The Hidden Realities and Concerns Behind Web3 Unicorn Phantom

marsbitPublicado a 2025-12-23Actualizado a 2025-12-23

Resumen

The Web3 unicorn Phantom, valued at $3 billion, has navigated a challenging 2025 in the crypto wallet market. While its user base grew to nearly 20 million monthly active users and assets under custody surpassed $25 billion, its market share in embedded swaps plummeted from 10% to just 0.5%, as users migrated to exchange-linked wallets offering lower fees and stronger incentives. Phantom, which started on Solana and expanded multi-chain, remains heavily dependent on the Solana ecosystem, with 97% of its swap transactions occurring there. This has posed risks as Solana's TVL declined over 34% from its peak. In response, Phantom has aggressively pursued new product lines to diversify revenue and usage. Key launches include its native stablecoin CASH, which surpassed $100 million in supply; a Phantom-branded debit card for spending crypto in the U.S.; the acquisition of trading tools like Solsniper; integration of a prediction market with Kalshi; and the release of a free SDK, Phantom Connect, for easier dApp onboarding. CEO Brandon Millman emphasizes focusing on product over token launches or an IPO, aiming to make crypto a tool for everyday payments. However, the path is competitive, with MetaMask having already launched a similar card in more regions. The success of Phantom's debit card and the sustainability of its stablecoin remain to be proven as it battles to define the future of independent non-custodial wallets.

Author: zhou, ChainCatcher

The cryptocurrency wallet market in 2025 is witnessing a fierce battle for market share.

As the meme coin frenzy subsides, high-frequency trading users are increasingly migrating to exchange-affiliated wallets that offer lower fees and stronger incentives. In the face of the closed-loop ecosystems of exchanges, the survival space for independent players is continuously shrinking.

Against this backdrop, Phantom's performance has drawn attention. Earlier this year, it raised $150 million in funding, pushing its valuation to $3 billion. Since the fourth quarter, the project has successively launched its own stablecoin CASH, a prediction market platform, and a crypto debit card, attempting to find new growth points beyond trading business.

$3 Billion Valuation: From Solana Origins to Multi-Chain Expansion

Looking back at Phantom's development history, in 2021, the Solana ecosystem had just exploded, and on-chain infrastructure was still incomplete. Traditional crypto wallets like MetaMask primarily supported Ethereum-based chains, with insufficient compatibility for other chains, resulting in certain user experience shortcomings.

Typically, when creating a wallet, users must manually write down a 12 or 24-word seed phrase. If the key is lost, assets become permanently irrecoverable, which many potential users find cumbersome and risky.

The three founders of Phantom had previously worked for years at 0x Labs (an Ethereum DeFi infrastructure project). They seized this opportunity, choosing to start with Solana to create a wallet with a simple interface and intuitive operation. Their core innovation lies in optimizing the backup process: providing various simple methods such as email login, biometric recognition, and encrypted cloud backup to assist and replace manual copying of seed phrases, significantly lowering the entry barrier for beginners.

In April 2021, the Phantom browser extension was launched, and within months, its user base exceeded one million, becoming the preferred choice for Solana users. According to RootData, in July of the same year, Phantom, still in its testing phase, received a $9 million Series A funding round led by a16z; in January 2022, Paradigm led a $109 million Series B round, valuing it at $1.2 billion; until early 2025, Paradigm and Sequoia again led a $150 million funding round, pushing its valuation to $3 billion.

As it scaled, Phantom subsequently began expanding its multi-chain footprint, supporting multiple public chains including Ethereum, Polygon, Bitcoin, Base, and Sui, attempting to shed the label of "Solana-specific wallet." However, Phantom still does not natively support BNB Chain, and previously, users have complained that Phantom supports ETH but not BNB Chain, causing issues with claiming airdrops.

Highs and Lows of 2025

2025 has been a year of extremes for Phantom: on one hand, rapid breakthroughs in user and product aspects; on the other, trading volume share being significantly eroded by exchange-affiliated wallets.

Specifically, user growth is a bright spot. Phantom's monthly active users grew from 15 million at the beginning of the year to nearly 20 million by year-end, ranking among the fastest-growing independent wallets, especially with significant user increases in emerging markets like India and Nigeria.

Meanwhile, Phantom's custodial assets under management exceeded $25 billion. At its peak, it generated $44 million in weekly revenue, and its annual revenue once surpassed that of MetaMask. Currently, Phantom's cumulative revenue is close to $570 million.

However, concerns on the trading volume side are equally prominent. According to Dune Analytics data, Phantom's share in the global embedded swap market dropped from nearly 10% at the beginning of the year to 2.3% in May, and further shrank to only 0.5% by year-end. Exchange-affiliated wallets, leveraging fee advantages, faster listing speeds, and high airdrop subsidies, have attracted a large number of high-frequency trading users. Currently, Binance Wallet holds nearly 70%, while OKX (wallet + routing API) combined holds over 20%.

A greater market concern for Phantom lies in its deep binding with Solana. Data shows that 97% of Phantom's swap transactions occur on Solana, while Solana's Total Value Locked (TVL) has fallen more than 34% from its peak of $13.22 billion on September 14, now down to a six-month low of $8.67 billion. This directly drags down Phantom's core trading metrics.

Facing these pressures, Phantom is betting resources on new products, attempting to open up a second growth curve.

In terms of product dimensions, Phantom has launched a series of differentiated features:

In July, integrated Hyperliquid perpetual contracts, driving approximately $1.8 billion in trading volume in just about 16 days after launch, generating nearly $930,000 in revenue through rebate mechanisms (builder codes);
In August, acquired meme coin monitoring tool Solsniper and NFT data platform SimpleHash, further consolidating coverage of niche trading needs.
The native stablecoin CASH, launched at the end of September, quickly saw its supply exceed $100 million, with a November peak of over 160,000 transactions. Its core competitiveness lies in fee-free P2P transfers and accompanying lending rewards;
The Phantom Cash debit card, first launched in the US in December, allows users to directly spend on-chain stablecoins with the card, and is compatible with mainstream mobile payments like Apple Pay and Google Pay;
On December 12, announced the launch of a prediction market platform, integrating the Kalshi prediction market within the wallet, currently open to eligible users;
Simultaneously launched the free SDK "Phantom Connect," allowing users to seamlessly access different web3 applications with the same account, further lowering the onboarding barriers for developers and users.

Among these, the debit card and CASH stablecoin are the most watched. Phantom is attempting to use them to solve the "last mile" problem of spending crypto assets.

Phantom CEO Brandon Millman has publicly stated that in the short term, there will be no token issuance, no IPO, and no building of their own chain. All efforts are focused on refining the product to turn the wallet into a financial tool usable by ordinary people. He believes that the endgame of the wallet race is not about who has the largest trading volume, but about who first brings crypto into daily payments.

However, the path to the "last mile" of cryptocurrency payments is not easy, and Phantom is not the first independent non-custodial wallet to launch a debit card.

Prior to this, MetaMask had already partnered with Mastercard, Baanx, and CompoSecure in Q2 2025 to launch the MetaMask Card, supporting real-time conversion of cryptocurrency to fiat for spending, and rolling out in multiple regions including the EU, UK, and Latin America. MetaMask's card has broader coverage and an earlier start, but is limited by the Ethereum and Linea networks, with higher fees and slower speeds, leading to user feedback that it is "convenient but rarely used."

In comparison, Phantom's debit card started later, currently only available in limited quantities in the US, and its actual adoption remains to be seen. Theoretically, leveraging Solana's low-fee advantage, it might be more competitive in fee-sensitive emerging markets, but it still has a clear gap compared to MetaMask Card in terms of global coverage and merchant acceptance.

Regarding stablecoins, if CASH cannot form a sustained network effect, it may follow the path of other wallet-native stablecoins that started high but fell quickly, such as MetaMask's native stablecoin mUSD, whose supply quickly surpassed the $100 million mark after launch but dropped to about $25 million in less than two months.

Conclusion

As the meme frenzy recedes, trading volume is no longer a reliable moat, and independent wallets must return to the essence of financial services.

Overall, Phantom integrates Hyperliquid perpetual contracts and the Kalshi prediction market on the trading end to retain advanced users; on the consumption end, it bets on the CASH stablecoin and debit card, attempting to truly bring on-chain assets into daily life.

This dual-drive strategy of "trading derivatives + consumption payments" is Phantom's self-redemption under the挤压 (squeeze) of the Matthew effect in the wallet赛道 (race). It is not only searching for a second growth curve but also defining the endgame for independent wallets.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat are the main challenges Phantom is facing in the 2025 crypto wallet market?

APhantom faces challenges including market share in embedded swap transactions (dropping to 0.5% by year-end), intense competition from exchange-linked wallets like Binance Wallet and OKX, and its heavy reliance on the Solana ecosystem, which has seen a significant TVL decline.

QHow did Phantom initially differentiate itself from traditional crypto wallets like MetaMask?

APhantom differentiated itself by simplifying the user experience, offering email login, biometric authentication, and encrypted cloud backups to replace manual seed phrase recording, lowering the entry barrier for new users.

QWhat new products has Phantom launched to diversify beyond its core wallet business?

APhantom launched its native stablecoin CASH, a prediction market platform with Kalshi, an encrypted debit card for spending crypto assets, and acquired tools like Solsniper and SimpleHash. It also integrated Hyperliquid for perpetual contracts and released the Phantom Connect SDK.

QWhy is Phantom's deep integration with Solana considered a potential risk?

A97% of Phantom's swap transactions occur on Solana, and Solana's TVL has dropped over 34% from its peak to a six-month low, directly impacting Phantom's core transaction metrics and exposing it to ecosystem-specific volatility.

QHow does Phantom's approach to crypto payments compare with MetaMask's efforts?

APhantom's debit card, launched later and currently limited to the US, leverages Solana's low fees but has less global coverage than MetaMask Card. MetaMask's card, available in multiple regions, suffers from higher fees and slower speeds due to its Ethereum/Linea foundation.

Lecturas Relacionadas

The Impossible Trilemma Is Basically a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that the core limitation of blockchain technology is not the scalability trilemma, but its fundamental lack of privacy, which acts as a barrier to institutional capital. It defines blockchain as a slow, expensive, shared computer whose primary value is "permissionlessness" (no administrator) and verifiable trust. While this is ideal for native financial assets like stable币, which now process trillions, two critical flaws remain for mainstream adoption: regulatory legitimacy and a default transparency that leaks all financial activity. The author contends that transparency is not a feature but a tax, quantified through MEV extraction, making the public ledger unusable for serious institutions. However, modern cryptography, specifically zero-knowledge proofs, now offers a solution: "provable privacy." This allows users to prove compliance (e.g., solvency, KYC) without revealing underlying data. This fusion of privacy and auditability resolves the transparency-compliant privacy-compliance dichotomy, enabling a purely upgraded system where transactions are verified but not broadcasted. Closing these flaws is presented as the essential bridge to onboard the next wave of trillions in capital.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

The Impossible Trilemma Is Basically a Pseudo-Problem

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that blockchain's fundamental limitation is not the scalability trilemma (decentralization, scalability, security), which has been largely solved, but the lack of **privacy** and, until recently, clear **legitimacy**. Blockchain is described as a slow, expensive, globally shared computer whose core value is censorship resistance and verifiability. While ideal for native digital assets like money (e.g., stablecoins), its default transparency acts as a **tax**, exposing all transactions and enabling MEV extraction, which deters serious institutional capital. Simultaneously, its permissionless nature created regulatory ambiguity. The piece contends that **privacy** is the missing critical feature. It rejects the false choice between total transparency and complete anonymity. Modern cryptography (like zero-knowledge proofs) enables **compliant privacy**: users can prove facts (solvency, KYC status, compliance) without revealing the underlying sensitive data (specific holdings, identities). This preserves auditability for regulators and eliminates the leak of financial information. With recent regulatory progress (e.g., the GENIUS Act) addressing legitimacy, adding default, provably compliant privacy becomes a pure upgrade. It transforms blockchain from a costly, public ledger into a confidential settlement layer, finally bridging the gap to mainstream institutional and individual adoption of on-chain finance.

链捕手Hace 2 hora(s)

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

链捕手Hace 2 hora(s)

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

The global optical chip industry is experiencing a massive wave of expansion driven by surging AI data center demand. Major players across the US, Japan, Europe, and China are aggressively investing to ramp up production capacity. In the US, Coherent is expanding its 6-inch Indium Phosphide (InP) semiconductor fab in Texas, supported by CHIPS Act funding and a $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA. Lumentum is building a new factory for InP optical devices, and Nokia is scaling its advanced photonic chip packaging and testing capabilities. NVIDIA's investments aim to secure future supply of critical lasers and optical interconnect products for AI infrastructure. Japan's JX Advanced Metals, a leading InP substrate supplier, plans a multi-billion yen investment to increase its capacity 7-10 times, strengthening its grip on the crucial upstream materials market. In Europe, IQE and Tower Semiconductor settled a patent dispute and signed a multi-year InP epitaxial wafer supply agreement, highlighting that next-generation silicon photonics platforms will integrate high-performance InP components. STMicroelectronics and Sivers Semiconductors are also expanding silicon photonics production and partnerships. China is rapidly building out its domestic supply chain. Dongshan Precision's subsidiary, Source Photonics, announced a $12 billion project to expand optical chip and module production. Companies like Sanan Optoelectronics and Yunnan Germanium are scaling up InP chip manufacturing and substrate production, moving towards vertical integration from materials to modules. While debate continues around the exact future architecture—whether CPO (Co-Packaged Optics), NPO, or pluggables will dominate—analysts like Morgan Stanley argue the underlying driver is unchangeable: the explosive growth in bandwidth demand. This will inevitably increase the volume of optical engines, lasers, and related content per GPU, regardless of the final technical path. The competition for "more light" in the AI era has intensified into a global, full-chain capacity race.

marsbitHace 4 hora(s)

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

marsbitHace 4 hora(s)

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

Stablecoin Real Yield Found: A Deep Dive into On-Chain Reinsurance with Re's Karan Saroya As stablecoin supply exceeds $170 billion, the search for sustainable, non-speculative yield intensifies. Re, an on-chain reinsurance platform, provides an answer: connecting stablecoin capital to the trillion-dollar traditional reinsurance market. Re operates as a regulated reinsurer, accepting stablecoin deposits as collateral to back US insurance companies. These insurers pay premiums, generating yield that flows back to on-chain depositors. Currently supporting 35 insurers and underwriting $500 million, Re projects scaling to over $1 billion soon. Key insights from a Bankless podcast with founder Karan Saroya and investor Avichal of Electric Capital: 1. **Uncorrelated, Real-World Yield:** Re offers stablecoin holders access to reinsurance returns (targeting 12-14%+), an asset class entirely separate from crypto or equity markets. 2. **Operational Efficiency via Smart Contracts:** Re replaces traditional, labor-intensive capital fundraising with smart contracts, allowing a ~12-person team to compete with industry giants. 3. **Regulatory Leverage:** For every $1 of collateral, regulations allow backing $5-7 in written premiums. This leverage amplifies returns from the underlying risk-free rate. 4. **DeFi Integration:** Depositors receive receipt tokens, which can be used in protocols like Morpho for "looping," potentially pushing yields to 18-20%+. 5. **The "DeFi Mullet" Model:** A compliant front-end (regulated reinsurer) paired with a decentralized back-end (smart contracts, DeFi capital markets). 6. **RE Governance Token:** Modeled on Lloyd's of London, the token governs the central capital pool's allocation, counterparty acceptance, and parameters. 7. **Real Economic Impact:** Capital funds real-world productivity (factories, clinics, businesses) via insurance, moving beyond crypto's internal loops. The discussion highlights a pivotal moment: DeFi's supply-side infrastructure is now met by real demand for productive yield, potentially kickstarting a flywheel where vast on-chain stablecoin capital seeks these real-world returns.

链捕手Hace 5 hora(s)

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

链捕手Hace 5 hora(s)

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

"1996 or 1999? Wall's First Big Test Is 'How to View AI'" Federal Reserve Chairman Wall's initial challenge is not whether to raise or cut rates, but a more fundamental judgment: what kind of boom is the current AI boom? This will determine the Fed's policy path and define his legacy. Economics is split between two opposing views, according to reporter Nick Timiraos. One sees imminent productivity gains that will increase supply and cool inflation, allowing the Fed to hold steady. The other argues that while productivity benefits are distant, demand shocks are here now, and waiting for data confirmation risks missing the intervention window, forcing sharper rate hikes later. Wall has signaled a leaning toward the first view, echoing 1996-era Alan Greenspan, who embraced strong, productivity-driven growth without fear of inflation. However, Wall faces a different macro environment than Greenspan did, with tariff pressures, expanding fiscal deficits, and diminishing globalization benefits, which could force more significant inflation pressures even if AI benefits materialize. Wall's logic, expressed before taking office, is that AI-driven productivity gains won't show in official data for years. If the Fed waits for confirmation, it might mistakenly tighten policy and choke off the very growth that could suppress inflation. This argues for using forward-looking narratives over lagging data. Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee presents a key counter-argument. He distinguishes between expected and unexpected productivity booms. A widely anticipated boom, like the current AI wave, can cause people to spend future wealth gains in advance, overheating the economy before productivity actually rises, thus requiring preemptive rate hikes. He cites rising costs for AI data centers as evidence of such overheating. Fed Governor Christopher Waller offers a rebuttal to Goolsbee, noting the "expected spending" mechanism only works if people can borrow against future income, which many households cannot do due to borrowing constraints. Wall also faces a paradox related to his desire to reduce the Fed's use of "forward guidance" (pre-announcing policy moves). This practice was established in 1999 when Greenspan began signaling hikes to avoid market shocks. If the economy follows a less optimistic path, Wall may be forced to choose between using the guidance he wants to abolish or risking market volatility by staying silent. The ultimate question defining Wall's first major test remains: Is this 1996 or 1999?

marsbitHace 6 hora(s)

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

marsbitHace 6 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros