TON Rebrands Native Token As Gram, Reviving Original White Paper Name

bitcoinistPublicado a 2026-06-03Actualizado a 2026-06-03

Resumen

The native token of the Toncoin (TON) network is being rebranded to 'Gram,' reviving its original name from the project's first white paper. This change, announced by Telegram co-founder and CEO Pavel Durov, is the fourth step in his "Make TON Great Again" (MTONGA) initiative. The transition period is expected to take about three weeks, and a new logo has been previewed. The rebrand follows Telegram's official return to the ecosystem in May as its largest validator, after a six-year absence that began with a 2020 legal dispute with the SEC. Durov stated that the move "returns to our roots" and paves the way for future developments, with three more steps remaining in the MTONGA roadmap. At the time of the announcement, Gram was trading around $2.02.

Toncoin’s native token has rebranded to ‘Gram’ as part of the latest step in Pavel Durov’s “Make TON Great Again” roadmap.

Toncoin’s Native Token Is Now Called Gram

In a new post on Telegram, Pavel Durov has shared details related to a rebranding of the native token of the Toncoin network. The asset is set to see a name change to Gram, with the transition period expected to take about three weeks.

Durov is the co-founder and CEO of Telegram, and one of the biggest backers of TON. In the blockchain’s early days, its full form even stood for the Telegram Open Network, with the Telegram team handling its development. Telegram’s official involvement with the token, however, ended back in 2020 following a legal dispute with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

After Telegram pulled out, the ecosystem rebranded itself to The Open Network and development was handed off to independent contributors. While the messaging giant ended its involvement in the project, it didn’t break all ties. In 2023, Telegram integrated a wallet based on the blockchain to its official app.

Durov himself also remained a supporter of the project. This year, the Telegram CEO kickstarted the “Make TON Great Again” (MTONGA) initiative, which is going to have a total of seven steps. The first two steps of the roadmap went into action in April and provided upgrades to the network’s transaction speed and fees.

The third step, announced in early May, saw Telegram officially re-enter the picture after a six-year absence, replacing the TON Foundation as the driving force behind the ecosystem. The messaging company also became the network’s largest validator.

“Telegram becoming TON’s largest validator strengthens decentralization,” said Durov in an X post a day after announcing the move. “It lets other major players join the validator pool without centralizing the network — with Telegram as the counterbalance.”

Now, the Telegram co-founder has unveiled the rebrand to the name Gram as the fourth checkpoint in the MTONGA plan. This change, which only applies to the blockchain’s native token, will bring back the asset’s original name from its first white paper. The new website for the token provides a teaser of a fresh logo for the cryptocurrency.

The new logo and name for the cryptocurrency | Source: Gram.org

“We’re returning to our roots — and starting a new chapter,” noted the Telegram co-founder. “This rebranding will pave the way for what comes next.” There are three more steps left in the MTONGA roadmap, but it only remains to be seen what they will bring to the network.

Gram Price

At the time of writing, Gram is trading around $2.02, up over 5% in the last seven days.

The trend in the price of the coin over the last five days | Source: TONUSDT on TradingView

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the new name of Toncoin's native token and why was it chosen?

AThe new name is 'Gram'. It was chosen to revive the asset's original name from its first white paper, marking a return to the project's roots.

QWho announced the rebranding of the native token and what initiative is it part of?

APavel Durov, co-founder and CEO of Telegram, announced the rebranding. It is the fourth checkpoint in his 'Make TON Great Again' (MTONGA) roadmap initiative.

QWhat was the full form of 'TON' originally, and what is its status with Telegram now?

AOriginally, TON stood for the 'Telegram Open Network'. Telegram officially re-entered the TON ecosystem in early May 2024, after a six-year absence, replacing the TON Foundation as the driving force and becoming its largest validator.

QWhat was the reason for Telegram's initial withdrawal from the TON project in 2020?

ATelegram withdrew from the TON project in 2020 following a legal dispute with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

QAccording to the article, what was the approximate price and weekly performance of Gram at the time of writing?

AAt the time of writing, Gram was trading around $2.02, up over 5% in the last seven days.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Conversation with Co-founder of Hyperdash: Why is Hyperliquid Still Severely Undervalued?

Interview Summary with Hanson Birringer, Co-founder of Hyperdash: Why Hyperliquid Remains Undervalued In an interview on *The Rollup*, Hanson Birringer, Co-founder and Chief Revenue Officer of Hyperdash—a trading data analytics platform for Hyperliquid—shared his investment thesis on the Hyperliquid ecosystem. He described Hyperliquid as a pure play on three key crypto super-trends: perpetual contracts, real-world assets (RWAs), and stablecoins. The platform is an open-source, decentralized, and high-performance financial system uniquely positioned to bridge traditional institutional capital with decentralized finance. Birringer highlighted Hyperliquid's leadership in perpetual DEX trading and its recent innovation of RWA perpetual contracts. He emphasized the significance of USDC becoming a core quoting asset, which, by allocating 90% of its backend yield from assets like US treasuries to a protocol buyback fund, creates substantial, programmatic buy pressure for the Hype token. He addressed regulatory challenges, noting that Hyperliquid's policy team is actively engaging with US regulators like the CFTC to establish clear rules for decentralized venues. Once achieved, regulated brokers could route orders directly to Hyperliquid's backend, tapping into its low-cost liquidity layer. Regarding revenue, Birringer was optimistic, citing the immense size of traditional financial markets. Even capturing a small fraction of global trading volume in products like RWA perpetuals could lead to exponential growth for the protocol. The recently launched Grayscale Hyperliquid ETF, seeded by their SPV (Hyper Holdings Global), provides a compliant on-ramp for institutional investors drawn to the clear "cash flow + token buyback" model. Finally, he discussed Hyperdash's acquisition of Imperator, enhancing its data and node infrastructure to serve both retail traders and traditional asset managers. His bullish case rests on Hyperliquid's potential to provide unprecedented global access to dollar-based capital markets. He struggled to articulate a bear case, seeing the long-term trends of internet adoption and financial inclusion as powerful tailwinds.

marsbitHace 31 min(s)

Conversation with Co-founder of Hyperdash: Why is Hyperliquid Still Severely Undervalued?

marsbitHace 31 min(s)

DeepSeek V4 'Full-Blooded Edition' Leaked, Could Be Released As Early As Tomorrow

The highly anticipated full release of DeepSeek V4 is imminent, expected to launch as early as tomorrow after nearly three months of waiting. A select group has already received access to the GA (General Availability) beta, which includes two versions: DeepSeek V4 Flash and DeepSeek V4 Pro. Early testers report that V4's overall performance is close to the level of Opus 4.8, with coding capabilities rivaling GPT-5.6 Sol. Its agent abilities are significantly enhanced, and 3D/SVG generation has improved notably. While it may not surpass the recently released Kimi K3 in performance, its expected price point is significantly lower. The official release will introduce a new "peak/off-peak" pricing model for its API. For example, deepseek-v4-pro will cost $0.87 per million output tokens during standard times and $1.74 during peak hours. The flash version is even more aggressive at $0.28/$0.56 per million tokens, with cached input tokens priced extremely low at $0.0028. This makes V4 a strong contender in terms of cost-effectiveness, potentially offering Opus-level capabilities at a fraction of the cost, continuing DeepSeek's reputation as a "price disruptor" in the AI market. Initial demos showcasing V4's capabilities have begun circulating, including generated 3D simulation games, HTML games blending elements of Minecraft and No Man's Sky, and classic games like a "Cut the Rope" clone. The final GA version is set to replace the older deepseek-chat and deepseek-reasoner models, which will be retired on July 24th.

marsbitHace 40 min(s)

DeepSeek V4 'Full-Blooded Edition' Leaked, Could Be Released As Early As Tomorrow

marsbitHace 40 min(s)

WEEX Labs Weekly Observation: The 'Power Restructuring' of AI Infrastructure and the 'Deep Dive Movement' into the Real Economy

WEEX Labs Weekly Review: AI Infrastructure's "Power Restructuring" and the "Deep Dive" into the Real Economy Mid-July 2026 marks a pivotal shift in the global AI industry. The allocation of computing power is transferring from cloud giants to compute resource owners, while the core value of AI is solidifying around its penetration into physical industry, moving beyond the race for model parameters. The era of fragmented model development is over, replaced by a capital-intensive, integrated chain driven by hard tech. Key developments this week include Meta's planned entry into the cloud computing market with "MetaCompute." This move by social media giants with massive GPU clusters challenges traditional cloud providers like AWS, integrating compute, models, and data into one-stop services, which will squeeze smaller rental providers and shift enterprise focus towards underlying model ecosystems. Chinese foundational models like DeepSeek-V4 and Tencent's Hy-3 are pushing towards "utility" status through open-source releases and extreme cost reductions via MoE architectures. This lowers entry barriers for enterprises, allowing them to focus resources on private deployment and deep business integration. Embodied intelligence, particularly humanoid robots, is transitioning from lab demos to real-world factory applications, driven by policies promoting large-scale, practical deployment in logistics and manufacturing. The value focus is shifting from spectacle to stable industrial data and real operational efficiency. Global governance, through forums like WAIC, is evolving from theoretical ethics to practical operational frameworks for "Sovereign AI," raising geopolitical compliance barriers and making auditability and data sovereignty core design requirements from the outset. WEEX Labs Insights: The current transformation shows AI's prosperity is deeply embedding into the fabric of global manufacturing. Strategic recommendations include: 1) leveraging open-source models for private, proprietary knowledge bases; 2) maintaining cloud provider diversity to avoid vendor lock-in from integrated model ecosystems; and 3) seeking opportunities in the "embodied infrastructure" supporting robots, such as data collection, industrial simulation, and factory AI adaptation services.

marsbitHace 56 min(s)

WEEX Labs Weekly Observation: The 'Power Restructuring' of AI Infrastructure and the 'Deep Dive Movement' into the Real Economy

marsbitHace 56 min(s)

Is WEEX TradFi Reliable? What You Should Know Before Your First Trade of U.S. Stock Tokens

In recent years, cryptocurrency users have expanded their focus beyond Bitcoin and Ethereum to include popular traditional financial (TradFi) assets like Nvidia, Apple, and Tesla stocks. This shift raises key questions: What do these TradFi assets represent on crypto trading platforms? How do they differ from traditional stock ownership? And how can users assess the reliability of platforms offering such products? TradFi products, such as those offered by WEEX TradFi (including NVDA, MSFT, AAPL, TSLA, and QQQ tokens), are blurring the lines between crypto and traditional markets. They allow users to trade based on the price movements of traditional assets within a familiar digital asset trading environment. However, it's crucial to understand that trading a "stock token" is not equivalent to owning the actual stock. Users are participating in price speculation, not gaining shareholder rights like dividends or voting. A key feature of these products is 7x24 trading, offering flexibility beyond traditional market hours. While convenient, this also introduces unique risks, such as potential liquidity gaps and volatility when underlying markets are closed. For users evaluating TradFi products, reliability hinges on transparency and risk management. Critical factors include understanding the product mechanism, how prices track the underlying assets, and the associated risks—especially when using leverage. Popular stocks and indices are still subject to company performance, macroeconomic shifts, and sector trends. Ultimately, TradFi represents a new gateway connecting crypto users to global markets. The future points toward integrated trading environments where the distinction between "crypto investor" and "traditional investor" fades. For newcomers, a platform's reliability stems not from promises, but from a clear understanding of the product, a comprehensive view of risks, and informed judgment of the platform's capabilities.

marsbitHace 57 min(s)

Is WEEX TradFi Reliable? What You Should Know Before Your First Trade of U.S. Stock Tokens

marsbitHace 57 min(s)

Coinbase is ‘a little bit distant from users,’ claims Cobie – Is there a fix?

Crypto influencer Rune questioned Jordan Fish (Cobie), lead for Coinbase's trading products and the Base App, on how to increase Base App usage given eroding trust within the crypto-native community. Fish acknowledged Coinbase has historically been "a little bit in an ivory tower and a little bit distant from users," particularly crypto natives. His stated goal is to bridge this gap, better represent the on-chain community's voice, and focus on building products people enjoy using, though he noted outcomes remain uncertain. This discussion coincided with criticism of Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong for using a CryptoPunk profile picture he did not own. After switching to a meme image, which sparked a speculative "Brian" memecoin rally on Base, Armstrong purchased a real CryptoPunk, shifting attention and causing the memecoin's value to collapse. These events added further stress to Coinbase's ongoing challenges with community trust.

ambcryptoHace 1 hora(s)

Coinbase is ‘a little bit distant from users,’ claims Cobie – Is there a fix?

ambcryptoHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot