The Second Half of Macro Influencer Fu Peng's Career

marsbitPublicado a 2026-04-21Actualizado a 2026-04-21

Resumen

Fu Peng, a prominent Chinese macroeconomist and former chief economist of Northeast Securities, has joined Hong Kong-based digital asset management firm Bitfire Group (formerly New Huo Group) as its chief economist. This move, announced in April 2026, triggered an 11% surge in Bitfire's stock price. Fu, known for his accessible macroeconomic commentary and large social media following, will focus on integrating digital assets into global asset allocation frameworks, particularly combining FICC (fixed income, currencies, and commodities) with cryptocurrencies for institutional clients. His career includes roles at Lehman Brothers and Solomon International, with significant influence gained through public communication. However, in late 2024, Fu faced temporary social media bans after a controversial private speech at HSBC on China's economic challenges, though he denied regulatory sanctions. He later left Northeast Securities citing health reasons. Bitfire, a licensed virtual asset manager serving high-net-worth clients, seeks to build trust and attract traditional capital through Fu’s expertise and credibility. The partnership represents a strategic shift for both: Fu enters the crypto sector after a traditional finance peak, while Bitfire aims to leverage his macro framework for institutional adoption. Outcomes remain uncertain regarding capital inflows and compatibility within corporate structure.

Author: BitalkNews

On the morning of April 20, 2026, the stock price of New Huo Group suddenly surged, rising more than 11% during the session.

What triggered this market movement was a piece of news that simultaneously ignited the financial and crypto circles: Fu Peng, former chief economist of Northeast Securities, officially joined New Huo Group as chief economist.

The news was first disclosed by Tencent News' "First Line," and New Huo Group subsequently confirmed it. Fu Peng himself also stated to the media: "It is mainly about combining FICC and C businesses."

Among them, FICC refers to fixed income, foreign exchange, and commodities, while C refers to cryptocurrency. His main work after joining will be to incorporate digital assets into the global asset allocation framework, providing macro research and asset allocation support for New Huo's institutional clients.

This is the first time he has reappeared in the public eye with an official position nearly a year after leaving Northeast Securities. For him, this is not just a change of employer but more like a restart of his career narrative.

The first half reached the pinnacle in the traditional financial system but was interrupted by controversy and illness; the second half is chosen in Hong Kong, in the crypto track, at the intersection where traditional finance and digital assets are slowly merging.

The Path of an Atypical Chief

In 2004, Fu Peng joined Lehman Brothers and later served as the head of global macro hedge strategy design at Solomon International Investment Group, responsible for currency, commodity, and major asset linkage analysis, for nearly four years.

He returned to China at the end of 2008 and worked at institutions such as Shandong High-Tech Investment, CIFCO, Galaxy Futures, Galaxy Securities, and Essence Securities.

In February 2020, he joined Northeast Securities as chief economist. His approach in this role differed from most of his peers: he made self-media his main battlefield.

He often used analogies and metaphors to explain economic logic, with a performance-style flair. His Weibo account, "Fu Peng's Financial World," has accumulated over 4 million followers, while his Douyin (TikTok) followers have reached 1.485 million. On Xiaohongshu and Bilibili, he has 355,000 and 773,000 followers, respectively.

In 2024, he published "Witnessing the Countercurrent," using a three-layer framework of "politics/distribution—macro—assets" to explain changes in global asset logic after 2016.

This approach gave him high recognition in the financial circle, making him an analyst who could present complex macro logic in an accessible way to ordinary investors.

The Consequences of a Speech

In late November 2024, Fu Peng was invited to give a year-end speech at an internal HSBC Private Wealth Planning event in Shanghai. The content covered China's declining demand, shrinking middle-class income,加剧的消费分化, and his judgment that current stimulus policies could not replicate the effects of the 2008 measures.

The recording and transcript were widely circulated online, removed from multiple platforms, and his WeChat and short video accounts were banned for nearly half a year.

Rumors emerged that he was canceled due to regulatory talks. Fu Peng publicly responded, directly criticizing HSBC, sharing chat records, and stating, "A lawyer's letter is already on the way, waiting for your apology."

Northeast Securities also stated: There has been no recent regulatory discussion. HSBC responded that it was "looking into the relevant situation." After that, the matter quietly faded from public discussion, with no further progress, eventually ending without resolution.

During the account ban, Fu Peng's channels for public expression were significantly reduced.

On April 30, 2025, he officially resigned from Northeast Securities, explaining externally: He had just undergone two major surgeries and needed to rest for more than half a year.

Predictive Ability and Boundaries

Among Fu Peng's fan base, there are many stories about his accurate predictions, covering the 2008 financial crisis, the recovery of the Japanese stock market, and the turning point of China's real estate cycle. Since 2016, he has consistently emphasized de-globalization and changes in interest rate trends, with parts of his framework later validated to some extent.

However, his prediction record is not consistent. There have been clear deviations in short-term exchange rates and specific policy windows, with some judgments criticized as overly pessimistic or significantly inaccurate due to policy interventions. He himself admits that macro research focuses on structural variables, not next quarter's data. This is both a methodological explanation and a preventive clarification for short-term inaccuracies.

What he provides is a framework for interpreting the world, not a stable, reproducible prediction tool. Describing him as a prophet who gets everything right is a misinterpretation.

One of his major advantages is his ability to express complex macro logic in an accessible manner while maintaining relatively independent judgment. This allows his influence to reach a broader audience, and this characteristic is precisely what New Huo Group needs most.

Why Choose New Huo

Theoretically, Fu Peng had more than one option for his comeback. Traditional securities firms would welcome him back, and the role of chief economist is familiar to him, but he chose New Huo.

The space in traditional finance is narrowing. For someone who spoke so bluntly in the HSBC speech, returning to the system would mean something he likely understands better than anyone.

His skill set was never limited to traditional assets; FICC has always been his forte. After institutionalization, the connection between crypto assets and macro logic has become increasingly evident. Interest rate cycles, dollar liquidity, geopolitical risk premiums—these variables affect both traditional and digital assets.

There is also a more practical factor: a comeback requires a suitable stage.

New Huo Group is licensed in Hong Kong, listed on the Hong Kong stock exchange, and operates within a compliance framework. At the same time, its size and stage provide enough flexibility to allow a strong-minded individual to build a new research system. This is a completely different situation from playing a fixed role in a mature large institution.

Why New Huo Needs Him

New Huo Group currently positions itself as a digital asset management institution for high-net-worth clients. It holds Hong Kong SFC Type 1, 4, and 9 licenses and a TCSP trust license, making it one of the较早实现全牌照虚拟资产管理的机构 in Hong Kong.

In 2025, Weng Xiaoqi became CEO, launched the Bitfire Premium service, acquired a majority stake in the Japanese licensed exchange BitTrade, exited the retail market, and focused on family offices, listed companies, and institutional clients. At the end of March 2026, the company was renamed New Huo Group Holdings Limited, with the English name Bitfire Group.

Financially, total revenue for the 2025 fiscal year was HKD 8.661 billion, a year-on-year increase of over 450%, but growth was mainly driven by low-margin crypto OTC trading volume. The company整体依然亏损. Management has designated 2026 as the year for profitability, with significant pressure.

The compliance framework is in place, and growth numbers are impressive, but what New Huo truly lacks at this stage is not流量, but trust.

The clients it serves—family office partners, financial executives of listed companies, private investors with substantial wealth—do not lack information or data. What they lack is a narrative framework that can make them comfortable with digital assets and a professional image from the traditional financial world.

Weng Xiaoqi stated this logic quite bluntly: "Fu Peng's profound global macro research capabilities and precise market liquidity insights will become the company's top strategic brain... helping clients accurately grasp certainty in the era of 'FICC+C.'"

Fu Peng's background in international investment banking and hedge funds, his independent public persona, and his million-level influence constitute a recognizable professional signal for traditional wealthy individuals evaluating whether to allocate more funds to digital assets.

This is a transaction where both sides get what they need.

A Beginning Without a Conclusion

On one side is a person who emerged from the traditional financial system, experienced highs, controversies, and a forced interruption, now seeking a space to continue expressing and contributing. On the other side is a company striving to transition from a trading platform to an institutional service provider, attempting to establish a language more easily understood by traditional capital.

Can the appeal of macro narratives translate into real institutional capital inflows? How long can Fu Peng's independent style last within the framework of a listed company?

Will the trust of traditional wealthy clients in digital assets ultimately be built on framework认同, or will it still require further regulatory developments? These questions will take time to answer.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the immediate market reaction to Fu Peng joining Xinhua Group, and what was the stock performance?

AXinhua Group's stock price surged by over 11% during the morning session on April 20, 2026, following the announcement of Fu Peng's appointment as Chief Economist.

QWhat are Fu Peng's main responsibilities at Xinhua Group, particularly regarding FICC and C?

AFu Peng's primary role is to integrate digital assets into the global asset allocation framework, providing macro research and asset allocation support for institutional clients, with FICC referring to fixed income, currencies, and commodities, and C referring to cryptocurrencies.

QWhy did Fu Peng leave his previous position at Northeast Securities, and what was the public reason given?

AFu Peng left Northeast Securities in April 2025, with the public explanation being that he needed to recuperate for over six months after undergoing two major surgeries.

QWhat incident led to Fu Peng's social media accounts being suspended, and how did he respond?

AHis accounts were suspended after a speech at a HSBC private wealth event in late 2024, where he discussed sensitive economic issues. He publicly criticized HSBC, threatened legal action, and shared chat records demanding an apology.

QWhy does Xinhua Group need someone like Fu Peng, and what does his appointment signify for their business strategy?

AXinhua Group needs Fu Peng to build trust with high-net-worth and institutional clients by providing a credible macro narrative for digital assets, leveraging his traditional finance background and public influence to attract traditional capital into the crypto space.

Lecturas Relacionadas

U.S. Government Bans Foreign Nationals from Using Fable 5, Anthropic Issues Rebuttal

U.S. Government Bans Foreign Access to Fable 5, Anthropic Issues Rebuttal On June 12th, the U.S. government ordered AI company Anthropic to immediately suspend all foreign access—including foreign nationals within the U.S. and Anthropic's own foreign employees—to its newly released Fable 5 and Mythos 5 AI models, citing national security concerns. This forced Anthropic to temporarily disable access to both models for all users globally, as it cannot technically differentiate user nationality at scale. The models, released just three days prior, represent Anthropic's highest public capability tier. Fable 5 is the first publicly available model from the advanced "Mythos" family, while Mythos 5 is a less-restricted version for approved cybersecurity and critical infrastructure partners. The government's directive was reportedly triggered by claims from another company that it could "jailbreak" Mythos 5, raising alarm within the Trump administration. Anthropic, in a detailed public statement, strongly challenged this rationale. The company argues the demonstrated "jailbreak" is a narrow, non-generalized technique that merely involves identifying minor, known software vulnerabilities—a capability common to other publicly available models like OpenAI's GPT-5.5 and routinely used by cybersecurity defenders. Anthropic stated it has complied with the order but disagrees with the government's standard, warning that applying it industry-wide would halt all new frontier model deployments. The company criticized the lack of a transparent, fact-based legal process and expressed confidence the situation stems from a misunderstanding. It is working to restore access and will release more technical details within 24 hours. Other Anthropic models remain unaffected.

链捕手Hace 17 min(s)

U.S. Government Bans Foreign Nationals from Using Fable 5, Anthropic Issues Rebuttal

链捕手Hace 17 min(s)

The Revelation from the Raydium Theft Incident: New DeFi Vulnerabilities Lurking in Forgotten Old Contracts

**Raydium Exploit Reveals DeFi's Hidden Risk: Forgotten "Zombie" Contracts** A recent attack on Raydium's deprecated V3 AMM pools resulted in a loss of approximately $1.34 million. The hacker exploited pools that were no longer supported by Raydium's current UI or SDK but remained fully functional and accessible on-chain. This incident highlights a critical, often overlooked category of risk in DeFi: inactive or legacy smart contracts that projects fail to properly decommission. Since March 2025, there have been at least 8 publicly reported attacks targeting such abandoned contracts, with total losses around $10.8 million. Including older pools and deprecated features, the count rises to 10 incidents with roughly $22.5 million in losses. These "zombie contracts" represent a lifecycle management failure rather than a code vulnerability, yet they are typically misclassified under general "code bug" categories in security reports, masking the true scale of the problem. The root cause is that projects often merely document a contract as "deprecated" without taking essential technical steps to secure it: withdrawing remaining assets, disabling external call functions, and implementing ongoing monitoring. These forgotten, under-monitored components become prime targets for attackers. To address this, the industry needs to recognize "zombie contracts" as a distinct risk category and establish standardized decommissioning protocols. Essential steps should include: 1) a formal retirement announcement, 2) removal of all front-end integrations, 3) withdrawal of locked assets, 4) disabling key contract functions, 5) ongoing security monitoring, 6) clear user communication, and 7) a post-mortem analysis. The value of a DeFi project lies not only in its current TVL but also in the security of its historical codebase, which has now become a new attack surface.

Foresight NewsHace 2 hora(s)

The Revelation from the Raydium Theft Incident: New DeFi Vulnerabilities Lurking in Forgotten Old Contracts

Foresight NewsHace 2 hora(s)

Robots Begin to 'Consume Data': The Hidden Production Chain from Indian Data Factories to Billion-Dollar Humanoid Robots

Robots have started to 'consume data,' driving the formation of a new industrial supply chain focused on producing training data for embodied AI. Unlike large language models, which are trained on vast internet text corpora, embodied AI models face a 'data desert' in the physical world. This has created a massive demand for first-person perspective video data (Ego Data), captured by workers wearing cameras in places like Indian garment factories. Companies like Neocambrian AI are establishing 'data factories' where workers perform standardized tasks (e.g., sorting clothes, kitchen organization) to generate thousands of hours of video. Research, such as NVIDIA's EgoScale, demonstrates that scaling this human demonstration data predictably improves robot performance, particularly for dexterous manipulation. This has validated a training path combining large-scale human data for pre-training with smaller amounts of robot-specific data for fine-tuning. The value of different data types varies significantly, forming a 'data pyramid.' The base consists of low-cost, large-scale internet and Ego Data. Higher layers include more expensive motion-capture data (e.g., from data gloves), simulation/synthetic data, and the most costly and scarce layer: real robot teleoperation data. This demand has spawned a layered ecosystem of data suppliers: low-cost data factories, motion capture and alignment specialists, robot-native teleoperation service providers, simulation data companies, and platforms aiming for data standardization. Robot companies themselves are adopting a 'layered procurement' strategy: outsourcing generic Ego Data while building in-house capabilities for robot-specific adaptation data and the critical deployment/failure data generated in real-world applications. The industry is shifting focus from hardware and basic mobility to the data pipelines required for general-purpose capability. While parallels exist to data labeling companies like Scale AI in the LLM boom, the physical complexity of robot data—involving action success ambiguity and sim-to-real gaps—requires more integrated solutions for data collection, annotation, and a continuous feedback loop. The race is on to build the data engines that will teach robots to operate reliably in the unstructured real world.

marsbitHace 4 hora(s)

Robots Begin to 'Consume Data': The Hidden Production Chain from Indian Data Factories to Billion-Dollar Humanoid Robots

marsbitHace 4 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片