US Treasurys lead tokenization wave as CoinShares predicts 2026 growth

cointelegraphPublicado a 2025-12-08Actualizado a 2025-12-08

Resumen

CoinShares predicts the tokenization of real-world assets (RWAs) will continue growing in 2026, driven by global demand for dollar yield. Tokenized U.S. Treasurys more than doubled in 2025, reaching $8.68 billion, while private credit nearly doubled to $18.58 billion. Ethereum remains the leading network for tokenized Treasurys, with over $4.9 billion. The report highlights that RWA tokenization has moved beyond a crypto niche, attracting established firms and regulatory engagement. Excluding stablecoins, the RWA market grew 229% in 2025, from $5.5 billion to $18.1 billion. CoinShares expects U.S. Treasury-backed products to lead 2026 expansion due to yield demand and efficient crypto settlement rails.

Digital asset investment company CoinShares predicts that the surge in tokenized real-world assets (RWAs) in 2025 will continue into 2026, driven by increasing global demand for dollar yield.

In its 2026 Digital Asset Outlook report, CoinShares said tokenized RWAs saw strong growth in 2025, led by tokenized US Treasurys. According to the report, onchain Treasurys more than doubled this year, climbing from $3.91 billion to $8.68 billion. Private credit nearly doubled as well, rising from $9.85 billion to $18.58 billion over the same period.

“Tokenisation has materially moved beyond the longtime narrative of crypto enthusiasts,” CoinShares digital asset analyst Matthew Kimmell said. “Real assets, issued by reputable firms, receiving material investment. Even real regulators engage with crypto rails as credible infrastructure.”

Ethereum remains the most dominant network for tokenized US Treasurys. Data from RWA.xyz showed that as of Monday, Ethereum has over $4.9 billion in US Treasurys tokenized in the blockchain.

*Ethereum leads US Treasurys by market capitalization. Source: RWA.xyz*

US Treasurys are the most “immediate” growth vector

CoinShares expects US government debt-backed products to lead the next leg of expansion in 2026, citing global demand for dollar yield and the efficiency of crypto-based settlement rails.

CoinShares said investors tend to prefer holding Treasurys over stablecoins when yield is available with minimal incremental risk.

“We’ve observed stablecoins demonstrating significant global demand for tokenised dollars as both a reserve and transactional asset,” CoinShares wrote. “Yet, when investors, as opposed to transactors, have the option, they generally prefer to hold Treasurys over holding dollars directly.”

CoinShares also argued that RWA tokenization has already moved beyond a niche experiment by crypto enthusiasts.

The company said that as established financial firms issue these assets, it attracts material capital and draws engagement from regulators who increasingly view blockchain as credible infrastructure.

The company also added that efficiency improvements are no longer theoretical. CoinShares said that settlement, issuance and distribution are starting to happen directly onchain, rather than through legacy custodial processes.

CoinShares expects the shift to continue, though not without competitive tension. According to the company, multiple networks and settlement systems are vying for market share. As a result, it remains uncertain which platforms will emerge victorious and how liquidity will consolidate.

Related: Hua Xia state-linked Chinese bank tokenizes $600M in yuan bonds

Tokenized RWAs grew 229% in 2025

RWA.xyz data showed that excluding stablecoins, which have a market capitalization of over $300 billion, RWAs grew from $5.5 billion on Dec. 31, 2024, to $18.1 billion at the time of writing. This represents a 229% growth in nearly a year.

*RWA growth from 2021 to 2025. Source: RWA.xyz*

CoinShares CEO Jean-Marie Mognetti said digital assets are no longer operating outside the traditional economy. He said they are embedded within it.

“If 2025 was the year of the graceful return, 2026 looks positioned to be a year of consolidation into the real economy,” he said.

Magazine: Koreans ‘pump’ alts after Upbit hack, China BTC mining surge: Asia Express

Lecturas Relacionadas

Bitcoin ETFs Rout Extends To June With $1.72 Billion Net Outflows In First Week

U.S. Bitcoin spot ETFs extended their downturn into early June, recording net outflows of approximately $1.72 billion from June 1-5 following a poor May. This trend reflects sustained bearish sentiment, with only one day of positive net inflows in the past 15 trading sessions. BlackRock's IBIT led the withdrawals with $1.34 billion in outflows, while most other major funds also saw redemptions. Total ETF net assets fell over 20% to $75.12 billion. In parallel, Ethereum spot ETFs saw net outflows of $168 million, indicating investor caution amid macroeconomic uncertainty. Bitcoin's price hovered around $61,592 at press time.

bitcoinistHace 35 min(s)

Bitcoin ETFs Rout Extends To June With $1.72 Billion Net Outflows In First Week

bitcoinistHace 35 min(s)

Zcash Suffers Historic Collapse As Billions Vanish From Market Value

Zcash, a privacy-focused cryptocurrency, suffered a historic collapse in price, losing over 50% of its value in 24 hours and erasing billions from its market cap. The dramatic sell-off was triggered by the disclosure of a major vulnerability in the Zcash Orchard privacy pool that had remained undetected since May 2022. A security researcher, using AI, developed a proof-of-concept to generate counterfeit ZEC. While the bug was patched by June 2, Zcash's privacy design makes it impossible to verify if any fake coins were minted before the fix, fueling market panic and uncertainty. This event highlights the trade-off between privacy and transparency. In response, Shielded Labs is exploring a network upgrade to allow supply verification. Despite the crisis, proponents argue that the discovery by world-class security researchers demonstrates the network's commitment to proactive hardening and resilience.

bitcoinistHace 4 hora(s)

Zcash Suffers Historic Collapse As Billions Vanish From Market Value

bitcoinistHace 4 hora(s)

Has the 'Digital Gold' Narrative for BTC Failed?

**Title: Has the "Digital Gold" Narrative for Bitcoin Failed?** The article argues that Bitcoin's "digital gold" narrative remains valid despite a recent sharp price decline (from a peak near $126k in Oct 2025 to briefly under $61k in Feb 2026). It presents a long-term investment framework based on three core points: **1. Viewing Bitcoin as an Asset:** Bitcoin is presented as a superior potential store of value compared to gold. Key arguments are its absolute scarcity (21 million cap), superior portability, and transparent auditability via its public ledger. While acknowledging its current use in early, volatile stages (~3-4% global adoption), the author draws parallels to the early, disruptive phases of the internet and e-commerce. **2. Understanding the Recent Downturn:** The current ~50% correction is framed as a predictable, consensus-driven cycle following its post-halving peak (the 2024 halving preceded the Oct 2025 high). A crucial factor is a historic "changing of hands": the influx of new institutional buyers via ETFs allowed early, low-cost holders (miners, OG believers) to take profits. The author notes that while severe, Bitcoin's historical drawdowns (e.g., 93% in 2011, 77% in 2021-22) have been progressively smaller, suggesting maturing holder structure and decreasing volatility over time. **3. The Long-Term Perspective:** The long-term thesis hinges on Bitcoin capturing a portion of gold's market value. With Bitcoin's market cap at ~$1.4 trillion (at $70k) versus gold's ~$20 trillion, significant upside potential exists if the "digital gold" narrative is partially realized. However, the author strongly cautions that short-term risks remain, the bottom is unpredictable, and high volatility is inherent. The real risk is not Bitcoin failing but poor personal position management (over-leverage, wrong capital) and a lack of deep understanding, which can force investors out during severe downturns. The conclusion uses Amazon's 95% crash post-2000 dot-com bubble and subsequent 42x recovery as an analogy. The ultimate question is not if Bitcoin's price will rise, but if an investor's strategy and conviction can withstand the volatility to see the long-term play out. The recent divergence (gold up, Bitcoin down) is posed not as a narrative failure, but as potential evidence of this ongoing, painful transition from a speculative asset to a mainstream allocation.

marsbitHace 5 hora(s)

Has the 'Digital Gold' Narrative for BTC Failed?

marsbitHace 5 hora(s)

Has BTC's 'Digital Gold' Narrative Failed?

The article discusses Bitcoin's "digital gold" narrative, its recent price drop, and long-term outlook through the perspective of "Jason". It argues the narrative is not a failure but that Bitcoin represents a superior, new asset class due to its fixed supply (21 million), portability, and auditability. The piece compares its current ~3-4% global adoption rate to early internet/e-commerce, suggesting significant growth potential. Regarding the 2025-2026 price decline (from ~$126k to briefly under $61k), the author views it as a predictable, consensus-driven sell-off within Bitcoin's ~4-year cycle post-halving, exacerbated by a major "handover" from early, low-cost holders to new institutional buyers via ETFs. A key observation is that historical peak-to-trough drawdowns have lessened over time (e.g., 93% in 2011 to ~50% in 2026), indicating maturing volatility as holder structure changes. For the long term, the author uses a simple framework: Bitcoin's total market cap (~$1.4T at $70k) is only about 7% of gold's (~$20T). Even capturing 30-50% of gold's value would imply substantial upside. However, the article strongly cautions against viewing this as investment advice, emphasizing extreme volatility and the critical importance of risk management, position sizing, and deep fundamental understanding to survive severe drawdowns. It concludes by drawing a parallel to Amazon's 95% crash in 2000 and subsequent 42x recovery, stressing that the key is surviving market cycles to realize long-term potential.

链捕手Hace 5 hora(s)

Has BTC's 'Digital Gold' Narrative Failed?

链捕手Hace 5 hora(s)

From Code to Cognition: A Ten-Thousand-Word Guide to the Evolution of the Robot Brain

"From Code to Cognition: The Evolution of Robot Brains" The journey of robotic intelligence has shifted dramatically from manually coded systems to AI-driven brains. For decades, robots relied on layered software stacks—perception, state estimation, planning, control—each handcrafted. While predictable, they lacked adaptability. The 2010s saw deep learning revolutionize perception (e.g., object detection) and control (via reinforcement learning), but learned skills remained narrow. The arrival of Large Language Models (LLMs) marked a turning point. LLMs acted as high-level planners, interpreting natural language instructions and generating sequences of actions for traditional robotic systems to execute. However, true integration came with Visual-Language-Action (VLA) models, which fused vision, language, and motion prediction into a single network. Pioneered by models like RT-2 and open-source projects like OpenVLA, VLAs enable robots to reason and act directly from visual input and commands. The most advanced humanoid robots now employ a "dual-brain" architecture: a slow-thinking, large VLA (System 2) for reasoning and planning, and a fast-reacting, small network (System 1) for high-frequency motion control, sometimes with an even lower-level System 0 for balance. This split balances cognition with the physics of real-time movement. Computation is split between onboard hardware (e.g., NVIDIA Jetson) for safety-critical control loops and cloud/edge servers for non-critical tasks like learning and interfaces. A crucial driver is the open-source ecosystem—models like GR00T and OpenVLA allow startups to build upon pre-trained brains and fine-tune them with their own data, accelerating development. Despite progress, current systems struggle with recovery from errors, sample inefficiency, and long-horizon tasks. This has spurred the rise of **World Models**—neural networks that predict the consequences of actions. By simulating possible futures before acting (like NVIDIA Cosmos or Meta V-JEPA), robots can plan, recover, and generalize better. This represents the next frontier: shifting intelligence from learned reactions to an internal model of physics and cause-and-effect. The field is rapidly evolving. While not yet at its "ChatGPT moment," the convergence of cheaper hardware, scalable simulation, and world models points toward robots that are increasingly capable, adaptive, and useful. The question is shifting from "what can robots do?" to "what *should* they do?"

marsbitHace 5 hora(s)

From Code to Cognition: A Ten-Thousand-Word Guide to the Evolution of the Robot Brain

marsbitHace 5 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros