Upbit Shifts Nearly All Assets to Cold Storage as Exchange Responds to Security Concerns

bitcoinistPublicado a 2025-12-11Actualizado a 2025-12-11

Resumen

Following a hack that stole $30 million from a Solana hot wallet, Upbit is shifting nearly all customer assets to cold storage, now holding approximately 99% of funds offline. This move places it among the most conservative exchanges globally in terms of online asset exposure, surpassing cold storage ratios of major competitors like Coinbase and Kraken. The decision follows Upbit's second significant security breach and aligns with stricter regulatory expectations in South Korea. While this enhances security, analysts caution that minimal hot wallet reserves could slow withdrawals during high volatility, potentially exacerbating price discrepancies in Korea’s closed crypto market. Upbit has committed to reimbursing affected users and assures that its rebuilt systems will maintain liquidity under normal conditions.

In the aftermath of a hack that saw attackers steal 44.5 billion won (approximately $30 million) from a Solana hot wallet, Upbit has begun shifting nearly all customer assets into cold storage, a move that now places it among the most conservative platforms globally in terms of online asset exposure.

This transition marks one of the strongest security pivots by a major exchange, signaling a broader industry conversation about balancing rapid withdrawals with the need to reduce attack surfaces.

As digital asset markets continue to expand, Upbit’s response provides a real-time glimpse into how platforms balance operational liquidity against systemic cyber risks.

BTC's price records some small gains on the daily chart. Source: BTCUSD on Tradingview

Upbit Pushes Hot Wallet Usage Toward Zero

Following its internal review and system overhaul, Upbit confirmed that it now stores approximately 99% of user assets in cold wallets, with hot wallet exposure reduced to about 1% and expected to decrease further.

As of late October, the exchange held 98.33% of customer funds offline, a rate already well above the 80% minimum required under South Korea’s Virtual Asset User Protection Act.

This shift follows a pattern of rising caution. The recent breach was Upbit’s second significant attack, occurring on November 27, mirroring a 2019 incident that saw more than 342,000 ETH drained from its systems.

This year’s Solana-based attack resulted in withdrawals across 24 tokens within less than an hour, prompting an immediate shutdown of hot wallet operations and emergency transfers to cold storage. Upbit has pledged to fully reimburse affected users from corporate reserves.

Domestic data suggests that the exchange already leads the market in cold storage usage, maintaining the lowest hot wallet ratio among local competitors, whose cold wallet shares range from 82% to 90%.

Security Benchmark Sets Pressure on Global and Local Exchanges

Upbit’s near-99% cold wallet ratio surpasses the standards of major global exchanges. Coinbase stores about 98% of its funds offline, while Kraken’s ratio sits between 95% and 97%.

Several Asian exchanges, including OKX and Gate.io, maintain similar levels. With Upbit’s latest update, the platform now stands at the forefront of global cold storage practices.

Industry observers note that the move aligns with broader regulatory momentum. South Korea’s Financial Services Commission is considering new rules that would require exchanges to compensate users for losses resulting from hacks, regardless of fault, similar to the standards imposed on banks.

Liquidity Questions Linger in a Restricted Market

While security is at the center of Upbit’s restructuring, analysts caution that running with minimal hot wallet reserves may slow withdrawals during periods of heightened market volatility.

South Korea’s crypto market is largely closed to foreign participants, restricting arbitrage and creating conditions where delays can exacerbate price discrepancies, commonly known as the “Kimchi premium.”

During last month’s temporary withdrawal suspension, liquidity was effectively trapped, resulting in sharply widening price gaps between the Korean and global markets. Still, Upbit maintains that its rebuilt systems and predictive models will ensure sufficient liquidity under normal trading conditions.

Cover image from ChatGPT, BTCUSD chart from Tradingview

Lecturas Relacionadas

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

The AI boom is facing an unexpected bottleneck: a severe shortage of skilled construction workers and electricians. As tech giants like Meta, OpenAI, and Alphabet race to build massive data centers—such as OpenAI's $16 billion "Stargate" project—they are hitting a critical labor wall. The U.S. needs an estimated 130,000 more electricians, 240,000 construction workers, and 150,000 supervisors by 2030 for AI infrastructure alone, but tens of thousands of electrician jobs go unfilled each year. While AI companies offer high premiums, with electricians earning up to $280,000 annually, worker scarcity still causes massive losses—delays on a single project can cost $14.2 million per month. The complexity of building AI data centers, which require immense power (equivalent to powering hundreds of thousands of homes), sophisticated electrical systems, and advanced liquid cooling solutions, demands highly skilled technicians who are in short supply. To combat this, companies are investing heavily in training. Meta has committed $115 million to a free training school offering tuition, housing, and stipends, targeting 5,000 new workers. OpenAI is partnering with unions to secure skilled labor. These efforts are paying off, with a significant rise in Gen Z interest in trade schools over college. However, the power demands are staggering. AI data centers are driving a rapid surge in electricity consumption, projected to account for up to 12% of U.S. power use by 2028 and raising costs for consumers. Furthermore, the construction boom is project-based, leading to a potential future glut of trained workers once building peaks, which could depress wages industry-wide. The race for AI supremacy now depends as much on skilled hands as on advanced chips.

marsbitHace 28 min(s)

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

marsbitHace 28 min(s)

OpenAI No Longer Sells Its Most Expensive Model for Profit

OpenAI is shifting its business strategy away from promoting its most expensive, flagship models for every task. Recent price cuts—80% for GPT-5.6 Luna and 20% for Terra—signal a deeper change: the company now actively advises users that many tasks don't require the most powerful model. Instead, OpenAI recommends a tiered approach: use the high-end GPT-5.6 Sol for complex planning and analysis, then delegate execution to cheaper models like Luna. This mirrors moves by Anthropic, which recently launched Claude Opus 5 at half the price of its top model, Fable 5. Both companies are de-emphasizing flagship models as primary revenue drivers, using them instead for brand prestige and technological showcases. The industry is entering a "mass-market" phase, similar to automotive, where high-volume, cost-effective models handle daily operations and drive scale. OpenAI's price reductions are partly enabled by AI models themselves optimizing underlying code and infrastructure, creating a self-reinforcing cycle of efficiency gains and cost reduction. Competition is shifting from "who is smartest" to "who offers the best value." The goal is no longer selling individual models but fostering widespread API adoption and ecosystem lock-in. By making AI calls cheap and ubiquitous, companies like OpenAI aim to become the indispensable, utility-like infrastructure powering automated workflows—the "water and electricity" of software, quietly embedded everywhere.

marsbitHace 28 min(s)

OpenAI No Longer Sells Its Most Expensive Model for Profit

marsbitHace 28 min(s)

Will the Fed Definitely Raise Interest Rates in September? How Will Crypto and U.S. Stocks Withstand the Pressure?

The market's expectation for a September Fed rate hike surged dramatically in early August, jumping from under 50% to over 80% within a week. This shift followed a contentious July FOMC meeting, where a 9-3 vote to hold rates revealed growing dissent from hawkish members advocating for an immediate hike to combat persistent inflation. The primary catalyst for this repricing is rising oil prices, driven by renewed geopolitical tensions around the Strait of Hormuz, which threaten global supply. Energy costs directly influence inflation metrics, making the upcoming July CPI report (due August 12th) a critical data point. If it shows inflation reaccelerating, the probability of a September hike will solidify. For Bitcoin and crypto assets, this is typically bearish news. Bitcoin continues to behave as a high-beta, liquidity-sensitive risk asset. A rate hike raises the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding assets and could drive capital toward money markets, pressuring crypto prices in the short term. However, historical patterns suggest that if a hike is perceived as the end of a tightening cycle rather than the start, any negative price impact may be brief. U.S. stocks, particularly crypto-linked equities like Coinbase and growth-oriented tech stocks, are also vulnerable. Higher rates increase discount rates in valuation models, putting pressure on high-multiple companies. This coincides with a pivotal tech earnings season where investor focus has shifted from massive AI capital expenditure to tangible revenue and cash flow generation. Companies with negative cash flow and weak growth narratives could face heightened volatility if borrowing costs rise in September. In summary, a September Fed hike has evolved into a mainstream market scenario. Key factors to watch are oil prices, the July CPI report, and Fed communications, which will determine the final decision and its impact on volatile crypto and equity markets.

marsbitHace 39 min(s)

Will the Fed Definitely Raise Interest Rates in September? How Will Crypto and U.S. Stocks Withstand the Pressure?

marsbitHace 39 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片