Trend in US Stocks: A Post Triggers a 930-Point Rebound, Tonight Belongs to SpaceX

marsbitPublicado a 2026-06-12Actualizado a 2026-06-12

Resumen

On Thursday (June 11, U.S. Eastern Time), Wall Street staged a textbook V-shaped reversal. The Dow Jones surged 929.97 points (+1.86%) to close above 50,000, while the Nasdaq and S&P 500 rose 2.54% and 1.75%, respectively. The rally occurred despite the hottest PPI report in years, with May data showing a 6.5% year-on-year surge, the highest since 2022. The market ignored the inflation data, focusing instead on reports that former President Trump called off a planned strike on Iran, hinting at a potential multi-party peace agreement draft. This sparked a sharp drop in oil prices, fueling hopes that inflation may have peaked. Sector rotations were stark: previously battered AI hardware and cyclical stocks led the gains, while defensive sectors that hit record highs the prior day were sold off. Chip stocks like Micron and Intel saw sharp rebounds. In contrast, software giant Oracle plunged nearly 10% despite beating earnings, with concerns over cloud revenue and cash flow. Adobe also fell after hours despite raising guidance, as its CFO announced departure. The rally's sustainability is questioned, driven largely by social media posts about unconfirmed geopolitical developments. Inflation risks remain, with pipeline pressures still high. Meanwhile, the market's risk appetite faces a major test with SpaceX's historic IPO. Priced at $135 per share, it aims to raise ~$75 billion with a $1.75 trillion valuation, becoming the largest U.S. IPO ever. It will join the Nasdaq 100 in 1...

Author: Trend Research

Thursday (US Eastern Time, June 11) witnessed a textbook V-shaped reversal on Wall Street. Funds that were fleeing headlong from inflation and war the day before collectively reversed course within 24 hours.

The Dow Jones surged 929.97 points (+1.86%) to close at 50,848.75, recapturing the 50,000 mark; the Nasdaq rose 2.54% to 25,809.66; the S&P 500 gained 1.75% to 7,394.30. The Russell 2000 index led all major indices with a 3.02% gain. The VIX fear index fell nearly 12%, dropping back below 20.

The interesting part is that this big green candle emerged despite the hottest inflation data of the year.

Hottest PPI, Coldest Reaction

The May PPI released in the morning soared 6.5% year-over-year, the highest since November 2022; it rose 1.1% month-over-month, far exceeding the expected 0.7%. Breaking it down is even more startling: goods prices rose 2.8% month-over-month, the largest single-month increase since records for this data series began in 2009, with about 80% coming from energy—wholesale gasoline prices surged a staggering 23.4% in a single month. The first-stage intermediate demand prices, closer to the upstream pipeline, rose 3.2% month-over-month, also setting a historical record.

On any ordinary trading day, this data would be enough to knock the Nasdaq down 2%. But the market cared about only one thing: whether the war is about to end.

In the afternoon, Trump announced the cancellation of a scheduled strike against Iran that night, stating that Iran's top leadership had approved a draft multilateral consensus agreement, and allies including Israel had "agreed in principle." Upon the news, WTI crude oil plummeted over 4% intraday to around $86, and Brent fell below $89. Oil is the engine of this round of inflation; an oil price plunge directly dismantles the ammunition for PPI. Trump's own response to inflation was even more blunt: "I like, I like this inflation," and stated that once the war ends, oil prices will "fall like a rock."

The logical chain for funds was thus closed: draft agreement, oil price plunge, peak inflation expectations, buy everything. Sectors that fell the hardest the previous day—tech, industrials, materials—led the gains, while defensive sectors (consumer staples, real estate, energy), which hit record highs on Wednesday, were conversely sold off. In two trading sessions, the same batch of funds completed a full rotation from short to long.

Chip Stocks' Vengeful Rebound, Software Stocks' No Man's Land

The rebound firepower concentrated on AI hardware. Micron surged nearly 12%, erasing all of this week's losses in a single day; Sandisk rose 14%; Intel, upgraded by Bank of America, gained about 10% on the rationale of a surge in CPU orders; AMD rose 8%. The Philadelphia Semiconductor Index, counting from the crash on June 5th, completed its sentiment repair in just four trading sessions.

Software is a different world. Oracle plunged 9.56%, closing around $184. Beating earnings expectations was meaningless; the market focused on cloud revenue missing expectations, negative free cash flow of $23.7 billion, and a new $40 billion financing plan. After hours, Adobe delivered a standard "beat and raise" combo: Q2 revenue of $6.62 billion up 13%, full-year EPS guidance raised to $24.35 to $24.45, AI-related recurring revenue tripling year-over-year. The stock's response was a further drop of over 5% after hours. The trigger was CFO Dan Durn announcing his departure next Monday to join Marvell, following CEO Narayen's announcement of succession in March, making him the second core executive to leave Adobe in three months. The stock is down 38% year-to-date. At current prices, a company whose AI revenue has tripled is being priced as a victim of AI.

The same AI narrative: hardware is being scooped up, software is being abandoned. The market's subtext is brutal: the money in computing power is visible; software moats are not. The direction executives are voting with their feet coincides precisely with the stock price—the CFO is going to Marvell, a chip company.

Tonight, The Largest IPO in History Opens

Another motive for the late Thursday buying spree lies in Friday: SpaceX priced at $135 per share and officially debuts on Nasdaq tonight, ticker SPCX.

The scale of this deal is unprecedented: the base offering raises approximately $75 billion, nearly triple the previous record holder Saudi Aramco ($25.6 billion); the offering valuation is about $1.75 trillion, making it the seventh-largest US company by market cap upon listing, ahead of its sibling Tesla (approx. $1.6 trillion). Reports indicate subscription demand exceeded $250 billion, roughly 3.5 to 4 times the fundraising target. About 30% of the shares were allocated to retail investors, three times the industry norm. Musk retains over 82% of the voting power post-offering.

More noteworthy for traders is the follow-up: by rule, SpaceX will be added to the Nasdaq-100 Index 15 days after listing, at which point global index funds tracking QQQ will be forced to buy mechanically, estimated at $22 to $27 billion.

Risks are also clear. Senator Warren wrote to the SEC requesting a delay in the offering, questioning the valuation's detachment from financial fundamentals (annual revenue approx. $20 billion, implying a P/S ratio of about 88x) and the dual-class share structure; Morningstar directly gave it a "significantly overvalued" rating. There's a more practical issue: the $75 billion fundraising will drain liquidity from the secondary market within a week; part of the violent volatility in the storage and CPU sectors this week was the result of funds repositioning for the IPO.

Trend Observation

The quality of this rebound warrants a question mark.

Wednesday's 953-point plunge and Thursday's 930-point surge were driven by the same person's social media account. The draft agreement is not yet signed, confirmation from Iran still comes from unofficial channels, and historically this conflict has seen multiple reversals after being "close to a deal." If an index is pulled back from the cliff edge by a post, it can be pushed back over by another.

The inflation line also remains un-de-risked. The record surge in intermediate PPI demand is water already in the pipeline; even if oil prices peak immediately, it will still feed into CPI over the next two to three months. Pricing for a 25-basis-point rate hike in December remained unmoved after the data release; the ECB already hiked to 2.25% on Thursday, with the Fed, Bank of Japan, and Bank of England taking the stage next week. The market is betting on the perfect script: "war ends, oil prices plummet, rate hikes canceled"—all three links are indispensable.

Counterarguments are also on the table: core PPI month-over-month at 0.4% was below expectations, indicating that inflation momentum excluding energy is indeed slowing; Intel's CPU orders and Micron's demand are real orders, not sentiment; if a peace deal materializes, the inflation path corresponding to $86 oil will look completely different from this week's panic pricing. Bulls don't need a perfect script; they just need oil prices to stop making new highs.

Tonight's SPCX opening price will be the most honest gauge of this market's risk appetite. $75 billion in new shares, an 88x P/S ratio, 4x oversubscription—greed and skepticism will meet in the same candlestick.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the primary reason for the sharp market rebound on Thursday, June 11th, despite hot inflation data?

AThe primary reason for the sharp market rebound was news from former President Donald Trump, who announced the cancellation of a planned strike on Iran and indicated that a multilateral consensus agreement draft had been approved, raising hopes for an end to conflict. This led to a sharp drop in oil prices, fueling expectations that inflation may have peaked and prompting a broad market rally.

QHow did the performance of hardware (chip) stocks differ from software stocks during the market rally described in the article?

AHardware (chip) stocks, particularly in the AI sector, led the rally with strong gains, such as Micron (up nearly 12%), Intel (up about 10%), and AMD (up 8%). In contrast, software stocks like Oracle (down 9.56%) and Adobe (down over 5% after-hours) were sold off despite positive earnings, reflecting market skepticism about software's competitive moats compared to the more tangible demand for computing hardware.

QWhat are the key details and potential market impacts of SpaceX's (ticker SPCX) upcoming IPO as mentioned in the article?

ASpaceX's IPO is priced at $135 per share, aiming to raise approximately $75 billion, making it the largest IPO on record. It will have a valuation of around $1.75 trillion, ranking it as the seventh-largest U.S. company. Key market impacts include: significant liquidity being drawn from the market for subscriptions, its expected inclusion in the Nasdaq 100 index 15 days post-listing (triggering estimated $22-$27 billion in forced buying by index funds), and concerns over its high valuation (around 88x price-to-sales) and dual-class share structure.

QWhat concerns does the article raise about the sustainability and quality of the market rebound?

AThe article questions the rebound's sustainability, noting it was largely driven by social media posts regarding unconfirmed peace prospects, which could easily reverse. Inflation risks remain, as record-high intermediate demand PPI will likely feed into CPI in coming months. The market is betting on a 'perfect script' of war ending, oil prices crashing, and rate hikes being canceled, but any failure in this chain could undermine the rally. The high valuation and massive capital absorption of the SpaceX IPO also pose near-term risks to market liquidity and sentiment.

QAccording to the article, what is the market's implicit view on AI-related companies, as illustrated by the contrasting performance of hardware and software stocks?

AThe market's implicit view, as illustrated by the divergent performance, is a preference for AI hardware companies over software companies. The perception is that the demand and profits for computing power (chips, semiconductors) are more visible and secure, while the competitive advantages and monetization paths for AI software are less clear and more vulnerable, as evidenced by software companies' weak stock performance even with strong AI revenue growth and executive departures to hardware firms.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Xpeng and NIO Compete on Computing Power, Li Auto Shifts Architecture

On June 15, 2026, Li Auto unveiled details of its self-developed chip, Mahe M100, for its new L9 Livis model. CTO Xie Yan stated the goal was not just a faster chip, but a fundamentally different one, targeting the chip architecture itself. While competitors like NIO, Xpeng, and Huawei highlight TOPS (computing power) figures for their self-developed chips, Li Auto’s Mahe M100 focuses on redesigning the underlying architecture. It employs a "dynamic data flow architecture" to address memory bandwidth bottlenecks in large model inference, claiming up to 3x the effective computing power of Nvidia's Thor U for its specific workloads and a 40% reduction in latency. The chip's design was peer-reviewed and accepted at ISCA 2026. However, this performance is highly optimized for Li Auto's own VLA2.1 algorithm, meaning it may not generalize as well to other tasks. Li Auto aims to achieve full-stack in-house development with Mahe M100, covering chip, compiler, OS, AI algorithms, and domain controller—a level of vertical integration few competitors match. Beyond the chip, CEO Li Xiang introduced a new strategic narrative: the "embodied intelligent vehicle," defined as an integration of an EV, a professional driver, an AI computer, and a life assistant. This shifts competition from features like large screens to systemic AI capabilities. A key commitment was that Li Auto's Mahe VLA autonomous driving model will match Tesla's FSD V14 by Q4 2026, with specific OTA milestones set for July, September, and December. Financially, Li Auto faces pressure with declining revenue and vehicle gross margins since Q4 2025, while maintaining high R&D investment (approx. ¥12B in 2026, 50% AI-related). Its 2026 sales target is 550,000 vehicles, up from 406,000 in 2025. The new L9 Livis garnered over 10,000 pre-orders in two weeks. The effectiveness of these strategic moves—new products, OTAs, and the novel chip architecture—will begin to show in Q3 2026 financial results, with the year-end FSD V14 benchmark being the ultimate test.

marsbitHace 36 min(s)

Xpeng and NIO Compete on Computing Power, Li Auto Shifts Architecture

marsbitHace 36 min(s)

The Year of AI Applications: Saying 'Yes' While Ignoring Risks? A Comprehensive Open Source Log of Software Development's Journey

The Year of AI Applications: Blindly Saying "Yes" While Ignoring Risks? A Software Development Log Goes Fully Open Source. AI-generated code harbors risks hidden within seemingly correct programs, potentially leading to data leaks or asset loss. The open-source project "Narwhal AI Code Risks," from Peking University's Narwhal-Lab, compiles real-world cases, early warning signs, and typical risk pathways. Its goal is to help developers identify potential hazards early and avoid repeating past mistakes. In 2026, code is generated faster than ever but deployed with less scrutiny. The danger often lies not in glaring errors, but in code that appears normal—syntactically correct, passing all checks—yet introduces subtle but critical flaws like non-existent dependencies, excessive permissions, or exposed databases. A stark example is the Moonwell cbETH oracle incident. A configuration file error, where a cryptocurrency price was set to ~$1.12 instead of ~$2,200, slipped through 28 checks and a pull request signed by both AI (Claude, Copilot) and human developers. This "semantic deviation" resulted in a loss of $1.78 million. The risk is that AI can produce functionally valid code that is semantically wrong for the business context. As AI moves beyond simple code completion to modifying configurations, installing dependencies, and operating via autonomous agents, it traverses longer, less traceable paths within software engineering, blurring traditional boundaries and oversight points. The Narwhal AI Code Risks project structures information into three layers: `/cases` for documented real-world incidents, `/inferred` for early warning signals, and `/scenarios` for clear, generalized risk patterns not yet tied to specific events. This aims to create a lasting, public record to prevent collective amnesia about past AI-coding pitfalls. Risks are categorized into seven areas: Software Supply Chain (e.g., recommending fake packages), Code-Level Vulnerabilities (e.g., reintroducing path traversal bugs), Cloud & Infrastructure Misconfiguration (e.g., overly permissive settings), Agent Risks (from autonomous tool execution), Vertical Domain Risks (e.g., in finance, healthcare), Intellectual Property & Compliance issues, and Human Factors (like over-reliance on AI output). The project's core value is transforming isolated incidents into reusable knowledge—a foundational resource for developers to spot similar issues, for security researchers to build upon, for toolmakers to create detection rules, and for the community to contribute new findings. As AI integration accelerates, this open-source "logbook" serves as a crucial navigational aid, charting past errors to help future projects steer clear of the same traps.

marsbitHace 37 min(s)

The Year of AI Applications: Saying 'Yes' While Ignoring Risks? A Comprehensive Open Source Log of Software Development's Journey

marsbitHace 37 min(s)

The Foundation of SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation: Who is Dividing Up Musk's Annual Tens of Billions in Capital Expenditure?

SpaceX's trillion-dollar valuation is built on its three core businesses: Starlink (profitable, 60% of revenue), rockets (driving down launch costs), and AI (a major investment area). This creates a financial cycle: Starlink funds rocket development, which enables low-cost launches for AI hardware, generating future revenue. This cycle fuels annual capital expenditures of tens of billions, flowing to a vast supply chain. Suppliers are categorized by their replaceability. The first group includes irreplaceable players like NVIDIA (GPU/CUDA ecosystem), Eutelsat (critical radio spectrum), Filtronic (specialized amplifiers), Materion (strategic beryllium), and STMicroelectronics (antenna chips). The second group consists of hard-to-replace suppliers due to high switching costs, such as Honeywell (flight control), Carpenter Technology (specialty alloys), Hexcel (carbon fiber), Broadcom (data exchange), and Linde (industrial gases). The third group comprises high-volume, cost-critical suppliers for mass-produced items like Starlink terminals. Key names include Wistron NeWeb (primary manufacturer) and several A-share companies like Shenzhen Sunway (connectors), Pies New Materials (forgings), Western Superconducting (alloys), and Yingliu (castings). Other niche players include Trimble (timing), Astronics (power distribution), and CTS (thermal management). The article argues that investing in these suppliers, rather than SpaceX stock directly, offers an alternative opportunity. The rationale is threefold: procurement is just beginning to scale, SpaceX's IPO brings new transparency to its supply chain, and the situation mirrors early stages of past "super terminal" ecosystems like Apple or Tesla. While risks exist (commodity cycles, geopolitical factors, technology shifts), the core thesis is that SpaceX's massive, ongoing procurement will translate into reliable revenue for its key suppliers, regardless of its own stock price volatility.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

The Foundation of SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation: Who is Dividing Up Musk's Annual Tens of Billions in Capital Expenditure?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation Base: Who's Sharing in Musk's Annual Tens of Billions in Capital Expenditure?

**Title: The Foundation of SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation: Who Benefits from Musk's Annual $100 Billion Capital Expenditure?** This article argues that investors seeking to benefit from SpaceX's growth might find greater opportunities in its supply chain rather than directly investing in the company itself, drawing parallels to historical successes with Apple, Tesla, and NVIDIA suppliers. **SpaceX's Business Model & Cash Flow:** SpaceX generates revenue from three main areas: 1. **Starlink:** Its profitable core, earning $11.3B in 2023 (60% of revenue), funding other ventures. 2. **Rockets (Falcon/Starship):** Requires $3B+ in annual R&D but achieves the world's lowest launch costs. 3. **AI:** Currently unprofitable (-$6B+ in 2023), investing heavily in ground-based supercomputers (220,000 GPUs) and future orbital data centers. The cycle is: Starlink profits → fund cheaper rockets → low-cost launches deploy AI hardware → AI compute rentals generate future revenue. This cycle drives annual procurement spending of tens of billions of dollars. **The Supply Chain Beneficiaries:** Suppliers are categorized by their replaceability: **1. Nearly Irreplaceable (High Barriers to Entry):** * **NVIDIA:** Powers the Colossus supercomputer; its CUDA ecosystem creates immense switching costs. * **Eutelsat (SATS):** Controls critical radio spectrum for satellite communications; holds a ~3% stake in SpaceX. * **Filtronic (FTC):** Supplies millimeter-wave signal amplifiers for Starlink satellites; SpaceX constitutes 83% of its revenue. * **Materion (MTRN):** Global leader in beryllium production, a strategic material used in Starship structures. * **STMicroelectronics (STM):** Supplies phased-array antenna chips for Starlink satellites. **2. Replaceable, but Switching Cost is Prohibitively High:** * **Honeywell (HON):** Provides flight control and inertial navigation systems with decades of certification. * **Carpenter Technology (CRS):** Manufactures ultra-pure specialty steel alloys for Raptor engines. * **Hexcel (HXL):** Supplies custom carbon fiber composites developed over a decade with SpaceX. * **Broadcom (AVGO):** Manages high-speed data switching. * **Linde Group:** Supplies industrial gases (liquid oxygen/nitrogen) from facilities built near SpaceX launch sites. **3. High-Volume, Cost-Critical Manufacturing:** Focuses on mass-producing components like Starlink user terminals (target: 30 million units). * **Key Players:** Wistron NeWeb (6285, primary terminal manufacturer), several Chinese A-share companies (e.g., Sunway Communication, PAX New Materials, Western Metal Materials, Yingliu Co.), and smaller US firms like Trimble (TRMB, timing systems). **Why Now?** Three factors make the supply chain opportunity timely: 1. **Volume Ramp-Up:** SpaceX plans 100 launches in 2026, aims for 30 million Starlink terminals, and will deploy AI data centers, meaning procurement will accelerate. 2. **Increased Transparency:** The IPO provides public financial data, allowing investors to track supplier order growth. 3. **Historical Precedent:** The current phase is likened to Tesla's early mass-production stage (circa 2018), suggesting a long growth runway for suppliers. **Conclusion:** The article posits that while investing in SpaceX stock is betting on Elon Musk's ambitious vision at a high valuation, investing in its established suppliers is a bet on the tangible, recurring revenue from its massive procurement budget, which is largely decoupled from day-to-day stock price volatility.

链捕手Hace 1 hora(s)

SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation Base: Who's Sharing in Musk's Annual Tens of Billions in Capital Expenditure?

链捕手Hace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片