The Fall of Crypto Actually Has Little to Do with Scamming Retail Investors

比推Publicado a 2026-03-12Actualizado a 2026-03-12

Resumen

The decline of Crypto is not primarily due to "scamming retail investors," but stems from deeper structural issues, according to a seasoned Crypto OG. Key problems include: 1. **Misunderstanding of Bitcoin’s Whitepaper**: The core concept is not "decentralization" (a term absent in the whitepaper) but "distributed trust architecture" — eliminating the need for trusted third parties. Many projects fail to achieve even basic distributed systems while overusing decentralized rhetoric. 2. **Loss of Incremental Users**: Grand narratives (Web3, Metaverse, GameFi, etc.) have oversold the technology’s capabilities, leading to repeated user disappointment and eroded trust. The market now suffers from a lack of new participants. 3. **Erosion of Community Belief**: Many communities engage in "narrative engineering" — using complex jargon to attract new users while insiders anticipate selling at peaks. This creates a cycle of hype, pump, and dump, damaging overall market credibility. 4. **Premature Financialization**: Crypto prioritized token launches and financialization before establishing robust infrastructure or mature applications. This led to overvaluation and repeated failures when technology couldn’t support inflated prices. 5. **Shift in Attention**: Human attention is moving from social and community interactions (like Telegram and Discord) toward AI-driven engagement. As an attention-dependent market, Crypto is naturally declining as interest wanes. The OG concludes that...

Source: Jiayan Kea


Some time ago, I had coffee with friends from Stanford, and the topic of Crypto came up at the table.

This kind of gathering is quite typical: VCs, engineers, entrepreneurs, and a few seasoned players. A young man suddenly said:

"Crypto is failing now because retail investors were scammed too hard."

Many at the table nodded. Sitting next to me was an old OG who had been in the Crypto space for over a decade. He had been silent until then.

Hearing this, he smiled, put down his coffee, and said:

"The fall of Crypto actually has little to do with scamming retail investors." Everyone was a bit surprised. Because the mainstream narrative nowadays is almost always: projects are too greedy, scams are too harsh, and the market has been ruined.

The old OG shook his head and said:

"Scamming retail investors has never been the problem; financial markets have been doing it for centuries. The real issue is—the underlying logic is wrong."

He said Crypto has at least a few fundamental issues.

First Point: Many People Have Never Seriously Read Satoshi's Whitepaper

The old OG shared something interesting observation.

He said he sometimes asks people working on projects: "Have you read the Bitcoin whitepaper?"

Many say they have. But if he follows up with: "What is the most core word in it?" Most people would say:

Decentralization.

He directly shook his head and said: "The word 'decentralization' doesn’t appear even once in the whitepaper." Someone at the table checked on their phone—it was true.

The old OG continued: The word that actually appears repeatedly in the whitepaper is:

Distributed


Mentioned about 6 times.

And the real problem it aimed to solve was captured in one sentence:

remove the need for a trusted third party

Eliminate the need for a trusted third party.

He said this is the soul of Crypto, not "decentralization," but a distributed trust structure.

Now, many projects haven’t even achieved the most basic distributed architecture.

Nodes are fake.

Governance is fake.

The network is fake.

And then they talk nonstop about:

Decentralization.

He said something particularly harsh:

"Talking about decentralization without even achieving distributed architecture is like building a skyscraper on sand."

Second Point: Crypto Has Lost Its Growth Market

The old OG said the biggest problem with Crypto isn’t actually technology.

It’s that the narrative has透支 (overdrawn) the future.

Over the past decade, the one thing Crypto projects have been best at is: manufacturing expectations.

Every new narrative is grand: Web3, Metaverse, GameFi, SocialFi, DeFi—each story sounds like it’s going to rebuild the world.

The problem is, the technical capabilities of the vast majority of projects can’t support these narratives.

So a classic thing happened: expectations were severely透支 (overdrawn).

Users came in, time and again.

And were disappointed, time and again.

Slowly, it became a story everyone is familiar with:

The boy who cried wolf.

When the market stops believing your story, new users disappear.

The biggest problem with Crypto isn’t actually the bear market.

It’s that:

No new people are coming in.

Third Point: The Community Stopped Believing Long Ago

The old OG said many Crypto communities nowadays are quite interesting.

On the surface, everyone is enthusiastic, posting in groups daily: GM, WAGMI, To the moon

But in reality, many core participants are well aware of one thing:

They don’t even believe in this narrative themselves.

The function of the community gradually devolved into one thing:

Downward compatibility with new retail investors.


Using a bunch of jargon:

Tokenomics/Layer2/Modular/Restaking/Intent/etc

To surround new entrants.

Many newcomers don’t really understand what these terms mean.

But in such an atmosphere, people easily get brainwashed.

The old OG said this is essentially a form of narrative engineering.

But the problem is, those setting up the game know it’s a game too.

So everyone is waiting for the right moment:

Sell on the high.


This creates a vicious cycle:

Keep telling new stories → Attract new people → Pump the price → Cash out → Tell new stories again.

In the long run, the entire market’s credit gets透支 (overdrawn).

Fourth Point: Financialization Rushed Before Technical Maturity

The old OG said Crypto has another fatal flaw. Financialization started before the technical phase was complete. The normal path of technological development should be:

First, build the "infrastructure."

Then, develop "applications."

Finally, comes "financialization."


But Crypto took the reverse route:

Issue tokens first.

Do finance first.

Focus on trading first.

Patch up the technology slowly.


The result is: Many things weren’t even mature yet but were already priced by the capital market.

Once the real capabilities can’t keep up with the price,

Projects continuously get disproven.

The market might forgive it once or twice.

But when disproval becomes the norm, trust vanishes.

Fifth Point: Attention is Fleeing Crypto, Unnoticed

Finally, he mentioned something many haven’t realized: Human attention is migrating.

Over the past decade, the biggest attention structure on the internet was:

Human-to-human interaction, social media, communities, DAOs.


But a shift is happening now:

More and more attention is turning towards

Human-AI interaction.

Look where people spend their time now: not in Telegram groups, not on Discord.

But talking to AI.


When the structure of attention migrates,

Many ecosystems that originally relied on community heat,

Will naturally decline.

Crypto is largely an

Attention-driven market. When attention decreases, growth naturally disappears.

As the dinner was ending, someone asked:

"So do you think Crypto is finished?"

The old OG thought for a moment and said something很有意思 (interesting):

"Crypto isn’t finished, but this generation’s narrative has ended."


Then he added:

"The real problem was never scamming retail investors."

Financial markets will always scam retail investors.

Stocks do it, forex does it, AI will do it in the future too.

Scamming isn’t the problem.

Having no new retail investors is the problem.


He said the biggest tragedy of Crypto is actually very simple:

When the technology wasn’t mature,

They told twenty years’ worth of stories

In just three years.

The stories are finished.

And so the people disperse.


Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Discussion Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7619255

Preguntas relacionadas

QAccording to the article, what is the core concept emphasized in Satoshi Nakamoto's Bitcoin whitepaper instead of 'decentralization'?

AThe core concept emphasized in the whitepaper is 'Distributed' (mentioned about 6 times) and the key problem it aims to solve is to 'remove the need for a trusted third party' (distributed trust structure).

QWhat does the article identify as the main reason for Crypto's decline, beyond just 'cutting leeks' (scamming investors)?

AThe main reasons are: the underlying logic is flawed, narrative has outpaced technical reality, loss of incremental market/new users, premature financialization before technical maturity, and migration of human attention to AI interactions.

QHow does the article describe the current state of many Crypto communities regarding their belief in the projects?

AThe article states that many core participants in Crypto communities don't actually believe in the narratives themselves. Communities have become primarily focused on 'downward compatibility with new韭菜 (newbies)' - using complex terminology to encircle and onboard new entrants while waiting for the right time to sell high.

QWhat problematic development pattern does the article highlight regarding Crypto's technological and financial progression?

ACrypto followed a reverse development path: it financialized first (issuing tokens, enabling trading) before the underlying technology was mature, rather than building infrastructure first, then applications, and finally financialization. This led to assets being priced by the market before their real capabilities were proven, resulting in constant disproof and loss of trust.

QWhat major shift in human attention does the article suggest is negatively impacting Crypto market?

AHuman attention is migrating from human-to-human interactions (social media, communities, DAOs) to human-to-AI interactions. As Crypto is an attention-driven market, this reduction in attention leads to a natural decline and loss of incremental users.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

The AI boom is facing an unexpected bottleneck: a severe shortage of skilled construction workers and electricians. As tech giants like Meta, OpenAI, and Alphabet race to build massive data centers—such as OpenAI's $16 billion "Stargate" project—they are hitting a critical labor wall. The U.S. needs an estimated 130,000 more electricians, 240,000 construction workers, and 150,000 supervisors by 2030 for AI infrastructure alone, but tens of thousands of electrician jobs go unfilled each year. While AI companies offer high premiums, with electricians earning up to $280,000 annually, worker scarcity still causes massive losses—delays on a single project can cost $14.2 million per month. The complexity of building AI data centers, which require immense power (equivalent to powering hundreds of thousands of homes), sophisticated electrical systems, and advanced liquid cooling solutions, demands highly skilled technicians who are in short supply. To combat this, companies are investing heavily in training. Meta has committed $115 million to a free training school offering tuition, housing, and stipends, targeting 5,000 new workers. OpenAI is partnering with unions to secure skilled labor. These efforts are paying off, with a significant rise in Gen Z interest in trade schools over college. However, the power demands are staggering. AI data centers are driving a rapid surge in electricity consumption, projected to account for up to 12% of U.S. power use by 2028 and raising costs for consumers. Furthermore, the construction boom is project-based, leading to a potential future glut of trained workers once building peaks, which could depress wages industry-wide. The race for AI supremacy now depends as much on skilled hands as on advanced chips.

marsbitHace 7 min(s)

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

marsbitHace 7 min(s)

OpenAI No Longer Sells Its Most Expensive Model for Profit

OpenAI is shifting its business strategy away from promoting its most expensive, flagship models for every task. Recent price cuts—80% for GPT-5.6 Luna and 20% for Terra—signal a deeper change: the company now actively advises users that many tasks don't require the most powerful model. Instead, OpenAI recommends a tiered approach: use the high-end GPT-5.6 Sol for complex planning and analysis, then delegate execution to cheaper models like Luna. This mirrors moves by Anthropic, which recently launched Claude Opus 5 at half the price of its top model, Fable 5. Both companies are de-emphasizing flagship models as primary revenue drivers, using them instead for brand prestige and technological showcases. The industry is entering a "mass-market" phase, similar to automotive, where high-volume, cost-effective models handle daily operations and drive scale. OpenAI's price reductions are partly enabled by AI models themselves optimizing underlying code and infrastructure, creating a self-reinforcing cycle of efficiency gains and cost reduction. Competition is shifting from "who is smartest" to "who offers the best value." The goal is no longer selling individual models but fostering widespread API adoption and ecosystem lock-in. By making AI calls cheap and ubiquitous, companies like OpenAI aim to become the indispensable, utility-like infrastructure powering automated workflows—the "water and electricity" of software, quietly embedded everywhere.

marsbitHace 7 min(s)

OpenAI No Longer Sells Its Most Expensive Model for Profit

marsbitHace 7 min(s)

Will the Fed Definitely Raise Interest Rates in September? How Will Crypto and U.S. Stocks Withstand the Pressure?

The market's expectation for a September Fed rate hike surged dramatically in early August, jumping from under 50% to over 80% within a week. This shift followed a contentious July FOMC meeting, where a 9-3 vote to hold rates revealed growing dissent from hawkish members advocating for an immediate hike to combat persistent inflation. The primary catalyst for this repricing is rising oil prices, driven by renewed geopolitical tensions around the Strait of Hormuz, which threaten global supply. Energy costs directly influence inflation metrics, making the upcoming July CPI report (due August 12th) a critical data point. If it shows inflation reaccelerating, the probability of a September hike will solidify. For Bitcoin and crypto assets, this is typically bearish news. Bitcoin continues to behave as a high-beta, liquidity-sensitive risk asset. A rate hike raises the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding assets and could drive capital toward money markets, pressuring crypto prices in the short term. However, historical patterns suggest that if a hike is perceived as the end of a tightening cycle rather than the start, any negative price impact may be brief. U.S. stocks, particularly crypto-linked equities like Coinbase and growth-oriented tech stocks, are also vulnerable. Higher rates increase discount rates in valuation models, putting pressure on high-multiple companies. This coincides with a pivotal tech earnings season where investor focus has shifted from massive AI capital expenditure to tangible revenue and cash flow generation. Companies with negative cash flow and weak growth narratives could face heightened volatility if borrowing costs rise in September. In summary, a September Fed hike has evolved into a mainstream market scenario. Key factors to watch are oil prices, the July CPI report, and Fed communications, which will determine the final decision and its impact on volatile crypto and equity markets.

marsbitHace 18 min(s)

Will the Fed Definitely Raise Interest Rates in September? How Will Crypto and U.S. Stocks Withstand the Pressure?

marsbitHace 18 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片