Thirteen Ministries and Seven Associations Issue Document to Prevent Virtual Currency Risks, Where is the Path for RWA?

marsbitPublicado a 2025-12-29Actualizado a 2025-12-29

Resumen

On December 5th, seven Chinese industry associations, including the Internet Finance Association and the Banking Association, jointly issued a "Risk Warning on Preventing Illegal Activities Involving Virtual Currencies." This follows a meeting on November 28th where thirteen government ministries and commissions discussed cracking down on virtual currency speculation. The document signals a tightening regulatory environment, causing concern among entrepreneurs planning Real World Asset (RWA) tokenization projects in mainland China. The core of RWA involves digitizing and tokenizing offline assets using blockchain technology for secondary market trading and financing. However, under China's current regulatory framework, any tokenization activity linked to public trading challenges the red lines established in the September 24, 2021 notice. The recent Risk Warning reinforces these strict prohibitions. The document explicitly states that no RWA activities have been approved by financial regulators in mainland China. Key legal obstacles include: 1. The定性 (qualification) of such activities as illegal fundraising and unauthorized securities offerings. 2. A complete ban on financial institutions and payment platforms providing settlement or promotional services for these businesses. 3. The non-legal status of stablecoins involved in RWA, which touches upon monetary sovereignty. Conducting RWA business in mainland China thus carries significant legal risks, including potential ...

Author: Crypto Salad

On December 5, seven industry associations, including the China Internet Finance Association and the Banking Association, jointly released a "Risk Warning on Preventing Illegal Activities Involving Virtual Currency." This follows the meeting of thirteen ministries and commissions on November 28 to crack down on virtual currency trading and speculation, with industry associations quickly following up with regulatory actions. The subtle undertones of this document (hereinafter referred to as the "Risk Warning") sent a chill down the spines of some entrepreneurs planning to tokenize real-world assets (RWA).

Many people asked in the background: Lawyer Sha, is RWA completely dead in mainland China?

As Web3 legal professionals, we believe the answer to this question is not a simple "yes" or "no." The core of RWA is to tokenize offline assets through blockchain technology, digitize them, and then enable secondary market liquidity and financing. However, under the current regulatory context in mainland China, any tokenization behavior attempting to engage with public trading essentially challenges the red line set by the "9.24 Notice" in 2021. The "Risk Warning" from the seven associations is more like adding a few more glaring locks to an already tightly shut iron door.

I. Why It "Cannot Be Done" in Mainland China: Risk Isolation Under a Bottom-Line Mindset

The "Risk Warning" clearly states: "Currently, China's financial regulatory authorities have not approved any real-world asset tokenization activities (within mainland China)." Engaging in RWA in mainland China faces legal obstacles akin to "three great mountains":

Qualification as Illegal Financial Activities: The document categorizes domestic RWA issuance and financing as suspected illegal fundraising, unauthorized public issuance of securities, and other illegal financial activities. In mainland China, any financing behavior bypassing特许经营权 is like licking blood off a knife's edge.
Comprehensive Blockade by Financial Institutions: Banks, payment institutions, and internet platforms are completely prohibited from providing settlement and promotional support for such businesses. Without funding channels and traffic inlets, domestic RWA becomes water without a source.
The Dominant Position of Legal Tender: Stablecoins involved in RWA do not have legal status in mainland China. Attempting to use them to anchor asset returns touches on the nerve of monetary sovereignty.

Using the bottom-line mindset common in criminal defense: engaging in RWA in mainland China may not be a question of "whether it's dead," but rather "how many years in prison." However, from a governance perspective, this high-pressure stance is actually an "emergency brake" by regulators who have not yet figured out effective monitoring methods. As mentioned in the dialogue, this is largely to protect society and avoid another systemic financial disaster similar to the P2P crisis.

II. The "Oasis" Overseas: The "Outlet" Under the Macro Narrative

Since mainland China is a forbidden zone, attention naturally turns to offshore markets like Hong Kong and Singapore. Although the seven associations mentioned that "overseas service providers conducting business in mainland China is also illegal," they did not issue a clear "sweeping ban" on purely overseas businesses.

This hides a profound macro narrative: China's internal economic circulation ultimately needs to connect with external circulation. The "strict lockdown" in mainland China and the "firm opening" in Hong Kong are actually two sides of the same coin. Mainland China needs such an "outlet" to allow assets to enter the international market in a compliant context.

As long as a project can achieve true "full offshore" operations—with underlying assets, funding sources, servers, and compliance entities all located overseas, and without involving the outflow of domestic RMB—mainland regulatory authorities generally lack the motivation for cross-border enforcement. Under this model, if you are operating vigorously overseas and complying with local regulations (such as obtaining a Hong Kong VASP license), that is your freedom.

III. The Theoretical "Thoroughfare" and the Practical "Chasm": Timing Matters More Than Anything

At this point, some domestic bosses might hatch a plan: Can I take the income rights of my domestic factory or mineral resources to Hong Kong for RWA?

Theoretically, it is feasible to set up an SPV through an ODI (Overseas Direct Investment) structure and "transfer" the rights to an overseas entity. However, in practical operation, this is comparable to the Shu Road in Li Bai's poetry, even近乎 "a chasm":

First, the Compliance Shackles of Asset Outflow: Cross-border rights confirmation is complex and极易 suspected as asset转移.
Second, the "Circuit Breaker" of Fund Repatriation: The settlement环节 faces extremely strict scrutiny involving virtual currencies. Account freezing is often the lightest consequence; more severe outcomes include fines and suspicion of illegal fundraising.
Finally, the Legal Risks for "Domestic Persons": If individuals are operating overseas virtual currency-related businesses from within mainland China, law enforcement agencies can still crack down (whether it's the boss, management, or ordinary employees, it is considered illegal financial activity).

Actually, regarding RWA business, the more core issue lies in "timing." Currently, we judge that at the regulatory level, multiple ministries and commissions have unified opinions, and the country is in a "high-pressure period" of making examples. Even in Hong Kong, due to the cautious consideration of political and business relations by listed companies and licensed institutions, the current stance is mostly a practical state of "even if it's not prohibited by law, please wait for now." The best strategy for existing projects at this stage is to respond to "window guidance"—either halt operations or completely switch to a full overseas方案,切忌 acting against the wind.

IV. Conclusion

RWA is not dead in mainland China; it has never truly been "figured out." The document issued by the thirteen ministries and commissions and the seven associations reiterates the red line for domestic business.

However, for ambitious domestic enterprises, the real opportunity for RWA lies in the deep waters of "offshore." This is no longer a mainland-style illegal fundraising show in disguise, but a high-difficulty acrobatics act involving legal compliance, foreign exchange management, and international private placement.

Our advice is: If you want to engage in RWA, first sever all ties with domestic currency, ordinary retail investors, and promotional channels. In the face of red lines, living long is more important than running fast. Legal red lines are never meant for jumping rope.

The current silence is for future standardization. If you are planning to launch RWA business overseas and need legal compliance论证 or structural design, please feel free to contact us for in-depth consultation.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat are the main legal obstacles for conducting RWA (Real World Asset) tokenization activities in mainland China according to the article?

AThe main legal obstacles are: 1) Being characterized as illegal financial activities like illegal fundraising or unauthorized securities issuance. 2) A complete blockade by financial institutions, prohibiting banks and payment platforms from providing settlement and promotional support. 3) The strong legal status of the fiat currency (RMB), as stablecoins involved in RWA have no legal status, touching on monetary sovereignty.

QHow does the article characterize the relationship between mainland China's strict stance and Hong Kong market regarding RWA?

AThe article suggests that mainland China's 'strict crackdown' and Hong Kong's 'firm openness' are two sides of the same coin. It presents a macro narrative that the Chinese economy's internal circulation ultimately needs to connect with the external cycle, and mainland China needs such an 'outlet' for assets to enter the international market in a compliant context.

QWhat is the practical challenge for a mainland Chinese business trying to tokenize a domestic asset (e.g., factory, mineral rights) via Hong Kong?

AThe practical challenge is likened to a 'natural moat'. Key hurdles include: the complex compliance shackles of getting the asset overseas, which can easily be suspected as asset transfer; the strict forex scrutiny and potential account freezes or fines during the capital repatriation (settlement) process; and the legal risk for 'mainland persons' involved, as operating an overseas crypto business while based in mainland China can still be targeted by law enforcement.

QWhat is the core advice the article gives to projects interested in RWA, especially regarding their connection to mainland China?

AThe core advice is to sever all connections with mainland China's Renminbi (RMB), retail investors, and promotional channels. The recommendation is to operate a truly 'fully offshore' model where the underlying asset, funding source, servers, and compliant entity are all outside mainland China. The emphasis is that 'living long is more important than running fast' in the face of legal red lines.

QWhat was the specific regulatory action mentioned that prompted the discussion about the future of RWA?

AThe specific regulatory action was a 'Risk Warning' document issued on December 5th by seven industry associations, including the China Internet Finance Association and the Banking Association. This followed a meeting on November 28th where thirteen government ministries and commissions pledged to crack down on virtual currency trading speculation.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Zcash Bug Could Have Minted Unlimited ZEC Undetected

A critical vulnerability in Zcash's Orchard shielded pool, discovered by researcher Taylor Hornby on May 29, 2026, could have allowed an attacker to create an unlimited amount of undetectable counterfeit ZEC. The flaw, involving an under-constrained element in the Orchard circuit, existed from the pool's 2022 activation until an emergency fix was deployed by June 2, 2026. Hornby identified the bug using AI-assisted auditing tools and confirmed its exploitability in a test environment. Due to Orchard's privacy features, which hide transaction amounts and history, there is no cryptographic way to prove whether the vulnerability was exploited before the fix. While Shielded Labs assesses prior exploitation as unlikely, this uncertainty has sparked a debate on proving supply integrity in privacy-preserving systems. In response, Shielded Labs and other developers are exploring a network upgrade, potentially involving a new shielded pool and formal verification of the circuit rules to prevent future vulnerabilities and allow verification of the ZEC supply's integrity. ZEC's price fell nearly 45% following the disclosure.

bitcoinistHace 4 min(s)

Zcash Bug Could Have Minted Unlimited ZEC Undetected

bitcoinistHace 4 min(s)

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

In 2026, a historic shift occurred in AI as major cloud providers' inference spending surpassed training spending for the first time, signaling a move from "building large models" to "using large models." This shifts the core challenge from computing power to the "memory wall"—the bottleneck of data movement (model weights, activations, KV Cache) between external DRAM and processors, where energy and latency from data transfer far exceed computation itself. Companies like Nvidia face GPU idle time due to bandwidth limits. In contrast, Cerebras Systems adopts a radical "wafer-scale" approach with its Wafer-Scale Engine (WSE). Instead of cutting a silicon wafer into many chips, Cerebras uses almost the entire wafer as one massive chip (WSE-3). This design provides 44GB of on-chip SRAM, delivering memory bandwidth thousands of times higher than traditional HBM (e.g., 21 PB/s vs. Nvidia B200). For LLM inference, weights are streamed layer-by-layer from external MemoryX storage to the chip, avoiding HBM bottlenecks. This results in token generation speeds 1.5–5 times faster than Nvidia's B200 in some models and significant advantages in first-token latency and long-context tasks. Additionally, Cerebras's architecture offers much lower interconnect power consumption (0.15 pJ/bit vs. GPU's ~10 pJ/bit). However, Cerebras faces challenges: SRAM scaling has slowed with advanced nodes, limiting future capacity gains; the chip requires specialized liquid cooling and custom software stacks; and its external I/O bandwidth (150 GB/s) is low compared to NVLink, hindering multi-system scaling for very large models. Competition is intensifying. Major players are pursuing three paths: 1) Developing proprietary inference ASICs (e.g., Google TPU, Microsoft Maia), 2) Leveraging advanced packaging (e.g., TSMC's SoW) to democratize wafer-scale-like integration, potentially eroding Cerebras's process advantage within a few years, and 3) Exploring optical interconnects for ultimate bandwidth. Commercially, Cerebras is transitioning from a hardware vendor to a service provider, facing the immense challenge of building high-power, specialized data centers to meet large contracts (e.g., 250MW/year from 2026–2028). In conclusion, the AI inference era presents a fundamental architectural trade-off. Cerebras opts for extreme physical optimization for low-latency, single-task performance, while Nvidia prioritizes versatility and massive cluster throughput. The path forward remains uncertain, with technology and business models still evolving in the race toward advanced AI.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

**Title: Has Bitcoin's Rebound Ended, Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?** **Summary:** Bitcoin's price has declined by 13% this week, signaling a potential return to late-stage bear market conditions. The price fell to around $67k, positioned between the Realized Price and Realized Cap Weighted Average. For the first time since early 2022, the Short-Term Holder cost basis has dropped below this key average, confirming a hallmark of late-cycle bear markets. Profitability metrics have collapsed sharply. The 7-day average of the Realized Profit/Loss ratio plummeted from a local high of 3.16 to 0.29, mirroring the February panic sell-off. Critically, the 90-day average never breached the threshold of 2, indicating the recent rally to $82k was a bear market bounce, not a structural shift. Realized losses surged to $1.35 billion daily, with $770 million coming from Long-Term Holders selling at a loss. This accelerating redistribution of supply from weak to strong hands is a necessary but ongoing process for a market bottom. The rally stalled almost precisely at the aggregate cost basis (~$83k) of US spot Bitcoin ETF investors, turning that level into strong resistance and leaving the average ETF holder underwater again. Spot market flows have turned decisively negative, showing sellers are dominating order books despite the price drop. While a significant futures long liquidation event cleared over $400 million in leverage, providing a potential reset, sustained spot demand is yet to materialize. Options markets continue to price in higher future volatility (Implied Volatility) than recent price action (Realized Volatility) has shown, with a persistent skew towards put options, indicating ongoing demand for downside protection. In conclusion, multiple metrics point to a fragile market structure. Resistance at the ETF cost basis, accelerating realized losses, dominant spot selling, and cautious options pricing all suggest the bear market trend persists. A sustainable recovery likely requires a resurgence of spot demand, ETF holders returning to profit, and a clear reduction in selling pressure.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar VIRTUAL

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar Virtuals Protocol (VIRTUAL) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar Virtuals Protocol (VIRTUAL) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu Virtuals Protocol (VIRTUAL)Después de comprar tu Virtuals Protocol (VIRTUAL), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear Virtuals Protocol (VIRTUAL)Tradear fácilmente con Virtuals Protocol (VIRTUAL) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

342 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2024.12.23Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de VIRTUAL (VIRTUAL).