Tiger Research: Ten Major Shifts in the Cryptocurrency Market by 2026

marsbitPublicado a 2025-12-29Actualizado a 2025-12-29

Resumen

Tiger Research outlines ten major shifts expected in the cryptocurrency market by 2026. As the industry matures, institutional capital will remain concentrated in Bitcoin and Ethereum, avoiding unproven assets. Projects without real revenue generation will face淘汰, while unsustainable tokenomics will give way to models emphasizing buybacks and burns. Increased M&A activity will drive market consolidation. Emerging trends include the fusion of robotics and crypto-enabled gig economies for decentralized data collection, and media companies adopting prediction markets to boost engagement. Traditional finance will dominate real-world assets (RWA) via private chains, while ETH staking ETFs will accelerate growth in Bitcoin-based financial products (BTCFi). Fintech apps will surpass exchanges as primary entry points for new users. Finally, privacy technology will become essential institutional infrastructure to protect large-scale trading strategies.

This report is authored by Tiger Research. The cryptocurrency industry is entering the mainstream. Institutions have become key players in the market. Capital is flowing to projects that generate real yield. Short-term price fluctuations are no longer important. Sustainable business models have become crucial. Tiger Research predicts ten major shifts in the cryptocurrency market by 2026.

1. Institutional Capital Continues to Stay in Bitcoin

Source: Tiger Research

As institutions dominate the market, capital flows have become more cautious. These investors avoid unverified assets, limiting their scope to Bitcoin and Ethereum. This trend is likely to continue. Market growth will be concentrated only on assets that meet institutional standards.

2. Profitless Projects Face Market Elimination

Source: Tiger Research

85% of new tokens decline in price after TGE, exposing the limitations of narrative-driven growth. Hype-based projects will be replaced by new trends at an increasingly rapid pace. The market will shift towards projects that generate real yield and demonstrate robust fundamentals.

3. Utility Has Failed, Buybacks Are the Only Answer

Source: Tiger Research

Tokenomics focused on utility have failed. Governance voting rights have failed to attract investors. Complex structures are unsustainable. The market now demands clear value returns. Models that provide direct returns through buybacks and burns will survive. Structures where protocol growth directly impacts token price will also survive. New innovative models will emerge from this shift.

4. Increased M&A Opportunities Between Projects

Source: Tiger Research

Web3 is maturing. Competition for market dominance is intensifying. Mergers and acquisitions (M&A) are now the fastest way for companies to scale and enhance competitiveness. The winners will drive aggressive M&A activity. The market will be reshaped by businesspeople who create real profits.

5. Robotics and Cryptocurrency Will Usher in a New Era of the Gig Economy

Source: figure.ai

The robotics industry is growing. Real-world data for robot training has become crucial. Traditional centralized methods cannot efficiently collect massive amounts of data. Blockchain-based decentralized crowdsourcing solves this problem. It collects vast amounts of data from individuals globally and provides transparent, instant rewards. A new gig economy centered around robotics will emerge.

6. Media Companies Adopt Prediction Markets

Source: Tiger Research

As traditional revenue models reach their limits, media companies will adopt prediction markets as a survival strategy. Readers will shift from passive consumption to active participation, placing capital bets on news outcomes. This shift will optimize revenue structures while driving deeper audience engagement.

7. Traditional Finance Dominates RWA Through Self-Built Chains

Source: Tiger Research

Traditional financial institutions are the main suppliers in the RWA market. Given the need for asset control and security, the benefits of using third-party platforms are minimal. These companies are likely to build their own chains to maintain market leadership. RWA projects lacking independent asset supplies will lose their competitive advantage and face elimination.

8. ETH Staking ETFs Will Drive BTCFi Growth

Source: Tiger Research

The launch of Ethereum staking ETFs will prompt Bitcoin ETF holders to seek yield. BTCFi fills this gap. As large amounts of capital enter Bitcoin, the demand for asset utility will rise. This pursuit of yield will drive the next wave of BTCFi growth.

9. Fintech Will Surpass Exchanges as the Primary On-Ramp

Source: Tiger Research

As rules become clearer, fintech applications have become the preferred choice for cryptocurrency trading. New users no longer need to use cryptocurrency exchanges. They can buy and sell directly within the applications they use daily. The next wave of growth will be led by these fintech tools.

10. Privacy Technology Becomes Core Institutional Infrastructure

Source: Tiger Research

On-chain transparency exposes trading plans. This is a weakness for large institutions. High-net-worth participants must hide their movements to ensure security. Privacy technology is a key tool for these institutions to enter the market. Large-scale capital will only flow in if transaction data is secure.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat are the two main cryptocurrencies that institutional investors are predicted to continue focusing on by 2026, according to Tiger Research?

AInstitutional investors are predicted to continue focusing primarily on Bitcoin and Ethereum, as they are considered established and meet institutional standards.

QWhy does Tiger Research claim that utility-focused tokenomics has failed, and what model is expected to survive?

AUtility-focused tokenomics has failed because governance voting rights failed to attract investors and complex structures proved unsustainable. The model expected to survive is one that provides direct returns through buybacks and burns, or structures where protocol growth directly impacts the token price.

QHow is the convergence of robotics and cryptocurrency predicted to create a new gig economy era?

AThe convergence is predicted to create a new gig economy era by using blockchain-based decentralized crowdsourcing to efficiently collect the massive amounts of real-world data needed for robot training from individuals globally, offering transparent and instant rewards.

QWhat role are financial technology (fintech) applications expected to play in the future of cryptocurrency onboarding?

AFintech applications are expected to become the primary onboarding channel for new users, surpassing exchanges. Users will be able to buy and sell cryptocurrency directly within the everyday applications they already use.

QWhy is privacy technology considered crucial for large institutional adoption of cryptocurrency?

APrivacy technology is considered crucial because on-chain transparency exposes the trading plans of large institutions, which is a significant weakness. High-net-worth participants must hide their movements for security, making privacy tech a key tool for their market entry. Large-scale capital will only flow in if transaction data is secure.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Why former Bank of America strategist sees an Ethereum ‘tactical bottom’

Stephen Suttmeier, former Bank of America strategist, identifies a potential "tactical bottom" for Ethereum (ETH), contingent on the price holding above $1690-$1700 and reclaiming $1800. A decisive move above $1800, turning the 50-day moving average into support, could target the 200-day MA near $2200, implying a 25% upside. This technical view finds some support from other analysts and a double-bottom pattern on the daily chart. However, on-chain data shows significant headwinds. Exchange selling pressure has surged, with over 220K ETH moved to exchanges recently, and whale selling persists. Furthermore, U.S. spot ETH ETFs, after days of inflows, recorded a $52 million net outflow due to macro risks like U.S.-Iran tensions and bond market volatility. In summary, while technicals suggest a bullish reversal is possible if ETH sustains above $1800, sustained selling pressure and macroeconomic risks threaten to invalidate the optimistic "tactical bottom" thesis.

ambcryptoHace 1 hora(s)

Why former Bank of America strategist sees an Ethereum ‘tactical bottom’

ambcryptoHace 1 hora(s)

Injective software package hit by malicious supply chain attack – Details

In a software supply chain attack, malicious actors compromised the Injective Labs TypeScript SDK (@injectivelabs/sdk-ts v1.20.21) by uploading a tainted version to the npm registry. The attackers gained access to a legitimate contributor's GitHub account to distribute malicious commits. The compromised package, disguised as a routine update, contained malware that activated only when developers used specific wallet generation functions, stealing private keys and mnemonic seed phrases. This breach impacted approximately 50,000 weekly downloads and spread through transitive dependencies in 17 other Injective packages. While a clean version (v1.20.23) was later released, the malicious package remained accessible. Affected users are advised to rotate credentials, create new wallets, and move their funds.

ambcryptoHace 4 hora(s)

Injective software package hit by malicious supply chain attack – Details

ambcryptoHace 4 hora(s)

After Aave's Exit and TVL's Sharp Fluctuation, Where Does MegaETH's Valuation Anchor Lie?

Following the withdrawal of Aave and a sharp drop in its Total Value Locked (TVL), the valuation of the high-performance DeFi blockchain MegaETH faces scrutiny. Once a highly anticipated project with a fully diluted valuation (FDV) reaching around $2 billion, MegaETH saw its TVL plummet from a May peak of $245 million to just over $30 million in July, a roughly 70% decline. Its native token, MEGA, currently trades around $0.048 with a market cap of approximately $54 million and an FDV of about $480 million. The report identifies a core vulnerability: MegaETH's TVL was heavily dependent on a single protocol, Aave V3, which at its peak contributed around 90% of the chain's TVL. A significant portion of this capital is attributed to leveraged yield-farming strategies involving stablecoins like USDe. When the profitability of these strategies diminished, capital rapidly exited, exposing the lack of diversified, sustainable activity. Three key mismatches between MegaETH's valuation and its fundamentals are highlighted: 1. **Valuation vs. Real Usage:** With an FDV of ~$4.8B but only ~$1M in annualized protocol revenue and ~2,600 daily active addresses, the valuation appears disconnected from current economic activity. 2. **Token Narrative vs. Ecosystem Reality:** Despite its DeFi narrative, nearly 80% of the chain's recent protocol revenue comes from a trading card game, Monster, not from core DeFi applications like Aave. The chain's native stablecoin, USDM, also shows low trading volume and a declining market cap. 3. **Short-Term Hype vs. Long-Term Delivery:** Initial hype from token generation, blue-chip integrations, and influencer support has faded. Major protocols like Uniswap now hold minimal TVL on the chain, indicating that early capital was largely transient and driven by incentives rather than organic demand. The situation reflects a broader market trend where investors are becoming less tolerant of valuations based on inflated TVL and narrative, demanding clearer evidence of sustainable transactions, revenue, and ecosystem development. While MEGA's price may experience short-term rebounds from market sentiment, a fundamental re-rating likely depends on the team's ability to convert its remaining resources into tangible, user-retaining applications and genuine ecosystem growth.

链捕手Hace 4 hora(s)

After Aave's Exit and TVL's Sharp Fluctuation, Where Does MegaETH's Valuation Anchor Lie?

链捕手Hace 4 hora(s)

Goldman Sachs In-Depth Report: Who Will Be the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry?

Goldman Sachs Report: China's AI Models at an Inflection Point China's open-source/open-weight large language models (LLMs) have reached performance parity with top global proprietary models, according to a Goldman Sachs report. This is driven by architectural innovations and higher parameter efficiency, allowing Chinese models to achieve comparable capabilities at 2%-10% the parameter size and significantly lower cost. The market is evolving into a two-tiered structure: a high-end segment (e.g., GLM5.2, Qwen3.7 Max) with premium pricing and a low-end, price-sensitive segment for global SMEs and individual users. Key points: * **Cost & Performance:** Innovations like Mixture of Experts (MoE) enable high performance with smaller models. Projects like Meituan's LongCat 2.0, trained on domestic hardware, highlight progress in tech self-sufficiency. * **Open-Source Strategy:** Most Chinese players use open-source/open-weight models for flexibility and ecosystem growth. However, Goldman notes this may underreport actual deployment and revenue. A shift toward "open-weight + community license" models with revenue sharing (e.g., MiniMax) could improve monetization. * **Market Shift & Global Expansion:** Enterprise AI adoption is shifting from "token maximization" to "ROI-first." International expansion, especially in non-US markets, is a major growth driver. Chinese models are increasingly available on global platforms like AWS Bedrock and Microsoft Copilot. * **Competitive Landscape:** Using a framework based on pricing power, cost advantage, and financial strength, Goldman identifies **Zhipu AI and DeepSeek** as the strongest in foundational text models, and **ByteDance** as the leader in multimodal/video generation. The report maintains Buy ratings on MiniMax and Kuaishou. * **Market Growth:** China's AI model API and subscription revenue is projected to grow from an estimated ¥35 billion in 2026 to ¥879 billion by 2030.

marsbitHace 4 hora(s)

Goldman Sachs In-Depth Report: Who Will Be the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry?

marsbitHace 4 hora(s)

Goldman Sachs Deep Dive Report: Who Will Become the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry?

Goldman Sachs Report: Who Will Be the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry? China's AI large model sector is at a historic inflection point. Goldman Sachs argues that the intelligence of Chinese open-source/open-weight models is approaching top global proprietary models. Rapid adoption by domestic enterprises and global SMEs is creating a data flywheel effect that will further drive model iteration. The evolution is summarized as moving from "DeepSeek's cost-efficiency moment last year to GLM's model-intelligence moment this year." Chinese models achieve near-state-of-the-art performance at significantly lower cost, primarily due to architectural innovations like Mixture of Experts (MoE) and higher parameter efficiency. Models like DeepSeek V4 Pro (1.6T params), GLM5.2 (0.7T), and MiniMax M3 (0.4T) are much smaller than global leaders. Recent advancements in coding capability are attributed to better data curation and RLHF. Landmarks like Meituan's LongCat 2.0, trained fully on domestic AI chips, demonstrate progress in hardware stack independence. The market is forming a "two-tiered structure." The high-end tier (e.g., GLM5.2, Alibaba's Qwen3.7 Max) prices around $1 per million tokens, about 10-25% of US top models, with estimated inference gross margins of 10-20%. The low-end tier (priced as low as $0.06-$0.2 per million tokens) targets price-sensitive global SMEs and individuals. MiniMax derives 60-70% of revenue overseas. Goldman forecasts China's AI model API/subscription revenue to grow from an estimated RMB 35bn in 2026 to RMB 879bn by 2030. Most Chinese players adopt open-source/open-weight strategies for deployment flexibility and community feedback, though this limits monetization as deployments on third-party platforms (e.g., Alibaba Cloud) may not generate direct revenue. A shift towards "open-weight + community license" models with revenue-sharing agreements (like MiniMax's approach) could improve unit economics. International expansion, particularly in non-US markets, is the key growth driver. The global enterprise AI paradigm is shifting from "token maximization" to "ROI prioritization." Chinese models are already hosted on major global platforms like AWS Bedrock and are under consideration for integration into Microsoft Copilot. Using a competitive framework based on pricing power, cost advantage, and financial strength, Goldman identifies the strongest players: In foundational text models, Zhipu AI (initiated coverage) and DeepSeek lead. In multimodal/video generation, ByteDance's Seed is the frontrunner, with Kuaishou's Kling and MiniMax's Hailuo also well-positioned. Goldman maintains a Buy rating on MiniMax, citing its attractive valuation.

链捕手Hace 5 hora(s)

Goldman Sachs Deep Dive Report: Who Will Become the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry?

链捕手Hace 5 hora(s)

Trading

Spot