US Softening Tariff Stance, Will it Work for the Crypto Market?

TheNewsCryptoPublicado a 2026-02-20Actualizado a 2026-02-20

Resumen

The US has reduced tariffs on Indonesia from 32% to 19%, including exemptions for products like palm oil and rubber, signaling a potential softening of its tariff stance. Similar reductions have been made for other countries, including India. This policy shift may alleviate financial pressure on lower-income consumers affected by inflation, potentially allowing them to allocate more funds to the crypto market. The overall crypto market cap has increased by 1.48% to $2.33 trillion, though the article emphasizes this is not investment advice.

The US has lowered its tariffs on Indonesia. This is in line with other countries, which now have a lower rate on their exports to the US. Thereby signaling a possibility that the Trump Administration might be softening its stance when it comes to imposing high tariffs. For the crypto market, this brings up a scenario where the space sees comparatively higher allocations.

US Tariff on Indonesia

Indonesia and the US have reached a deal to bring down the tariff on the former from 32% to 19%. A lot of items have been exempt, giving them an entry with 0% rate. This includes products like palm oil, rubber, and cocoa, among others. Indonesia’s senior Economic Minister Airlangga Hartarto has called the deal a win-win, adding that it respects the sovereignty of both nations.

A fact sheet by the White House has called this a breakthrough for the country’s different sectors, namely agriculture, manufacturing, and digital. Indonesia, in response, has agreed to remove barriers on more than 99% of American exports, per the fact sheet.

Other Similar US Tariff Instances

This is not a standalone case where the US has reduced or eliminated the tariff rate for a country. India is the most recent nation which secured a deal to bring down the rate to 18% from almost 50%. All the details are likely to be published after signing the official document; however, such developments go on to show that America may be softening its stand on tariff.

The said tariff rate on Indonesia puts it together with other countries, like Cambodia, Malaysia, the Philippines, and Thailand. Vietnam is also on the list, but with a slightly higher rate of 20%. Needless to say, a lowered tariff rate is estimated to work well for crypto enthusiasts.

What’s for the Crypto Market?

A recent report underlined that lower-income consumers were struggling due to high inflation triggered by the tariff policy. A reduced rate could offer some sigh of relief, enabling them to allocate a portion of their portfolios to the crypto market. The sentiment could eventually be replicated by bigger investors upon noticing a bullish movement.

For now, the crypto market is up by 1.48% in terms of the market cap, which is $2.33 trillion. It is important to note that the content of this article is neither advice nor a recommendation. Do thorough research and risk assessment before crypto investments.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Capital Rotates From DeFi to Tokenized Real-World Assets Amid Crypto Market Pullback

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the new tariff rate the US has agreed upon with Indonesia, and what was the previous rate?

AThe US has lowered the tariff rate on Indonesia from 32% to 19%.

QAccording to the article, how could a reduced tariff rate potentially benefit the crypto market?

AA reduced tariff rate could offer relief to lower-income consumers struggling with high prices, potentially enabling them to allocate a portion of their portfolios to the crypto market. This sentiment could be replicated by larger investors if they notice a bullish movement.

QBesides Indonesia, which other countries are mentioned as having similar reduced US tariff rates?

AOther countries with similar reduced US tariff rates include Cambodia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Thailand, and Vietnam (with a slightly higher rate of 20%).

QWhat did Indonesia agree to do in response to the US lowering its tariffs?

AIn response, Indonesia agreed to remove barriers on more than 99% of American exports.

QWhat was the overall performance of the crypto market at the time the article was written, as measured by its market cap?

AAt the time of writing, the crypto market was up by 1.48%, with a total market capitalization of $2.33 trillion.

Lecturas Relacionadas

The Impossible Trilemma Is Basically a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that the core limitation of blockchain technology is not the scalability trilemma, but its fundamental lack of privacy, which acts as a barrier to institutional capital. It defines blockchain as a slow, expensive, shared computer whose primary value is "permissionlessness" (no administrator) and verifiable trust. While this is ideal for native financial assets like stable币, which now process trillions, two critical flaws remain for mainstream adoption: regulatory legitimacy and a default transparency that leaks all financial activity. The author contends that transparency is not a feature but a tax, quantified through MEV extraction, making the public ledger unusable for serious institutions. However, modern cryptography, specifically zero-knowledge proofs, now offers a solution: "provable privacy." This allows users to prove compliance (e.g., solvency, KYC) without revealing underlying data. This fusion of privacy and auditability resolves the transparency-compliant privacy-compliance dichotomy, enabling a purely upgraded system where transactions are verified but not broadcasted. Closing these flaws is presented as the essential bridge to onboard the next wave of trillions in capital.

marsbitHace 8 hora(s)

The Impossible Trilemma Is Basically a Pseudo-Problem

marsbitHace 8 hora(s)

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that blockchain's fundamental limitation is not the scalability trilemma (decentralization, scalability, security), which has been largely solved, but the lack of **privacy** and, until recently, clear **legitimacy**. Blockchain is described as a slow, expensive, globally shared computer whose core value is censorship resistance and verifiability. While ideal for native digital assets like money (e.g., stablecoins), its default transparency acts as a **tax**, exposing all transactions and enabling MEV extraction, which deters serious institutional capital. Simultaneously, its permissionless nature created regulatory ambiguity. The piece contends that **privacy** is the missing critical feature. It rejects the false choice between total transparency and complete anonymity. Modern cryptography (like zero-knowledge proofs) enables **compliant privacy**: users can prove facts (solvency, KYC status, compliance) without revealing the underlying sensitive data (specific holdings, identities). This preserves auditability for regulators and eliminates the leak of financial information. With recent regulatory progress (e.g., the GENIUS Act) addressing legitimacy, adding default, provably compliant privacy becomes a pure upgrade. It transforms blockchain from a costly, public ledger into a confidential settlement layer, finally bridging the gap to mainstream institutional and individual adoption of on-chain finance.

链捕手Hace 8 hora(s)

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

链捕手Hace 8 hora(s)

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

The global optical chip industry is experiencing a massive wave of expansion driven by surging AI data center demand. Major players across the US, Japan, Europe, and China are aggressively investing to ramp up production capacity. In the US, Coherent is expanding its 6-inch Indium Phosphide (InP) semiconductor fab in Texas, supported by CHIPS Act funding and a $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA. Lumentum is building a new factory for InP optical devices, and Nokia is scaling its advanced photonic chip packaging and testing capabilities. NVIDIA's investments aim to secure future supply of critical lasers and optical interconnect products for AI infrastructure. Japan's JX Advanced Metals, a leading InP substrate supplier, plans a multi-billion yen investment to increase its capacity 7-10 times, strengthening its grip on the crucial upstream materials market. In Europe, IQE and Tower Semiconductor settled a patent dispute and signed a multi-year InP epitaxial wafer supply agreement, highlighting that next-generation silicon photonics platforms will integrate high-performance InP components. STMicroelectronics and Sivers Semiconductors are also expanding silicon photonics production and partnerships. China is rapidly building out its domestic supply chain. Dongshan Precision's subsidiary, Source Photonics, announced a $12 billion project to expand optical chip and module production. Companies like Sanan Optoelectronics and Yunnan Germanium are scaling up InP chip manufacturing and substrate production, moving towards vertical integration from materials to modules. While debate continues around the exact future architecture—whether CPO (Co-Packaged Optics), NPO, or pluggables will dominate—analysts like Morgan Stanley argue the underlying driver is unchangeable: the explosive growth in bandwidth demand. This will inevitably increase the volume of optical engines, lasers, and related content per GPU, regardless of the final technical path. The competition for "more light" in the AI era has intensified into a global, full-chain capacity race.

marsbitHace 11 hora(s)

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

marsbitHace 11 hora(s)

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

Stablecoin Real Yield Found: A Deep Dive into On-Chain Reinsurance with Re's Karan Saroya As stablecoin supply exceeds $170 billion, the search for sustainable, non-speculative yield intensifies. Re, an on-chain reinsurance platform, provides an answer: connecting stablecoin capital to the trillion-dollar traditional reinsurance market. Re operates as a regulated reinsurer, accepting stablecoin deposits as collateral to back US insurance companies. These insurers pay premiums, generating yield that flows back to on-chain depositors. Currently supporting 35 insurers and underwriting $500 million, Re projects scaling to over $1 billion soon. Key insights from a Bankless podcast with founder Karan Saroya and investor Avichal of Electric Capital: 1. **Uncorrelated, Real-World Yield:** Re offers stablecoin holders access to reinsurance returns (targeting 12-14%+), an asset class entirely separate from crypto or equity markets. 2. **Operational Efficiency via Smart Contracts:** Re replaces traditional, labor-intensive capital fundraising with smart contracts, allowing a ~12-person team to compete with industry giants. 3. **Regulatory Leverage:** For every $1 of collateral, regulations allow backing $5-7 in written premiums. This leverage amplifies returns from the underlying risk-free rate. 4. **DeFi Integration:** Depositors receive receipt tokens, which can be used in protocols like Morpho for "looping," potentially pushing yields to 18-20%+. 5. **The "DeFi Mullet" Model:** A compliant front-end (regulated reinsurer) paired with a decentralized back-end (smart contracts, DeFi capital markets). 6. **RE Governance Token:** Modeled on Lloyd's of London, the token governs the central capital pool's allocation, counterparty acceptance, and parameters. 7. **Real Economic Impact:** Capital funds real-world productivity (factories, clinics, businesses) via insurance, moving beyond crypto's internal loops. The discussion highlights a pivotal moment: DeFi's supply-side infrastructure is now met by real demand for productive yield, potentially kickstarting a flywheel where vast on-chain stablecoin capital seeks these real-world returns.

链捕手Hace 12 hora(s)

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

链捕手Hace 12 hora(s)

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

"1996 or 1999? Wall's First Big Test Is 'How to View AI'" Federal Reserve Chairman Wall's initial challenge is not whether to raise or cut rates, but a more fundamental judgment: what kind of boom is the current AI boom? This will determine the Fed's policy path and define his legacy. Economics is split between two opposing views, according to reporter Nick Timiraos. One sees imminent productivity gains that will increase supply and cool inflation, allowing the Fed to hold steady. The other argues that while productivity benefits are distant, demand shocks are here now, and waiting for data confirmation risks missing the intervention window, forcing sharper rate hikes later. Wall has signaled a leaning toward the first view, echoing 1996-era Alan Greenspan, who embraced strong, productivity-driven growth without fear of inflation. However, Wall faces a different macro environment than Greenspan did, with tariff pressures, expanding fiscal deficits, and diminishing globalization benefits, which could force more significant inflation pressures even if AI benefits materialize. Wall's logic, expressed before taking office, is that AI-driven productivity gains won't show in official data for years. If the Fed waits for confirmation, it might mistakenly tighten policy and choke off the very growth that could suppress inflation. This argues for using forward-looking narratives over lagging data. Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee presents a key counter-argument. He distinguishes between expected and unexpected productivity booms. A widely anticipated boom, like the current AI wave, can cause people to spend future wealth gains in advance, overheating the economy before productivity actually rises, thus requiring preemptive rate hikes. He cites rising costs for AI data centers as evidence of such overheating. Fed Governor Christopher Waller offers a rebuttal to Goolsbee, noting the "expected spending" mechanism only works if people can borrow against future income, which many households cannot do due to borrowing constraints. Wall also faces a paradox related to his desire to reduce the Fed's use of "forward guidance" (pre-announcing policy moves). This practice was established in 1999 when Greenspan began signaling hikes to avoid market shocks. If the economy follows a less optimistic path, Wall may be forced to choose between using the guidance he wants to abolish or risking market volatility by staying silent. The ultimate question defining Wall's first major test remains: Is this 1996 or 1999?

marsbitHace 13 hora(s)

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

marsbitHace 13 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros