US Regulator Warns Prediction Markets Against Simplifying Terms in Event Contracts

cryptonews.ruPublicado a 2026-07-27Actualizado a 2026-07-27

Resumen

The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), which positions itself as the leading regulator of prediction markets run by companies like Kalshi and Polymarket, issued a warning on Friday. It reminded these companies that they must not simplify the certification procedure for event contracts covering a wide range of topics. The CFTC stated that companies should not submit general, template certifications, marking the second time in recent months the regulator has warned against overly broad filings. The agency noted that many designated contract markets continue to self-certify event contracts using generic templates without providing the terms for each specific offering or a proper analysis of the product's compliance. The regulator warned that circumventing the proper procedure undermines its ability to determine if a firm has provided all necessary information and adequately assessed the settlement methodology and data sources for all contract options. However, the CFTC clarified that closely related event contracts can be certified as a single class, referencing legitimate ways to file consolidated documents. The explosive growth of the event contract market, especially in sports betting and political outcome prediction, presents a dynamic regulatory challenge. This is due to the industry's relative inexperience and ongoing legal uncertainty about the CFTC's regulatory status. The CFTC's role as the primary regulator is itself facing legal challenges, with cour...

The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), which positions itself as the leading regulator of prediction markets managed by companies like Kalshi, Coinbase, Polymarket, and Crypto.com, issued a warning on Friday reminding these companies that simplifying the contract certification procedure covering a wide range of events is not permissible.

The agency stated that 'general, template certificates should not be submitted,' marking the second instance in recent months where the regulator had to caution against overly generalized documents.

Many of the 'designated contract markets' regulated by the CFTC 'continue to self-certify event contracts' (in other words, prediction market contracts) using general templates, 'without providing the terms for each offered combination, as well as a brief explanation and analysis of the product terms, underlying commodity, and the product’s compliance with requirements,' the agency said in a statement.

The regulator stated that bypassing the procedure could undermine its ability to determine whether a firm has provided 'all necessary information, explanations, and analysis,' as well as whether it has 'adequately assessed the settlement methodology, data sources, and compliance with the core principles of all contract options.'

Nevertheless, the agency clarified that 'closely related event contracts may be certified as a single class,' citing legitimate ways to submit consolidated filings with common appendices.

The explosive growth of the event contract market - particularly in the areas of sports betting and political outcome prediction - to some extent represents a situation requiring an on-the-fly solution, given the relative inexperience of much of the industry and the uncertainty of the CFTC's legal status.

The CFTC's status as the primary regulator of prediction markets itself still faces some legal uncertainty, which is expected to be resolved by the courts - perhaps at some point by the U.S. Supreme Court. While the regulator's chairman, Mike Selig, has made it an agency priority to wage a full-scale battle in state and federal courts across the country, insisting that the CFTC bears sole responsibility for overseeing event contract platforms, a large number of states are pursuing these companies on charges of illegal sports betting, which should be regulated at the state level.

Also on Friday, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) issued a notice extending the regulatory status of the Kraken platform, the Kraken Derivatives Exchange, which had been in 'inactive' status. The last trade on this exchange was made in early 2025, and the CFTC's approval of the company's request means 'granting the registered entity the opportunity to resume operations.' Kraken stated that it needs more time to evaluate its next steps following the acquisition of Bitnomial earlier this year.

end-content

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhich U.S. regulator issued a warning about simplifying event contract certifications?

AThe U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) issued the warning.

QWhat specific practice did the CFTC warn prediction market companies against in their certification process?

AThe CFTC warned companies against filing general, template certificates for event contracts without providing terms, explanations, and analysis for each specific contract combination offered.

QWhat potential problem does the CFTC say is caused by the 'template' certification approach?

AIt undermines the CFTC's ability to determine if a firm has provided all necessary information and adequately assessed the settlement methodology, data sources, and compliance of all contract options.

QWhat legal uncertainty surrounds the CFTC's role as the main regulator of prediction markets, according to the article?

AThe CFTC's status as the primary regulator faces legal uncertainty, with disputes expected to be resolved in courts (potentially the U.S. Supreme Court), as many states pursue these companies for what they claim are illegal sports bets under state-level oversight.

QWhat other regulatory action did the CFTC take on the same Friday, as mentioned in the article?

AThe CFTC issued a notice extending the regulatory status of the 'inactive' Kraken Derivatives Exchange platform, allowing the entity to resume activities if it chooses.

Lecturas Relacionadas

After the Fed's Interest Rate Decision and Comments from Kevin Walsh, Experts Gathered and Shared Their Latest Insights!

Following the Fed's decision to hold interest rates steady, experts highlight a potential shift towards more independent policymaking within the FOMC, as three members dissented. Market strategists note the slight decline in bond yields and a weaker dollar post-announcement, but caution that a rate hike in September remains possible. Experts like Mark Hackett point to the three dissenting votes as a sign of growing committee independence. While markets initially rallied in relief, the final direction hinges on Fed Chair Kevin Warsh's upcoming press conference. Analysts, including Audrey Childs-Freeman, interpret the dissent as the Fed maintaining a hawkish stance. They suggest the Fed will continue monitoring data, with a summer scenario of high bond yields supporting the dollar still in play. Chris Anstey emphasizes that markets will closely watch the 10-year Treasury yield during Warsh's conference. A continued rise could signal investor fears that the Fed is not acting aggressively enough on inflation, posing a challenge for the Chair. The long-term yield is also viewed as critical for mortgages and economic management. Diane Swonk of KPMG argues a September rate hike is likely, stating that an increase now would have been more appropriate given nearly five years of high inflation. She warns that prolonged high prices risk becoming embedded in the economic system. *This is not investment advice.

cryptonews.ruHace 2 hora(s)

After the Fed's Interest Rate Decision and Comments from Kevin Walsh, Experts Gathered and Shared Their Latest Insights!

cryptonews.ruHace 2 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片