The Hottest Open Source Project in History, Almost Became a 'Trophy' in the Crypto World

marsbitPublicado a 2026-03-04Actualizado a 2026-03-04

Resumen

OpenClaw has rapidly become one of the most popular and fastest-growing open-source projects in history, amassing over 250,000 stars on GitHub in just three months. Its creator, Peter Steinberger, has gained significant influence in the AI community but has also taken a strong stance against the crypto industry. Despite its success, OpenClaw has faced challenges, including a trademark dispute that led to a name change. During this process, crypto speculators quickly created and promoted fake tokens using the project’s name, leading to significant financial losses for some investors. Steinberger publicly denounced these activities, clarifying that OpenClaw would never issue a token and disavowing any association with cryptocurrency. The project also briefly listed Venice, a crypto-native AI project on Base chain, as a recommended model provider—a move that was quickly reversed to maintain neutrality and avoid perceived endorsements of crypto-related initiatives. Steinberger has repeatedly expressed frustration with crypto communities, citing harassment, malicious code submissions, and off-topic speculation as disruptive to genuine technical discussion. He has even considered abandoning the project due to these issues. Steinberger, who is financially independent, has advised young developers to avoid cryptocurrency, reflecting his broader criticism of the industry’s speculative culture. The conflict highlights the ongoing struggle between open-source innovation and crypto-dr...

Author: Nancy, PANews

A dark horse has emerged in the open-source world. In just three months, OpenClaw has become the most popular and fastest-growing open-source project in history, a new favorite among developers.

This intelligent agent tsunami, sparked by Peter Steinberger, has not only made him a top AI influencer but also won him a large number of "lobster believers" worldwide. This highly sought-after lobster godfather, however, strongly rejects the crypto world and has repeatedly publicly criticized it. Such a stance undoubtedly brings more negative舆论 to cryptocurrency.

Topping GitHub's Star Ranking, Urgently "Distancing" from Crypto Projects

There is no doubt that AI has become the golden narrative for capital and talent migration. Its rapid rise has led many to see AI as the hope for revitalizing the crypto industry, becoming a new opportunity for many in the circle to蹭流量 or seek investment.

Especially the recently trending OpenClaw. According to the latest data, OpenClaw's star count on the GitHub platform has exceeded 250,000, surpassing Linux and React to become one of the most popular open-source projects and setting the record for the fastest growth in open-source history.

As "raising lobsters" becomes popular globally, tutorials,变现 cases, and user experiences around OpenClaw continue to emerge. Some even make a profit by offering on-site OpenClaw installation services. From independent developers to large companies to offline services, the "shovel-selling" business for OpenClaw is booming.

The crypto market naturally wouldn't miss this hotspot. Recently, Venice, an AI project on the Base chain, became a recommended model provider for OpenClaw, and the only crypto-native project. With the加持 of the top AI project's popularity, the Venice token surged, its market cap once exceeding $900 million. This news quickly caught the attention of crypto industry practitioners and was widely shared.

It is reported that Venice is a generative AI project focused on privacy protection and content censorship resistance. Its底层 integrates various open-source large models and was founded in 2024 by crypto OG and ShapeShift founder Erik Voorhees. It has recently gained attention due to the Agent privacy trend.

However, Steinberger clearly did not agree with this kind of捆绑炒作. He immediately publicly clarified, "This was an oversight in a previous document. We want to remain neutral on this matter." Simultaneously, OpenClaw promptly deleted the related recommendation content.

In other words, OpenClaw's "distancing" this time is not否定 or贬低ing the actual value and technical advantages of the Venice project, but rather proactively deleting the "official key recommendation" label that could lead to over-interpretation, to avoid unnecessary narrative绑架 and利益猜测. Especially as an open-source Agent framework, and with the founder having joined OpenAI, OpenClaw needs to maintain technical neutrality and avoid any suspicion of利益冲突.

Choosing to Sever Ties Due to Crypto "Piggybacking," Once Considered Abandoning the Project

Unlike AI leaders like OpenAI founder Sam Altman and xAI co-founder Musk, who hold positive or even open attitudes towards crypto, Steinberger adopts a stance of "fans only, no disturbances." This attitude of avoidance inevitably leaves the币圈 feeling "破防" (disheartened/offended).

In fact, Steinberger, who is not interested in crypto, is very排斥 the "piggybacking" phenomenon in the crypto circle. Since last year, he has issued dozens of public statements expressing strong dissatisfaction with crypto speculation culture, even直言 (stating bluntly) "don't come near."

Especially after OpenClaw became popular. In January of this year, OpenClaw's popularity rose, but its original name, Clawdbot, encountered a trademark dispute with Anthropic's AI model Claude and received a cease-and-desist notice from their legal team. Subsequently, Steinberger renamed the project twice,最终 settling on the name OpenClaw.

However, this renaming风波 was exploited by crypto speculators for抢注 (domain squatting) and炒作.

During the renaming process, snipers used automated scripts to quickly hijack accounts, impersonate the official team, and趁机 issue fake tokens, such as CLAWD. The market cap of some of these tokens once soared to tens of millions of dollars, attracting a large number of investors.

Faced with market speculation, Steinberger quickly publicly stated that he would never issue a token and emphasized that any project issuing tokens in his name is a scam. This caused the prices of these tokens to plummet, resulting in significant losses for many retail investors.

If this crypto闹剧 (farce) only made Steinberger反感 (disgusted), then the damage to the community ecology made him愤怒 (angry).

As OpenClaw continued to gain popularity, a large number of crypto players flooded into related communities, with some radicals even maliciously submitting code, sending abusive private messages, demanding Steinberger claim transaction fees or crypto-fy the project.

As a result, the official OpenClaw Discord server began completely banning mentions of keywords like Bitcoin, Crypto, etc., even neutral technical discussions were not exempt. Some users were removed for quoting Bitcoin block heights as benchmark tests.

"I underestimated these people," Steinberger said bluntly in a recent interview, pointing out that the crypto community is a very particular subculture that quickly tokenizes any hot topic. But he had already achieved financial freedom economically and simply did not want to support this (crypto) thing. The crypto noise made it almost impossible for him to see any real project discussion; the related speculative炒作 was harming the project.

It was precisely because of the "harassment" from the crypto community that this天才开发者 (genius developer) admitted he had even briefly considered abandoning the entire project. He very much did not want the project to become a tool for crypto speculation.

Just recently, Steinberger also publicly advised young people, "Don't waste your time on cryptocurrency." These remarks further exposed his dissatisfaction with the crypto industry.

This unexpected clash between the open-source world and the币圈 is not just a act of "self-preservation" by a hit project; it更折射出 (reflects even more) the difficult-to-reconcile矛盾 (contradiction) between technical purity and capital炒作 (hype/speculation) in the current AI wave.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is OpenClaw and why is it considered a breakthrough in the open-source community?

AOpenClaw is an open-source project that became the most popular and fastest-growing in history, gaining over 250,000 stars on GitHub in just three months. It is an AI agent framework that has attracted widespread attention from developers and is seen as a new favorite in the AI space due to its rapid growth and innovative approach.

QWho is Peter Steinberger and what is his stance on cryptocurrency?

APeter Steinberger is the creator of OpenClaw and a prominent figure in AI. He strongly opposes cryptocurrency, publicly criticizing it multiple times and expressing frustration with crypto communities for 'harassing' his project, issuing fake tokens, and disrupting discussions. He has stated that he will never issue a token and advises young people wasting time on crypto.

QWhy did OpenClaw remove its recommendation for the Venice project?

AOpenClaw removed its recommendation for Venice, a crypto-native AI project on the Base chain, to maintain a neutral stance and avoid any perception of endorsement or利益冲突. Steinberger clarified that the initial inclusion was an oversight and that OpenClaw wanted to remain impartial, especially as an open-source framework, to prevent narrative hijacking and speculative interest.

QHow did the cryptocurrency community react to OpenClaw's popularity, and what were the consequences?

AThe cryptocurrency community engaged in speculative activities, including creating fake tokens like CLAWD with millions in market cap, flooding discussions with crypto-related content, and even sending abusive messages. This led OpenClaw to ban crypto-related terms on its Discord and caused Steinberger to consider abandoning the project due to the harm from炒作 and harassment.

QWhat challenges did OpenClaw face regarding its name, and how was it resolved?

AOpenClaw faced a trademark dispute with Anthropic's AI model Claude, originally named Clawdbot, and received a cease-and-desist letter. After two name changes, it settled on OpenClaw. During this process, crypto opportunists quickly registered similar names and issued counterfeit tokens, prompting Steinberger to publicly denounce them as scams.

Lecturas Relacionadas

From South Korea to the United States: Blue-Collar Jobs Are Becoming Increasingly Popular, Thanks to AI

AI is reshaping the labor market's value proposition. The traditional four-year college degree is losing its appeal as a guaranteed career path, while skilled blue-collar trades like electricians, welders, and plumbers are experiencing historic demand and wage premiums. This shift is driven by dual pressures: AI's displacement of certain white-collar roles and a booming need for physical infrastructure and data center construction. Data confirms the trend. In the U.S., vocational school revenue surged, and a significant portion of recent layoffs are AI-related. Surveys show a majority of Gen Z adults plan to pursue blue-collar work, citing better job security against AI automation. Vocational education interest has exploded recently. Experts cite a psychological shift as younger generations seek tangible, AI-resistant careers and avoid high student debt. In many cases, salaries for skilled trades now match or exceed those requiring a bachelor's degree. In South Korea, semiconductor vocational high schools boast near-total employment, with graduates securing high-paying roles at companies like Samsung. The shortage is structural, exacerbated by a retiring baby boomer workforce and massive infrastructure projects. Companies like JPMorgan Chase, Meta, and Lowe's are investing heavily in training programs. However, overcoming historical stigma and a "perception gap" around trade careers remains a key challenge to closing the talent gap.

marsbitHace 25 min(s)

From South Korea to the United States: Blue-Collar Jobs Are Becoming Increasingly Popular, Thanks to AI

marsbitHace 25 min(s)

Qualcomm: AI Hype Subsides, When Will Smartphones Emerge from the Gloom?

Qualcomm reported its Q3 FY2026 results (ending June 2026), with revenue of $9.95B, down 4% YoY but above expectations. Gross margin declined to 53.1%, pressured by rising costs across manufacturing and memory. Key business segments showed mixed performance: Handset revenue fell 19.6% YoY to $5.09B, dragged by an 11% decline in non-Apple Android shipments and weaker high-end mix. Conversely, Automotive revenue surged 61% to $1.59B, and IoT grew 9% to $1.83B. Core operating profit dropped 41% YoY due to margin compression and higher expenses. Management's Q4 FY2026 guidance projects revenue of $9.7B-$10.5B, in line with consensus, but Non-GAAP EPS guidance of $2.05-$2.25 fell short of expectations. Amidst persistent weakness in its core handset market, Qualcomm is pursuing growth in AI, focusing on Edge AI (smartphones, PCs, automotive) and Data Center AI. Its data center strategy includes four pillars: AI accelerators (e.g., AI200), commercial CPUs (Dragonfly C1000), custom silicon, and connectivity solutions. While these initiatives initially boosted its stock, concerns over AI capital expenditure sustainability have since erased those gains. The company targets $5B in data center revenue for FY2027 and $15B for FY2029. The report concludes that with the traditional handset business still under pressure, the data center opportunity is currently viewed as a longer-term option, and a more conservative valuation based on core operations may be warranted until AI contributions materialize.

marsbitHace 30 min(s)

Qualcomm: AI Hype Subsides, When Will Smartphones Emerge from the Gloom?

marsbitHace 30 min(s)

From TPU to Self-Evolving Agents: How Jeff Dean Predicts the Next Step in AI

At the 2026 YC Startup School, Jeff Dean outlined his vision for AI's next phase, shifting focus from simply scaling models to building intelligent, autonomous systems. He believes AI's progress is no longer just about creating smarter models, but about integrating them into systems capable of long-term, iterative work, automated experimentation, and continuous learning. This evolution moves the competition from "who has the bigger model" to "who can best organize intelligence." Dean suggests AI capabilities are now comparable to a junior engineer, enabling the automation of complex workflows. However, the true challenge and opportunity lie in managing these AI "workers" at scale. He emphasizes the importance of **context engineering**—structuring tools, memory, and feedback loops—over raw model power. For startups, this means building deep expertise in niche domains where general models currently fail (near 0-1% success rates), leveraging proprietary data, specialized tools, and domain-specific evaluators. A recurring theme is re-examining fundamental constraints. Dean's past work, like moving Google's search index to memory or creating the TPU, stemmed from questioning outdated assumptions about hardware and cost. He sees similar inflection points today, particularly in **specialized inference hardware** to drastically reduce latency and energy consumption for real-time Agent operation. Notably, he points out that in modern AI systems, the dominant cost is often not computation but **data movement**. Reliable, long-running Agents require robust system design, borrowing concepts from distributed computing like checkpointing, state management, and parallel exploration to handle failures and maintain progress over days or weeks. As AI automates execution, the scarcest human skills will shift to **defining clear specifications**, **judging what problems are worth solving** (taste), and designing effective feedback loops. Ultimately, Dean's framework prioritizes understanding the problem deeply, identifying the true bottlenecks, and systematically building closed-loop systems where AI can not only perform tasks but also improve AI itself.

marsbitHace 30 min(s)

From TPU to Self-Evolving Agents: How Jeff Dean Predicts the Next Step in AI

marsbitHace 30 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片