U.S. Lawmakers Push to Clarify Crypto Developer Liability Under Federal Law

TheNewsCryptoPublicado a 2026-01-13Actualizado a 2026-01-13

Resumen

U.S. Senators Cynthia Lummis and Ron Wyden have reintroduced the bipartisan Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act to protect cryptocurrency developers from being wrongly classified as financial institutions or money transmitters. The bill clarifies that liability should be based on control of user funds, not merely writing or maintaining code. This addresses growing legal uncertainty and fear among developers, especially following recent Department of Justice cases involving privacy tools. Lawmakers argue that misapplying financial regulations to developers who don’t handle funds is unfair, stifles innovation, and could drive talent overseas. The legislation aims to safeguard open-source development and prevent overreach by ensuring only entities with actual control over assets face strict regulatory obligations.

Two U.S. senators, Cynthia Lummis and Ron Wyden, have reintroduced a bipartisan bill called the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act to protect cryptocurrency developers from being wrongly treated as banks or financial institutions under U.S. law.

This bill can help resolve the issue between U.S. law and cryptocurrency developers. Right now, the law is unclear about who counts and handles the money of the users. Because of this, some developers who only write the code and never handle the users’ money, or don’t even control wallets, are being treated as the money-handling company and being charged. This risk has grown after the recent DOJ cases involving privacy and self-custody tools, and many developers are in fear of building crypto tools.

Control, Not Code: Lawmakers Push to Shield Crypto Developers From Liability

The bill says that control matters a lot, not the code. If you only write or maintain software and you cannot access or control the funds, and you don’t have legal authority over assets, then you should not be treated as a money transmitter. Only companies that actually control funds should follow strict money laws.

The bill was urgently reintroduced because the issue became very serious. Developers have already been criminally charged, and this fear for the developers could push them out of the U.S., thus bringing slow innovations and breaking open-source development. So the lawmakers have realized this is dangerous and unfair, and they want to fix the rule before more damage happens.

Both Lummis and Wyden have played a major role in bringing this bill urgently. Lummis says that there is no use in regulating the developers like banks when they never handle the users’ money. Wyden warns that forcing developers to follow the exchange-level rules is technologically ignorant and harmful to privacy. Both argue that liability should follow actual control of funds.

This law helps to keep the crypto tools open and innovation alive, with developers safe. If the developers are afraid of building the tools, fewer wallets will be built, and there will be fewer innovations and more control by the big companies.

Highlighted Crypto News:

‌Red Candles Stack Up for OFFICIAL TRUMP (TRUMP): Will Sellers Tighten Their Grip?

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the name of the bipartisan bill reintroduced by Senators Lummis and Wyden?

AThe Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act.

QAccording to the bill, what is the key factor that should determine if someone is treated as a money transmitter?

AActual control over the funds, not just writing or maintaining the code.

QWhy was the bill urgently reintroduced, according to the article?

ABecause developers have already been criminally charged, creating fear that could push innovation out of the U.S. and harm open-source development.

QWhat negative consequence could occur if developers are afraid to build crypto tools?

AFewer wallets and innovations would be built, leading to more control by big companies.

QWhich U.S. government agency's recent cases were mentioned as increasing the risk for developers?

AThe Department of Justice (DOJ).

Lecturas Relacionadas

Cardano Gets Filecoin-Backed Storage Upgrade

Cardano's ecosystem has integrated a significant storage upgrade through a collaboration between Blockfrost and Filecoin. This new premium storage tier offers Cardano builders a decentralized, verifiable backup solution without requiring any changes to their existing workflows. The integration, which was initially announced in late 2024, has now been productized, providing enhanced data resilience for applications on Cardano. Charles Hoskinson endorsed the move, welcoming Filecoin as "one of the OGs" to the ecosystem. The service leverages Filecoin's decentralized storage network to strengthen app reliability and underscores a commitment to decentralization by coordinating two major layer-1 blockchain ecosystems.

bitcoinistHace 6 min(s)

Cardano Gets Filecoin-Backed Storage Upgrade

bitcoinistHace 6 min(s)

Justin Sun Sues Trump Family: What $75 Million Bought Was Only a Blacklist

Justin Sun, founder of Tron, has filed a lawsuit in federal court against World Liberty Financial (WLF), alleging he was made the "primary target of a fraudulent scheme" after investing $75 million. Sun claims the investment secured him an advisor title and WLFI tokens, which were later frozen by WLF, causing "hundreds of millions in losses." The dispute began in late 2024 when Sun's investment helped revive WLF's struggling token sale, which ultimately raised $550 million. Shortly after, the SEC dropped its lawsuit against Sun following Donald Trump's inauguration. However, relations soured when Sun refused WLF's demands for additional funding. In August 2025, WLF added a "blacklist" function to its smart contract, allowing it to unilaterally freeze tokens. Sun's holdings, worth approximately $107 million, were frozen, and he was threatened with token destruction. The lawsuit highlights WLF's structure, which directs 75% of token sale profits to the Trump family, who had earned $1 billion by December 2025. WLF's CEO is Zach Witkoff, son of U.S. Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff. The project faces scrutiny for opaque operations, including a controversial loan arrangement on the Dolomite platform, co-founded by a WLF advisor. Despite Sun's history with the SEC, the case underscores centralization risks within DeFi, as WLF controls governance and holds powers to freeze assets arbitrarily. Sun's tokens remain frozen as legal proceedings begin.

marsbitHace 6 min(s)

Justin Sun Sues Trump Family: What $75 Million Bought Was Only a Blacklist

marsbitHace 6 min(s)

$500 to Buy OpenAI Stock: Silicon Valley's Most Respectable Liquidity Invitation

Silicon Valley's largest venture capital platform, AngelList, has launched a new fund called USVC, allowing U.S. retail investors to buy into high-profile AI companies like OpenAI, Anthropic, and xAI with a minimum investment of $500—no accredited investor status required. Promoted by AngelList co-founder Naval Ravikant, the fund is framed as an opportunity for ordinary people to access high-growth private tech investments traditionally reserved for VCs. However, critics argue it functions more like an exit vehicle for early insiders. USVC acquires shares not through primary rounds but largely via secondary transactions—purchasing stakes from early investors, VC funds, and employees looking to cash out at peak valuations. With companies like xAI heavily weighted in the portfolio, the fund effectively channels retail money into providing liquidity for insiders who entered at much lower valuations. The fund’s structure raises concerns: shares are illiquid, with no secondary market, and buybacks are limited and discretionary. The actual annual fee reaches 3.61%, far above the advertised 1% management fee. This model parallels the "low float, high fully diluted valuation" strategy seen in crypto, where early investors profit by selling to latecomers at inflated prices. The timing—alongside similar moves by platforms like Robinhood—suggests that Silicon Valley’s sudden interest in retail inclusion may be less about democratizing access and more about securing exits for insiders.

marsbitHace 36 min(s)

$500 to Buy OpenAI Stock: Silicon Valley's Most Respectable Liquidity Invitation

marsbitHace 36 min(s)

Bitcoin Approaches $80,000 Mark, ETF Funds Continue Inflow, Is the Crypto Market Shifting?

Bitcoin is approaching the $80,000 mark, reaching a new high since February, while Ethereum remains around $2,400 with some altcoins surging significantly. Over the past 24 hours, $462 million in futures contracts were liquidated, with shorts accounting for $353 million. The market fear and greed index has risen to 60, indicating neutral sentiment. Global risk assets continue to rebound, with U.S. stock markets hitting record highs. The S&P 500, Nasdaq, and Dow Jones all saw gains. Meanwhile, the U.S. dollar index remains stable around 98.61. Geopolitical developments, including a temporary extension of the U.S.-Iran ceasefire, have influenced market dynamics, though tensions persist. Bitcoin spot ETFs have seen six consecutive days of net inflows, with a peak single-day inflow of $663.91 million. Ethereum spot ETFs also recorded nine straight days of net inflows. Stablecoin market capitalization has risen to $320.6 billion, with a weekly net inflow of $635 million. Market analysts note that Bitcoin's recovery is supported by renewed spot demand and ETF inflows. However, high realized profits and low volatility suggest caution, with resistance expected near $80,000. Institutional and ETF-driven demand is strengthening market support, indicating a potential shift toward a new trading range with increased upward momentum.

marsbitHace 37 min(s)

Bitcoin Approaches $80,000 Mark, ETF Funds Continue Inflow, Is the Crypto Market Shifting?

marsbitHace 37 min(s)

Anthropic Survey of 80,000 Claude Users: Those Who Use AI to Improve Efficiency the Fastest Feel the Least Secure About the Future

Anthropic surveyed 81,000 Claude users and found a paradox: those who benefit most from AI efficiency gains—like programmers and designers—are also the most anxious about being replaced by AI. Early-career workers expressed greater job insecurity than senior professionals. High-wage and low-wage occupations reported the largest productivity improvements, often through task scope expansion. Nearly half of users cited expanded capabilities as the key benefit, while 40% highlighted increased speed. However, those experiencing the greatest speed boosts reported higher levels of anxiety about job displacement. The findings suggest that AI’s economic impact is already affecting the labor market psychologically, even as many individuals report personal gains from AI use.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Anthropic Survey of 80,000 Claude Users: Those Who Use AI to Improve Efficiency the Fastest Feel the Least Secure About the Future

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros