Uniswap (UNI) Volume Soars 500%, Will the Recent Spike Turn Into a Breakout?

TheNewsCryptoPublicado a 2026-02-12Actualizado a 2026-02-12

Resumen

Despite a generally bearish crypto market, Uniswap (UNI) experienced a significant surge, with its price gaining 5.23% and trading volume soaring over 568% to $1.05 billion. After opening at $3.23, the price climbed to a high of $4.37 before settling at $3.39. However, technical indicators suggest a potential bearish correction. The MACD and signal lines are below zero, indicating a negative trend, and the Chaikin Money Flow (CMF) at -0.24 shows strong selling pressure. The RSI at 48.19 is neutral, while the Bull Bear Power (BBP) reading of -0.036 indicates slight bearish dominance. Key support is at $3.31, with resistance at $3.47.

With a 0.45% spike in the market, some of the crypto assets are charted in green. The bearish dominance has erased all the recent gains, keeping the broader sentiment in extreme fear. The largest asset, Bitcoin (BTC), trades around $66.9K, while Ethereum (ETH), the largest altcoin, hovers at $1.9K. Among other altcoins, Uniswap (UNI) lit green on the chart with a 5.23% gain.

The asset opened the day trading at a bottom level of $3.23, and the entry of bulls was lightning-fast, resulting in the UNI price climbing to a high range of $4.37. According to CMC data, at press time, Uniswap traded at $3.39, with its market cap resting at $2.12 billion. Notably, the daily trading volume has increased by over 568% touched the $1.05 billion zone.

Uniswap’s 4-hour trading pattern reveals the negative outlook, and the price could slip to the key support at around $3.31. Assuming the downside correction intensifies, the asset’s price may steadily fall toward $3.23 or even lower. On the flip side, if the UNI bulls reclaimed power against the pressure, the price movement might rise to a retest of the $3.47 resistance. As the token continues to move upward, it will climb high toward the $3.55 range.

Uniswap Faces Bearish Correction on the Charts

When both the Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) and the signal lines of Uniswap are below the zero line, displaying its bearish mood. As the downward momentum dominates, the broader trend is negative. Only a bullish move above zero can rescue the asset.

In addition, the Chaikin Money Flow (CMF) indicator is located at -0.24, pointing to a strong selling pressure in the UNI market. There is a significant amount of capital outflows, and if the negative reading persists, it likely supports the downside momentum to continue.

Uniswap’s daily Relative Strength Index (RSI) is found at 48.19 suggests neutral momentum. It is neither overbought nor oversold, hovering near the midpoint of 50, and a move above it hints at strengthening bullish pressure, while a drop below 40 may signal growing weakness.

Furthermore, the Bull Bear Power (BBP) reading of -0.036 indicates slight bearish dominance. With the negative value, the sellers have a marginal edge. Also, as the magnitude is very small, the ongoing market momentum of UNI is weak rather than strongly bearish.

Top Updated Crypto News

73% Price Jump and 404% Volume Boom: Can Berachain (BERA) Power Higher?

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the percentage increase in Uniswap's (UNI) daily trading volume mentioned in the article?

AThe daily trading volume of Uniswap (UNI) increased by over 568%.

QAccording to the technical analysis, what is the key support level for UNI's price?

AThe key support level for UNI's price is around $3.31.

QWhat does the Chaikin Money Flow (CMF) indicator value of -0.24 indicate about the UNI market?

AA CMF value of -0.24 indicates strong selling pressure and significant capital outflows in the UNI market.

QWhat is the significance of the Relative Strength Index (RSI) reading of 48.19 for Uniswap?

AAn RSI reading of 48.19 suggests a neutral momentum, meaning the asset is neither overbought nor oversold.

QWhat condition would 'rescue' the asset from its bearish trend according to the MACD analysis?

AA bullish move above the zero line by the Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) could rescue the asset from its bearish trend.

Lecturas Relacionadas

The Gold Buy-on-the-Dip Guide: Watch Interest Rates, Not Just War

"Gold Buying Guide: Focus on Interest Rates, Not Just War" Four months ago, gold buyers likely didn't anticipate buying at a peak that even a war couldn't sustain. After hitting a record high of $5,596 on January 29, gold entered a bear market just 91 days later, its fastest decline since 2008. A key trigger was the Fed's hawkish shift, highlighting that monetary policy, not geopolitics, is the primary driver. The article argues that the traditional "buy gold in turmoil" script has changed. While the US-Iran conflict initially boosted prices, the sustained rally in oil prices heightened inflation fears, forcing central banks to maintain or consider tighter policy. Since gold yields no interest, higher rates increase its opportunity cost, eroding its appeal. This dynamic was evident when gold fell sharply on May 18 despite positive peace talks, as lower oil prices eased inflation and thus rate hike pressures. The recent sell-off is also part of a broader market deleveraging. Correlations between gold, Nasdaq, and Bitcoin spiked as leveraged investors sold liquid assets to cover losses, creating a synchronized downturn. Historically, gold bottoms align with policy shifts, not conflict resolutions. The 2008 and 2022 bear markets ended with shifts to extreme easing and peak inflation expectations, respectively. For potential buyers, the author suggests monitoring three signals: 1) Peak interest rate hike expectations, 2) Reopening of the Strait of Hormuz (to ease oil/inflation pressure), and 3) A return to net inflows for Gold ETFs, indicating the end of forced selling. While predicting the exact bottom is impossible, the author's personal strategy involves scaling into a position across price levels like $4000, $3700, and $3500, committing no more than 30% of the intended total allocation initially, and adding the remainder only if key signals emerge. The core conclusion: In turbulent times, watching interest rates is more crucial than watching wars.

marsbitHace 5 min(s)

The Gold Buy-on-the-Dip Guide: Watch Interest Rates, Not Just War

marsbitHace 5 min(s)

Recent On-Chain Review: No Clear Narrative Under U.S. Stock Market Pressure, Just Hype

This article analyzes the current state of the Solana meme coin and community token ecosystem, highlighting a market caught between two dominant forces: attention-based PvP and a gradual return to community-centric projects. The first part explores the "Attention PvP" dynamic, where success is driven by celebrity endorsements, viral events, and speed. Examples include $JOTCHUA, which surged after its meme creator's social media activity, and $WORLDCUP, which outperformed a similar Base chain project ($PITCH) largely due to influencer support. The recent "pump.fun GO" feature, allowing bounty tasks for token promotion, is critiqued for fostering sensationalist and often negative stunts—like people getting token tickers tattooed on their bodies for rewards—reminiscent of old internet shock content. In contrast, the article points to a resurgence of organic, community-driven tokens that survive market volatility through strong holder bases and shared ideology, not just hype. Influencer Ansem is cited, arguing that durable meme coins rely on communities willing to endure losses and promote their core message daily. Examples given are older tokens like $neet (anti-work ethos), $troll, $buttcoin, and $triplet, which have maintained relative price stability. A prime example of this community-build model is the new project $KINS, the token for the browser-based MMORPG Kintara. Its success stems not from advanced graphics but from consistently delivering updates, fostering player trust, and creating genuine engagement (e.g., in-game economies, events, property auctions). It has attracted a growing player base and even notable KOLs as participants, demonstrating that sustainable growth can come from building trust rather than orchestrating pumps. The article concludes by questioning whether the market is ultimately a game of mutual trust or mutual deception, expressing hope that such reflection might lead to a healthier ecosystem.

marsbitHace 5 min(s)

Recent On-Chain Review: No Clear Narrative Under U.S. Stock Market Pressure, Just Hype

marsbitHace 5 min(s)

Teen Accused Of $13M Crypto Scam That Funded Miami Luxury

A Canadian teenager, Trenton Richard David Johnston, is accused of running a cryptocurrency fraud scheme from the Miami area, allegedly causing over $13 million in losses. The 19-year-old and unnamed co-conspirators are charged with posing as support representatives from a major search engine and crypto companies to gain access to victims' digital accounts and crypto wallets. He was indicted on charges of conspiracy to commit wire fraud and money laundering. Prosecutors allege that Johnston, along with co-defendant Brandon Michael Tardibone, laundered more than $1 million of the illicit funds to finance luxury vehicles, high-end jewelry, and an extravagant nightlife. Tardibone is additionally charged with harboring Johnston, who had overstayed his visa. Both defendants face up to 20 years in prison if convicted. The case is being prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida.

bitcoinistHace 10 min(s)

Teen Accused Of $13M Crypto Scam That Funded Miami Luxury

bitcoinistHace 10 min(s)

On-Chain Scene on Opening Day: $20 Billion Already Staked, How Do On-Chain Contracts Know Who Wins?

On the opening day of the 2026 World Cup, over $2 billion had already been wagered on just the "tournament winner" contracts on platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi. This article explores how these blockchain-based prediction markets actually function once the games begin. It breaks down the massive volume and explains how single-game and tournament-long contracts are priced, with values moving between 1-99 cents to reflect implied probabilities. A key mechanism highlighted is "elimination zeroing," where a team's "champion yes" contract immediately settles to zero once they are mathematically eliminated. The core technical question answered is: how does a smart contract "know" who won a real-world match? The answer lies in oracles. The article details two primary paradigms: UMA's "optimistic oracle" (used by most of Polymarket), which allows a challenge period after a proposed result, and Chainlink's multi-source data aggregation (used by FIFA partners like ADI Predictstreet), which automates settlement with minimal dispute windows. Finally, the article injects a note of caution, citing research estimating that a significant portion of historical trading volume on these platforms might be "wash trading" to inflate numbers. It concludes by contrasting the legal status of these "event contracts" under CFTC rules in the U.S. versus traditional, state-regulated sports betting. As the tournament progresses, the real-time operation of this multi-billion dollar machine—its settlements, eliminations, and underlying mechanisms—becomes a story as compelling as the football itself.

marsbitHace 20 min(s)

On-Chain Scene on Opening Day: $20 Billion Already Staked, How Do On-Chain Contracts Know Who Wins?

marsbitHace 20 min(s)

Sequoia Dialogue with Jensen Huang: Computing Model Undergoes a 60-Year Transformation; You Won't Be Replaced by AI, But You Will Be Dimensionality-Reduced by 'Those Who Master AI'

NVIDIA founder and CEO Jensen Huang, in a conversation with Sequoia Capital's Konstantine Buhler, argues that we are witnessing the most significant computing shift in 60 years—from retrieval-based to generative computing. Instead of just storing and retrieving data, future systems will generate highly personalized content (text, images, video) on demand, powered by massive "AI factories." Huang envisions a global "intelligence network" that will envelop the planet, following the historical patterns of energy and communication grids. He outlines a five-layer investment framework: 1) Energy, 2) Chips/Computers, 3) Infrastructure (data centers), 4) AI Models, and 5) Applications. He predicts this ecosystem will reach a scale of $20 trillion annually. Crucially, Huang pushes back against fears of AI-driven job loss. He distinguishes between specific "tasks" (e.g., typing, analyzing images) and overall "jobs" (e.g., CEO, radiologist). While AI automates tasks, it increases efficiency and demand for the higher-value problem-solving aspects of professions, thus creating more jobs and "up-leveling" careers. The real risk, he asserts, is not being replaced by AI, but being outperformed by someone who effectively leverages it. He urges everyone to embrace AI as a tool for augmented capability and innovation.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Sequoia Dialogue with Jensen Huang: Computing Model Undergoes a 60-Year Transformation; You Won't Be Replaced by AI, But You Will Be Dimensionality-Reduced by 'Those Who Master AI'

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros