U.S. Treasury Sanctions UK Crypto Exchanges for Iran Sanctions Evasion

TheNewsCryptoPublicado a 2026-01-31Actualizado a 2026-01-31

Resumen

The U.S. Treasury, through OFAC, has sanctioned two UK-based crypto exchanges, Zedcex and Zedxion, for allegedly enabling Iran to evade international financial sanctions. This marks the first time OFAC has targeted crypto exchanges for supporting Iran’s financial activities. The exchanges reportedly provided services to sanctioned Iranian entities, facilitating over $389 million in transactions and helping obscure fund flows using digital assets. Seven Iranian individuals, including businessman Babak Zanjani, were also designated. OFAC emphasized that digital assets do not exempt entities from sanctions enforcement and warned crypto platforms to strengthen compliance measures to avoid facilitating illicit finance.

The U.S. Treasury has sanctioned two crypto exchanges in the UK, Zedcex and Zedxion, for allegedly assisting Iran in evading U.S. and international financial sanctions. The sanctions were issued by OFAC, or the Office of Foreign Assets Control, at the U.S. Treasury. This is the first time that OFAC has sanctioned crypto exchanges for their role in Iran’s financial sector.

According to the U.S. Treasury, the two crypto exchanges provided users with access to financial services that supported Iranian individuals and entities who are subject to U.S. sanctions. OFAC further stated that the two crypto exchanges facilitated sanctioned persons in moving their funds through the international financial system using digital assets.

Targeted Individuals and Groups

In addition to the transactions, OFAC designated seven Iranian individuals to the blocklist. Also sanctioned was Babak Zanjani, an Iranian businessman with a past financial conviction record, who was reportedly freed for the sole purpose of facilitating funds for the regime.

According to Treasury officials, the group utilized cryptocurrency infrastructure to obscure the flow of funds and evade traditional banking controls. Blockchain analysis related to the designation reveals that wallet addresses associated with these entities facilitated over $389 million in transactions.

The Treasury emphasized that the use of digital assets does not provide a shield from sanctions enforcement and that crypto-related activities are still subject to US laws and regulations.

Implications for Crypto Compliance

OFAC emphasized that these sanctions are a strong statement about the enforcement of sanctions in the face of evolving financial technology. OFAC warned that crypto platforms that do not follow proper compliance procedures may be facilitating illicit finance and could be subject to enforcement action if they knowingly facilitate sanctioned jurisdictions or persons. The sanctions require U.S. persons to freeze all property and interests in property of the named entities and to prohibit all transactions involving them.

However, Treasury officials emphasized that all exchanges must have strong compliance programs regardless of their base. The actions against Zedcex and Zedxion indicate toughening of U.S. enforcement of evasion facilitated by crypto related to Iran. OFAC’s designation of the exchanges and the individuals involved in the transfer of illicit funds indicates that the digital asset industry is bound by U.S. sanctions laws.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Banking and Crypto Leaders Clash Over CLARITY Act Ahead of White House Policy Talks

TagsCrypto ExchangeIranIran GovernmentOFAC

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhich UK crypto exchanges were sanctioned by the U.S. Treasury for Iran sanctions evasion?

AZedcex and Zedxion.

QWhich U.S. government agency issued the sanctions against the crypto exchanges?

AThe Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) at the U.S. Treasury.

QWhat was the total value of transactions facilitated by the wallet addresses associated with the sanctioned entities, according to blockchain analysis?

AOver $389 million.

QBesides the crypto exchanges, how many Iranian individuals were designated to the blocklist by OFAC?

ASeven.

QWhat key message did OFAC emphasize regarding digital assets and sanctions enforcement?

AThe use of digital assets does not provide a shield from sanctions enforcement, and crypto-related activities are still subject to U.S. laws and regulations.

Lecturas Relacionadas

North Korean Hackers Loot $500 Million in a Single Month, Becoming the Top Threat to Crypto Security

North Korean hackers, particularly the notorious Lazarus Group and its subgroup TraderTraitor, have stolen over $500 million from cryptocurrency DeFi platforms in less than three weeks, bringing their total theft for the year to over $700 million. Recent major attacks on Drift Protocol and KelpDAO, resulting in losses of approximately $286 million and $290 million respectively, highlight a strategic shift: instead of targeting core smart contracts, attackers are now exploiting vulnerabilities in peripheral infrastructure. For instance, the KelpDAO attack involved compromising downstream RPC infrastructure used by LayerZero's decentralized validation network (DVN), allowing manipulation without breaching core cryptography. This sophisticated approach mirrors advanced corporate cyber-espionage. Additionally, North Korea has systematically infiltrated the global crypto workforce, with an estimated 100 operatives using fake identities to gain employment at blockchain companies, enabling long-term access to sensitive systems and facilitating large-scale thefts. According to Chainalysis, North Korean-linked hackers stole a record $2 billion in 2025, accounting for 60% of all global crypto theft that year. Their total historical crypto theft has reached $6.75 billion. Post-theft, they employ specialized money laundering methods, heavily relying on Chinese OTC brokers and cross-chain mixing services rather than standard decentralized exchanges. Security experts, while acknowledging the increased sophistication, emphasize that many attacks still exploit fundamental weaknesses like poor access controls and centralized operational risks. Strengthening private key management, limiting privileged access, and enhancing coordination among exchanges, analysts, and law enforcement immediately after an attack are critical to improving defense and fund recovery chances. The industry's challenge now extends beyond secure smart contracts to safeguarding operational security at the infrastructure level.

marsbitHace 58 min(s)

North Korean Hackers Loot $500 Million in a Single Month, Becoming the Top Threat to Crypto Security

marsbitHace 58 min(s)

Circle CEO's Seoul Visit: No Korean Won Stablecoin Issuance, But Met All Major Korean Banks

Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire's recent activities in Seoul indicate a strategic shift for the company, moving away from issuing a Korean won-backed stablecoin and instead focusing on embedding itself as a key infrastructure provider within Korea’s financial and crypto ecosystem. Despite Korea accounting for nearly 30% of global crypto trading volume—with a market characterized by high retail participation and altcoin dominance—Circle has chosen not to compete for the role of stablecoin issuer. Instead, Allaire met with major Korean banks (including Shinhan, KB, and Woori), financial groups, leading exchanges (Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone), and tech firms like Kakao. This approach reflects a broader industry transition: the core of stablecoin competition is shifting from issuance rights to systemic positioning. With Korean regulators still debating whether banks or tech companies should issue stablecoins, Circle is avoiding regulatory uncertainty by strengthening its role as a service and technology partner. The company is deepening integration with trading platforms, building connections, and promoting stablecoin infrastructure. This positions Circle to benefit regardless of which entity eventually issues a won stablecoin. Allaire also noted the potential for a Chinese yuan stablecoin in the next 3–5 years, underscoring a regional trend of stablecoins becoming more regulated and integrated with traditional finance. Ultimately, Circle’s strategy highlights that future influence in the stablecoin market will belong not necessarily to the issuers, but to the foundational infrastructure layers that enable cross-system transactions.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Circle CEO's Seoul Visit: No Korean Won Stablecoin Issuance, But Met All Major Korean Banks

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

SpaceX Ties Up with Cursor: A High-Stakes AI Gambit of 'Lock First, Acquire Later'

SpaceX has secured an option to acquire AI programming company Cursor for $60 billion, with an alternative clause requiring a $10 billion collaboration fee if the acquisition does not proceed. This structure is not merely a potential acquisition but a strategic move to control core access points in the AI era. The deal is designed as a flexible, dual-path arrangement, allowing SpaceX to either fully acquire Cursor or maintain a binding partnership through high-cost collaboration. This "option-style" approach minimizes immediate regulatory and integration risks while ensuring long-term alignment between the two companies. At its core, the transaction exchanges critical AI-era resources: SpaceX provides its Colossus supercomputing cluster—one of the world’s most powerful AI training infrastructures—while Cursor contributes its AI-native developer environment and strong product adoption. This synergy connects compute power, models, and application layers, forming a closed-loop AI capability stack. Cursor, founded in 2022, has achieved rapid growth with over $1 billion in annual revenue and widespread enterprise adoption. Its value lies in transforming software development through AI agents capable of coding, debugging, and system design—positioning it as a gateway to future software production. For SpaceX, this move is part of a broader strategy to evolve from a aerospace company into an AI infrastructure empire, integrating xAI, supercomputing, and chip manufacturing. Controlling Cursor fills a gap in its developer tooling layer, strengthening its AI narrative ahead of a potential IPO. The deal reflects a shift in AI competition from model superiority to ecosystem and entry-point control. With programming tools as a key battleground, securing developer loyalty becomes crucial for dominating the software production landscape. Risks include questions around Cursor’s valuation, technical integration challenges, and potential regulatory scrutiny. Nevertheless, the deal underscores a strategic bet: controlling both compute and software development access may redefine power dynamics in the AI-driven future.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

SpaceX Ties Up with Cursor: A High-Stakes AI Gambit of 'Lock First, Acquire Later'

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片