US Seizes Nearly $1B in Iranian Crypto Amid Economic Pressure Campaign

TheNewsCryptoPublicado a 2026-05-30Actualizado a 2026-05-30

Resumen

The United States has seized nearly $1 billion worth of Iranian cryptocurrency, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent announced. He noted some wallet owners may be unaware their funds were confiscated. The action is part of "Operation Economic Fury," a U.S. financial pressure campaign against Iran launched in March 2025, which has also involved freezing bank accounts and seizing properties with European partners. Bessent stated that prior to U.S. intervention, the Iranian regime was allegedly diverting hundreds of millions monthly to a small elite. He described Iran's economy as severely strained, with food rationing, internet outages, and many military personnel going unpaid. The $1 billion seizure figure marks a significant increase from previous totals reported in April.

On Friday, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said that the US has confiscated around $1 billion worth of Iranian cryptocurrency. He also mentioned that some of the wallet owners may not even be aware that their funds has been confiscated. “I believe that we have seized about a billion dollars of their crypto”, Bessent said during his speech at the Reagan National Economic Forum.

According to Bessent, the seizures are a component of Operation Economic Fury, the United States’ strategy to put financial pressure on Iran. The operation, which began in March 2025 and has since seized crypto, frozen bank accounts, and collaborated with European partners to confiscate properties, has targeted Iranian assets on numerous fronts.

Intensifying Financial Pressure

Before the United States interfered, the regime was allegedly stealing $400–$500 million per month and distributing the money around 80 or so elites, according to the Treasury secretary.

According to him, the Iranian economy is in shambles, with food coupons being handed out, the internet down, and 40 to 50% of the Iranian military being unpaid. Regarding the current talks with Iran, Bessent said that it is difficult to work with a divided leadership structure because of the attacks on key regime members by the US and Israel.

The newly revealed $1 billion figure is significantly higher than the $344 million in cryptocurrency that was frozen after the US Office of Foreign Assets Control sanctioned Iran-linked wallets on April 24. It is also approximately twice as much as the $500 million in Iranian cryptocurrency assets that the Treasury Department announced it had seized in late April.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Crypto VC Funding Slumps in Q1 2026 as Mega Deals Dry Up

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the total value of Iranian cryptocurrency that US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent claims has been seized?

AUS Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent claims that the US has seized about $1 billion worth of Iranian cryptocurrency.

QWhat is the name of the US operation under which these cryptocurrency seizures took place?

AThe seizures are a component of Operation Economic Fury, the United States' strategy to put financial pressure on Iran.

QAccording to the Treasury Secretary, what was the Iranian regime allegedly doing with $400-$500 million per month before US intervention?

AAccording to the Treasury Secretary, the Iranian regime was allegedly stealing $400-$500 million per month and distributing the money to around 80 elites.

QHow does the newly revealed $1 billion seizure figure compare to previous amounts reported?

AThe $1 billion figure is significantly higher than the $344 million frozen in late April and is approximately twice as much as the $500 million in Iranian crypto assets the Treasury Department announced seizing in late April.

QWhat reasons did Bessent give for the difficulty in current talks with Iran?

ABessent said it is difficult to work with Iran's divided leadership structure due to attacks on key regime members by the US and Israel.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Fei-Fei Li's Team Clarifies the Concept of 'World Models', Sora Merely a Renderer

"World Models" has become a widely used yet confusing term in AI. To address this, a team led by Fei-Fei Li and World Labs proposed a functional taxonomy based on the Partially Observable Markov Decision Process framework. This taxonomy categorizes systems called "world models" into three distinct projections: Renderers, Simulators, and Planners. Renderers, like OpenAI's Sora and other video generation models, focus on producing photorealistic visual outputs for human perception. They prioritize visual fidelity over physical accuracy. Simulators, such as NVIDIA Omniverse, aim to compute precise future environmental states for computational tasks like engineering analysis or digital twins. Planners, like Vision-Language-Action models, take in observations and goals to output executable actions for robots or agents. The article clarifies that most current "world models," including Sora, are primarily Renderers. They generate convincing visuals but lack the core ability to simulate state transitions based on actions, a key requirement for a true world model in classic reinforcement learning definitions. This conceptual confusion has practical implications, leading to potential misalignment in technology selection, investment, and public understanding of AI capabilities. Clear categorization is crucial. It helps enterprises avoid costly mistakes (e.g., using a renderer for robot training), allows investors to accurately assess markets, and enables researchers to build comparable benchmarks. While future systems may integrate these functions, recognizing current boundaries is essential for honest assessment and progress.

marsbitHace 3 min(s)

Fei-Fei Li's Team Clarifies the Concept of 'World Models', Sora Merely a Renderer

marsbitHace 3 min(s)

From Web3 to AI Agent: Veteran Crypto VC Variant Bets $300 Million on Pivot

Variant Fund has announced the launch of Variant 4, a new $222 million early-stage venture fund. Its investment thesis has evolved from "digital ownership" to a broader theme of "sovereignty," focusing on technologies that enhance user agency—the control individuals have over their lives, assets, and identity. The firm distinguishes between mere automation and systems that genuinely empower users, emphasizing that the key question is who ultimately benefits: the user or the platform. This new framework encompasses Variant's existing investments in areas like public blockchains (Ethereum, Solana), developer infrastructure, decentralized finance (e.g., Uniswap), and consumer applications. It also informs recent early bets on projects such as Honcho (for self-custodial AI agent memory), Octet (cryptographic verification of physical location), and here.now (an "agent cloud" for owning and composing generative content). Variant's core mission remains to back founders building technologies that expand user sovereignty, moving towards an internet where users possess unprecedented agency rather than being the product.

marsbitHace 8 min(s)

From Web3 to AI Agent: Veteran Crypto VC Variant Bets $300 Million on Pivot

marsbitHace 8 min(s)

Solana Explosive Growth Pushes Its Monthly Perps Volume Beyond Prior Records

Despite bearish market conditions and price volatility, Solana is demonstrating significant strength in its derivatives market. The network's monthly perpetual futures volume has surged to a new record, exceeding $76.7 billion in May 2026—a 34% increase from the previous high. This growth reflects heightened speculative activity and trader engagement. Analysts note that perpetual contracts are becoming crucial financial primitives, with Solana positioning itself as a network for genuine on-chain price discovery and execution. Concurrently, Solana is experiencing a massive increase in stablecoin activity, processing over $79.9 billion in stablecoin volume in one week, underscoring its role as a major hub for on-chain liquidity and transactions.

bitcoinistHace 17 min(s)

Solana Explosive Growth Pushes Its Monthly Perps Volume Beyond Prior Records

bitcoinistHace 17 min(s)

Bloomberg Uncovered: How Do China's Wealthy Circumvent the Annual $50,000 Limit to Transfer Assets?

**Summary: How Wealthy Chinese Circumvent $50,000 Annual Foreign Exchange Limits** Despite China's strict capital controls, including an annual $50,000 per person foreign exchange quota, an estimated $150 billion in funds still leaves the country annually via various gray and underground channels. This report outlines the evolution of China's "capital wall" and the methods used to bypass it. **The Evolving Capital Controls:** * **Foundation (1994):** The system of "current account convertibility with strict capital account controls" was established. * **Quota Set (2007):** The $50,000 individual annual forex purchase limit was formalized. * **Crackdown Begins (2015-2017):** Following market volatility, enforcement tightened. Banks were required to scrutinize transactions, and channels like using UnionPay cards for Hong Kong insurance premiums or buying overseas property were blocked. * **Digital & Legal Upgrades (2024-2026):** Enhanced algorithms now flag suspicious patterns (e.g., "smurfing"). The Common Reporting Standard (CRS) provides Chinese tax authorities with data on citizens' offshore accounts. Unlicensed cross-border brokers have been targeted. **Five Primary Methods for Moving Capital:** 1. **Underground Banking / "Hawala" (Duiqiao):** The largest-scale method. No money crosses borders. Clients pay RMB to a domestic account; an overseas associate deposits equivalent foreign currency into the client's offshore account. Risks include high fees, account freezes, and legal penalties. 2. **"Smurfing" or "Ant Moving":** Using multiple individuals' $50,000 quotas to pool funds for one offshore recipient. Increasingly detected by anti-money laundering algorithms. 3. **Trade Invoice Manipulation:** Businesses over-invoice imports or under-invoice exports via offshore shell companies, creating a pretext to transfer excess funds abroad under the guise of trade. 4. **Channel Migration:** After a crackdown on internet brokers, funds flow toward more compliant but costly channels like major banks' cross-border wealth management services or Qualified Domestic Institutional Investor (QDII) quotas. 5. **Structural Arrangements:** High-net-worth individuals use complex, high-cost legal structures involving offshore trusts, insurance, and investment migration programs to transfer asset ownership. **Regulatory Response: Focusing on People, Not Just Money** The current strategy extends oversight from enterprises to **individual residents**. Tools like CRS allow retroactive visibility into offshore assets. Cryptocurrencies, once seen as a potential loophole, are now actively monitored and prosecuted as an illegal channel. The underlying driver remains: with significant wealth concentrated among millions of affluent households seeking diversification amid domestic economic shifts, the incentive to move assets offshore persists despite regulatory barriers.

marsbitHace 23 min(s)

Bloomberg Uncovered: How Do China's Wealthy Circumvent the Annual $50,000 Limit to Transfer Assets?

marsbitHace 23 min(s)

Ethereum's Ballmer Moment: As Everyone Is Bearish, the Circulating Supply Is Disappearing

"Ethereum's Ballmer Moment: Circulation Shrinks Amid Bearish Sentiment" Amid widespread bearish sentiment, with prominent figures like Bankless founder David Hoffman selling ETH and young developers flocking to Solana, some argue Ethereum is entering its "Ballmer era"—akin to Microsoft's perceived stagnation under Steve Ballmer. While surface-level criticisms about slow protocol development, cautious leadership, and competitive pressure are valid, underlying fundamentals tell a different story. Approximately 30% of ETH is staked, major holders like BitMine are accumulating, and spot ETFs continue to absorb supply. Regulatory clarity, including the SEC/CFTC's March ruling on staking rewards and the potential passage of the CLARITY Act, is transforming crypto from a regulatory threat into a legitimized framework. This institutionalization, alongside a shrinking circulating supply (with net issuance around 0.23% annually), creates significant buy-side pressure independent of fee-based value capture. The broader crypto total addressable market is expanding through regulated stablecoins, tokenized assets, and institutional adoption. While public chains face competition from permissioned alternatives, the winning model appears to be permissioned assets settling on public chains like Ethereum and Solana. The author advocates a non-maximalist, barbell strategy: holding ETH for its institutional role and supply squeeze, SOL for consumer/throughput trends, BTC as a macro hedge, and a basket of next-gen L1s. Key bullish drivers for ETH include rapid circulation shrinkage, potential Q2 staked ETF approvals, regulatory tailwinds solidifying its role as a default settlement layer, and the optionality of an eventual "Satya moment" leadership shift. Despite bearish consensus, the current setup—where crypto is "not hot" and regulatory groundwork is being laid—presents a compelling investment opportunity. The crypto cycle's focus may have shifted to AI, but blockchain infrastructure is gaining a legal and institutional foothold precisely while attention is elsewhere.

marsbitHace 23 min(s)

Ethereum's Ballmer Moment: As Everyone Is Bearish, the Circulating Supply Is Disappearing

marsbitHace 23 min(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros