Those Who Can't Buy Anthropic Are Driving Its Shadow Stock to 16 Times Its Value

marsbitPublicado a 2026-03-25Actualizado a 2026-03-25

Resumen

A new closed-end fund, VCX, listed on the NYSE, saw its share price surge to 16 times its net asset value due to high demand for exposure to Anthropic, which holds a 21% stake in the fund. Anthropic, recently valued at $380 billion in a private funding round, is not publicly traded, making VCX one of the few ways for retail investors to gain indirect access. The fund's limited liquidity, with most shares locked until September, amplified buying pressure. Similar funds without significant Anthropic or OpenAI stakes performed poorly, highlighting that the frenzy is specifically tied to AI-related FOMO. However, the premium is considered temporary, as it may vanish once Anthropic and other held companies like SpaceX go public, expected in 2026-2027. The phenomenon reflects broader investor anxiety about missing out on transformative AI companies that are reshaping industries while remaining private longer.

Author: David, TechFlow Deep Tide

Last Thursday, a new stock appeared on the NYSE with the ticker VCX.

It is actually a fund. The fund holds shares in companies like Anthropic, OpenAI, and SpaceX. Anthropic accounts for 21% and OpenAI for 10%.

These companies have one thing in common: none of them are publicly listed, and ordinary people cannot buy their shares.

VCX is one of the very few vehicles available on the market that allows ordinary investors to indirectly hold shares in Anthropic.

Its net asset value is $19 per share. On the first day of trading, it opened at $42, surged to $125 during the session, and closed at $76. On the fourth trading day, it hit a high of $315 intraday, triggering volatility halts twice.

Four days, from $19 to $315.

Investors are essentially paying 16 times the actual asset value to snap up this fund. Not because the fund manager is exceptionally skilled, but because it contains Anthropic.

A month ago, Anthropic just raised $30 billion at a valuation of $380 billion, making it the second-largest financing round globally this year. Its annualized revenue is $14 billion. But it is not publicly listed, has no stock ticker, and you cannot find it in any brokerage's search box.

If you can't buy the real thing, go for the shadow. VCX is currently the shadow of Anthropic, or rather, the shadow of AI FOMO.

Why is it so expensive?

VCX is not a traditional fund.

With ordinary funds, if you think it's expensive, you can wait for it to drop because the fund manager can issue more shares; supply is elastic. VCX is a closed-end fund. The number of shares was locked at the time of listing and will not increase.

More importantly, the vast majority of shares cannot be sold. Investors who bought before February 20 had their shares locked for six months and cannot trade until September. VCX has over 100,000 investors, but only a very small portion of shares are actually available for trading on the market right now.

What does this mean? Many people want to buy, but very few shares are available to buy. A small amount of buying pressure can twist the price out of shape.

So that 16x premium is essentially pricing "how many people want a piece of Anthropic and how narrow the door is." But this hunger wasn't created by VCX itself.

Chart: Top 10 Holdings of Fundrise's VCX Fund

Over the past decade, a structural change has occurred in the tech industry: the best companies are going public later and later, or not at all.

When Facebook went public in 2012, its valuation was $104 billion, which was an astronomical figure at the time. Today, Anthropic's private valuation is more than three times that of Facebook's IPO, but it previously had no clear plans to go public;

OpenAI is valued at $500 billion and is also not public. News about SpaceX preparing for an IPO has been circulating for over a year, with no confirmed date yet.

A decade ago, a company of this size would have long since rung the bell on the NYSE. Now they don't need to. The private market can provide almost unlimited capital, without the pressure of quarterly reports or dealing with retail investors and short sellers.

For founders, this is a rational choice. For ordinary investors, it means that the fastest-growing companies in history are behind a glass wall, out of reach.

VCX was originally scheduled to list on March 9 but was delayed for ten days due to the Iran war. In those ten days, nothing changed—Anthropic's price didn't go up or down, the fund's holdings didn't change a single share. But the delay itself brewed another ten days of anticipation.

When it finally listed, all the pent-up demand from those ten days squeezed through an extremely narrow passage.

Not all shadows are valuable

There are more ways to gain exposure to shares of unlisted companies than just the VCX fund.

But before discussing these avenues, there's a more fundamental question: Anthropic isn't public, so how did a publicly traded fund get its shares?

The answer is the back door.

Large private companies do a funding round every few months, from Series A to Series G, each time letting new investors in. Anthropic just closed a $30 billion Series G last month, with a long list of participating institutions from GIC to Sequoia to Goldman Sachs. These rounds are usually only open to institutional investors, with minimums often starting in the tens of millions of dollars.

But there is a second path.

Just because a company isn't public doesn't mean its shares can't be traded privately. Early employees and angel investors hold shares, and some of them want to cash out early. This creates a secondary market for private companies—not public, not transparent, but real trades happen.

Fundrise started buying on these two paths back in 2022, when valuations of private tech companies had just experienced a crash and prices were cheap. Over four years, they accumulated a portfolio including Anthropic, OpenAI, and SpaceX. Then they packaged it into VCX, listed it on the NYSE, and now ordinary people can buy it like a stock.

In the same month, at least three similar funds were trading on the NYSE, all selling the same concept:

Selling you, through the front door, what was bought through the back door.

Robinhood created a fund called RVI, listed on March 6 with an issue price of $25. Its holdings include Databricks, Revolut, Ramp—all good private companies. It fell 11% on its first day, closing at $21.

Destiny Tech100, ticker DXYZ, listed in 2024, is a pioneer in this space. Heavily weighted in SpaceX, with a 16% holding. It only added a small exposure to Anthropic indirectly in February of this year. Its price is now hovering around $24.

There's also XOVR, the first ETF approved to directly hold shares of private companies, with SpaceX making up about 21%.

Four funds, similar structures, similar concepts, all trading on the same exchange. But their fates are completely different.

VCX rose 1500% in four days. RVI broke issue price on its first day. DXYZ is lukewarm.

VCX holds 21% Anthropic and 10% OpenAI. RVI's holdings include neither Anthropic nor OpenAI. DXYZ's exposure to Anthropic was added recently and is very small.

This shows that, at least for now, the market isn't chasing "shares in private companies." The market is chasing Anthropic.

Whoever is closest to them is valuable.

That's where Robinhood's RVI lost out. Databricks and Revolut are certainly good companies, but clearly, right now, they are not the name people are willing to pay a 16x premium for.

Shadows also have an expiration date

What are those who bought VCX at $312 betting on?

They are betting that before the door opens, someone else will be willing to pay an even higher price for the privilege of not being able to get Anthropic directly.

However, this door won't stay closed forever.

VCX has over 100,000 investors, and the vast majority of their shares are locked for six months. The lock-up period ends on September 19. At that time, a large number of shares will flood the market, and supply will change overnight from极度稀缺 (extremely scarce) to abundant.

The reason VCX can sell at a 16x premium is half because it contains Anthropic, and half perhaps because so few shares are available to sell. Once the lock-up period ends, the second condition disappears.

There is an even bigger variable.

Anthropic, OpenAI, SpaceX—all three are rumored to be targeting IPOs in the second half of 2026 to 2027. Anthropic just raised $30 billion last month at a $380 billion valuation and has already hired Silicon Valley law firm Wilson Sonsini for IPO preparations. SpaceX's CFO has been communicating with investors about an IPO since the end of last year, targeting mid-year.

Once the real thing goes public, the shadow becomes worthless.

If you can directly type Anthropic's stock ticker into your brokerage search box, why would you pay a 16x premium for a fund that indirectly holds it?

For example, DXYZ also surged wildly when it first listed in 2024, but as SpaceX's IPO was delayed, the hype faded, and its price fell by more than half from its high.

So, VCX investors are experiencing a classic countdown.

What they bought for 16 times the price is not shares in Anthropic, but a ticket with an expiration date. When the door opens depends on when Anthropic decides to go public.

Before that, the premium is maintained by scarcity; after that, the premium goes to zero.

But the phenomenon of shadow stocks itself is not accidental.

Every technological wave creates the same anxiety: you can't buy the most important companies. In the 2000s, before Google's IPO, Goldman Sachs employees fought fiercely internally for allocations. In 2020, it was SpaceX, and secondary market intermediaries in Silicon Valley became the most sought-after connections overnight.

Now it's AI's turn.

And this time the anxiety is deeper. Anthropic and OpenAI may not be profitable now, but they are rewriting the rules. Because of AI's impact, SaaS stocks crashed, security stocks crashed, and IBM lost $31 billion in a day.

Investors see not just "this company is very profitable," but "if I'm not on its side, I might be on the side it runs over."

The 16x premium of VCX isn't pricing just a fund; it's pricing this anxiety itself.

The ticket will expire, the premium will fade. But as long as AI keeps accelerating, as long as the most valuable companies keep their doors closed, there will be people willing to pay irrational prices for the shadow.

Not because the shadow is worth that much, but because the feeling of being locked out is too expensive.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the VCX fund and why did its price surge dramatically upon listing?

AVCX is a closed-end fund listed on the NYSE that holds shares in private companies like Anthropic (21%) and OpenAI (10%). Its price surged to 16 times its net asset value due to extreme scarcity of tradable shares and high demand from investors seeking exposure to these coveted, pre-IPO AI companies.

QWhy are top tech companies like Anthropic and OpenAI delaying their IPOs, and how does this affect retail investors?

ALeading tech companies are delaying IPOs because private markets provide ample capital without the quarterly reporting pressures and scrutiny from public investors. This excludes retail investors from directly accessing the fastest-growing companies, fueling demand for indirect vehicles like VCX.

QHow did Fundrise's VCX fund acquire shares in private companies like Anthropic?

AFundrise acquired shares through secondary markets, where early employees and investors sell their stakes, and by participating in private funding rounds, assembling a portfolio of pre-IPO companies like Anthropic and OpenAI over four years.

QWhat risks do investors face when buying VCX at a significant premium to its net asset value?

AInvestors risk a sharp price decline when the six-month lockup period ends in September, flooding the market with shares, and if Anthropic or OpenAI IPO, making the indirect fund obsolete as direct ownership becomes available.

QHow does the market's reaction to VCX compare to other similar funds like RVI and DXYZ?

AVCX's 1500% surge dwarfed RVI's drop and DXYZ's stagnation because VCX held substantial Anthropic and OpenAI exposure, while others lacked these specific high-demand AI assets, highlighting that the frenzy is focused on Anthropic, not private equities broadly.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Has Hook Summer Truly Arrived? sato, Lo0p, FLOOD Ignite the New Uniswap v4 Narrative

With the broader market showing signs of recovery, a new wave of interest has emerged around Ethereum-based meme coins. Following ASTEROID, tokens like sato, sat1, Lo0p, and FLOOD, built upon the Uniswap v4 Hook protocol, are capturing market attention. Their market capitalizations range from millions to tens of millions of dollars, injecting much-needed focused liquidity into a market lacking narratives. This article explores whether this trend signifies an incoming "Hook Summer" and its potential impact on UNI's price. Hooks are essentially plug-in smart contracts for Uniswap v4 liquidity pools, allowing developers to inject custom logic at key points in a pool's lifecycle (like initialization, adding/removing liquidity, swaps). This transforms the AMM into programmable building blocks. Key highlighted projects include: * **sato**: Peaked over $38M market cap. It utilizes a v4 curve for minting/burning; buying locks ETH as reserve to mint new tokens, while selling redeems ETH from the reserve and burns tokens. * **sat1**: Market cap briefly exceeded $10M, promoted as an "optimized sato," but later declined significantly. * **Lo0p**: Reached nearly $6.6M. It's a lending AMM protocol where buying LO0P tokens locks them as collateral, allowing users to borrow ETH from the pool reserve at 40% LTV, aiming to improve capital efficiency for idle ETH in LPs. * **FLOOD**: Peaked near $6M. Its mechanism directs asset reserves from buys into Aave v3 to generate yield, with fees and interest retained in the pool to potentially influence the token's price long-term. In the long term, the development of the Hook ecosystem can attract users and liquidity to Uniswap v4, benefiting UNI's fundamentals—especially combined with the recent activation of the protocol fee switch, where a portion of fees is used to burn UNI. However, in the short term, these Hook-based tokens are unlikely to directly drive significant UNI price appreciation. Their impact is moderated by factors like token sustainability, price volatility, and broader market and regulatory conditions. Currently, Uniswap v4's TVL ($595M) still trails behind v2 and v3, indicating adoption and growth will take time. The article concludes that while the Hook ecosystem provides long-term "nourishment" for UNI, its short-term role is more of a "catalyst" than a "booster." Readers are cautioned that these are early-stage experimental tokens and may carry unknown risks.

Odaily星球日报Hace 7 min(s)

Has Hook Summer Truly Arrived? sato, Lo0p, FLOOD Ignite the New Uniswap v4 Narrative

Odaily星球日报Hace 7 min(s)

Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I Would Sell Bitcoin, But Never a Net Sale

Interview with Michael Saylor: I Said We'd Sell Bitcoin, But Never Be a Net Seller In a recent podcast, MicroStrategy Executive Chairman Michael Saylor clarified the company's stance on potentially selling Bitcoin. Following MicroStrategy's earnings call statement about being prepared to sell BTC to fund dividends for its STRC (Strategic) credit product, Saylor emphasized the distinction between selling and being a "net seller." Saylor explained the core business model: MicroStrategy sells credit instruments like STRC and uses the proceeds to buy Bitcoin, which is viewed as "digital capital" expected to appreciate around 30-40% annually. A portion of these capital gains can then be used to pay the dividends on the credit products. He stressed that even if the company sells some Bitcoin for dividends, it simultaneously buys much more with new credit issuance. For example, after raising $3.2 billion from STRC sales in April, the dividend obligation was only $80-90 million, making the company a net buyer. The clarification aims to counter market narratives questioning the value of Bitcoin on MicroStrategy's balance sheet if it were never sold, and to dismiss claims of a "Ponzi scheme." Saylor reiterated his personal philosophy for investors: "Don't be a net seller of bitcoin" and ensure your Bitcoin holdings increase each year. Saylor also discussed Bitcoin's role as the foundation for "digital credit," noting that STRC has become the largest and most liquid preferred stock issue in the U.S., offering high risk-adjusted returns (Sharpe ratio). He highlighted Bitcoin's deep liquidity, stating that even large purchases by MicroStrategy do not move the market significantly, which is driven by macro factors, geopolitical tensions, and capital flows from ETFs and credit products. Finally, Saylor reflected on his early inspiration from sci-fi books, which motivated his path to MIT, and maintained his fundamental thesis on Bitcoin remains unchanged: it is superior digital capital enabling superior digital credit.

链捕手Hace 11 min(s)

Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I Would Sell Bitcoin, But Never a Net Sale

链捕手Hace 11 min(s)

Beaten SK Hynix Employees in China: Year-end Bonus Less Than 5% of Korean Staff's

"SK Hynix Chinese Staff Hit Hard: Bonuses Less Than 5% of Korean Counterparts" Driven by the AI boom, South Korea's SK Hynix is experiencing record performance, with media reports predicting massive year-end bonuses for its employees, making them highly desirable in the matchmaking market. However, this prosperity starkly contrasts with the situation for the company's Chinese employees. According to reports, SK Hynix operates under a rule allocating 10% of operating profit for employee bonuses. While projections suggest Korean employees could receive bonuses reaching millions of RMB, a Chinese employee with over a decade of technical experience revealed the disparity: "If they get 3 million, Chinese staff get less than 5% of that." After adjustments based on KPI ratings, this employee's highest bonus was slightly over 100,000 RMB. Bonuses are paid annually in Korea but semi-annually in China. During the industry downturn in 2023-2024, Chinese employees received no bonus at all. The gap extends beyond bonuses. Recruitment posts for SK Hynix's Chinese factories (in Wuxi, Dalian, Chongqing) show engineer monthly salaries ranging from 10,000 to 35,000 RMB, with a 13th-month salary promised. Chinese employees also receive standard benefits like annual leave but lack stock incentives, which are reportedly unavailable to them. Furthermore, management positions in China are predominantly held by Korean personnel, though industry observers note a gradual increase in local middle managers over time. SK Hynix has confirmed the 10% bonus rule but cautioned that specific future bonus amounts remain unpredictable. The company forecasts strong demand for HBM and other high-value enterprise products for the next 2-3 years, driven by AI infrastructure investment. This focus on business-to-business markets may continue to constrain supply for consumer products, potentially prolonging price increases for components like memory.

链捕手Hace 25 min(s)

Beaten SK Hynix Employees in China: Year-end Bonus Less Than 5% of Korean Staff's

链捕手Hace 25 min(s)

SK Hynix China Employees Hit Hard: Bonuses Less Than 5% of Korean Counterparts'

"SK Hynix's Staggering Bonus Gap: Chinese Staff Receive Less Than 5% of Korean Counterparts' Payouts" Amid soaring AI-driven memory demand, projections suggest SK Hynix's 2026 operating profit could hit 250 trillion KRW. Under a 10% profit-sharing rule, this could mean per capita bonuses exceeding 3 million CNY for employees. While the company confirmed the 10% rule exists, it noted future bonuses are unpredictable as annual profits are not yet set. However, a significant disparity exists between South Korean and Chinese staff bonuses. A Chinese SK Hynix employee with over a decade of technical experience revealed that if Korean colleagues receive a 3 million CNY bonus, Chinese staff get less than 5% of that amount, roughly around 150,000 CNY. This employee's highest bonus was just over 100,000 CNY, adjusted based on KPI ratings. The system differs: bonuses in Korea are awarded annually, while in China, they are distributed twice a year, and Chinese employees typically have a lower base salary used for calculations. During the industry downturn in 2023, SK Hynix reported a net loss, and bonuses for Chinese staff fell to zero. Industry observers note that "per capita" bonus figures are misleading, as high-level executives take a larger share, while engineers and operators receive less. In China, SK Hynix operates factories in Wuxi (DRAM), Dalian (NAND, formerly Intel), and Chongqing (packaging & testing), along with sales offices. Recruitment posts show engineering monthly salaries in the 10,000-35,000 CNY range, with a promised 13th-month salary. Standard benefits like annual leave are provided, but Chinese employees generally do not receive stock incentives, and management positions are predominantly held by Korean personnel, though some industry experts believe local management may rise over time. Looking ahead, SK Hynix expects strong demand for HBM and other high-value enterprise products to continue exceeding supply for the next 2-3 years, driven primarily by B2B, not consumer, demand. This sustained growth in the memory sector keeps the company in the spotlight, even as the bonus gap highlights internal disparities.

marsbitHace 45 min(s)

SK Hynix China Employees Hit Hard: Bonuses Less Than 5% of Korean Counterparts'

marsbitHace 45 min(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片