Trust Wallet Launches Address Poisoning Protection

TheNewsCryptoPublicado a 2026-03-10Actualizado a 2026-03-10

Resumen

Trust Wallet has launched a new security feature called Address Poisoning Protection to safeguard users from a common crypto scam. The tool, available on mobile across over 32 EVM chains, scans transactions in real-time to detect fraudulent addresses and alerts users before they send funds. It uses intelligence from HashDit and Binance Security to identify known scam addresses and provides a side-by-side comparison to highlight differences. This initiative responds to the rising threat of address poisoning, where scammers send small transactions from similar-looking addresses to trick users. Trust Wallet estimates 34,000 such attacks occur hourly, targeting millions. The feature builds on the wallet’s existing security stack, including a transaction-risk tool introduced in 2023. Other platforms like Ledger Live and Safe also offer similar protections against this growing threat.

Trust Wallet has rolled out a new security feature to safeguard users from a common type of crypto scam known as address poisoning. The feature will be accessible on Trust Wallet for mobile over 32 EVM chains, with extra chains planned.

As per the publication, the new Trust Address Poisoning Protection will instinctively scan user transactions to detect false addresses and alert users before any false funds are sent, a scam that comprises sending small transactions from similar wallet addresses to trick users into copying the wrong place.

The tool will leverage aggregated intelligence from HashDit and Binance Security to verify known scam and similar addresses. It will also make a side-by-side comparison to show where the addresses differ.

The chief executive officer of Trust Wallet, Felix Fan, mentioned that the threat is made to be invisible: a few characters buried in the middle of a long string, easy to miss and expensive to ignore.

Others To Permit Automatic Transaction

Address Poisoning Protection is the response to that reality: automatic, real-time alerts that offer users the information they need before they act. Chainalysis has reported recently that around $17 billion was lost to crypto scams in 2025, mainly influenced by the rise of AI-enabled impersonation tactics.

Trust Wallet is not the sole entity to permit automatic transaction protections. Ledger Live, for instance, provides “clear signing” to give complete transaction details along with a whitelisting option for trusted addresses.

Safe, which also provides some address poisoning safeguarding, mentioned that this form of “spoofing” is comparatively new and has been a surging issue in the past few years. Security firm Cyvers mentioned that it has been finding over 1 million address-poisoning preparations per day on Ethereum, while Trust approximates 34,000 attacks occur every hour, aiming at 17 million victims, as per the spokesperson.

For its part, Trust Wallet mentions Address Poisoning Protection is set to be made on its current security stack, comprising a transaction-level risk tool launched in 2023.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Nasdaq Collaboration Targets Pan-European Tokenized Securities Trading and Settlement

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the new security feature launched by Trust Wallet and what does it protect against?

ATrust Wallet has launched a new security feature called Address Poisoning Protection to safeguard users from a common type of crypto scam known as address poisoning.

QHow does the Address Poisoning Protection feature work to alert users?

AThe feature instinctively scans user transactions to detect false addresses and alerts users before any false funds are sent. It makes a side-by-side comparison to show where the addresses differ.

QWhich security firms' intelligence does the new Trust Wallet tool leverage?

AThe tool leverages aggregated intelligence from HashDit and Binance Security to verify known scam and similar addresses.

QAccording to the article, how many address-poisoning attacks does Trust Wallet estimate occur every hour?

ATrust Wallet approximates that 34,000 address-poisoning attacks occur every hour.

QBesides Trust Wallet, name another entity mentioned that provides automatic transaction protection.

ALedger Live is another entity that provides automatic transaction protections, such as 'clear signing' and a whitelisting option for trusted addresses.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Following US Ban on Fable 5, Zhipu AI's Stock Soars 47%

On June 15th, shares of Zhipu AI surged dramatically on the Hong Kong stock market, peaking at a 47.6% gain before closing 32.82% higher. This sharp increase was directly triggered by two recent industry events. On June 12th, Anthropic announced it was suspending global access to its latest flagship models, Claude Fable 5 and Claude Mythos 5, to comply with a U.S. government export control order. The next day, Zhipu AI announced it would open access to its latest open-source flagship model, GLM-5.2, under the permissive MIT license. The Anthropic incident highlighted a critical issue beyond raw model capability: the risk of sudden, unpredictable loss of access to advanced AI models, especially for developers and enterprises deeply integrated with them. This has shifted industry and market focus toward factors like stability, sustainable access, and controllability. Zhipu's move, promoting "frontier intelligence for all," positions its openly available model as a reliable and accessible alternative. The GLM-5.2 model emphasizes "Long Horizon Task" capabilities with a 1M context window, targeting complex, multi-step coding and engineering workflows where maintaining context is crucial. Analysts note this event exposes the risk of dependency on closed-source models subject to single jurisdictional controls, potentially accelerating a shift toward domestic base models and localized deployments. The market's reaction signals a new valuation dimension in AI: providers who can offer stable, long-term, and sustainably accessible AI capabilities are gaining strategic importance.

marsbitHace 9 min(s)

Following US Ban on Fable 5, Zhipu AI's Stock Soars 47%

marsbitHace 9 min(s)

Fully Entering the AI Era: Alipay Bets on Conversation, WeChat Holds Fast to Social

In May 2026, Alipay announced over 300 million AI payment transactions. Shortly after, WeChat opened its mini-programs for AI integration, sparking controversy by requiring developer source code access. This highlights their diverging approaches to AI integration. Alipay is testing "Project Treasure," an optional AI-native interface replacing traditional app grids with a conversational window. Users can command complex tasks (e.g., "book a ride and order coffee") handled end-to-end by AI. This shift follows an abandoned standalone AI app, focusing instead on enhancing its existing user base. For unmodified mini-programs, Alipay's AI uses "screen-reading" to simulate user interactions, bypassing the need for developer overhaul. It also introduced "Token Pay" for micro-transactions and "AI Wallets" for autonomous agent spending. WeChat, prioritizing its core social function, is taking an embedded approach. Its AI agent will operate within existing contexts like group chats and official accounts, assisting without a separate interface. To enable this, WeChat offers developers two paths: granting source code access for direct AI control ("Automatic Mode") or manually encapsulating services into standardized "Skills." Both place significant burden on developers. Key differences emerge in handling legacy services: WeChat demands developer cooperation (code or labor), while Alipay's screen-reading offers immediate, if potentially less stable, compatibility. Alipay's 3 billion AI transactions demonstrate user acceptance of AI-driven commercial actions. The divergent strategies may reshape mini-program ecosystems—Alipay passively "AI-fying" services, WeChat potentially favoring resource-rich developers—and set competing technical standards. Ultimately, the competition centers on where users entrust the command to "help me get things done."

marsbitHace 9 min(s)

Fully Entering the AI Era: Alipay Bets on Conversation, WeChat Holds Fast to Social

marsbitHace 9 min(s)

Supply Chain, Energy, and Bloc Formation: Untangling the Core Threads of 2026 AI Investment

The core thesis for 2026 investment is a shift from traditional growth-inflation analysis towards a geopolitical framework of strategic blocs, supply chain reconfiguration, and capital expenditure (capex) direction. The US is moving from a global guarantor role towards a more bounded "camp system," reshaping trade, security, and technology flows. Key investment themes emerge from this realignment: production-capable US-aligned economies (e.g., Japan, South Korea), regional security focusing on Latin America, and the hard constraint of energy/grid capacity enabling reshoring. Europe's strength lies not in macro growth but in its high-quality "pick-and-shovel" industrial, electrical, and automation exporters serving the global capex cycle. AI remains the central US-China strategic battleground, driving massive investment in compute, power, and manufacturing stacks, with robotics gaining prominence. The investment implication is a rotation away from crowded US mega-cap tech momentum toward global beneficiaries of this restructuring: electrification equipment, industrial automation, energy storage, grid infrastructure, and select non-US markets. 2026 will be defined by investment intensity driven by geopolitical repositioning, not near-term commercial maturity.

marsbitHace 49 min(s)

Supply Chain, Energy, and Bloc Formation: Untangling the Core Threads of 2026 AI Investment

marsbitHace 49 min(s)

Appeals Court Rejects Sam Bankman-Fried Bid For New FTX Trial

A federal appeals court has rejected Sam Bankman-Fried's bid for a new trial, upholding his convictions in the FTX fraud case. The Second Circuit Court of Appeals denied defense claims of an unfair trial, sharply narrowing his legal options. His team could still petition the US Supreme Court. The ruling reinforces the legal precedent from one of crypto's most consequential cases, keeping focus on FTX's collapse, customer losses, and ongoing bankruptcy proceedings. For the market, the decision underscores the lasting impact of FTX on regulatory debates concerning exchange oversight, custody rules, and asset segregation as the industry works to rebuild trust.

bitcoinistHace 54 min(s)

Appeals Court Rejects Sam Bankman-Fried Bid For New FTX Trial

bitcoinistHace 54 min(s)

Apple Also Has to Pay Rent Now

Apple Pays Rent Too: The Two-Way Flow of "Traffic Tax" and "AI Capability Rent" Between Tech Giants For over two decades, Google has paid Apple an estimated $20 billion annually to remain the default search engine on Safari, a "traffic tax" for a critical user entry point. However, in 2026, the direction of this cash flow partially reversed. Apple agreed to pay Google roughly $1 billion per year to license its Gemini AI models, as Apple's own models reportedly struggled with complex tasks. This creates a unique dynamic: Apple acts as the "landlord" in the established search ecosystem, collecting rent from Google for access. Simultaneously, in the emerging AI arena, Apple becomes the "tenant," paying Google for access to cutting-edge AI capabilities it cannot currently match internally. While Apple claims its new models are "distilled" from Gemini outputs and contain "not a drop" of Google's original code, core dependencies remain. Its knowledge base is refined using Gemini's outputs, and its most powerful cloud model runs on Google's infrastructure. Apple has structured the deal as non-exclusive, allowing it to theoretically switch AI suppliers—a hedge against over-reliance. The future hinges on whether advanced AI models become a commodity (cheap and abundant) or remain a concentrated, scarce resource (expensive and controlled by few). Apple is betting on the former, leveraging its massive device ecosystem to be a powerful, choosy customer. If the latter proves true, its bargaining power could erode. This power dynamic is extending to developers. Apple, Google, and WeChat are all pushing for apps to expose their core functions as standardized "actions" or "intents" that their respective AI assistants (Siri, Gemini, WeChat AI) can directly call. The new scarce resource is no longer just app store visibility, but "being selected by the AI." The currency of "rent" has changed from a 30% revenue share to ceding control over how users interact with an app's functions.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros