The Quantum Threat Is Coming—Stellar Reveals Its Defense Strategy

bitcoinistPublicado a 2026-06-10Actualizado a 2026-06-10

Resumen

The Stellar Development Foundation has released a Quantum Preparedness Plan, aiming to migrate the entire Stellar network to quantum-safe cryptography by the end of 2027. The urgency stems from quantum computers potentially using Shor's algorithm to crack the elliptic curve cryptography currently securing blockchains. A significant challenge identified is handling dormant accounts, where quantum attacks could derive private keys from public ones, risking account takeover. Stellar's structural advantage is that its account addresses are separate from signing keys. This allows users to add quantum-safe signers via existing operations without changing their address or moving assets, unlike most other blockchains. The migration will occur in phases: post-quantum signature verification for smart contracts in 2026, native support for classic accounts in 2027, and a future deprecation of the old Ed25519 standard. However, the plan notes that zero-knowledge proof systems on the network remain vulnerable and require further research.

Dormant accounts are the hardest part. That is one of the quiet admissions buried in Stellar’s newly released Quantum Preparedness Plan, a phased roadmap to migrate the entire network to quantum-safe cryptography by the end of 2027.

The Stellar Development Foundation said it will seek community input on how to handle accounts that have gone inactive — and whether recovery mechanisms are even possible for them.

A Threat That Starts With Math

The urgency behind the plan traces back to Shor’s algorithm, a mathematical process that sufficiently advanced quantum computers could use to crack elliptic curve cryptography — the same signing method Stellar and most other blockchains rely on today.

Scientists at INRIA have already reduced the number of logical qubits needed to break 256-bit elliptic curves, while the US National Institute of Standards and Technology has revised its risk window to 2029 or earlier. Google is also targeting post-quantum readiness by that same year.

Stellar identified two core risks. The first involves validator signatures, where a breach could destabilize network consensus. The second — and more difficult — is account takeover, where a quantum machine could derive a private key directly from a public one.

With thousands of dormant accounts on the network, addressing that second threat at scale is a problem without an easy answer.

What Sets Stellar Apart

Most blockchains tie an address directly to a public key, which means going quantum-safe typically requires moving assets to an entirely new account.

Stellar works differently. Its account addresses are separate from the signing keys attached to them. Users can add or swap signers through an existing operation called set_options without touching their address, balance, or transaction history.

BTCUSD trading at $61,220 on the 24-hour chart: TradingView

According to the foundation, that structural design gives the network a smoother path than many of its peers.

The rollout is structured in three stages. Starting in 2026, post-quantum signature verification using NIST-standard algorithms ML-DSA-44 and ML-DSA-65 will be added to Soroban smart contracts, allowing enterprise wallets to begin migrating.

In 2027, a Core Advancement Proposal will bring quantum-safe signer types to classic accounts natively, letting all existing users add them alongside current keys.

The third stage — deprecation of the old Ed25519 standard — has no fixed date and will depend on how quantum computing develops and how ready the broader ecosystem is.

One Gap Remains Open

Not everything is covered. Reports indicate that zero-knowledge proof systems running on the network use pairing-based curves that are also vulnerable to quantum attack, and the foundation acknowledged that this area still requires further research. Separate collaboration with ZK protocol teams is planned to address it.

Featured image from Trezor, chart from TradingView

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main challenge Stellar faces in implementing its Quantum Preparedness Plan according to the article?

AThe hardest part is dealing with dormant accounts, as they are difficult to migrate to quantum-safe cryptography, and the foundation is seeking community input on how to handle or potentially recover them.

QWhat is the primary cryptographic threat that Stellar's plan aims to address?

AThe threat is Shor's algorithm, which could allow sufficiently advanced quantum computers to break the elliptic curve cryptography that Stellar and most other blockchains currently rely on for digital signatures.

QHow does Stellar's account structure provide an advantage for migrating to quantum-safe cryptography compared to other blockchains?

AOn Stellar, account addresses are separate from their signing keys. This allows users to add or swap to quantum-safe signers using the existing set_options operation without changing their address, balance, or transaction history, unlike chains where the address is tied directly to the public key.

QWhat are the three stages of Stellar's rollout plan for quantum-safe cryptography?

A1. In 2026, add post-quantum signature verification to Soroban smart contracts. 2. In 2027, introduce quantum-safe signer types natively to classic accounts via a Core Advancement Proposal. 3. A future stage to deprecate the old Ed25519 standard, with no fixed date.

QWhat specific vulnerability does the article mention is not yet fully addressed by Stellar's current quantum preparedness roadmap?

AZero-knowledge proof systems running on the network that use pairing-based curves are also vulnerable to quantum attack. The foundation acknowledged this area requires further research and plans separate collaboration with ZK protocol teams.

Lecturas Relacionadas

12.9 Million Candidates: The First Summer of Fate in the Hands of AI

The 2026 Chinese college entrance exam, or Gaokao, saw a novel phenomenon: AI aggressively entering the college application advice arena before results were even released. Major tech companies like Alibaba, Tencent, Baidu, and others launched free AI-powered "agents" and tools designed to generate personalized university and major recommendations for over 12.9 million candidates. For years, a lucrative industry thrived on the "information gap" in college applications, with personalized consulting services costing families thousands of dollars. AI is now disrupting this by providing similar, data-driven analysis for free. These tools process standardized data—scores, rankings, historical admission trends—to create tailored application strategies, offering a form of information parity previously unavailable, especially to students from rural or less-resourced backgrounds. This shift represents more than just a marketing trend; it signifies AI's first large-scale entry into a critical, high-stakes life decision for millions of Chinese families. The Gaokao application, with its clear inputs and outputs, is an ideal scenario for AI. Its involvement begins to level the informational playing field, potentially reducing the advantage held by families with greater social capital or access to expensive consultants. However, the article raises a profound question: while AI can optimize choices for employability and financial return based on cold data, it risks promoting a homogenized, utilitarian path. It might steer a passionate student away from a less lucrative field like literature or archaeology toward supposedly "safer" options like computer science. The core dilemma remains: as AI flattens information disparities, does it also flatten the diversity of life choices and the freedom to make—and learn from—mistakes? Ultimately, 2026 may be remembered not for exam questions, but as the year AI began formally influencing the life trajectories of ordinary Chinese people. The real test lies not in the algorithm's recommendations, but in whether individuals will retain the courage to make their own choices and bear the consequences in an increasingly algorithmic age.

marsbitHace 39 min(s)

12.9 Million Candidates: The First Summer of Fate in the Hands of AI

marsbitHace 39 min(s)

IC3 Top Universities Collaborative Analysis: Is AI x Crypto the Real Future or Just a Narrative Bubble?

IC3 researchers from leading universities analyze the convergence of AI and crypto. They argue meaningful integration is still nascent, with hype often outstripping progress. The report frames AI as a "translation middleware" making blockchain accessible, while crypto serves as a "trust middleware" via tools like ZK proofs and TEEs for integrity, availability, and confidentiality. Two main directions are examined: 1) **Crypto x AI**: Using AI to enhance blockchain via analysis (fraud detection), algorithmic design, and AI oracles (with accuracy varying by task). New risks include AI-driven malicious smart contracts. 2) **AI x Crypto**: Using crypto to enhance AI via decentralized infrastructure (DePIN), data markets, agent micropayments, governance, and securing AI pipelines (training/federated learning, secure inference). The "Protected Pipeline" (Props) framework combines oracles and trusted computation for secure use of private data. Key challenges are highlighted: The industry must rigorously prove decentralized AI's cost competitiveness and crypto's utility for agent payments. Major research gaps include providing systemic security for autonomous agents and addressing novel threats like unstoppable AI agents. The report concludes by debunking five common misconceptions: blockchain cannot inherently detect AI content, solve algorithmic bias, grant true AI autonomy, ensure AI trustworthiness through mere transparency, or guarantee that decentralization is always cheaper for AI tasks. The field remains in an early, evidence-seeking phase.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

IC3 Top Universities Collaborative Analysis: Is AI x Crypto the Real Future or Just a Narrative Bubble?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Anthropic Released the "Most Powerful Model," But Most People Can't Use It

In April, Anthropic launched a preview of its "Mythos" model, which was not publicly released due to its exceptional ability to autonomously discover high-risk zero-day vulnerabilities, posing a security threat if misused. It was restricted to a trusted group of security partners under "Project Glasswing." On June 10, Anthropic officially released Fable 5 and Mythos 5. They share the same underlying model but are distributed under different rules. Fable 5 is for general users, while Mythos 5 remains locked for trusted security partners. Benchmarks show Fable 5 leading in software engineering and long-task execution, with significant improvements in generating production-ready code. However, Fable 5 includes a safety classifier that automatically downgrades requests related to cybersecurity, biochemistry, or model distillation to the weaker Opus 4.8 model. This mechanism, while intended for safety, can affect the user experience and has faced criticism for being overly conservative. Pricing is another key point. Fable 5's API costs are double that of Opus 4.8. Furthermore, after a free trial period ending June 23, it will be removed from standard subscription plans, requiring users to purchase additional credits for access. This shift signals a move towards pay-as-you-go pricing for the most advanced capabilities. The strategy highlights a growing divergence in the AI industry: while some players like DeepSeek are drastically cutting prices, Anthropic is increasing them for its top-tier model, using cost as a filter for high-value users. The article suggests the AI market is stratifying, with commoditized capabilities becoming cheaper while premium, cutting-edge models command a significant price premium.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Anthropic Released the "Most Powerful Model," But Most People Can't Use It

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar ONE

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar Harmony (ONE) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar Harmony (ONE) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu Harmony (ONE)Después de comprar tu Harmony (ONE), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear Harmony (ONE)Tradear fácilmente con Harmony (ONE) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

283 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2024.12.12Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Cómo comprar ONE

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de ONE (ONE).

活动图片