US Softening Tariff Stance, Will it Work for the Crypto Market?

TheNewsCryptoPublicado a 2026-02-20Actualizado a 2026-02-20

Resumen

The US has reduced tariffs on Indonesia from 32% to 19%, including exemptions for products like palm oil and rubber, signaling a potential softening of its tariff stance. Similar reductions have been made for other countries, including India. This policy shift may alleviate financial pressure on lower-income consumers affected by inflation, potentially allowing them to allocate more funds to the crypto market. The overall crypto market cap has increased by 1.48% to $2.33 trillion, though the article emphasizes this is not investment advice.

The US has lowered its tariffs on Indonesia. This is in line with other countries, which now have a lower rate on their exports to the US. Thereby signaling a possibility that the Trump Administration might be softening its stance when it comes to imposing high tariffs. For the crypto market, this brings up a scenario where the space sees comparatively higher allocations.

US Tariff on Indonesia

Indonesia and the US have reached a deal to bring down the tariff on the former from 32% to 19%. A lot of items have been exempt, giving them an entry with 0% rate. This includes products like palm oil, rubber, and cocoa, among others. Indonesia’s senior Economic Minister Airlangga Hartarto has called the deal a win-win, adding that it respects the sovereignty of both nations.

A fact sheet by the White House has called this a breakthrough for the country’s different sectors, namely agriculture, manufacturing, and digital. Indonesia, in response, has agreed to remove barriers on more than 99% of American exports, per the fact sheet.

Other Similar US Tariff Instances

This is not a standalone case where the US has reduced or eliminated the tariff rate for a country. India is the most recent nation which secured a deal to bring down the rate to 18% from almost 50%. All the details are likely to be published after signing the official document; however, such developments go on to show that America may be softening its stand on tariff.

The said tariff rate on Indonesia puts it together with other countries, like Cambodia, Malaysia, the Philippines, and Thailand. Vietnam is also on the list, but with a slightly higher rate of 20%. Needless to say, a lowered tariff rate is estimated to work well for crypto enthusiasts.

What’s for the Crypto Market?

A recent report underlined that lower-income consumers were struggling due to high inflation triggered by the tariff policy. A reduced rate could offer some sigh of relief, enabling them to allocate a portion of their portfolios to the crypto market. The sentiment could eventually be replicated by bigger investors upon noticing a bullish movement.

For now, the crypto market is up by 1.48% in terms of the market cap, which is $2.33 trillion. It is important to note that the content of this article is neither advice nor a recommendation. Do thorough research and risk assessment before crypto investments.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Capital Rotates From DeFi to Tokenized Real-World Assets Amid Crypto Market Pullback

TagsCrypto MarketTARIFF

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the new tariff rate the US has agreed upon with Indonesia, and what was the previous rate?

AThe US has lowered the tariff rate on Indonesia from 32% to 19%.

QAccording to the article, how could a reduced tariff rate potentially benefit the crypto market?

AA reduced tariff rate could offer relief to lower-income consumers struggling with high prices, potentially enabling them to allocate a portion of their portfolios to the crypto market. This sentiment could be replicated by larger investors if they notice a bullish movement.

QBesides Indonesia, which other countries are mentioned as having similar reduced US tariff rates?

AOther countries with similar reduced US tariff rates include Cambodia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Thailand, and Vietnam (with a slightly higher rate of 20%).

QWhat did Indonesia agree to do in response to the US lowering its tariffs?

AIn response, Indonesia agreed to remove barriers on more than 99% of American exports.

QWhat was the overall performance of the crypto market at the time the article was written, as measured by its market cap?

AAt the time of writing, the crypto market was up by 1.48%, with a total market capitalization of $2.33 trillion.

Lecturas Relacionadas

He Just Raised 2.7 Billion, and Li Fei-Fei Also Invested

Pete Florence, a former senior research scientist at Google DeepMind and a key contributor to the Vision-Language-Action (VLA) model architecture, is deliberately distancing his startup, Generalist AI, from the trendy "world model" label. He argues that the industry should prioritize concrete goals over buzzwords. His goal is to create robots that can perform a vast range of unseen tasks with high speed and success rates, without needing task-specific training data. Recently, his company raised $400 million (¥2.7 billion) at a $2 billion valuation. Notable investors include NVIDIA's NVentures, Bezos Expeditions, NFDG, as well as Xiaomi co-founder Lin Bin, Zoom founder Eric Yuan, and renowned AI scientist Fei-Fei Li. Florence's approach stems from his academic background at MIT under Professor Russ Tedrake, focusing on understanding the physical world. After joining DeepMind, he developed models like Transporter Network and co-created the VLA framework. He left in 2025 to found Generalist AI. The company has launched two models: GEN-0, which demonstrated that scaling laws apply to physical motion, and GEN-1. GEN-1 was trained on over 500,000 hours of physical interaction data collected via a specialized wearable device. It achieves a 99% success rate on precise mechanical tasks like folding boxes and maintains performance three times faster than its predecessor. Florence believes GEN-1 is reaching a commercial utility threshold similar to the GPT-3 inflection point. The substantial funding round, following GEN-1's release, signifies strong investor confidence in Generalist AI's practical, goal-driven path to creating versatile, useful robots, regardless of the "world model" terminology.

marsbitHace 6 min(s)

He Just Raised 2.7 Billion, and Li Fei-Fei Also Invested

marsbitHace 6 min(s)

Two Legends Lost in Three Days: Is Google's AI Talent Dam Cracking?

In three days, Google lost two AI legends. On June 18, Noam Shazeer, co-author of the seminal "Attention is All You Need" paper and Gemini co-lead, left for OpenAI. Just 48 hours later, John Jumper, 2024 Nobel laureate and AlphaFold lead, departed DeepMind for Anthropic. This follows Andrej Karpathy joining Anthropic in May. These moves highlight a structural trend: top AI talent is concentrating at mission-driven, pre-IPO firms like OpenAI and Anthropic, while Google becomes a primary source. The exodus stems from a core mission mismatch. Google's ad-centric model often subordinates AI research to product and revenue goals, creating friction for pioneers like Shazeer, who returned in 2024 only to leave again. In contrast, OpenAI and Anthropic offer singular focus on pushing AI boundaries, whether towards AGI or safety-aligned models, which deeply appeals to top researchers like Jumper. Financial incentives amplify the pull. With both OpenAI and Anthropic nearing IPO, employees stand to gain immensely from equity, an upside Google's mature stock cannot match. Furthermore, the 2023 merger of Google Brain and DeepMind, intended to consolidate strength, has instead created cultural tension and slowed the path from research to product, as evidenced by Gemini's pace. This talent redistribution is reshaping the AI landscape. While Google retains vast data and compute resources, its true crisis is the quiet, continuous loss of the people who define the field's future. The real moat in AI is not infrastructure, but the concentration of brilliant minds—a battle Google is currently losing.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Two Legends Lost in Three Days: Is Google's AI Talent Dam Cracking?

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Behind the AI Report Card, Lies a Chinese 'Exam Setter'

Beyond the familiar performance charts like MMLU-Pro and MMMU, which major AI models strive to ace, stands a key "examiner": Chinese-Canadian researcher Wenhu Chen. An assistant professor at the University of Waterloo and founder of TIGERLab, Chen addresses the crucial need for more rigorous AI evaluation. As models like GPT-4 began scoring near-perfect results on older benchmarks like MMLU, it became difficult to distinguish their true capabilities. In response, Chen introduced MMLU-Pro in 2024, featuring harder, more reasoning-focused questions with more answer choices, successfully reintroducing meaningful performance gaps. His work extends to multi-modal evaluation with MMMU and its enhanced version, MMMU-Pro. These benchmarks test a model's ability to understand and reason with complex information from images, charts, and text across diverse academic subjects, exposing the significant challenges even top models face in genuine comprehension. Chen's background in complex QA, table reasoning, and his experience at Google DeepMind on projects like Gemini inform his approach. He understands that effective benchmarks must anticipate how models might "cheat" by memorizing data or avoiding visual analysis. His lab also actively researches video understanding and generation models (e.g., UniVideo, Vamba), ensuring his evaluation work is grounded in practical model-building challenges. Now at Meta's Super Intelligence Lab, Chen continues his focus on multi-modal data and evaluation, representing the deep yet often unseen contributions of Chinese talent in shaping the fundamental tools of the AI industry.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Behind the AI Report Card, Lies a Chinese 'Exam Setter'

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written at the Moment Cursor Sold for $600 Billion

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: On Cursor's $60 Billion Sale Many aspiring founders see massive exits like Cursor's $60B sale and wonder why they can't achieve the same, often concluding opportunities are exhausted. But great companies aren't built in obvious, crowded spaces. Cursor, like Stripe, Figma, and Shopify before it, started with a non-consensus belief about the future. Before ChatGPT, they believed AI would transform knowledge work. They focused on a genuinely exciting domain, became their own customer, and obsessed over power users. Their journey involved years of "glass-chewing" effort before the market was ready. The pattern is consistent: identify a long-term technological shift, find a missed entry point, and execute for years before the trend becomes obvious. First-generation products (PayPal, Adobe, Amazon) prove a market exists. Second-generation winners (Stripe, Figma, Shopify) rebuild that market around new insights, technology, or changing customer behaviors. Founders must identify their phase in the cycle. Early entrants like Coinbase or Cursor focus on making new technology usable for power users. Later entrants find the "yin" to the established "yang"—the blind spots incumbents miss as they grow distant from individual users. The key is deep market immersion. Use every product in your space. Talk to users. Build an audience. Stop looking for ideas and start *seeing* them everywhere. Then, choose one. The idea must offer a 10x improvement or solve a "hair-on-fire" pain point—something severe enough that users are already crafting workarounds. When building, avoid feature bloat. Ask: why would someone switch? Great startups rarely force new behaviors; they improve familiar workflows with drastically lower friction (e.g., Cursor forked VS Code instead of creating a new editor). Distribution is the underestimated moat. Before product-market fit, achieve distribution-market fit. How do customers discover new tools? Founders like those at Airbnb, Stripe, and Cursor did unscalable, manual work to recruit early users. The final, unteachable ingredient is resilience. Cursor built for years pre-market, faced rejection, and persisted. So did Airbnb, Nvidia, and Rain (which launched post-FTX collapse). The lesson isn't that these founders were smarter, but that they stayed in the game long enough for their insights to compound. Framework: Spot technological cycles. Cultivate unique insight. Obsess over your market. Talk to customers. Find a hair-on-fire problem. Build the simplest wedge. Win your distribution channel. Above all, don't quit when it gets hard. Most people won't do these things consistently. The few who do build the next generation of great companies. Go build.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written at the Moment Cursor Sold for $600 Billion

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片