Trump pushes for legislative ‘compromise’ on crypto bill: Here’s how

ambcryptoPublicado a 2026-01-29Actualizado a 2026-01-29

Resumen

President Trump is pushing for a compromise between crypto firms and banks to advance the stalled crypto market structure bill, the CLARITY Act. A key sticking point is stablecoin yields, which led Coinbase to withdraw support and caused a Senate Banking Committee vote to be postponed. The White House has called a meeting on February 2nd to bring both sides back to the negotiating table. Industry groups express optimism, while the crypto super PAC Fairshake has amassed $193 million to support pro-crypto candidates in the upcoming midterm elections.

U.S President Donald Trump appears keen on advancing the stalled crypto market structure bill to the finish line.

According to Reuters, the White House will meet the crypto firms and banks on the 2nd of February to seek a ‘compromise’ on the crypto bill. The main issue will be stablecoin yields, which have pitted the two sectors and stalled the bill’s momentum.

The bill, also known as the CLARITY Act, faced a setback in mid-January after Coinbase withdrew its support. The exchange cited ‘too many issues’, including a direct ban on stablecoin rewards and tokenized securities.

This forced the previously planned Senate Banking Committee vote on the draft bill to be postponed. And the two sectors have been clashing ever since.

In fact, even the White House was reportedly unhappy with the turn of events and called on Coinbase to come back to the negotiating table.

Trump to revive crypto bill?

The Senate Banking group was further instructed to double down on affordable housing policy, putting the crypto bill on the back burner.

With a winter storm underway, a possible government shutdown looming, and the November midterms approaching, many feared the bill would stall.

However, the latest update brings renewed optimism. It signals progress toward what could become the sector’s most significant regulatory effort since the stablecoin framework, the GENIUS Act.

Commenting on the same, Summer Mersinger, CEO of the Blockchain Association, an umbrella group invited to the White House meeting, which represents Coinbase, Kraken, Ripple, and others, said,

“We look forward to continuing to work with policymakers across the aisle so Congress can advance lasting market structure legislation and ensure the United States remains the crypto capital of the world.”

Similarly, Cody Carbone, CEO of another crypto trade group, The Digital Chamber, hailed the White House for ‘pulling all sides to the negotiation table.’

During his 2024 campaign trail, Trump was heavily supported by crypto firms and promised regulatory clarity for the industry.

Whatever the bill’s outcome, the industry isn’t taking any chances. Crypto’s super PAC Fairshake has unveiled a $193 million war chest ahead of the November midterms. Josh Vlasto, a spokesperson for Fairshake, said,

“With the midterms approaching, we are united behind our mission with Fairshake continuing to oppose anti-crypto politicians and support pro-crypto leaders.”

Since last July, it has received $74 million in extra cash, with $25 million each from Coinbase and Ripple and $24 million from VC firm a16z.

According to analysts, Fairshake is now the second-largest Super PAC by funding, underscoring crypto’s clout in U.S. lobbying and elections.


Final Thoughts

  • Trump is reportedly pushing for a ‘compromise’ on stablecoin yield between crypto firms and banks to advance the CLARITY Act.
  • Crypto super PAC Fairshake now has $193 million for pro-crypto candidates ahead in the November U.S. elections.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main issue that has stalled the crypto market structure bill and pitted crypto firms against banks?

AThe main issue is stablecoin yields, which have caused disagreement between the two sectors and stalled the bill's momentum.

QWhy did Coinbase withdraw its support for the CLARITY Act in mid-January?

ACoinbase cited 'too many issues', including a direct ban on stablecoin rewards and tokenized securities.

QWhat is the name of the crypto super PAC and how much funding does it have for the November midterms?

AThe crypto super PAC is called Fairshake, and it has a war chest of $193 million for the November midterms.

QWhich major companies and organizations are represented by the Blockchain Association, which was invited to the White House meeting?

AThe Blockchain Association represents Coinbase, Kraken, Ripple, and others.

QWhat significant promise did Donald Trump make to the crypto industry during his 2024 campaign trail?

ADuring his 2024 campaign trail, Donald Trump promised regulatory clarity for the crypto industry.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Six Years Later, UNI Finally Welcomes Its Own "Buyback Bull"

After years of debate, Uniswap's UNI token has finally entered a 'buyback bull' phase following the long-awaited activation of its fee-switch mechanism. The UNIfication proposal, executed in December 2025, redirected a portion of protocol fees from select pools and Unichain sequencer revenue into a treasury (TokenJar) dedicated to buying back and permanently burning UNI. Initial market reaction was muted due to modest early burn rates. A significant shift occurred in July 2026 with the launch of Robinhood Chain. Uniswap's immediate deployment there skyrocketed trading volume, making it a top fee-generator. Subsequently, governance votes extended the fee mechanism to v4 pools and Robinhood Chain, causing protocol revenue to nearly triple. Daily funds directed to UNI burns rose sharply, with Robinhood Chain contributing over half. This transitioned UNI's narrative from a governance token to a cash-flow asset backed by a perpetual automatic buyer. UNI's price, which had languished around $2.30 in early June, nearly doubled to approach $4.60 by late July. Analysts credit this to the tangible cash flow from fees rather than mere speculation. Unlike many newer projects where buybacks are offset by large investor unlocks, UNI's six-year history has resulted in a widely distributed and relatively clean supply, allowing the buyback pressure to effectively impact the secondary market. The key test will be whether trading activity, particularly on Robinhood Chain, sustains after its initial gas subsidies expire.

marsbitHace 2 min(s)

Six Years Later, UNI Finally Welcomes Its Own "Buyback Bull"

marsbitHace 2 min(s)

Only 153 Venture Capital Firms Invested in July: Is the Crypto VC Industry Experiencing a 'Mass Extinction'?

In July 2026, only 153 unique venture capital firms participated in disclosed crypto funding rounds, marking the lowest monthly count since November 2020. This figure represents an 87% decline from the peak of 1,177 firms in 2022. Overall, the first seven months of 2026 saw crypto projects raise approximately $11.78 billion across 481 rounds. This crypto VC contraction contrasts sharply with the broader venture capital landscape, where global VC investment reached a record $560.4 billion in H1 2026, heavily fueled by major AI company financings. This shift in capital allocation has drawn funds away from the crypto sector. Within crypto, funding is highly concentrated. Trading platforms, prediction markets, and payment sectors absorbed 53% of the total capital. While early-stage deals remain frequent, the largest sums flow to a few late-stage rounds and mergers & acquisitions, which surged to $7.23 billion in Q2 2026. The market is consolidating around top funds like a16z crypto and Dragonfly, which successfully raised new multi-billion dollar funds, while many smaller firms have retreated. Analysts describe this as a "great extinction" for crypto VCs, where capital is becoming more selective, favoring proven business models and assets over early-stage speculation. This raises the bar for project quality, funding efficiency, and viable exit paths.

marsbitHace 23 min(s)

Only 153 Venture Capital Firms Invested in July: Is the Crypto VC Industry Experiencing a 'Mass Extinction'?

marsbitHace 23 min(s)

Strategy's Loss in the Second Quarter Reaches $8.22 Billion Amid Bitcoin Decline

Strategy, the largest corporate holder of Bitcoin, reported a net loss of $8.22 billion for the second quarter. This loss was primarily driven by an $8.32 billion unrealized loss on its Bitcoin holdings due to a decline in the asset's price during the period. Despite these paper losses, the company increased its Bitcoin holdings to 843,775 BTC, a 25% growth since the start of the year. As part of a new monetization strategy, Strategy sold approximately $218.4 million worth of Bitcoin, mainly to fund dividends for preferred shareholders, with $216 million of that sold after Q2 ended. The company also built a $3.75 billion cash reserve, which it claims is sufficient to cover over two years of dividend and interest payments, aiming to insulate itself from Bitcoin's volatility while meeting obligations. Following the earnings release, Strategy's stock (MSTR) rose 4.7% in regular trading but corrected slightly after-hours. This pattern reflects how the company's accounting results are heavily tied to Bitcoin's price swings, even as its long-term strategy remains unchanged. The report indicates that Strategy is maintaining its core strategy of accumulating Bitcoin while building a financial buffer. This quarterly loss follows a recognizable pattern, with the company posting significant unrealized losses in previous quarters (e.g., $12.4 billion in Q4 2025 and ~$12.5 billion in Q1 2026) due to fair-value accounting. A key technical shift is its new monetization program, which introduces periodic selling pressure on the market, transitioning Strategy from a pure accumulator to a participant that occasionally adds supply. A critical question remains: how long can the cash reserve cover dividend obligations if a Bitcoin price downturn persists beyond two years?

cryptonews.ruHace 43 min(s)

Strategy's Loss in the Second Quarter Reaches $8.22 Billion Amid Bitcoin Decline

cryptonews.ruHace 43 min(s)

Will Terrorist Durov Ban Russian Officials?

Telegram founder Pavel Durov publicly reacted to being labeled a "terrorist" by Russian authorities, stating the designation came after he refused demands for mass surveillance and censorship on the platform. In a Telegram post, he highlighted that this status formally bans him from "publishing information online." Durov concluded with a statement widely circulated: Russian officials "clearly don't understand who can ban whom on the internet." This remark suggests Durov could potentially restrict official Russian government and officials' channels on Telegram, which continue to operate on the platform despite its formal blocking in Russia. The situation parallels previous, slow-moving state directives, like switching officials to domestic cars, contrasted with the current push to migrate all government communication to the Russian-made messenger MAX by 2030. However, reports indicate many officials still use Telegram via workarounds, fearing surveillance on MAX, while alternatives like BiP and KakaoTalk recently became inaccessible in Russia without a VPN. Durov has not specified any immediate actions against state channels. His statement is an initial response, with further developments depending on the authorities' reaction. The dynamic differs from 2020 when Russian regulators lifted a block on Telegram; now, Durov implies control from within the platform itself over the official accounts that persisted through that earlier blockade.

cryptonews.ruHace 43 min(s)

Will Terrorist Durov Ban Russian Officials?

cryptonews.ruHace 43 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片