Tim Scott Signals Breakthrough on Stablecoin Yield Dispute

TheNewsCryptoPublicado a 2026-03-18Actualizado a 2026-03-18

Resumen

U.S. Senator Tim Scott has indicated that a breakthrough may be imminent in the dispute over stablecoin yield provisions within the Senate's crypto market structure bill, the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act. He expects to receive the first compromise proposal this week. The bill's progress had stalled due to disagreements on a clause that would ban third parties from offering yields on stablecoins. Traditional bankers argue such yields create a loophole diverting deposits from banks, while crypto advocates view the restriction as anti-competitive. Recent closed-door meetings between banks and crypto lobbyists have aimed to find a middle ground, though no official updates to the legislative calendar have been made.

Tim Scott, a U.S. senator, has revealed that this week banks and crypto lobbyists may compromise regarding stablecoin yield payments. In the current scenario, the Senate’s crypto market structure bill progress is stalled.

Scott attended a crypto lobby event in Washington chaired by the Senate Banking Committee, in which he said that he anticipates having the first proposal in his hands to take a look at. He further added that if that really happens before the end of this week, and I think that it will. I think we are going to be in much better shape.

The bill about which he is talking is the Senate’s crypto market structure legislation, officially known as the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, which was rolled out to define how regulators will look after digital assets and describe the roles of various agencies.

Although progress revolving the legislation came to a standstill after disagreements arose over a provision that would prohibit third parties from providing stablecoin yield payments. Bankers claim that such yield offerings make a loophole that could take deposits away from traditional banks.

The crypto proponents say the limitation is anti-competitive and restricts user incentives. The bill is of concern to the Securities and Exchange Commission as well as the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

The Rigorous Meetings

Senate Banking, which looks after the SEC, indefinitely delayed a markup of the bill in January. Afterward, the Senate Agriculture Committee, which looks after the CFTC, progressed its version to the Senate floor.

In the last weeks, bankers and crypto lobbyists have met in various closed-door meetings to negotiate a middle ground, but the Senate Banking Committee has not yet set any official updates to the legislative calendar.

In the latest comments, House Financial Services Committee chair French Hill mentioned the CLARITY Act can help address some of the unresolved issues associated with stablecoin regulation and wider market structure concerns.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

OKX has Launched a Security-Packed Agentic Wallet

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main breakthrough that Senator Tim Scott signaled regarding stablecoin regulation?

ASenator Tim Scott signaled that banks and crypto lobbyists may compromise on the dispute over stablecoin yield payments, potentially leading to a proposal being reviewed by the end of the week.

QWhich specific bill is being discussed in relation to crypto market structure and stablecoin yields?

AThe bill being discussed is the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, which aims to define regulatory oversight of digital assets and assign roles to various agencies.

QWhy did progress on the crypto market structure bill stall in the Senate?

AProgress stalled due to disagreements over a provision that would prohibit third parties from providing stablecoin yield payments, with bankers arguing it creates a loophole that could divert deposits from traditional banks.

QWhat are the opposing views between bankers and crypto proponents on stablecoin yield payments?

ABankers claim stablecoin yield offerings create a loophole that could take deposits away from traditional banks, while crypto proponents argue the limitation is anti-competitive and restricts user incentives.

QWhich congressional committees are involved in overseeing the crypto market structure legislation?

AThe Senate Banking Committee (overseeing the SEC) and the Senate Agriculture Committee (overseeing the CFTC) are involved, with the House Financial Services Committee also commenting on the CLARITY Act's potential to address regulatory issues.

Lecturas Relacionadas

a16z: How Blockchain Fills the Gaps in AI Agent Identity, Payments, and Trust?

AI Agents are rapidly evolving from tools into autonomous economic participants, but they lack standardized ways to prove identity, authorization, and payment across environments. Blockchain infrastructure addresses these gaps by providing portable identities via wallets, programmable payments through stablecoins, and auditable transaction records on public ledgers. Key challenges include the absence of a universal identity layer (like "KYA" – Know Your Agent) for non-human entities, governance risks when AI systems control critical resources, and the need for trustless payment systems for agent-to-agent commerce. Emerging solutions include on-chain agent registries, encrypted credentials, and crypto-native toolkits that enable delegated authority and verifiable execution. Stablecoins and embedded payment protocols (e.g., x402) are enabling a new class of "headless merchants" where agents transact without human intervention. Trust shifts from manual oversight to cryptographic verification, as scalability demands automated accountability. Ultimately, blockchain allows agents to operate as permissionless economic actors while preserving user control through programmable constraints and transparent governance.

marsbitHace 13 min(s)

a16z: How Blockchain Fills the Gaps in AI Agent Identity, Payments, and Trust?

marsbitHace 13 min(s)

Exploring Physical World AGI with "Visual Reasoning", ElorianAI Raises $55 Million

ElorianAI, co-founded by ex-Google AI expert Andrew Dai and former AI specialist Yinfei Yang, has raised $55 million in early funding to develop next-generation AI systems with advanced visual reasoning capabilities. While current large models excel in text-based tasks like programming and math, they perform poorly in visual reasoning—even top models like Gemini only match a 3-year-old’s ability in basic visual benchmarks. The key limitation lies in the architecture of current vision-language models (VLMs), which first convert visual inputs into text before reasoning, losing critical spatial and structural information. ElorianAI aims to build a native multimodal model that processes and reasons directly in visual space, enabling deeper understanding of physical relationships, constraints, and environments. The company plans to release a state-of-the-art visual reasoning model by 2026, with potential applications in robotics, disaster management, engineering, healthcare, and AI hardware. By using high-quality, diverse, and synthetically generated data, ElorianAI intends to create models that don’t just perceive but truly understand and reason about the physical world—bringing us closer to visual AGI.

marsbitHace 42 min(s)

Exploring Physical World AGI with "Visual Reasoning", ElorianAI Raises $55 Million

marsbitHace 42 min(s)

This Time, OpenAI Eliminated 90% of Human Designers

OpenAI's latest release, GPT-Image 2, marks a paradigm shift in AI-generated imagery, moving beyond aesthetic quality to logical reasoning and contextual understanding. The model introduces a "thinking mode," where it performs background reasoning—such as mathematical calculations and geographic knowledge—before generating images. This enables highly accurate and context-aware outputs, like a livestream overlay showing precise distance metrics or a brand-aligned poster design. The model excels in rendering Chinese text with remarkable accuracy and aesthetic quality, a significant improvement over previous versions. It supports multi-turn conversational editing via the new Responses API, allowing iterative refinements similar to chatting with a large language model. While GPT-Image 2 demonstrates unprecedented capabilities in commercial applications like marketing material and illustration—potentially displacing many human designers due to its cost efficiency—it still has limitations. Minor artifacts in fine text details persist, and complex prompts can cause extended processing times. Additionally, the technology raises ethical concerns around deepfakes and digital trust. Overall, GPT-Image 2 transitions AI image generation from a novelty to a powerful production-ready tool, redefining industry standards and pushing the boundary of what’s possible in visual AI.

marsbitHace 48 min(s)

This Time, OpenAI Eliminated 90% of Human Designers

marsbitHace 48 min(s)

20 Billion Valuation, Alibaba and Tencent Competing to Invest, Whose Money Will Liang Wenfeng Take?

DeepSeek, an AI startup founded by Liang Wenfeng, is reportedly in talks with Alibaba and Tencent for an external funding round that could value the company at over $20 billion. This marks a significant shift, as DeepSeek had previously relied solely on funding from its parent company,幻方量化 (Huanfang Quantitative), and had resisted external investment. The potential valuation would place DeepSeek among the top-tier AI model companies in China, comparable to competitors like MoonDark (valued at ~$18 billion) and ahead of recently listed firms like MiniMax and Zhipu. The funding—which could range from $600 million (for a 3% stake) to $2 billion (for 10%)—is seen as a move to secure resources for model development, retain talent, and support infrastructure needs, particularly as competition in inference models and AI agents intensifies. Both Alibaba and Tencent are eager to invest, not only for financial returns but also to integrate DeepSeek into their broader AI ecosystems. However, DeepSeek’s leadership is cautious about maintaining independence and may prefer financial investors over strategic ones to avoid being locked into a specific tech ecosystem. Alternative options, such as state-backed funds, offer longer-term capital and policy support but may come with slower decision-making and potential constraints on global expansion. With competing AI firms accelerating their IPO plans, DeepSeek’s window for securing optimal terms may be narrowing. The final decision will reflect a trade-off between capital, resources, and strategic independence.

marsbitHace 59 min(s)

20 Billion Valuation, Alibaba and Tencent Competing to Invest, Whose Money Will Liang Wenfeng Take?

marsbitHace 59 min(s)

After Losing 97% of Its Market Value, iQiyi Attempts to Use AI to Forcefully Extend Its Lifespan

After losing 97% of its market value since its 2018 peak, iQiyi is aggressively pivoting to AI in a desperate attempt to survive. At its 2026 World Conference, CEO Gong Yu announced an "AI Artist Library" with over 100 virtual performers and a new AIGC platform, "NaDou Pro," promising faster production and lower costs. This shift comes as the company faces severe financial distress: its market cap sits near delisting thresholds at $1.36 billion, with significant losses, declining membership revenue, and depleted cash flow. The AI strategy has sparked controversy. Top actors have issued legal threats against unauthorized digital replicas, while in Hengdian, over 134,000 background actors are seeing their already scarce job opportunities vanish as AI replaces them for background roles. iQiyi's move represents a fundamental shift from being a high-cost content buyer to a landlord" to becoming a "platform capitalist" that transfers production risk to creators. This contrasts with competitors like Douyin (TikTok's Chinese counterpart), which is investing heavily in *real* actor-led short dramas, betting that authentic human connection retains users better than AI-generated content. The article draws a parallel to the 1920s transition to "talkies," which made cinema musicians obsolete but ultimately enriched the art form. In contrast, iQiyi's AI drive is framed not as an artistic evolution but as a cost-cutting measure that could degrade storytelling, replacing genuine human emotion with algorithmically calculated stimulation and potentially numbing audiences' capacity for empathy. The core question remains: can a company focused solely on financial survival preserve the art of storytelling?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

After Losing 97% of Its Market Value, iQiyi Attempts to Use AI to Forcefully Extend Its Lifespan

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros