U.S. Court Clears Path for Nevada to Take Action Against Kalshi Prediction Market

TheNewsCryptoPublicado a 2026-03-20Actualizado a 2026-03-20

Resumen

A U.S. appeals court has allowed Nevada to proceed with legal action against prediction market platform Kalshi, denying the company’s request to block a potential temporary restraining order. This could force Kalshi to suspend operations in Nevada for about two weeks until a follow-up hearing. The dispute began in March 2025 when the Nevada Gaming Control Board issued a cease-and-desist order, arguing that Kalshi’s sports-related prediction contracts violate state gambling laws. Kalshi contends that its products are federally regulated by the CFTC, which supports its position. The ruling is a setback for Kalshi and may lead to an imminent temporary ban in the state.

A U.S. appeals court has permitted the state of Nevada to pursue legal action against predictionmarket platform Kalshi. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals denied Kalshi’s request to block a possible temporary restraining order (TRO). If approved, Kalshi may have to stop operating in the state for a short time, likely around two weeks, until the next hearing.

What this Case carries

The problem began in March 2025 when Kalshi received a cease-and-desist order from the Nevada Gaming Control Board. Because it believes that sports-related prediction contracts violate state gambling laws, the regulator asked Kalshi to cease providing them. Kalshi countered that federalregulations, not state regulations, govern its products.

With the court decision, Nevada may now issue a temporary restraining order. Legal experts say that this order could come very soon, and Kalshi could be forced to stop operating in Nevada, and the ban could last at least two weeks.

Kalshi warned that it would face serious harm if the court did not intervene. The firm says that it could face multiple legal cases at the same time, and different courts might give conflicting decisions. The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) supports Kalshi’s view. The CFTC says it has authority over prediction markets, while states like Nevada believe they also have control, especially for sports-related products.

The court’s decision represents a setback for Kalshi and provides an opportunity for Nevada to take more robust action. The next few days will be important, as a temporary ban on Kalshi in Nevada could be enforced soon. More updates are expected soon as the state court moves forward with the case.

Highlighted Crypto News:

FBI Issues Warning Over Fake ‘FBI Tokens’ on Tron Network

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat action did the U.S. appeals court allow Nevada to take against Kalshi?

AThe U.S. appeals court permitted Nevada to pursue legal action and denied Kalshi's request to block a possible temporary restraining order (TRO).

QWhy did the Nevada Gaming Control Board issue a cease-and-desist order to Kalshi in March 2025?

AThe Nevada Gaming Control Board issued the order because it believes Kalshi's sports-related prediction contracts violate state gambling laws.

QWhat is Kalshi's argument regarding the regulation of its prediction market products?

AKalshi argues that federal regulations, not state regulations, govern its products.

QWhich federal regulatory body supports Kalshi's position in this case?

AThe Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) supports Kalshi's view, stating it has authority over prediction markets.

QWhat potential immediate consequence could Kalshi face in Nevada following the court's decision?

AKalshi could face a temporary ban on operating in Nevada for at least two weeks if a temporary restraining order is issued.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Six Years Later, UNI Finally Welcomes Its Own "Buyback Bull"

After years of debate, Uniswap's UNI token has finally entered a 'buyback bull' phase following the long-awaited activation of its fee-switch mechanism. The UNIfication proposal, executed in December 2025, redirected a portion of protocol fees from select pools and Unichain sequencer revenue into a treasury (TokenJar) dedicated to buying back and permanently burning UNI. Initial market reaction was muted due to modest early burn rates. A significant shift occurred in July 2026 with the launch of Robinhood Chain. Uniswap's immediate deployment there skyrocketed trading volume, making it a top fee-generator. Subsequently, governance votes extended the fee mechanism to v4 pools and Robinhood Chain, causing protocol revenue to nearly triple. Daily funds directed to UNI burns rose sharply, with Robinhood Chain contributing over half. This transitioned UNI's narrative from a governance token to a cash-flow asset backed by a perpetual automatic buyer. UNI's price, which had languished around $2.30 in early June, nearly doubled to approach $4.60 by late July. Analysts credit this to the tangible cash flow from fees rather than mere speculation. Unlike many newer projects where buybacks are offset by large investor unlocks, UNI's six-year history has resulted in a widely distributed and relatively clean supply, allowing the buyback pressure to effectively impact the secondary market. The key test will be whether trading activity, particularly on Robinhood Chain, sustains after its initial gas subsidies expire.

marsbitHace 3 min(s)

Six Years Later, UNI Finally Welcomes Its Own "Buyback Bull"

marsbitHace 3 min(s)

Only 153 Venture Capital Firms Invested in July: Is the Crypto VC Industry Experiencing a 'Mass Extinction'?

In July 2026, only 153 unique venture capital firms participated in disclosed crypto funding rounds, marking the lowest monthly count since November 2020. This figure represents an 87% decline from the peak of 1,177 firms in 2022. Overall, the first seven months of 2026 saw crypto projects raise approximately $11.78 billion across 481 rounds. This crypto VC contraction contrasts sharply with the broader venture capital landscape, where global VC investment reached a record $560.4 billion in H1 2026, heavily fueled by major AI company financings. This shift in capital allocation has drawn funds away from the crypto sector. Within crypto, funding is highly concentrated. Trading platforms, prediction markets, and payment sectors absorbed 53% of the total capital. While early-stage deals remain frequent, the largest sums flow to a few late-stage rounds and mergers & acquisitions, which surged to $7.23 billion in Q2 2026. The market is consolidating around top funds like a16z crypto and Dragonfly, which successfully raised new multi-billion dollar funds, while many smaller firms have retreated. Analysts describe this as a "great extinction" for crypto VCs, where capital is becoming more selective, favoring proven business models and assets over early-stage speculation. This raises the bar for project quality, funding efficiency, and viable exit paths.

marsbitHace 23 min(s)

Only 153 Venture Capital Firms Invested in July: Is the Crypto VC Industry Experiencing a 'Mass Extinction'?

marsbitHace 23 min(s)

Storage Chip Stocks Skyrocket: Is This a Return to a Bull Market or a Dead Cat Bounce?

The storage chip sector experienced a dramatic overnight rebound in US markets, with major stocks like SK Hynix and Micron surging over 17%. This sharp reversal is attributed to multiple factors: potential short-selling bans and market stabilization measures from South Korea, significant leverage unwinding (with leveraged ETF assets down ~70% from peaks), cooler-than-expected US inflation data easing rate hike fears, and a stellar Microsoft earnings report showing strong cloud/AI demand growth. Microsoft's results, highlighting Azure revenue crossing $100 billion, helped counter the "AI bubble burst" narrative that had pressured the sector. However, the article cautions against declaring a sustained bull market. Key risks remain, including potential further interest rate hikes by the Bank of Japan, which could pressure global carry trades, and unanswered questions about whether high industry profits can be maintained amid the supply cycle and new competition. Investors are advised to monitor whether gains hold, watch for updates on HBM/DRAM/NAND pricing and orders, and await key upcoming events like NVIDIA's earnings. The conclusion emphasizes disciplined investing—avoiding panic selling or FOMO buying—and using strategies like hedging to manage risk in this volatile environment.

marsbitHace 33 min(s)

Storage Chip Stocks Skyrocket: Is This a Return to a Bull Market or a Dead Cat Bounce?

marsbitHace 33 min(s)

Strategy's Loss in the Second Quarter Reaches $8.22 Billion Amid Bitcoin Decline

Strategy, the largest corporate holder of Bitcoin, reported a net loss of $8.22 billion for the second quarter. This loss was primarily driven by an $8.32 billion unrealized loss on its Bitcoin holdings due to a decline in the asset's price during the period. Despite these paper losses, the company increased its Bitcoin holdings to 843,775 BTC, a 25% growth since the start of the year. As part of a new monetization strategy, Strategy sold approximately $218.4 million worth of Bitcoin, mainly to fund dividends for preferred shareholders, with $216 million of that sold after Q2 ended. The company also built a $3.75 billion cash reserve, which it claims is sufficient to cover over two years of dividend and interest payments, aiming to insulate itself from Bitcoin's volatility while meeting obligations. Following the earnings release, Strategy's stock (MSTR) rose 4.7% in regular trading but corrected slightly after-hours. This pattern reflects how the company's accounting results are heavily tied to Bitcoin's price swings, even as its long-term strategy remains unchanged. The report indicates that Strategy is maintaining its core strategy of accumulating Bitcoin while building a financial buffer. This quarterly loss follows a recognizable pattern, with the company posting significant unrealized losses in previous quarters (e.g., $12.4 billion in Q4 2025 and ~$12.5 billion in Q1 2026) due to fair-value accounting. A key technical shift is its new monetization program, which introduces periodic selling pressure on the market, transitioning Strategy from a pure accumulator to a participant that occasionally adds supply. A critical question remains: how long can the cash reserve cover dividend obligations if a Bitcoin price downturn persists beyond two years?

cryptonews.ruHace 43 min(s)

Strategy's Loss in the Second Quarter Reaches $8.22 Billion Amid Bitcoin Decline

cryptonews.ruHace 43 min(s)

Will Terrorist Durov Ban Russian Officials?

Telegram founder Pavel Durov publicly reacted to being labeled a "terrorist" by Russian authorities, stating the designation came after he refused demands for mass surveillance and censorship on the platform. In a Telegram post, he highlighted that this status formally bans him from "publishing information online." Durov concluded with a statement widely circulated: Russian officials "clearly don't understand who can ban whom on the internet." This remark suggests Durov could potentially restrict official Russian government and officials' channels on Telegram, which continue to operate on the platform despite its formal blocking in Russia. The situation parallels previous, slow-moving state directives, like switching officials to domestic cars, contrasted with the current push to migrate all government communication to the Russian-made messenger MAX by 2030. However, reports indicate many officials still use Telegram via workarounds, fearing surveillance on MAX, while alternatives like BiP and KakaoTalk recently became inaccessible in Russia without a VPN. Durov has not specified any immediate actions against state channels. His statement is an initial response, with further developments depending on the authorities' reaction. The dynamic differs from 2020 when Russian regulators lifted a block on Telegram; now, Durov implies control from within the platform itself over the official accounts that persisted through that earlier blockade.

cryptonews.ruHace 43 min(s)

Will Terrorist Durov Ban Russian Officials?

cryptonews.ruHace 43 min(s)

Trading

Spot