure but is precariously maintained by ongoing human effort. The true cost in the AI era may not be discovery, but whether there will be enough people left willing and able to do the hard work of repair.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Claude Opus 4.8 Finds a $4.5 Billion Bug: The AI Era is Mass-Producing Hackers

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片