Uniswap Wins Legal Battle as U.S. Federal Judge Dismisses Crypto Rug-Pull Lawsuit

TheNewsCryptoPublicado a 2026-03-03Actualizado a 2026-03-03

Resumen

A U.S. federal judge dismissed a class-action lawsuit against Uniswap Labs and its founder, Hayden Adams, which sought to hold the decentralized exchange accountable for alleged rug pulls and pump-and-dump schemes on its platform. Judge Katherine Polk Failla ruled that Uniswap cannot be held responsible for the fraudulent actions of anonymous token issuers, emphasizing that operating a decentralized, open-source trading platform does not constitute assisting fraud. The plaintiffs had refiled the case with state-level consumer protection claims after an earlier dismissal, but the court reaffirmed legal protections for DeFi infrastructure. Following the decision, Uniswap's native token UNI saw a price increase and higher trading volume. The ruling is seen as a significant legal victory for the DeFi sector.

Uniswap Labs and its founder, Hayden Adams, saw a significant legal victory when a US federal judge dismissed a four-year-old class-action complaint seeking to hold the decentralized exchange accountable for rug pull and pump-and-dump fraud on its platform.

The decision was delivered by Judge Katherine Polk Failla in Manhattan on March 2, ruling that Uniswap cannot be held responsible for the actions of anonymous token issuers and that operating as a decentralized platform providing an open‐source trading environment does not constitute assisting fraud.

Federal Court Backs DeFi Infrastructure

Nessa Risley led the plaintiffs and filed the first lawsuit against Hayden Adams and Uniswap in April 2022. The lawsuit was dismissed in August 2023 and upheld on appeal. Again, the plaintiffs refiled in May; this time, they switched to state consumer protection concerns and claimed that the platform permitted pump-and-dump schemes and rug pulls.

The court upheld the legal safeguards for open-source DeFi platforms by rejecting the arguments once more.

Then, Brian, policy and legal lead at Uniswap Labs, said the ruling marks “another precedent-setting win for DeFi,” He stressed that even though the plaintiffs switched to state-level claims, the court once more determined that Uniswap cannot be held accountable for stated scams carried out by anonymous third-party token issuers, adding that it “defies logic” to hold a smart contract developer accountable for how others abuse the protocol.

As this decision marks Uniswap’s another major courtroom victory, as in February, Bancor-affiliated entities filed a patent infringement lawsuit against the exchange, which was dismissed by a New York federal judge, ruling that the patents at issue were based on abstract ideas and therefore not eligible for protection under U.S. patent law.

Following the ruling and continued legal wins, UNI is trading up about 1.5%, at $3.86, with a total market cap of $2.45 billion. Also, the 24-hour trading volume climbed over 23%, which signals increased market activity.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Hong Kong and Shanghai Authorities Integrate Cargo Data on Blockchain

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the outcome of the US federal judge's ruling regarding Uniswap Labs and the class-action lawsuit?

AThe US federal judge dismissed the class-action complaint against Uniswap Labs, ruling that the decentralized exchange cannot be held accountable for rug pull and pump-and-dump fraud conducted by anonymous token issuers on its platform.

QWho is the judge that delivered the decision in the Uniswap lawsuit and on what date?

AJudge Katherine Polk Failla in Manhattan delivered the decision on March 2.

QWhat did the plaintiffs claim in their refiled lawsuit against Uniswap in May?

AThe plaintiffs refiled the lawsuit switching to state consumer protection concerns, claiming that the platform permitted pump-and-dump schemes and rug pulls.

QHow did the legal representative of Uniswap Labs characterize this court ruling?

ABrian, the policy and legal lead at Uniswap Labs, said the ruling marks 'another precedent-setting win for DeFi' and stated that it 'defies logic' to hold a smart contract developer accountable for how others abuse the protocol.

QWhat was the market reaction of UNI token following the court ruling?

AFollowing the ruling, UNI was trading up about 1.5% at $3.86, with a 24-hour trading volume that climbed over 23%, signaling increased market activity.

Lecturas Relacionadas

$30 Billion DeFi Capital Exodus: LayerZero Stumbles, Chainlink Feasts

Following the major DeFi security incident involving Kelp DAO, a significant migration of funds is underway from the cross-chain protocol LayerZero to Chainlink's CCIP (Cross-Chain Interoperability Protocol). Over $30 billion in Total Value Locked (TVL) from protocols like Kelp DAO, Solv Protocol, Re, and Tydro has moved to Chainlink in the past week, driven by security concerns. LayerZero is facing a severe trust crisis after the attack. Initially denying responsibility, LayerZero Labs has now issued a public apology, acknowledging management oversights. These include a vulnerable "1/1" single-node configuration for its Decentralized Verification Network (DVN) and past misuse of a multi-signature wallet by a team member. The protocol's weekly bridge volume has slumped to near-historic lows of around $470 million. In contrast, Chainlink is experiencing a surge in adoption and activity. Its independent active addresses recently hit multi-month highs, and whales have been accumulating LINK tokens. Beyond DeFi, Chainlink is securing partnerships with traditional finance giants like DTCC, European stock exchange operator SIX Group, and asset manager Amundi. While LayerZero has announced security upgrades—such as migrating to stronger multi-signature configurations and developing a second DVN client—and contributed to a rescue fund, the event underscores that security is becoming a decisive competitive factor as DeFi matures.

marsbitHace 22 min(s)

$30 Billion DeFi Capital Exodus: LayerZero Stumbles, Chainlink Feasts

marsbitHace 22 min(s)

The $13 Trillion Repo Market Is Quietly Being Rewritten by Blockchain

The $13 trillion repurchase agreement (repo) market, a crucial artery for global short-term funding, is experiencing a significant transformation through blockchain technology. After years of limited impact in finance, blockchain is finding substantial adoption in repo transactions. Major institutions like JPMorgan Chase, HSBC, and Broadridge are deploying tokenized repo platforms, with daily volumes already reaching tens of billions of dollars. Traditional repo markets operate with fixed hours, rely on intermediaries, and involve manual, time-consuming processes. Tokenized repos, by contrast, use blockchain to create digital tokens representing cash and securities collateral. This enables near-instantaneous settlement, 24/7 trading, automated execution, and enhanced auditability. The key drivers for adoption include maturing technology, more receptive regulators, and growing client recognition of tangible benefits like reduced operational friction and capital efficiency. Analyses, such as one from Broadridge, indicate that moving a portion of repo activity onto blockchain can significantly reduce a bank's required liquidity buffers, potentially freeing up billions in capital. The infrastructure is also seen as foundational for a future of round-the-clock trading for traditional assets. Challenges remain, including the existence of fragmented blockchain networks, the need for stress testing under extreme market conditions, and the loss of operational flexibility compared to manual processes. However, the industry consensus is that these are implementation hurdles. Tokenized repo has moved beyond pilot stages to become one of blockchain's most concrete and impactful applications in traditional finance, marking a pivotal shift in how a core market functions.

marsbitHace 23 min(s)

The $13 Trillion Repo Market Is Quietly Being Rewritten by Blockchain

marsbitHace 23 min(s)

Bitwise: Why Are Top-Tier Capital Giants Aggressively Betting on New Public Blockchains Like Arc, Canton, and Tempo?

Why Top Institutions Are Betting Big on New Blockchains Like Arc, Canton, and Tempo This week saw a surge of major funding announcements for new, purpose-built blockchains. Circle's Arc raised $222M at a $3B valuation from investors like BlackRock. Canton Network developer Digital Asset secured $300M led by a16z at a $2B valuation. Stripe's Tempo, already a leader, raised $500M last year and has partnered with major firms. These three chains share key traits: they are designed for stablecoins and asset tokenization, they emerged after the US passed the *Genius Act* in July 2025, they natively support private transactions crucial for enterprise adoption, and they are backed by traditional finance and tech giants—unlike the crypto-native origins of Ethereum or Solana. This trend highlights three major shifts: 1) Clear regulation (like the pending *Clarity Act*) is unlocking massive institutional capital. 2) Built-in privacy is becoming a core feature for real-world business use, addressing the limitations of fully transparent ledgers. 3) Established corporations are now directly entering the blockchain arena, bringing significant resources and execution capability, which will accelerate innovation and competition across the entire crypto ecosystem.

marsbitHace 35 min(s)

Bitwise: Why Are Top-Tier Capital Giants Aggressively Betting on New Public Blockchains Like Arc, Canton, and Tempo?

marsbitHace 35 min(s)

From Gas Limit to 'Keyed Nonces', How to Understand the Next Step in Ethereum Scalability?

Ethereum’s scalability efforts are shifting toward a user-centric approach—focusing not only on higher TPS, but on translating technical upgrades into lower costs, smoother operations, and better wallet experiences. Two recent developments highlight this direction: - **Raising the Gas Limit to 200 million**: Following the Fusaka upgrade that increased it to 60 million, a consensus has formed around a potential future increase to 200 million. This would boost Ethereum’s execution capacity, but it is planned alongside other upgrades—such as ePBS, Block-Level Access Lists (BAL), and EIP-8037—to manage state growth and keep node operation viable for average participants. - **Keyed Nonces (EIP-8250)**: This proposal aims to improve how transactions are queued. Instead of a single linear nonce per account, it introduces multiple independent nonce domains. This prevents different types of transactions—such as private payments, session keys, or batch operations—from blocking each other. Vitalik Buterin views this as a foundational step toward better privacy support and more flexible state scalability. Together, these upgrades are part of a broader move to push complexity from wallets, DApps, and relays back into the protocol layer. For everyday users, this means future Ethereum interactions could become less congested, more intuitive, and safer—especially as core improvements in account abstraction, cross-L2 interoperability, and node decentralization continue to progress. Ultimately, Ethereum is evolving to handle not just more transactions, but more varied and complex on-chain use cases while preserving its decentralized foundation.

marsbitHace 45 min(s)

From Gas Limit to 'Keyed Nonces', How to Understand the Next Step in Ethereum Scalability?

marsbitHace 45 min(s)

Leaving OpenAI, How Much Has Their Net Worth Increased?

Former OpenAI employees have collectively accrued near-trillion dollar valuations through ventures and investments, charting AI's future. The article highlights two main paths: founding high-value companies like Anthropic and Perplexity, or applying insider insights as investors. Leopold Aschenbrenner exemplifies the investor path. After being fired from OpenAI, he leveraged firsthand knowledge of AI's massive energy demands to make hugely successful public market bets on nuclear and fuel cell companies, practicing "cross-industry cognitive arbitrage." Other alumni, like the Zero Shot VC fund founders, use their technical foresight for early-stage investing. Their key advantage lies not just in picking winners, but in knowing which technical approaches are likely dead ends—a "veto list" derived from internal OpenAI experience. Angel investing within the network, as seen with Mira Murati and Sam Altman, operates on deep, pre-existing understanding of a founder's capabilities, reducing due diligence to near zero. This creates an ecosystem bound by a shared belief in AGI's imminent arrival, differing from networks like the "PayPal Mafia" which were built on shared past struggles. The shift of these builders to investors signals a profound conviction: their situational awareness of the AI landscape is now so clear that deploying capital based on that judgment is more efficient than building themselves. They are allocating bets on the future they helped shape from the inside.

marsbitHace 56 min(s)

Leaving OpenAI, How Much Has Their Net Worth Increased?

marsbitHace 56 min(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros