The Hottest 00s Generation on Wall Street

marsbitPublicado a 2026-05-31Actualizado a 2026-05-31

Resumen

"Wall Street's Hottest '00s Phenom: The 25-Year-Old Fund Manager Who Bet on AI's 'Boring' Backbone" At just 25, Leopold Aschenbrenner, once fired by OpenAI, now runs a hedge fund worth $13.7 billion. His strategy? Betting against the consensus. While others chased AI chips, he invested early in the physical infrastructure powering the AI boom: electricity, data centers, and energy. Expelled from OpenAI's safety team in 2024, Aschenbrenner foresaw the coming bottleneck. He argued that AI progress would be limited not by algorithms, but by power, chip capacity, and space. Acting on this, he founded Situational Awareness LP to go long on these "old economy" assets. His bets have paid off spectacularly. His fund's assets soared from $255 million in late 2024 to $13.7 billion by Q1 2026. His portfolio is a direct reflection of his thesis: major long positions in fuel cell company Bloom Energy and data center/bitcoin mining firms like CleanSpark and Riot Platforms, which control critical land and power resources. Conversely, he holds massive put options against overheated semiconductor giants like NVIDIA and AMD. A notable exception was his bullish bet on storage company SanDisk, which surged ~160% in Q2. Aschenbrenner's vision is materializing. Tech giants like Amazon, Alphabet, and Meta are ramping up colossal capital expenditure on data centers. Global data center power consumption is projected to skyrocket, with AI accounting for over half by 2030. The demand for enabling t...

"I was early, but I wasn't wrong."

The protagonist in the movie "The Big Short" would surely resonate deeply with these words, much like the youngest hedge fund manager on Wall Street today.

In 2024, a notice from OpenAI sent 23-year-old Leopold Aschenbrenner packing. Soon after, he turned around and founded a hedge fund, positioning himself against the prevailing consensus—he didn't go all-in on the then-sizzling hot AI chips and semiconductors, but instead went long on electricity, data centers, computing power infrastructure, and energy infrastructure. These were seen as slow, clunky "old-school" assets at the time.

His early calculation soon proved prophetic. Today, tech giants are pouring huge investments into AI infrastructure, and the capital markets have enthusiastically crowned new AI kings in areas like storage and optical modules. Leopold won. His fund's portfolio value had already reached $13.7 billion (approx. RMB 90 billion) by the end of Q1 this year, and his personal wealth has skyrocketed.

And he's only 25. In the AI era, the genius narrative is simply too compelling.

Graduated from University at 19

Fired by OpenAI Two Years Ago

His youth shouldn't be too surprising, considering he started university at 15.

This German teenager from a family of doctors showed exceptional academic talent. In 2021, at age 19, Leopold earned three degrees in Mathematics, Statistics, and Economics, graduating as the valedictorian from Columbia University, and subsequently worked at two funds.

Not long after, he joined OpenAI's Superalignment team. This was a star-studded team, co-led by OpenAI co-founder Ilya Sutskever, with the goal of solving the superintelligence alignment problem within four years—essentially ensuring highly intelligent AI remains under human control.

The drama came when Leopold was very publicly fired by OpenAI.

The trigger was an internal memo written by the OpenAI board warning of insufficient safety measures at the company. This memo, however, sparked tensions between management and the board. In April 2024, OpenAI dismissed Leopold, citing information leaks.

Experiences shape choices and hone foresight.

Shortly after being fired, Leopold published a profound, lengthy essay that almost predicted the current direction of AI development and investment trends. In it, he mentioned that by 2027, large models would be capable of doing the work of AI researchers or engineers.

To achieve this, the key constraints wouldn't be at the algorithmic level, but in electricity, chip manufacturing capacity, and physical space. The power consumption of a single training cluster would leap from megawatt scale to gigawatt scale, approaching the output of a large nuclear power plant.

Based on this prediction, at the end of 2024, Leopold chose to start a business—founding the hedge fund Situational Awareness LP, dedicating himself to going long on the energy and computing power infrastructure needed for AI development, while avoiding the crowded bubbles in chips and the application layer.

Shorting Nvidia

But Buying Into the High-Flier SanDisk

Thus, Wall Street's new genius trader was born.

In May 2026, as Leopold's hedge fund disclosed its latest U.S. stock holdings (13F filing) for the first quarter of the year, the astonishing expansion of this 00s-generation manager's wealth came into view:

The total market value of his portfolio had skyrocketed from $5.52 billion at the end of 2025 to $13.7 billion. At the end of 2024, the fund's size was merely $255 million. This speed is nothing short of meteoric.

Beyond his resume and genius stories, global onlookers were more interested in what he bought.

Looking at his latest holdings, Leopold maintained his long positions in AI infrastructure while establishing new short option positions worth $8.45 billion as a hedge against tech and semiconductors. As of the end of Q1, his top five holdings were all put options. These included put options on the VanEck Semiconductor ETF valued at around $2 billion, put options on Nvidia valued at around $1.6 billion, as well as put options on Oracle, Broadcom, and Advanced Micro Devices (AMD).

This portfolio clearly signaled wariness towards overheated chip stocks. An exception was that by the end of Q1, he had exclusively increased his holdings of SanDisk by 86,000 shares and established call options on SanDisk worth $390 million. SanDisk's subsequent performance undoubtedly became the envy of many; since the start of Q2 alone, SanDisk has risen approximately 160%.

The main action was on the long side, where Leopold heavily invested in critical infrastructure assets for the AGI era.

His top long holding was the fuel cell company Bloom Energy. Leopold holds nearly 6.5 million shares of the company, with a position value of about $879 million. More precisely, Bloom Energy makes fuel cells, which can efficiently convert natural gas directly into electricity.

Simultaneously, in Q1, Leopold also increased his holdings in companies like CleanSpark, Riot Platforms, Applied Digital, and IREN—firms involved in data centers or crypto mining, possessing land, power resources, data center capabilities, or grid permits.

"The speed of AI development is determined by physical bottlenecks, so you should invest in the bottlenecks themselves." Looking across these trades, they precisely correspond to the underlying logic Leopold had when founding the fund.

Of course, for ordinary investors, copying these moves comes a bit late. Holdings reports typically have a 45-day delay, and by the time the public sees what the big players have bought, the most lucrative part of the rally has often already passed.

The End Point of the AI World

"The whole world is starting to value AI infrastructure assets."

In just the past few months of this year, the sectors Leopold bet on—power supply, data center computing power, semiconductor optics—have fully demonstrated their potential and immense demand.

Take electricity, for example. IEA data shows that in 2025, global data centers consumed 485 TWh of electricity, with AI accounting for 170 TWh (35%). It's projected that by 2030, total global data center electricity consumption will reach 950 TWh, with AI consuming 510 TWh (54%), exceeding Japan's total national electricity consumption. China's figures are equally staggering: in 2025, AI electricity consumption reached 450 billion kWh (3.8% of total societal electricity use), and it's expected to reach 600 billion kWh (5%) in 2026, nearly matching the annual electricity consumption of China's entire steel industry.

Then look at "light." As AI competition rapidly evolves from a battle of computing power to one of connectivity, traditional copper wire connections are long overburdened, leading to explosive growth in demand for "optical links."

According to data from UK-based commodity research firm CRU, global data center fiber optic cable usage reached 69.6 million core kilometers in 2025 and is expected to exceed 100 million core kilometers in 2026. Their estimates suggest that by 2027, AI-driven fiber demand will account for 35% of total data center fiber demand. For optical modules, Goldman Sachs has significantly raised its 2026 sales forecast for 800G optical modules from an initial 25 million units to 33.5 million units, a 58% increase.

Unsurprisingly, tech giants have already begun building their AI infrastructure moats.

In 2026, capital expenditure plans from Amazon, Alphabet (Google's parent), Meta, and others have grown substantially, with massive funds directed towards building new data centers and a long list of equipment including AI chips, network cables, and backup generators. Domestically, the latest development is rumors that ByteDance is discussing a spending plan of up to $70 billion (approx. RMB 474.7 billion) this year, primarily for building data centers and other AI infrastructure.

This wave of AI infrastructure frenzy is even more directly and violently reflected in the capital markets.

Looking domestically, the "Yi-Zhong-Tian" trio of optical module giants have seen their stock prices double since last year, especially InnoLight Technology, which soared from a low of 66 yuan per share in April last year to over 1,000 yuan, with a market cap now nearing 1.3 trillion yuan.

Similarly, since the memory cycle rally began in the second half of last year, stocks like Longsys, Deming Li, and Biwin Storage have surged in sync. Dapu Micro, which just went public in April, multiplied its IPO price nearly 20-fold in just one month.

In contrast, one can't help but reflect: the internet was once imagined as a weightless world, yet it gave rise to server rooms, fiber optic cables, and undersea cables. Now AI might seem even lighter, but when it comes to actual implementation, it equally relies on electricity, land, chips, networks, and cooling systems.

A grand future always grows from those silent assets.

This article is from the WeChat public account "Investment Community" (ID: pedaily2012), author: Feng Yuchen

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the core investment thesis behind Leopold Aschenbrenner's hedge fund, Situational Awareness LP, when he founded it?

AThe core investment thesis was to go long on the physical infrastructure necessary for AI development—such as power, data centers, compute capacity, and energy infrastructure—while avoiding the crowded and potentially overvalued bets on AI chips and semiconductors. He believed that the speed of AI advancement would be limited by these physical bottlenecks, so investors should own the bottlenecks themselves.

QWhat major positions did Leopold Aschenbrenner's fund hold in Q1 2026 according to the 13F filing, and what did they indicate about his market view?

AIn Q1 2026, his fund's largest holdings were put options (bearish bets), primarily on semiconductor and tech companies like the VanEck Semiconductor ETF, NVIDIA, Oracle, Broadcom, and AMD, indicating a strong caution towards overheated valuations in the chip sector. Conversely, he held significant long positions in companies like Bloom Energy (fuel cells), CleanSpark, and other data center/crypto mining firms with energy and infrastructure assets, reflecting his bullish thesis on AI infrastructure.

QWhy was Leopold Aschenbrenner fired from OpenAI, and how did that experience influence his subsequent career path?

AHe was fired from OpenAI in 2024 for allegedly leaking an internal memorandum where the board warned of insufficient safety measures, which heightened tensions between management and the board. This experience, coupled with his work on superintelligence alignment, helped shape his foresight. He later published an essay predicting AI's physical infrastructure needs, which directly led him to found a hedge fund focused on investing in that very sector.

QWhat does the article suggest are the key physical constraints on the rapid development of AI, based on data cited?

AThe article identifies electricity/power and optical connectivity ('light') as key physical constraints. It cites IEA data showing AI's massive and growing share of global data center electricity consumption. It also references forecasts for surging demand in fiber optics and optical modules within data centers, driven by AI's need for high-speed connections that copper wires cannot support.

QAccording to the article, how have capital markets and tech giants responded to the growing demand for AI infrastructure?

ACapital markets have responded by dramatically driving up the stock prices of companies in relevant sectors, such as Chinese optical module manufacturers ('Yizhongtian') and memory chip makers, with some seeing multi-fold increases. Tech giants like Amazon, Alphabet, Meta, and reportedly ByteDance are making massive capital expenditure plans, significantly increasing investments in building new data centers and purchasing related equipment like AI chips and network cables to secure their AI infrastructure moats.

Lecturas Relacionadas

GitHub, Transfixed by AI

On the night of February 9th, GitHub suffered a major outage caused by a simple configuration change—reducing a cache refresh interval from 12 to 2 hours—that triggered a cascade of failures. This was not an isolated event, but part of a broader pattern. In early 2026, GitHub experienced at least 8 major incidents, failing to meet its promised 99.9% availability. These outages stemmed from structural issues: explosive growth in load, tight service coupling, and insufficient protection against abnormal traffic. This unprecedented load is driven by AI Agents. In 2025, GitHub handled ~1 billion commits. By 2026, weekly commits reached 275 million, projecting to ~14 billion for the year—a 14x increase. AI tools like Claude Code now contribute 4.5% of all public repository commits, with weekly submissions surging 25x in just three months. AI-generated pull requests jumped from 4 million to 17 million per month in half a year. Unlike human developers, AI Agents work continuously, generating commits at a scale that overwhelms infrastructure designed for human rhythms. The surge also shattered GitHub's business model. Copilot's flat-rate pricing, based on assisting human developers, became unsustainable as Agentic AI sessions consumed resources worth hundreds of dollars for a few dollars in fees. In response, GitHub imposed usage limits and, by June 1st, shifted to a pay-per-use "AI Credits" system. Facing this new reality, GitHub realized a 10x scaling plan was insufficient. It announced a need to *redesign* its architecture for 30x current scale—decoupling services, adding fault isolation, and improving change management to prevent cascading failures. Other platforms like Stripe and AWS are facing similar challenges with AI Agents. Fundamentally, GitHub is transitioning from a human collaboration platform to an "exhaust pipe" for automated AI workflows. Its detailed post-mortem reports aim to maintain trust during this turbulent rebuild. The February outage was not just a technical glitch, but a signal of the software industry's entry into a new, AI-driven era.

marsbitHace 16 min(s)

GitHub, Transfixed by AI

marsbitHace 16 min(s)

Both Suffer Massive Losses Exceeding $90 Billion, Which Is in Greater Peril: Strategy or Bitmine?

Facing massive paper losses exceeding $90 billion each amidst a sharp market downturn, "Digital Asset Treasury" (DAT) giants Strategy and Bitmine find themselves in a precarious position, but with different underlying risks. Strategy, heavily invested in Bitcoin (BTC), faces significant financial strain. Its strategy relies heavily on debt, including convertible notes and preferred stock (STRC) requiring substantial dividend payments. With its cash reserves dwindling and BTC offering no staking yield for cash flow, Strategy's high leverage makes it vulnerable. A continued price decline could force asset sales to meet obligations, potentially creating a negative feedback loop. Its market value has already fallen sharply. In contrast, Bitmine, an Ethereum (ETH) holder, appears on firmer financial ground. It primarily funds its purchases through equity offerings (like ATM programs), avoiding debt pressure. It also generates income by staking a large portion of its ETH holdings. While not immune to market drops and shareholder dilution concerns, Bitmine maintains more flexibility, recently announcing a new preferred share offering to raise further capital. The core divergence lies in their financing: Bitmine uses equity (investor money), while Strategy uses debt (borrowed money). Consequently, Bitmine currently faces less immediate liquidity pressure than Strategy, which must navigate the dual challenge of servicing debt/dividends and a declining core asset (BTC) price.

marsbitHace 23 min(s)

Both Suffer Massive Losses Exceeding $90 Billion, Which Is in Greater Peril: Strategy or Bitmine?

marsbitHace 23 min(s)

Where the AI Bubble Really Is: Which Layer of Players Are Naked

AI Bubble: Where It Really Is and Who's Swimming Naked This analysis dissects the AI industry not as a single entity but as a five-layer pyramid, arguing that bubbles are concentrated in specific tiers, not uniformly distributed. **Key Distinction from the 2000 Dot-com Bubble:** Unlike 2000, where companies had stock prices before revenue, today's leading AI players have massive, contract-backed revenue driving their valuations. Core infrastructure demand is real, with every GPU running at full capacity for paying customers. **The Five-Layer Pyramid & Bubble Assessment:** * **L0 (Fab/Manufacturing) & Top L4 (Leading AI Apps): NO BUBBLE.** Companies like TSMC, NVIDIA, major cloud providers (Microsoft, Google, Meta, Amazon), and top AI labs have real revenues and orders. Supply is tightly constrained by TSMC's disciplined capacity control and physical limits like power/land for data centers, preventing a supply glut. * **L1 (Memory): BATTLEGROUND.** Sky-high HBM margins could signal a new structural cycle or a classic "boom before bust." The oligopoly of three major players may enforce supply discipline, making this a high-stakes bet. * **L2 (Interconnect/Optical Modules): BUBBLE TERRITORY.** Companies like Lumentum and AAOI have seen stock surges (4-10x) far outpacing revenue growth. This hardware segment has lower physical barriers to expansion than fabs, allowing speculation. It mirrors the 2000 bubble's epicenter—optics. * **L3 (Infrastructure/"GPU Landlords"): VULNERABLE.** GPU leasing companies profit from the current compute shortage but own no long-term moat. Their business model relies on a temporary bottleneck that will ease as big tech expands and new tech (e.g., potential space-based data centers) emerges. * **L4 Long Tail (VC-backed Startups): STRONG BUBBLE SIGNALS.** VC funding concentration in AI is twice that of the 1999 peak. Many startups with little revenue use the valuation logic of successful giants to justify their own, creating high risk of a "valuation crunch" when funding dries up. **Critical Risks to Monitor:** 1. **GPU Depreciation & Accounting:** Companies extending the assumed useful life of GPUs artificially boost profits. The true economic life depends on future generational leaps from NVIDIA. 2. **"GPU Credit" & Off-Balance-Sheet Leverage:** Emerging structures where shell companies borrow to buy GPUs and lease them out (with chipmakers sometimes investing) move debt off major balance sheets. This echoes the "vendor financing" of 2000 and the securitization risks of 2008, though currently small-scale. 3. **TSMC Abandoning Caution:** If the primary supply bottleneck (TSMC's conservative capacity planning) breaks, runaway supply could trigger a bust. 4. **Algorithmic Efficiency Breakthrough:** A major leap in software efficiency could drastically reduce the need for raw compute hardware, undermining the investment thesis. **Conclusion:** The AI boom is expensive and has frothy areas, but its core is underpinned by real demand and physical supply constraints. The bubble risk is layered: most present in optical components, GPU leasing, and the long-tail startup ecosystem, while the foundational chip manufacturing and leading application layers remain relatively solid—for now.

marsbitHace 36 min(s)

Where the AI Bubble Really Is: Which Layer of Players Are Naked

marsbitHace 36 min(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片